Hearth Record

Golden Health Services Inc.

A home health agency in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19124

2100 Scattergood Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19124. (215) 289-9005.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 2, 2025: a recertification inspection.

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 2, 2025: recertification inspection10 deficiencies
  • Develop Ep Plan, Review And Update Annually

    The inspectors’ words, 443 words

    “Develop EP Plan, Review and Update Annually CFR(s): 484.102(a) §403.748(a), §416.54(a), §418.113(a), §441.184(a), §460.84(a), §482.15(a), §483.73(a), §483.475(a), §484.102(a), §485.68(a), §485.542(a), §485.625(a), §485.727(a), §485.920(a), §486.360(a), §491.12(a), §494.62(a). The [facility] must comply with all applicable Federal, State and local emergency preparedness requirements. The [facility] must develop establish and maintain a comprehensive emergency preparedness program that meets the requirements of this section. The emergency preparedness program must include, but not be limited to, the following elements: (a) Emergency Plan. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be [reviewed], and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do all of the following: * [For hospitals at §482.15 and CAHs at §485.625(a):] Emergency Plan. The [hospital or CAH] must comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local emergency preparedness requirements. The [hospital or CAH] must develop and maintain a comprehensive emergency preparedness program that meets the requirements of this section, utilizing an all-hazards approach. * [For LTC Facilities at §483.73(a):] Emergency Plan. The LTC facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least annually. * [For ESRD Facilities at §494.62(a):] Emergency Plan. The ESRD facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be [evaluated], and updated at least every 2 years. . This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of Emergency Preparedness documentation and an interview with the administrator, the agency failed to maintain documentation for review/update of the emergency preparedness plan with all required elements every two (2) years since 2019. Findings include: A review of agency policy titled, “Emergency Management Policy” conducted on July 1, 2025, at approximately 11:00 AM states, “The agency will develop and maintain a written emergency management plan describing the process for disaster readiness and emergency management and implements it as appropriate...” Policy did not contain any documentation as to how often the policy will be reviewed/updated. A review of QAPI meeting minutes dated 9/26/2024; 12/16/2024; 3/31/2025; and 6/25/2025 conducted on July 2, 2025, at approximately 11:00 AM, did not contain any documentation regarding the annual review of the Emergency Preparedness program. A review of Governing Body meeting minutes dated 2/10/2025 conducted on June 1, 2025, at approximately 12:35 PM, did not contain any documentation regarding the annual review of the Emergency Preparedness program. A review of agency’s Emergency Preparedness Program conducted on July 1, 2025, at approximately 1:00 PM revealed no documentation that the facility reviewed or updated the emergency preparedness plan with all required elements every two (2) years since 2019. An interview with the administrator on July 2, 2025, at approximately 11:00 am confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule E0004. Standard-level.

  • Plan Based On All Hazards Risk Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 479 words

    “Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment CFR(s): 484.102(a)(1)-(2) §403.748(a)(1)-(2), §416.54(a)(1)-(2), §418.113(a)(1)-(2), §441.184(a)(1)-(2), §460.84(a)(1)-(2), §482.15(a)(1)-(2), §483.73(a)(1)-(2), §483.475(a)(1)-(2), §484.102(a)(1)-(2), §485.68(a)(1)-(2), §485.542(a)(1)-(2), §485.625(a)(1)-(2), §485.727(a)(1)-(2), §485.920(a)(1)-(2), §486.360(a)(1)-(2), §491.12(a)(1)-(2), §494.62(a)(1)-(2) [(a) Emergency Plan. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following:] (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach.* (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. * [For Hospices at §418.113(a):] Emergency Plan. The Hospice must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment, including the management of the consequences of power failures, natural disasters, and other emergencies that would affect the hospice’s ability to provide care. *[For LTC facilities at §483.73(a):] Emergency Plan. The LTC facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least annually. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach, including missing residents. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. *[For ICF/IIDs at §483.475(a):] Emergency Plan. The ICF/IID must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach, including missing clients. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on an interview with the administrator, review of agency policy, and the agency’s emergency preparedness plan, the agency failed to base the emergency preparedness plan on/or to include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach. Findings include: A review of agency policy “Emergency Management Policy” was conducted on July 2, 2025, at approximately 10:30 AM. Policy states, “Golden Health Services conducts an analysis to identify potential emergencies and the direct and indirect effects these emergencies may have on agency operations and the demand for services...” Policy did not indicate a time frame for completion of the facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach. A review of the agency emergency preparedness plan conducted on July 1, 2025, at approximately 1:30 PM revealed no documentation that the emergency preparedness plan based on/or included a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach was updated/reviewed since 2019. Interview with the administrator conducted on July 2, 2025, at approximately 11:00 AM confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • Ep Program Patient Population

    The inspectors’ words, 377 words

    “EP Program Patient Population CFR(s): 484.102(a)(3) §403.748(a)(3), §416.54(a)(3), §418.113(a)(3), §441.184(a)(3), §460.84(a)(3), §482.15(a)(3), §483.73(a)(3), §483.475(a)(3), §484.102(a)(3), §485.68(a)(3), §485.542(a)(3), §485.625(a)(3), §485.727(a)(3), §485.920(a)(3), §491.12(a)(3), §494.62(a)(3). [(a) Emergency Plan. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following:] (3) Address [patient/client] population, including, but not limited to, persons at-risk; the type of services the [facility] has the ability to provide in an emergency; and continuity of operations, including delegations of authority and succession plans.** *[For LTC facilities at §483.73(a):] Emergency Plan. The LTC facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least annually. The plan must do all of the following: (3) Address resident population, including, but not limited to, persons at-risk; the type of services the LTC facility has the ability to provide in an emergency; and continuity of operations, including delegations of authority and succession plans. *NOTE: [“Persons at risk” does not apply to: ASC, hospice, PACE, HHA, CORF, CMCH, RHC/FQHC, or ESRD facilities.] This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of agency policy, emergency preparedness documentation, and interview with the administrator, the agency failed to develop an emergency plan that addressed patient population, including, but not limited to, persons at-risk; the types of services the agency had the ability to provide in an emergency; and continuity of operations, including delegation of authority and succession plans. Findings include: A review of agency policy titled “Emergency Management Policy” conducted on July 1, 2025, at approximately 10:10 AM states, “A classification system will be identified within the agency to determine client acuity and need for services during an emergency. This classification would be used to assure client with immediate needs are seen during this time or alternate arrangements are made...” A review of agency’s Emergency Preparedness Plan did not provide any documentation of an emergency plan that addressed patient/client population, including, but not limited to, persons at-risk; the types of services the facility had the ability to provide in an emergency; and continuity of operations, including delegation of authority and succession plans. An interview with the administrator conducted on July 2, 2025, at approximately 11:00 AM confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule E0007. Standard-level.

  • Names And Contact Information

    The inspectors’ words, 477 words

    “Names and Contact Information CFR(s): 484.102(c)(1) §403.748(c)(1), §416.54(c)(1), §418.113(c)(1), §441.184(c)(1), §460.84(c)(1), §482.15(c)(1), §483.73(c)(1), §483.475(c)(1), §484.102(c)(1), §485.68(c)(1), §485.542(c)(1), §485.625(c)(1), §485.727(c)(1), §485.920(c)(1), §486.360(c)(1), §491.12(c)(1), §494.62(c)(1). [(c) The [facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness communication plan that complies with Federal, State and local laws and must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. The communication plan must include all of the following:] (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [facilities]. (v) Volunteers. *[For Hospitals at §482.15(c) and CAHs at §485.625(c)] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [hospitals and CAHs]. (v) Volunteers. *[For RNHCIs at §403.748(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Next of kin, guardian, or custodian. (iv) Other RNHCIs. (v) Volunteers. *[For ASCs at §416.45(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For Hospices at §418.113(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Hospice employees. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Other hospices. *[For HHAs at §484.102(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For OPOs at §486.360(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (2) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Volunteers. (iv) Other OPOs. (v) Transplant and donor hospitals in the OPO’s Donation Service Area (DSA). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of agency policy, and an interview with the administrator, the agency failed to demonstrate that the emergency preparedness communication plan included the Names and Contact Information for the following: Staff, Entities providing services under arrangement, Patients’ physicians and Volunteers. Findings include: A review of agency policy titled, “Emergency Management Policy” conducted on July 1, 2025, at approximately 10:20 AM states, “A listing of all staff members and telephone numbers will be included in the agency’s on-call book. If there were actual or impending disaster, the triage system would be initiated to ensure client needs are met...” A review agency’s Emergency Preparedness Plan did not provide any documentation that included the names and contact information for all agency staff and patients’ physicians. An interview conducted with the administrator conducted on July 2, 2025, at approximately 11:00 AM confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule E0030. Standard-level.

  • Emergency Officials Contact Information

    The inspectors’ words, 357 words

    “Emergency Officials Contact Information CFR(s): 484.102(c)(2) §403.748(c)(2), §416.54(c)(2), §418.113(c)(2), §441.184(c)(2), §460.84(c)(2), §482.15(c)(2), §483.73(c)(2), §483.475(c)(2), §484.102(c)(2), §485.68(c)(2), §485.542(c)(2), §485.625(c)(2), §485.727(c)(2), §485.920(c)(2), §486.360(c)(2), §491.12(c)(2), §494.62(c)(2). [(c) The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness communication plan that complies with Federal, State and local laws and must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. The communication plan must include all of the following: (2) Contact information for the following: (i) Federal, State, tribal, regional, and local emergency preparedness staff. (ii) Other sources of assistance. *[For LTC Facilities at §483.73(c):] (2) Contact information for the following: (i) Federal, State, tribal, regional, and local emergency preparedness staff. (ii) The State Licensing and Certification Agency. (iii) The Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. (iv) Other sources of assistance. *[For ICF/IIDs at §483.475(c):] (2) Contact information for the following: (i) Federal, State, tribal, regional, and local emergency preparedness staff. (ii) Other sources of assistance. (iii) The State Licensing and Certification Agency. (iv) The State Protection and Advocacy Agency. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of agency policy, agency’s emergency preparedness plan, and an interview with the administrator, it was determined the agency failed to establish and maintain an emergency preparedness communication plan that included contact information for local/regional/state/federal emergency preparedness staff. Findings include: A review of the agency policy “Emergency Management Policy” conducted on July 1, 2025, at approximately 10:10 AM states, “Clients dependent on medical equipment that is necessary for maintaining life support will have battery pack backup available. Local authorities would be notified of these client’s high-risk status at the time of admission...The emergency plan will identify the links to local community organizations that may be needed to assist the agency in responding to client needs or who may need to utilize agency staff and resources to respond to community needs…” A review of agency’s Emergency Preparedness program did not contain any documentation of a printed copy of the communication plan that included contact information for local/regional/state/federal emergency preparedness staff. An interview with the administrator conducted on July 2, 2025, at approximately 11:00 AM confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule E0031. Standard-level.

  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 386 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical home visit observations, a review of agency policies, and an interview with the administrator, the agency failed to follow its policy pertaining to infection control for three (3) of three (3) clinical home visits conducted, (CR#1, 3, and 8). Findings Include: A review of agency policy titled “Nursing Bag Technique” was conducted on July 2, 2025 at approximately 12:30 PM. Policy states, “..Once in patient’s home, select the cleanest and most convenient work area away from children and pets, and spread the newspaper. Place bad on the newspaper….After providing care, clean all equipment with soap and water or a home health agency approved disinfectant before returning it to the bag..” On-site clinical home visits were conducted on July 1, 2025, from approximately 9:45 am- 11:30 am. CR #3 Start of Care 10/24/2022, arrived at the home at 9:45 AM. The nurse (PF#3) placed the clinical bag on the patient’s coffee table with no barrier beneath the bag. The nurse removed a blood pressure (BP) cuff and obtained patients’ blood pressure. Then put returned BP cuff to the bag without sanitizing the item. The observation revealed that there was no separation between clean equipment and equipment that was used and required sanitization. CR #1 Start of Care 11/07/2023, arrived at the home at 10:30 AM. The nurse (PF#3) placed the clinical bag on the patient’s couch with no barrier beneath the bag. The observation revealed that there was no separation between clean equipment and equipment that was used and required sanitization. CR #8 Start of Care 09/13/2021, arrived at the home at 11:00 AM. The nurse (PF#3) placed the clinical bag on the patient’s couch with no barrier beneath the bag. The nurse removed a blood pressure (BP) cuff and obtained patients’ blood pressure. Then put returned BP cuff to the bag without sanitizing the item. The observation revealed that there was no separation between clean equipment and equipment that was used and required sanitization. An interview with the agency administrator and staff conducted on July 3, 2025, at approximately 11:00 AM confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 378 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of agency policy, clinical records (CR), and an interview with the agency Administrator, the agency failed to provide documentation showing staff completed evaluations of all patient medications per policy including but not limited to: any potential adverse effects, any drug reactions including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy for two (2) of seven (7) clinical records reviewed, (CR# 2 and #4). Findings include: A review of Agency policy titled “Medication Review & Reconciliation” conducted on July 2, 2025, at approximately 10:00 AM states, “Nurses preparing the plan of care and the Medication administration record must pay attention to detail, go over again, review and verify each medication for the correct patient, correct medication, correct dosage, correct route, and correct time against the physician orders, or medications listed. Nurses must compare this to the medication administration record (MAR)… Clarify and compare patient’s medication list on the plan of care (485) with the medication administration records. Reconcile the Medication and Treatment record with the current Home Health Certification and Plan of care/Physician Orders..” A review of CRs was conducted on June 30, 2025, at approximately 11:30 am and July 1, 2025, at approximately 11:00 am and completed on revealed the following: CR #2, Start of Care: 02/20/2025: Certification period reviewed 1/28/25 through 3/28/25; contained no documentation that medications were reviewed for potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. CR #4, Start of Care: 03/20/2023: Certification period reviewed 12/22/24 through 2/19/25; contained no documentation that medications were reviewed for potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. An interview with the agency administrator and staff conducted on July 3, 2025, at approximately 11:00 AM confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

  • Preparing Clinical Notes

    The inspectors’ words, 208 words

    “Preparing clinical notes CFR(s): 484.75(b)(6) Preparing clinical notes; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of agency policy, clinical records (CR), and the agency administrator the agency failed to file clinical notes in accordance with its policy for two (2) of eight (8) CRs reviewed, (CR #1 and #4). Findings include: A review of agency policy titled “Contents of Clinical Record” conducted on July 1, 2025, at approximately 10:45 AM states, “Clinical notes must be written the day service is rendered and should be incorporated into the clinical record no less often then weekly. A review of CRs was conducted on June 30, 2025, at approximately 11:30 am and July 1, 2025, at approximately 11:00 am and completed on revealed the following: CR #1, Start of Care: 11/07/2023. Certification period reviewed: 04/30/2025- 06/28/2025. Orders included: SN 84 hours/week M-S overnight; 40 hours/week M-F days. File did not contain any skilled nursing (SN) notes dated 06/13/2025-06/28/2025. CR #4, Start of Care: 03/20/2023. Orders included: 63 hours/week days. Certification period reviewed: 06/14/25- 08/02/2025. File did not contain any skilled nursing (SN) notes dated 05/24/2025. An interview with the agency administrator and staff conducted on July 3, 2025, at approximately 11:00 AM confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule G0716. Element-level.

  • Responsible For All Day-To-Day Operations

    The inspectors’ words, 203 words

    “Responsible for all day-to-day operations CFR(s): 484.105(b)(1)(ii) (ii) Be responsible for all day-to-day operations of the HHA; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of agency policy, personnel records (PF), and an interview the agency Administrator, the agency failed to be responsible for all day-to-day operations by not following its policies to provide documentation of tuberculosis testing at hire for two (2) of ten (10) PFs reviewed, (PF #2 and 7). Findings Include: A review of agency policy titled “Tuberculosis (TB) Screening Program” conducted on June 1, 2025, at approximately 12:10 PM states, “Screening will be provided upon hire to determine the baseline TB status of all health care workers and volunteers with potential exposure to aerosolized M. tb and will include two-step skin testing, as appropriate...” A review of PF’s conducted on June 30, 2025, from approximately 10:30 AM to 11:40 AM revealed the following: PF #2, RN, Date of Hire: 1/7/25, contained documentation of a negative QuantiFERON test dated 10/5/2023. PF #7, HHA, Date of Hire: 8/9/22, contained documentation of only one negative two-step tuberculosis skin test dated 4/3/2024. An interview with the Administrator on July 2, 2025, at approximately 11:00 AM confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule G0948. Element-level.

  • Discharge And Transfer Summaries

    The inspectors’ words, 391 words

    “Discharge and transfer summaries CFR(s): 484.110(a)(6)(i-iii) (i) A completed discharge summary that is sent to the primary care practitioner or other health care professional who will be responsible for providing care and services to the patient after discharge from the HHA (if any) within 5 business days of the patient’s discharge; or (ii) A completed transfer summary that is sent within 2 business days of a planned transfer, if the patient’s care will be immediately continued in a health care facility; or (iii) A completed transfer summary that is sent within 2 business days of becoming aware of an unplanned transfer, if the patient is still receiving care in a health care facility at the time when the HHA becomes aware of the transfer. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of agency policies, clinical records (CR), and interview with the administrator, it was determined that the agency failed to complete and/or submit to the physician a discharge summary for two (2) of two (2) discharged CRs, (CR #6 and 7). Findings include: A review of agency policy titled “Discharge Summary” conducted on July 1, 2025, at approximately 1:00 PM states, “A discharge summary will be completed for clients discharges from Golden Health Services to record a summary of care received by the client from the start of care through discharge; to document client status at the time of discharge, identify unmet needs, and referrals initiated; to document instructions given to the client/family regarding medications, treatments, referrals, and necessary follow-up…A copy of the discharge summary is mailed to the physician…” A review of CRs conducted on June 30, 2025, from approximately 11:30 AM to 2:30 PM and July 1, 2025, from approximately 9:30 AM to 11:00 AM revealed the following: CR #6, Start of Care: 10/7/24. Discharge Date: 5/15/25. Certification period reviewed: 5/5/25 through 6/9/25. File did not contain any documentation of a discharge summary and there is no documentation that a discharge summary was sent to the physician. CR #7, Start of Care: 1/29/24. Discharge Date: 3/10/25. Certification period reviewed: 1/23/25 through 3/10/25. File did not contain any documentation of a discharge summary and there is no documentation that a discharge summary was sent to the physician. An interview with the administrator conducted on July 2, 2025, at approximately 11:00 AM confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule G1022. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 2, 2025Recertification inspection10 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since May 12, 2004.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 17 owners or officers are people: Adedeji Amos Ajibolade (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Folasade O Ajibolade (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Adedeji Amos Ajibolade (corporate officer); Adedeji Amos Ajibolade (managing employee (on the payroll)); Musafau O Ashiru (managing employee (under contract)); Musafau O Ashiru (corporate director); Malory Innocent (managing employee (on the payroll)); Malory Innocent (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Olusegm T Awujoola (corporate director); Folasade O Ajibolade (corporate officer); Folasade O Ajibolade (corporate director); Folasade O Ajibolade (managing employee (on the payroll)); Folasade O Ajibolade (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Sharmayne Cartwright (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jennifer E Brown-Dawson (managing employee (under contract)); Jennifer E Brown-Dawson (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Yalanda Peterson (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no : “The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.”
  • CMS gives no : “No survey results are available for this period.”
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half starsNot rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • CMS gives this agency no quality of patient care rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.