Hearth Record

Comprehensive Medical Home Care

A home health agency in Dupont, Pennsylvania 18641

216 Center Street, Dupont, Pennsylvania 18641. (570) 451-3050.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 5, 2026: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 5, 2026: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Revised Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 495 words

    “Revised plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(c)(2) A revised plan of care must reflect current information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment, and contain information concerning the patient’s progress toward the measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and patient in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on the review of agency policies/procedures and clinical records, and based on interview with the Administrator (Employee #12) and the Chief Executive Officer/Director of Clinical Services (CEO/DoCS-Employee #13), the agency failed to ensure wound care orders were consistent with skilled nursing (SN) interventions included on the comprehensive assessment for one (1) of two (2) patients for whom home health services were resumed after hospitalization. (Patient #4) Findings include: On February 5, 2026 at approximately 3:20 PM, review of agency policy 2-018, titled “Care Planning Process” revealed the following under “Procedure”: 8. The plan of care will be revised no less than every sixty (60) days or as frequently as deemed necessary by the clinician, based on the ongoing assessment of the patient. On February 5, 2026 at approximately 3:20 PM, review of agency policy 5-006, titled “Entries into the Clinical Record”, revealed the following: Policy...Documentation in the clinical record will be...accurate...The clinical record should tell a linear story of the course of the patient’s care that is managed and delivered by the organization. Patient #4 (Discharge): Between February 3, 2026 at approximately 10:32 AM and February 5, 2026 at approximately 1:07 PM, review of the clinical record revealed wound care provided by the SN (Employee #1) included the following as documented on the resumption of care (ROC) assessment dated 06/10/2025: -Right Lower Extremity Wounds (Wounds #1, #3, #8, #9): Aquacel Ag (wound treatment which contains silver) applied. Review ROC orders obtained by the SN (Employee #1) on 06/10/2025 revealed wound care orders included the following as documented on the “Post Hospital Order”: -RLE ulcer and non-pressure ulcer wound care orders included on page 2 and 3: Apply Aquacel Ag three (3) times a week -RLE ulcer wound care orders included on page 4: Apply Xeroform (wound dressing/treatment) twice a week -RLE non-pressure ulcer wound care orders included on page 4: Apply Xeroform every other day. -RLE non-pressure ulcer wound care orders included on page 5: Apply Xeroform and cover with Allevyn border (foam dressing) three (3) times a week and apply Xeroform three (3) times a week. There was no documentation on the “Post Hospital Order” dated 06/10/2025 which provided evidence wound care orders obtained by the SN for the application of Xeroform to the RLE ulcer and non-pressure ulcer wounds were consistent with the wound care provided by the SN during the resumption of care visit completed on 06/10/2025. During interview conducted on February 5, 2026 at approximately 3:25 PM, the Administrator and the CEO/DoCS confirmed wound care orders included on the “Post Hospital Order” were not consistent with SN wound care interventions completed during ROC visit for patient #4.”

    Rule G0592. Element-level.

  • Preparing Clinical Notes

    The inspectors’ words, 833 words

    “Preparing clinical notes CFR(s): 484.75(b)(6) Preparing clinical notes; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on the review of agency policies/procedures and clinical records, and based on interview with the Administrator (Employee #12) and the Chief Executive Officer/Director of Clinical Services (CEO/DoCS-Employee #13), the agency failed to ensure skilled nursing (SN) wound assessment findings were documented in accordance with agency policy/procedure and/or physician orders for three (3) of twelve (12) patients for whom wound care was provided by SN staff. (Patients #1, #2 and #15) Findings include: On February 5, 2026 at approximately 3:20 PM, review of agency policy 5-006, titled “Entries into the Clinical Record”, revealed the following: Policy...Documentation in the clinical record will be...accurate and reflect the care or services provided...The clinical record should tell a linear story of the course of the patient’s care that is managed and delivered by the organization. Procedure...1. A clinical record will be initiated and maintained for each patient receiving care or services, according to organization policies...and will include at a minimum: G. Current patient status and progress towards goals... On February 5, 2026 at approximately 2:59 PM, review of agency policy 2-014, titled “Wound Care Assessment”, revealed the following under “Procedure”: 2. Documentation of Assessment includes: a. Location and type... b. Length x width x depth... d. Tissue type/color e. Exudate (drainage)-Measurable amount... g. Periwound (tissue surrounding wound) condition... 6. Wound evaluation every visit... Patient #1 (Discharge): Between February 2, 2026 at approximately 12:39 PM and February 5, 2026 at approximately 1:00 PM, review of the clinical record revealed SN was to provide wound care to the left heel wound and that SN interventions included the following as documented on the “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” for the recertification period of 11/25/2025 through 01/23/2026: SN to assess wound noting condition of wound bed, drainage and periwound and for SN to measure wound weekly. Review of SN visit note documentation dated 12/01/2025 revealed the SN (Employee #8) provided wound care to the left foot wound and that the SN documented that were no signs/symptoms of infection. There was no documentation on the SN visit noted dated 12/01/2025 which provided evidence the SN assessed the condition of the wound bed, wound drainage nor the periwound. Review of the verbal order dated 12/10/2025 revealed an order was received for SN to provide care to the right heel wound (new wound). Review of SN visit note documentation dated 12//10/2025 revealed the SN (Employee #1) provided wound care to the right heel wound. There was no documentation on the SN visit noted dated 12/10/2025 which provided evidence the SN assessed the right heel wound size nor the condition of the wound bed, wound drainage nor the periwound. Patient #2 (Discharge): Between February 2, 2026 at approximately 1:56 PM and February 5, 2026 at approximately 1:03 PM, review of the clinical record revealed SN was to provide wound care to the left lateral foot wound and that SN goals included the following as documented on the “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” for the recertification period of 11/14/2025 through 01/12/2026: Wound will decrease in size and heal without complications. Review of SN visit note documentation dated 12/11/2025 revealed the SN (Employee #8) provided wound care to the left foot wound and that the SN documented that were no signs/symptoms of infection. There was no documentation on the SN visit noted dated 12/11/2025 which provided evidence the SN assessed the condition of the wound bed, wound drainage nor the periwound. Patient #15: On February 5, 2026 at approximately 7:40 AM, review of the clinical record revealed an additional SN visit was ordered to assess right lower leg and for ace wrap application as ordered on the physician order dated 01/23/2026. Review of the start of care assessment dated 01/17/2026 revealed there were no surgical, stasis ulcer nor pressure wounds present during the initial SN assessment. Review of SN visit note documentation dated 01/24/2026 revealed the SN (Employee #13) documented the knee was assessed and was without signs or symptoms of infection, that wound care was provided and that discharge planning included for “when knee is healed”. The SN documented an ace wrap was applied to the left leg. Review of SN visit note documentation dated 01/29/2026 revealed a right knee Incision present, that the incision was clean, dry, intact and closed with surgical glue, and that no signs/symptoms of infection were noted. There was no documentation on the SN visit noted dated 01/24/2026 which provided evidence the SN documented the location and type of knee wound which was assessed nor was documentation present which provided evidence the SN had assessed the length/width/depth of wound to which wound care was provided nor the status of wound drainage. During interview conducted on February 5, 2026 at approximately 3:25 PM, the Administrator and the CEO/DoCS confirmed wound assessment documentation was no completed in accordance with agency policies/procedures or physician orders on the aforementioned dates for the above identified patients.”

    Rule G0716. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 5, 2026Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Mar 14, 1995.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Comprehensive Client Care Services owns 100% directly since Sep 9, 2011.
  • 2 owners or officers are people: Teresa M Croker (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Janet Trombetta (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Comprehensive Client Care ServicesOwns 5% or more directly100%Sep 9, 2011

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (136 surveys completed): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate81.94% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate10.90% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.01% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 24 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 18641, where this agency’s office is, 22 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 2.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.