Coteau Des Prairie Health Care System
A home health agency in Sisseton, South Dakota 57262
205 Orchard Drive, Sisseton, South Dakota 57262. (605) 698-4664.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 3.5of 5 quality of patient care rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jun 26, 2024: a recertification inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jun 26, 2024: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
-
5 Calendar Days After Start Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 741 words
“5 calendar days after start of care CFR(s): 484.55(b)(1) The comprehensive assessment must be completed in a timely manner, consistent with the patient’s immediate needs, but no later than 5 calendar days after the start of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the physician-ordered occupational therapy (OT) evaluation was completed within five days of the start of care (SOC) and was included in the comprehensive assessment for two of seven sampled patients (2 and 3) records reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of patient 2’s electronic medical record (EMR) revealed: *She was referred to the home health agency (HHA) on 6/6/24. *The referring physician ordered home health skilled nursing (SN), physical therapy (PT), and OT services. * The HHA registered nurse (RN) completed the initial assessment and SOC on 6/6/24. *OT completed their initial evaluation on 6/12/24, six days after the SOC. 2. Review of patient 3’s EMR revealed: *She was referred to the HHA on 3/21/24. *The referring physician ordered home health SN, PT & OT services. *The HHA RN completed the initial assessment and SOC on 3/21/24. *OT completed their initial evaluation on 4/2/24, twelve days after the SOC. 3. Interview on 6/26/24 at 12:25 p.m. with occupational therapist (OT) C revealed: *All therapy referrals were sent to the therapy agency by the HHA. *She completed initial OT evaluations. *She did not schedule the home health initial OT evaluations and visits; the therapy agency secretary scheduled the home health initial OT evaluations and visits. *She had thought at least one of the home health initial therapy evaluations was supposed to be completed within 48 hours of the referral to their agency. *She had not been aware all home health skilled services ordered at SOC were to be completed within five days and included in the comprehensive assessment. 4. Interview on 6/26/24 at 3:20 p.m. with clinical manager A revealed: *The HHA RN completed the SOC and comprehensive assessments for all HHA patients. *She had not managed or scheduled the home health therapy services. *The HHA had contracted with a therapy agency to provide PT, OT, and speech therapy (ST) services. *Therapy referrals were sent to the contracted agency when received by the HHA. 5. Interview on 6/26/24 at 3:40 p.m. with therapy clinic manager B revealed: *He had been the therapy clinic manager for eleven years. *Therapy staff completed home health training and competencies online annually. * Therapy staff and the HHA met weekly to discuss the patient caseload and upcoming referrals. *The HHA agency sent therapy referrals to the therapy agency and initial evaluations were scheduled by their department secretary. *He was aware all home health skilled services ordered at SOC were to be completed within five days and included in the comprehensive assessment. *They did their best to complete the initial OT therapy evaluations within five days of the SOC, but with one OT on staff, there were times when they were unable to meet the compliance. *They had not notified or obtained new orders from the referring physician regarding their inability to complete the initial OT evaluations within the required five days of SOC. 6. Review of the HHA Intake and Admission policy dated 7/8/21 revealed: *” Policy - Before accepting patient for services, the agency ensures that it can meet the patient’s identified medical, nursing, rehabilitative and psychosocial needs in the patient’s place of residence. The governing body establishes criteria for admission including: --the agency has adequate and suitable staff and resources to provide the needed services.” --“Coordinating timely service delivery, including communication to the appropriate staff members.” --“If the agency encounters difficulties with the time frames the admitting RN contacts the provider to discuss the situation. --Staff will perform the comprehensive assessment, including OASIS, within five calendar days of the start of care or patients subject to the requirement.” 7. Review of the [therapy agency] Home Health Therapy Order/Extension Order/Missed Visit Form policy dated 2/2/21 revealed: *”Purpose -1.1 To establish guidelines for completing a home health evaluation in a timely manner and adjustment of frequency and duration of established plan of care. *Policy -2.1 An Evaluation must be completed for each home health patient within agency timeline ([therapy agency] recommends within 48 hours for at least one discipline).” * “Procedure -3.1 Schedule evaluation within guidelines. -3.2 Complete Extension Order/Missed Visit Form when additional visits required and missed visits occur.””
-
Plan Of Care Must Include The Following
The inspectors’ words, 1,001 words
“Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the goals and interventions established from the initial occupational therapy (OT) evaluation were included in the patient’s initial plan of care (POC) and sent to the physician for review and signature for two of seven sampled patients (2 and 3) records reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of patient 2’s electronic medical record (EMR) revealed: *She was referred to the home health agency (HHA) on 6/6/24. *The referring physician ordered home health skilled nursing (SN), physical therapy (PT), and OT services. * The HHA registered nurse (RN) completed the initial assessment and SOC on 6/6/24. *OT completed their initial evaluation on 6/12/24, six days after the SOC. *The patient’s OT goals and interventions established during the initial OT evaluation were listed on the care plan, but not included in the patient’s initial POC or sent to the physician for review or signature. 2. Review of patient 3’s EMR revealed: *She was referred to the HHA on 3/21/24. *The referring physician ordered home health SN, PT & OT services. *The HHA RN completed the initial assessment and SOC on 3/21/24. *OT completed their initial evaluation on 4/2/24, twelve days after the SOC. *The patient’s OT goals and interventions established during the initial OT evaluation were listed on the care plan, but not included in the patient’s initial POC or sent to the physician for review or signature. 3. Interview on 6/26/24 at 12:25 p.m. with occupational therapist (OT) C revealed: *She completed home health initial OT evaluations and OT visits. *She had been trained to use the home health EMR system. *She documented the patient’s initial OT evaluation, entered goals and interventions into the patient care plan, and generated an order for OT visits into the patient’s home health EMR. *She was unsure if the computer system automatically sent her documentation to the physician for review and signature or how the physician received the OT plan of care or other orders for review and signature. *The other hospital computer systems used in the therapy department notified her when the physician had signed OT orders and POCs. 4. Interview on 6/26/24 at 3:20 p.m. with clinical manager A revealed: *The HHA RN completed the SOC, and comprehensive assessment, and generated the initial home health POC that was sent to the physician for review and signature for all HHA patients. *She had not managed or scheduled the home health therapy services. *The HHA had contracted with the therapy agency to provide PT, OT, and speech therapy (ST) services. *Therapy referrals were sent to the contracted therapy agency when received by the HHA. *She had not reviewed the OT POC to ensure it was sent to the provider for review and signature. *She agreed the home health initial POC for patients 2 and 3 did not include the OT POC established during the initial OT evaluation, and the OT goals and interventions for patients 2 and 3 had not been reviewed or signed by the physician. *She stated the RN did not check the appropriate box in the system that would have included the initial OT goals and interventions in the POC for the physician’s review and signature. 5. Interview on 6/26/24 at 3:40 p.m. with therapy clinic manager B revealed: *He had been the therapy clinic manager for eleven years. *Therapy staff completed home health training and competencies online annually. *He had not reviewed the OT POC to ensure it was sent to the provider for review and signature. *He agreed the home health initial POC for patients 2 and 3 did not include the OT POC established during the initial OT evaluation, and the OT goals and interventions for patients 2 and 3 had not been reviewed or signed by the physician. 6. Review of the HHA “The Provider’s Role” policy dated 12/2/20 revealed: *” Purpose The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines for interactions with the providers that promote appropriate care planning, delivery of care, orders and provider certification, and coordination of services; ensures that the providers who work with the agency provide orders for services practice within accepted standards of care; and ensure that the agency informs the providers who manage patient care of the policies and procedures regarding agency and provider responsibilities.” *” Policy The plan of care includes all pertinent diagnoses, mental status, types of services and equipment required, frequency of visits, prognosis, rehabilitation potential, functional limitations, activities permitted, nutritional requirements, medications, treatments, safety measures to protect against injury, instructions for timely discharge or referral any other appropriate items. The agency uses the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care (CMS 485) as the plan of care. The plan is individualized to the patient’s needs, strengths, limitations, goals, and environment.” -“Care delivery follows the plan of care.” -” The agency ensures that staff providing services under arrangement or contract: --Participate in developing the plan of care. --Deliver services according to the plan of care. --Notifies the provider of changes in the patient’s condition and communicates and documents accordingly.””
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2024 | Recertification inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Apr 10, 1996.
- Ownership: non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech pathology.
- Doesn’t offer medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Coteau Des Prairies Hospital owns 100% directly since Dec 1, 2022.
- 16 owners or officers are people: Matthew R Glynn (corporate director, 0%); Allen James Meyer (corporate director, 0%); Terry H. Jaspers (corporate director, 0%); Janet Frederick (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Katie Jean Ceroll (corporate director, 0%); Lori Finnesand (corporate director, 0%); Steven D Mccleerey (corporate director, 0%); April Hieb (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Erin Hanson (corporate director, 0%); Lyle Gene Bien (corporate director, 0%); Yvonne A Hippen (corporate director, 0%); Craig A Kantos (corporate officer, 0%); Jennifer M Steiner (corporate director, 0%); Jennifer M Steiner (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David G Gleason (corporate director, 0%); Michaela Johnson (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coteau Des Prairies Hospital | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Dec 1, 2022 |
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 3.5 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 66.93% (worse than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 8.69% (same as the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 4.08% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 2 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 57262, where this agency’s office is, 2 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.25 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Coteau Des Prairie Health Care System This home health agency | 3.5 |
| Prairie Lakes Home Health | 3 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.