Hearth Record

Pruitthealth Home Health-Florence

A home health agency in Florence, South Carolina 29501

2051 Elijah Ludd Rd, Suite 1, Florence, South Carolina 29501. (843) 665-1763.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 30, 2024: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 30, 2024: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 318 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview and review of the Home Health Agency’s (HHA’s) policy, the HHA failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for one of one wound care procedures observed, Patient #5. The findings include: A home visit was made to Patient #5 on 5/29/24 at 9:23 AM with Registered Nurse (RN) #3. During observation of the nursing visit, RN #3 was providing wound care to Patient #5’s bilateral lower leg wounds with breaches in infection control observed. RN #3 used the temporal thermometer to take Patient #5’s temperature, then placed it down and without doing hand hygiene, entered the nursing bag multiple times to obtain a sublingual thermometer and thermometer covers. During wound care, with gloved hands, RN #3 used her/his right hand to use the spray bottle of wound cleanser to spray a piece of gauze and then clean the wound with the moistened gauze using both the right and left hands multiple times and then without removing the soiled gloves and performing hand hygiene, RN #3 applied a new clean dressing. RN #3 performed this process for both the right and left lower leg wounds. RN #3 also used a tape measure to measure Patient #5’s ankles and retracted the measuring tape back in without disinfecting the tape measure. During an interview on 5/29/24 at 11:00 AM, RN #3 confirmed re-entering the nursing bag without doing hand hygiene. During an interview on 5/30/24 at 11:35 AM, the Administrator confirmed staff are always supposed to perform hand hygiene before re-entering the nursing bag, remove soiled gloves and perform hand hygiene after removing the soiled dressing, and disinfect the tape measuring after using it and before retracting it.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 586 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, staff intervews and Home Health Agency (HHA) reconciled medication record review, the HHA failed to ensure staff updated the patient’s agency medication profile with the patient’s home medications for 5 of 6 home observations. (Patient #1, #2, #3, #4 and #5). Findings: A home visit was made with Registered Nurse (RN) #3 to Patient #5 on 05/29/24 at 9:23 AM. Medication discrepancies were revealed during medication reconciliation with the HHA “Medication List” dated 05/29/24 and the medications in the home Patient #5 was actually taking. Venlofaxin ER (extended release) 150 mg (milligrams) daily was in Patient #5’s medications but was not on the HHA “Medication List.” Patient #5’s caregiver (CG) stated, “She’s been on Venlofaxin for a long time.” Tolterodine 1 mg orally twice a day with a fill date of 5/17/24 was in the home and the CG confirmed Patient #5 was taking it. Tolterodine was not on the HHA “Medication List.” Certrizine 10 mg daily with a fill date of 2/27/24 was in the home and the CG confirmed Patient #5 was taking it. Certrizine was not on the HHA “Medication List.” In a concurrent interview, RN #3 confirmed the discrepancies. A home visit was made with Physical Therapist (PT) #1 to Patient #4 on 05/29/24 at 1:50 PM. Medication discrepancies were revealed during medication reconciliation with the HHA “Medication List” dated 05/29/24 and the medications in the home Patient #4 was actually taking. Patient #4 was taking Celecoxib 200 mg once daily. It had a fill date of 03/25/24. Celecoxib was not on the HHA Medication List. Patient #4 was taking Tadalafil 20 mg once daily with a fill date of 05/15/24. Tadalafil was not on the HHA Medication List. In a concurrent interview, PT #1 confirmed the discrepancies. Observations during Patient #2’s home visit on 05/29/2024 between 9:30 AM and 10:10 AM yielded inaccuracies in the home health agency’s medication profile for the patient when compared with medications in the home that Patient #2 reports actively taking. Patient #2 reports currently taking Amlodipine 10 mg (milligrams) by mouth daily. HHA profile does not list Amlodipine 10 mg daily. Interview on 5/29/2024 at 10:11 AM with Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) #1. PTA #1 reported medications were missing and verified the finding. Observation during a home visit with Patient #1 on 05/29/2024 between 11:10 AM and 11:45 AM yielded inaccuracies between the HHA profile for the patient when compared with medications in the home. Patient #1 and the patient’s caregiver confirm Patient #1 is currently taking Hydrocodone. Hydrocodone 5mg-325 mg by mouth q 6 hours as needed for pain. This medication is not listed on HHA medication list. Interview on 05/29/2024 at 11:47 AM with Registered Nurse (RN) #1. RN #1 reported medications were missing and verified the finding. Observations during a home visit with Patient #3 on 05/29/2024 between 12:25 PM and 1:10 PM yielded inaccuracies between the HHA profile for the patient when compared with medications in the home. Patient #3 reports the Macrobid 100 mg capsule 2 times a day was discontinued. Interview on 05/29/2024 at 1:12 PM with RN #2. RN #2 reports Macrobid should have been removed from current medication list.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 386 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview and record review, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to ensure all diagnoses were included in the plan of care for one of six patient records reviewed, Patient #5. Findings: During a home visit to Patient #5 on 5/29/24 at 9:23 AM Registered Nurse (RN) #3 was observed providing wound care to Patient #5’s bilateral lower extremities. Patient #5’s caregiver stated Patient #5’s leg wounds were caused by calcium which collects in her/his legs and stones of calcium come up through the skin and cause wounds. The caregiver stated this started years ago when Patient #5 had heart surgery. Review of Patient #5’s record on 5/30/24 at 9:00 AM revealed Patient #5 was admitted to the HHA on 05/16/24 with a diagnosis of Chronic Venous Hypertension with Ulcer of Right and Left Lower Extremities. The list of diagnoses indicated Patient #5 had a heart valve replacement in 2019 with no diagnosis reflecting calcium accumulation in the legs with stones. During an interview on 5/30/24 at 11:20 AM, the Administrator when asked about the condition causing Patient #5’s wounds stated, “It’s Calcinosis Cutis.” The Administrator further stated he/she became aware of it when he/she provided wound care to Patient #5 and confirmed Calcinosis Cutis was the cause of Patient #5’s bilateral lower extremity wounds and the diagnosis was not included in Patient #5’s plan of care.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • Only As Ordered By A Physician

    The inspectors’ words, 415 words

    “Only as ordered by a physician CFR(s): 484.60(b)(1) Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview and record review, the Home Health Agency (HHA) staff failed to follow physician orders regarding visit schedules and vital sign assessments for 4 out of 17 patient charts reviewed. (Patients #7, #10, #11 and #16). Findings include: Review of Patient #7’s medical record on 5/29/2024 at 12:22 PM showed physician orders for licensed professionals to notify physician for weights outside of parameters 208 pounds (lbs) to 218 lbs at skilled visits. Physical Therapist (PT) reassessment visit on 5/09/2024 revealed no documentation of Patient #7’s weights and/or vital signs. During an interview on 5/30/2024 at 10:41 AM, Regional Administrator #1 stated that he/she was unable to find documentation of vital signs or weight for that visit and verified the findings. Review of Patient #10’s medical record on 5/29/2024 at 9:20 AM showed physician orders dated 3/15/2024 for wound care orders stated, “Wound care to be done three times a week, once by Mobile Wound Care and twice by Home Health”. Chart documentation revealed Registered Nurse (RN) visits on 3/21/2024, 3/29/2024 and 4/04/2024 for one visit each week and not two per physician orders. During an interview on 5/30/2024 at 10:35 AM, Regional Administrator #1 stated that visits should have been increased to twice a week and verified the findings. Review of Patient #11’s medical record on 5/29/2024 at 9:45 AM showed physician orders for licensed professionals to report fasting blood glucose levels less than 75 and greater than 280. PT reassessment visit on 5/09/2024 revealed no documentation of glucose levels. During an interview on 5/30/2024 at 10:24 AM, Regional Administrator #1 stated that he/she was unable to find documentation of a glucose level for that visit and verified the findings. Review of Patient #16’s medical record on 5/29/2024 at 1:31 PM showed physician orders for Medical Social Worker (MSW) to evaluate patient for social and emotional needs. Record review on 3/15/2024 revealed the MSW made a phone call to Patient #16 to set up a visit with no answer by the patient. Further review of the chart revealed no documentation for any follow up by the MSW to contact the patient. During an interview on 5/30/2024 at 9:55 AM, Regional Administrator #1 stated that the MSW is part time which did not excuse the lack of followup and verified the finding.”

    Rule G0580. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 30, 2024Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Apr 17, 2015.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • Doesn’t offer home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • United Health Services of Georgia, Inc. owns 100% directly since Nov 1, 2003.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Tonya Sheets (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Robin L Kinard (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Alison Cushing (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Neil Little Pruitt (corporate officer); Neil Little Pruitt (corporate director); Nancy W Pruitt (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
United Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 2, 2006
Uhs-Pruitt Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 2, 2006
United Health Services of Georgia, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Nov 1, 2003
Neil L Pruitt Jr TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies37.79%Jan 2, 2006
Lisa P Hamby TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies28.71%Jan 2, 2006
J Paige Pruitt TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies26.96%Jan 2, 2006
Nwp 2020 Child Tr Fbo Neil L Pruitt JrOwns 5% or more through other companies5.32%Aug 8, 2022

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (204 surveys completed): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 78% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate81.19% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate12.40% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.07% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 9 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 29501, where this agency’s office is, 9 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.