Hearth Record

Elara Caring

A home health agency in Brownwood, Texas 76801

521 E Baker St Ste B, Brownwood, Texas 76801. (325) 643-4999.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Oct 31, 2024: a recertification inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Oct 31, 2024: recertification inspection1 deficiency
  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 2,806 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the agency failed to ensure that each patient received the home health services that were written in an individualized plan of care for 1 of 10 (Patient #1) patients reviewed in that the agency skilled nurses, LVN F, RN G, and LVN C, failed to obtain the abdominal measurement for Patient #1, when unable to obtain the patient’s weight, on 10/15/24, 10/18/24, 10/22/24, and 10/25/24, as ordered by the physician in the written plan of care. This failure could have resulted in the skilled nurse failing to identify signs of a worsening of the patient’s heart failure (a medical condition in which the heart is unable to pump effectively which can result in the buildup of fluid in the tissues of the body including the lungs and the abdomen, which can result in shortness of breath, difficulty breathing, increase in the abdominal measurement, and increase in weight) to allow the physician to order additional interventions if needed and could result in adverse outcomes to the patient including hospitalization. The findings included: Record review of the clinical record for Patient #1 included a plan of care, for the certification period of 08/31/24 – 10/29/24, signed by Physician #1, which indicated the patient had a diagnosis of heart failure and indicated the patient was to receive skilled nurse visits once a week for one week, twice a week for two weeks, then once a week for eight weeks. Record review of a physician’s order, dated 10/09/24, signed by Physician #1, indicated, “SN or trained patient/caregiver to obtain weight daily and weight gain of 2 LBS overnight or 5 LBS in a week to be reported to physician/provider. If unable to weigh patient, SN or trained patient/caregiver to obtain measurement of abdomen in CM daily and report an increase of 1 CM to physician/provider.” The order further indicated the patient was to receive skilled nurse visits once a week for one week, twice a week for two weeks, and then once a week for one week. Record review of hospital records, from Hospital #1, dated 10/11/24, indicated the patient was seen in the emergency room on this date for a complaint of shortness of breath and was diagnosed with acute respiratory failure (an inability of the respiratory system to take in enough oxygen or to remove enough carbon dioxide from the body which can be life threatening) with hypoxia (a medical condition in which there is not enough oxygen reaching the body’s tissues) and heart failure and was administered Lasix (a medication used to remove excess fluid from the body). Record review of a skilled nurse’s virtual visit (telephone visit) note, dated 10/12/24, signed by LVN D, indicated Patient #1 went to the emergency room at Hospital #1 on the evening of 10/11/24 for shortness of breath and was administered IV (medication is administered into the blood stream via a needle inserted into a blood vessel) Lasix and discharged home. Record review of a skilled nurse’s note, dated 10/15/24, signed by LVN F, did not indicate the skilled nurse, patient, or caregiver obtained the patient’s weight or abdominal measurement during this visit as ordered by the physician in the written plan of care. Record review of a skilled nurse’s note, dated 10/18/24, signed by RN G, did not indicate the skilled nurse, patient, or caregiver obtained the patient’s weight or abdominal measurement during this visit as ordered by the physician in the written plan of care. Record review of a skilled nurse’s note, dated 10/22/24, signed by LVN C, did not indicate the skilled nurse, patient, or caregiver obtained the patient’s weight or abdominal measurement during this visit as ordered by the physician in the written plan of care. Record review of a recertification OASIS assessment, dated 10/25/24, signed by RN G, did not indicate the skilled nurse, patient, or caregiver obtained the patient’s weight or abdominal measurement during this visit as ordered by the physician in the written plan of care. Record review of the agency’s home folder for Patient #1, for the time-period of 10/09/24 – 10/25/24, did not include documentation to indicate the skilled nurse obtained the patient’s weight or abdominal measurement during the skilled nurse visits conducted on 10/15/24, 10/18/24, 10/22/24 and 10/25/24, as ordered by the physician in the written plan of care. During an interview conducted on 10/30/24 at 8:33 a.m., with LVN C and the alternate administrator/alternate supervising nurse, LVN C said she did not remember reading the part about obtaining the abdominal measurement on the physician’s order, dated 10/09/24. LVN C said she first obtained the abdominal measurement for Patient #1 on 10/29/24. LVN C said the patient could not weigh due to amputation (surgical removal) of both his legs below the knee. The alternate administrator/alternate supervising nurse said she had not audited the patient’s clinical record until 10/28/24 and that was when she realized there was no way to really get his weight and realized they needed to obtain the abdominal measurement. LVN C said she was not able to get the patient’s weight and she did not realize the abdominal measurement order was included in the physician’s orders until yesterday. When asked who was responsible for obtaining Patient #1’s weight or abdominal measurement if unable to weigh the patient, LVN C said it was the responsibility of the nurse. When asked how often the weight or abdominal measurement should be obtained, LVN C said they should be obtained at each skilled nurse visit. When asked if she had obtained the patient’s weight or abdominal measurement during the skilled nurse visit she conducted with Patient #1 on 10/22/24, LVN C said, “no.” When asked where the weight or abdominal measurement would be documented if they had been obtained, LVN C said they would be documented in the vital sign section of the skilled nurse’s note. When asked if there could have been any potential adverse outcomes related to the failure to obtain the weight or abdominal measurement if unable to obtain the weight for Patient #1, LVN C said, “yes,” and said the agency could potentially fail to identify a worsening of the patient’s heart failure as quickly. During an interview conducted on 10/30/24 at 11:00 a.m., with Patient #1’s Family Member #1 and Family Member #2, when asked if the nurses obtained the patient’s weight during each nurse visit, Family Member #1 said, “no,” because the patient was not able to easily weigh in the home as he had amputations of both lower legs. When asked if the nurses obtained the patient’s abdominal measurement, Family Member #1 said, “yes.” When asked when the nurses had begun doing this, Family Member #1 said she did not recall. During an interview conducted on 10/30/24 at 1:00 p.m., with RN G and the alternate administrator/alternate supervising nurse, RN G said she had reviewed the physician’s orders for Patient #1 but did not notice the order to obtain the patient’s abdominal measurement if unable to weigh the patient. When asked who was responsible for obtaining the patient’s weight or abdominal measurement if unable to obtain the weight, RN G said the nurse was responsible for completing this task during skilled nurse visits. When asked how frequently the abdominal measurement should be obtained if unable to weight the patient, RN G said, “I’m going to say every visit.” When asked if she had obtained Patient #1’s weight or abdominal measurement during the visits she conducted with the patient on 10/18/24 and 10/25/24, RN G said, “I did not.” RN G said she was unable to weigh the patient and was unaware of the order to obtain the abdominal measurement if unable to weigh the patient. RN G said if she had obtained the weight or abdominal measurement during the skilled nurse visit, she would have documented the finding in the skilled nurse’s note in the vital sign section and would also document the finding in the patient’s home folder. RN G said she knew the nurse was supposed to weigh the patient during visits but there was no way to get the patient on the scale and she did not know about the order to obtain the abdominal measurements. RN G said the patient/family did not refuse the abdominal measurement she (RN G) just did not know the nurse was supposed to obtain it. When asked if there could be any potential adverse outcome or harm to the patient related to the failure to obtain the abdominal measurement when unable to weigh the patient, RN G said she didn’t think so if the nurse did an appropriate assessment. When asked if she would agree that obtaining the weight or abdominal measurement was part of an appropriate nursing assessment for a patient with a diagnosis of heart failure, RN G said, “Yes.” During an interview conducted on 10/30/24 at 2:20 p.m., with LVN D and the alternate administrator/alternate supervising nurse, when asked regarding the virtual visit nurse’s note, dated 10/12/24, LVN D confirmed he conducted a virtual (telephone) visit with Patient #1 on this date and confirmed the patient had gone to the emergency room on 10/11/24. LVN D said he thought the hospital either increased the Lasix or gave the patient Lasix in the emergency room on 10/11/24. LVN D reviewed the virtual visit note, dated 10/12/24, and said what was documented in the note sounded correct for what he recalled. LVN D said Patient #1’s Family Member #1 said the patient had gone to the emergency room the previous night for increased shortness of breath and was given IV Lasix. During an interview conducted on 10/31/24 at 10:36 a.m., with LVN F and the alternate administrator/alternate supervising nurse, LVN F reviewed the physician’s orders for Patient #1 and said the orders said if the patient was unable to weigh the nurse was to obtain the abdominal measurement. LVN F said the patient could not stand to weigh, and so the nurses were to get his abdominal measurement. When asked who was responsible for obtaining the patient’s weight or the abdominal measurement if the patient was unable to weigh, LVN F said during skilled nurse visits the nurse should obtain the weight or abdominal measurement. When asked how often the weight or abdominal measurement should be obtained, LVN F said it should be obtained every day either by the nurse or the patient/caregiver if the nurse was not present. When asked if she had obtained the patient’s weight or abdominal measurement during the skilled nurse visit she conducted with the patient on 10/15/24, LVN F said she knew she had not obtained the patient’s abdominal measurement on 10/15/24. LVN F reviewed the skilled nurse’s note, dated 10/15/24, and said she did not document that she obtained the patient’s weight during that visit. When asked why the weight or abdominal measurement was not obtained, LVN F said, she did not remember why she did not get it. LVN F said if she did get the weight, she did not write it down. When asked where the weight or abdominal measurement would be documented if obtained during the visit, LVN F said she would document the abdominal measurement in the narrative section of the nurse’s note and in the patient’s home folder and if she had obtained the weight, she would document it in the vital signs section of the skilled nurse’s note and in the home folder. LVN F confirmed the patient had a recent below the knee amputation of his left leg and was difficult to weigh in the home. LVN F confirmed the patient and family did not refuse the weight or the abdominal measurement. When asked if there were any potential adverse outcomes related to the failure to obtain the weight or abdominal measurement for Patient #1, LVN F said, yes, potentially, especially for a patient with a diagnosis of heart failure and said it was possible the nurse would not catch a worsening of the heart failure early which could result in hospitalization. LVN F said she conducted a PRN (as needed) skilled nurse visit with Patient #1 on 10/11/24 because the patient’s Family Member #1 called and said the patient wasn’t feeling well. LVN said the patient’s heart rate was increased, his blood pressure was low, and he was complaining of shortness of breath. LVN F said the patient was so short of breath he was not able to get his words out to speak. LVN F said the patient’s Family Member #1 took the patient to the emergency room and after he returned home Patient #1’s Family Member #1 said the emergency room was able to take quite a bit of fluid off the patient and said the emergency room staff gave the patient IV Lasix during the visit. The surveyor reviewed the documentation from Patient #1’s home folder with LVN F and she confirmed there was no documentation of the patient’s weight or abdominal measurement for the date of 10/15/24. LVN F said there was nowhere else other than the skilled nurse’s note and the home folder where she would have documented the weight if obtained. During an interview conducted on 10/31/24 at 10:54 a.m., the administrator/supervising nurse said the physician’s orders for Patient #1 said to obtain the patient’s weight, and if unable to weigh the patient, to obtain the patient’s abdominal measurement daily. When asked who was responsible for obtaining the patient’s weight or abdominal measurement during skilled nurse visits, the administrator/supervising nurse said the nurse was responsible unless the family had already obtained it. The administrator/supervising nurse said if the family had already obtained the weight or abdominal measurement when the skilled nurse visit was made the nurse should review the family’s documentation and record what the finding was. The administrator/supervising nurse said this should be done every skilled nurse visit unless refused by the patient/family. When asked if the patient’s weight or abdominal measurement was obtained during the skilled nurse visits conducted on 10/15/24, 10/18/24, 10/22/24 and 10/25/24, the administrator/supervising nurse said, “No Ma’am.” The administrator/supervising nurse said if the weight or abdominal measurement had been obtained it should have been documented in the patient’s home folder and in the skilled nurse’s note. The administrator/supervising nurse said Patient #1 was unable to stand to weigh and his abdominal measurement was not obtained by the skilled nurse. The administrator/supervising nurse said the nurses did not realize there was an order to obtain the patient’s abdominal measurement if the patient was unable to weigh. The administrator/supervising nurse said the patient/family did not refuse the weight/abdominal measurement to her knowledge. When asked if there could be any adverse outcomes or potential harm to the patient related to the failure to obtain the weight or the abdominal measurement for Patient #1, the administrator/supervising nurse said she didn’t think so because the nurses were doing an assessment, which would include assessment of his abdomen, and she didn’t think failure to obtain the abdominal measurement could result in a failure to identify signs and symptoms of a worsening of the patient’s heart failure. When asked if obtaining the patient’s weight or abdominal measurement would be part of conducting a thorough nursing assessment for a patient with a diagnosis of heart failure, the administrator/supervising nurse said, “yes.” During an interview conducted on 10/31/24 at 1:12 p.m., with Physician #1’s Nurse #1, when asked if it would have been important to obtain the weight or abdominal measurements for Patient #1, Physician #1’s Nurse #1 said, “yes,” if the physician ordered it that would indicate the physician felt it needed to be done. When asked if there could be any adverse outcomes related to the failure of the agency to obtain the weight or abdominal measurements if the patient was unable to be weighed, Physician #1’s Nurse #1 said, “yes,” if the abdomen was distended (increased in size) and the -patient was retaining fluid the physician would need to know about that so interventions could be ordered if needed. Record review of an agency policy titled, “Admission Policy,” dated 09/09/2020, indicated, “Services for a client receiving Skilled Nursing … must follow a written Plan of Care established … by a physician …””

    Rule G0572. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 31, 2024Recertification inspection1 deficiency cited
Aug 1, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jan 28, 1992.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Home Healthcare Partners Corporation owns 100% directly since Jun 16, 2006.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Daniel R Manley (corporate officer); Ananth P Mohan (corporate officer, 0%); Ananth P Mohan (corporate director); Melissa Trigg (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); John Mcmahon (corporate officer); Katie L Monastiere (corporate officer, 0%); Kasey Simmons (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Angel Stansbury (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Home Healthcare Partners CorporationOwns 5% or more directly100%Jun 16, 2006
Jhh Parent Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
Airjaguar Holdco, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
Ec Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 20, 2026
Ec Homecare Holdings Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 20, 2026
Jordan Health CARE Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2017
Airjaguar Acquisition, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
Ec Homecare Holdings Intermediate, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 20, 2026
Ec Homecare Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 20, 2026
Jhh/Cima Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2017
Carecycle Solutions LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 16, 2006
Jordan Louisiana Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2017
JHH Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2017
Bw Nhhc Holdco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 20, 2026
Acof VII Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies49.3%Jul 20, 2026
Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund VII, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies35.8%Jul 20, 2026
Davita Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies32.9%Jul 20, 2026
Total Renal Care, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies32.9%Jun 26, 2026
Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund VII Parallel (Te), L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies9.07%Jul 20, 2026
Dawson Holdings (Armstrong), LPOwns 5% or more through other companies7.8%Jul 20, 2026
Acof VII Axiom Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies7.8%Jul 20, 2026

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (110 surveys completed): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 81% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate89.30% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate10.70% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.71% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 10 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 76801, where this agency’s office is, 10 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.