Hearth Record

Carepine Home Health, LLC

A home health agency in Horsham, Pennsylvania 19044

300 Welsh Road Suite 1-100, Horsham, Pennsylvania 19044. (215) 874-8535.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 24, 2025: a recertification inspection.

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 24, 2025: recertification inspection6 deficiencies
  • Transfer And Discharge

    The inspectors’ words, 373 words

    “Transfer and discharge CFR(s): 484.50(d) Standard: Transfer and discharge. The patient and representative (if any), have a right to be informed of the HHA’s policies for transfer and discharge. The HHA may only transfer or discharge the patient from the HHA if: This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of agency patient welcome packet, clinical records (CR), and an interview with the agency Director of Operations, the agency failed to provide the patient or their representative with the required discharge and transfer policies upon admission for seven (7) of seven (7) CR reviewed. (CR #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7) Findings include: Review of agency patient welcome packet on July 23, 2025, at approximately 10:45 A.M. revealed that there was no documentation of the agency’s discharge and transfer policies in the welcome packet. Review of CR on July 23, 2025, from approximately 11:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. revealed the following: CR #1, start of care June 25, 2025, contained no documentation that the patient or their representative received the required discharge and transfer policies at start of care. CR #2, start of care July 14, 2025, contained no documentation that the patient or their representative received the required discharge and transfer policies at start of care. CR #3, start of care June 7, 2025, contained no documentation that the patient or their representative received the required discharge and transfer policies at start of care. CR #4, start of care July 7, 2025, contained no documentation that the patient or their representative received the required discharge and transfer policies at start of care. CR #5, start of care June 19, 2025, contained no documentation that the patient or their representative received the required discharge and transfer policies at start of care. CR #6, start of care July 9, 2025, contained no documentation that the patient or their representative received the required discharge and transfer policies at start of care. CR #7, start of care June 4, 2025, contained no documentation that the patient or their representative received the required discharge and transfer policies at start of care. An interview with the agency Director of Operations on July 24, 2025, at approximately 3:00 P.M. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule G0452. Standard-level.

  • Program Data

    The inspectors’ words, 297 words

    “Program data CFR(s): 484.65(b)(1),(2),(3) Standard: Program data. (1) The program must utilize quality indicator data, including measures derived from OASIS, where applicable, and other relevant data, in the design of its program. (2) The HHA must use the data collected to- (i) Monitor the effectiveness and safety of services and quality of care; and (ii) Identify opportunities for improvement. (3) The frequency and detail of the data collection must be approved by the HHA’s governing body. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of agency policy, a request of quality indicator data utilized for the agency QAPI (quality assurance and performance improvement) program, and an interview with the agency Director of Operations, the agency failed to utilize data to monitor the effectiveness and safety of services and quality of care and/or identify opportunities for improvement. Findings include: Review of agency policy titled ‘Provider’s Quality Management Plan’ on July 24, 2025, at approximately 2:30 P.M. states, “ ... must maintain an environment that fosters continuous improvement strategies. This is achieved through implementation of a Quality Management Program (QMP), a system to monitor and objectively evaluate health home quality, efficiency, and effectiveness. To track their performance, Carepine Home Health must collect, analyze, and report on data in a way that measures the effectiveness of care coordination and chronic disease management… member satisfaction… quality of care outcomes ...” QAPI documentation was requested for review on July 24, 2025, at approximately 2:15 P.M. No data was available due the location only providing services since May 2025. There was no documentation to demonstrate the agency has a system in place to collect, track and analyze data. An interview with the agency Director of Operations on July 24, 2025, at approximately 3:00 P. M. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule G0644. Standard-level.

  • Infection Control

    The inspectors’ words, 339 words

    “Infection control CFR(s): 484.70(b)(1)(2) Standard: Control. The HHA must maintain a coordinated agency-wide program for the surveillance, identification, prevention, control, and investigation of infectious and communicable diseases that is an integral part of the HHA’s quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program. The infection control program must include: (1) A method for identifying infectious and communicable disease problems; and (2) A plan for the appropriate actions that are expected to result in improvement and disease prevention. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of agency policy, personnel files (PF), and an interview with the agency Director of Operations, the agency failed to conduct TB testing per agency policy for three (3) of five (5) PF reviewed (PF #1, 2, and 4). Findings include: Review of agency policies on July 24, 2025, at approximately 2:30 P.M. revealed the following: Policy 1-004.1 ‘Selection/Hiring of Personnel’ ‘Hiring’ states, “11. A current physical and TB test/chest x-ray must be received prior to the first day of employment.” Policy 7-002.1 ‘Tuberculosis Exposure Control Plan’ states, “3. Procedure: 12. Where required by state and/or local regulations, a two-step Mantoux PPD skin test will be given to all personnel upon hire, if no PPD skin test has been performed within 12 months of hire date, and thereafter, according to risk assessment.” A review of personnel files conducted on July 24, 2025, at approximately 2:00 P.M. revealed the following: PF#1, date of hire July 9, 2024, contained documentation of a single TST completed on June 23, 2024. There was no documentation that a second TST was completed. PF#2, date of hire August 5, 2024, contained documentation of a single TST completed on July 30, 2024. There was no documentation that a second was TST completed. PF#4, date of hire February 24, 2017, contained documentation of a single TST completed on February 22, 2019. There was no documentation that a second TST was completed. An interview with agency Director of Operations on July 24, 2025, at approximately 3:00 P.M. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule G0684. Standard-level.

  • Rn Performs Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 566 words

    “RN performs assessment CFR(s): 484.55(a)(1) A registered nurse must conduct an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of the patient; and, for Medicare patients, to determine eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, including homebound status. The initial assessment visit must be held either within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician or allowed practitioner - ordered start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of agency policy, clinical records (CR), and an interview with the agency Director of Operations, the agency failed to complete the initial assessment visit within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patients return home, or on the physician-ordered start of care date, for five (5) of seven (7) CR reviewed (CR#1, 2, 3, 4, and 5). Findings include: Review of agency policy ‘2-005.1’, ‘Admission Criteria and Process’ on July 24, 2025, at approximately 8:00 A.M. states, “(3) ‘Procedure’ section (3): The initial visit must be performed either within 48 hours of the referral, within 48 hours of the patients return home, or on the start of care date ordered by the physician (or other authorized licensed independent practitioner). (B) The initial and comprehensive assessments must be conducted by a registered nurse, unless physical therapy or speech language pathology is the only requested service for the patient.” A review of CR conducted July 23, 2025, from approximately 11:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. revealed the following: CR#1, start of care June 25, 2025, contained a coordination note for intake dated June 18, 2025. The patient was discharged from the hospital on June 19, 2025. A coordination note dated June 20, 2025, documented the patient requested a start of care on June 25, 2025, due to physician appointments. There was no physician order to amend the start of care date. CR #2, start of care July 14, 2025, contained a coordination note for intake pending skilled nursing facility discharge on July 11, 2025. A coordination note dated July 10, 2025, noted that the daughter was “ok with visit on Monday (July 14, 2025). There was no indication that the daughter requested the start of care date. There was no physician order for an amended start of care date. CR #3, start of care June 7, 2025, contained a coordination note for intake pending hospital discharge on June 2, 2025. A coordination note dated June 4, 2025, noted that the patient requested a start of care date of June 7, 2025. There was no physician order for an amended start of care date. CR #4, start of July 7, 2025, contained a coordination note for intake pending hospital discharge on July 2, 2025. The patient was discharged from the hospital on July 3, 2025, and requested start of care on July 7, 2025. There was no physician order for an amended start of care date. CR #5, start of care June 19, 2025, contained a physician referral for services noting “schedule within provider’s discretion”. A coordination note dated June 16, 2025, noted a conversation with the patient’s daughter. There was no reason documented for the delayed start of care and no physician order amending the start of care date. An interview with the Director of Operations on July 24, 2025, at approximately 3:00 P.M. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule G0514. Element-level.

  • Only As Ordered By A Physician

    The inspectors’ words, 633 words

    “Only as ordered by a physician CFR(s): 484.60(b)(1) Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of agency policy, clinical records (CR), and an interview with the agency Director of Operations, the agency failed to document physician notification and/or obtain a verbal order to amend frequencies for missed visits for four (4) of seven (7) CR reviewed. (CR #1, 2, 3, and 5) Findings include: Review of agency policy #X-001.1 titled ‘Missed Visits’ states, “Procedure: 2. Clinicians should document on the patient chart: D. That MD was notified of the missed visit. 3. If missed visits become routine and regular for a particular patient, through actions not originating from the clinician, the clinician should obtain a modified physician order adjusting the visit frequency order, intervention and goals...” Review of clinical records on July 23, 2025, from approximately 11:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. revealed the following: CR #1, start of care June 25, 2025. Certification period reviewed, June 25, 2025, through August 23, 2025, contained orders for physical therapy (PT), one (1) visit per week for two (2) weeks, then two (2) visits per week for seven (7) weeks. A missed visit was documented on July 3, 2025, July 9, 2025, and July 11, 2025. Skilled nursing visits were ordered one (1) visit per week for one (1) week. A verbal order dated July 3, 2025, amended the skilled nursing visits effective June 29, 2025, one (1) visit per week for one (1) week, then two (2) visits per week for two (2) weeks. A missed skilled nursing visit was documented on July 11, 2025. There was no documentation that the primary physician was notified of the missed visits and no verbal order to amend the visit frequency. CR #2, start of care July 14, 2025. Certification period reviewed, July 14, 2025, through September 11, 2025, contained orders for one (1) PT visit. A missed PT visit was documented on July 17, 2025. There was no documentation that the primary physician was notified of the missed visit and no verbal order to amend the visit frequency. CR #3, start of care June 7, 2025. Certification period reviewed, June 7, 2025, through August 5, 2025, contained orders effective June 8, 2025, for PT one (1) visit per week for one (1) week, then two (2) visits per week for two (2) weeks. A missed visit was documented on June 21, 2025, and the order was amended on June 21, 2025, to PT one (1) visit every two (2) weeks for two (2) weeks. There were no subsequent PT visits documented. There was no documentation that the primary physician was notified of the missed visits and no verbal order to amend the visit frequency. There was no order to discharge the patient. CR #5, start of care June 19, 2025. Certification period reviewed, June 19, 2025, through August 17, 2025, contained orders for PT one (1) visit per week for one (1) week. A missed visit was documented on June 21, 2025, and June 28, 2025. Orders were amended effective June 29, 2025, to one (1) visit per week for one (1) week, then two (2) visits per week for two (2) weeks, then one (1) visit per week for three (3) weeks. The week of July 6 through July 12, 2025, only one (1) visit was completed. There was no documentation of a missed visit. A missed visit was documented on July 17, 2025. There was no documentation that the primary physician was notified of the missed visits and no verbal order to amend the visit frequency. An interview with agency Director of Operations on July 24, 2025, at approximately 3:00 P.M. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule G0580. Element-level.

  • Responsible For All Day-To-Day Operations

    The inspectors’ words, 152 words

    “Responsible for all day-to-day operations CFR(s): 484.105(b)(1)(ii) (ii) Be responsible for all day-to-day operations of the HHA; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on the review of agency’ s organizational chart and interview with the agency Director of Operations, the governing body failed to assume full legal authority and responsibility for the agency’s overall management and operation, and the provision of all home health services by not having an on-site full-time administrator, alternate administrator, and clinical manager at this location. Findings include: Review of the agency’s organizational chart on July 24, 2025, at approximately 2:30 P.M., identified the designated administrator, alternate administrator, and clinical supervisor. An interview with the agency Director of Clinical Operations on July 24, 2025, at approximately 2:30 P.M. revealed that the administrator, alternate administrator and clinical manager assume the same roles for two (2) additional, separately licensed and Medicare certified agencies under the same ownership.”

    Rule G0948. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 24, 2025Recertification inspection6 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Feb 18, 2014.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • Doesn’t offer home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 2 owners or officers are people: Eliud Omollo (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Eliud Omollo (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no : “The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.”
  • CMS gives no : “No survey results are available for this period.”
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half starsNot rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • CMS gives this agency no quality of patient care rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.