Hearth Record

Carepro Home Healthcare Services

A home health agency in Las Vegas, Nevada 89119

1771 E Flamingo Rd, Las Vegas, Nevada 89119. (702) 430-9517.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 20, 2026: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 20, 2026: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Written Instructions To Patient Include:

    The inspectors’ words, 208 words

    “Written instructions to patient include: CFR(s): 484.60(e) Standard: Written information to the patient. The HHA must provide the patient and caregiver with a copy of written instructions outlining: This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure written instructions were in the homes for 2 of 3 patients (Patient (P)2 and P3) who were selected for a joint visit with a clinician. The agency folder in each patient’s home lacked current, written instructions of specific care and services to be provided. This deficient practice had the potential to prevent appropriate care and needed services from being provided as ordered by the physician for all patients on the agency’s service. Findings include: On 05/19/2026 at 9:45 AM during a home visit with Home Health Aide (HHA1), a review of P3’s home folder was completed. The folder lacked a current Plan of Care (diagnoses, physician orders, specific written instructions of care and services to be provided, disciplines involved and visit frequencies). The Plan of Care (POC) was/is also known as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) 485. On 05/19/2026 at 10:00 AM during an interview, HHA1 could not explain why there was no current POC in P3’s folder.”

    Rule G0612. Standard-level.

  • Program Scope

    The inspectors’ words, 363 words

    “Program scope CFR(s): 484.65(a)(1),(2) Standard: Program scope. (1) The program must at least be capable of showing measurable improvement in indicators for which there is evidence that improvement in those indicators will improve health outcomes, patient safety, and quality of care. (2) The HHA must measure, analyze, and track quality indicators, including adverse patient events, and other aspects of performance that enable the HHA to assess processes of care, HHA services, and operations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and document review, the agency failed to show measurable indicators of documented events in the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program for five months. The failure to monitor measurable indicators of events created missed opportunities for performance improvement and had the potential to affect all 51 current patients. Findings include: On 05/18/2026 at 10:20 AM during an interview, the Quality Assurance Manager (QAM) revealed the agency’s “Back Office” was located in the Philippines. QAM verified the “Back Office” was responsible for communication with the patients to schedule clinician visits. The QAM provided a record of “QAPI Minutes of Meeting, dated January 2026 until May 2026. The record revealed the Back Office Manager (BOM) failed to document measurable indicators of tracked data which included the “Monitoring Back Office performance with focus on communication improvement”. Between 01/02/2026 and 05/15/2026, the “Monitoring Back Office performance with focus on communication improvement” was documented as an issue in 13 of 14 “Minutes of Meeting” without measurable indicators to identify potential problems and to identify opportunities for improving care. The same QAPI “Minutes of Meeting” revealed the QAM failed to document measurable indicators of tracked data which included the “reminders to clinicians for pending documentation”. Between 01/02/2026 and 05/15/2026 the “clinicians’ timely submission of service notes” was documented as an issue in 11 of 14 “Minutes of Meetings” without measurable indicators to identify potential problems and to identify opportunities for improving care. On 05/20/2026 at 11:50 AM during an interview, Director of Clinical Operations verified the QAPI failed to show measurable indicators for communication improvement and missing documentation. The agency failed to provide a surveyor-requested policy for the agency’s QAPI and measurable indicators improvement plan.”

    Rule G0642. Standard-level.

  • Infection Control Education

    The inspectors’ words, 266 words

    “Infection control education CFR(s): 484.70(c) Standard: Education. The HHA must provide infection control education to staff, patients, and caregiver(s). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and policy review, the agency failed to ensure personnel records accurately reflected infection control education and training for 5 of 5 sampled clinicians: Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA1), Registered Nurse (RN), Home Health Aide (HHA1), Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA1), and Social Worker (SW). This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 51 patients currently receiving services from the agency. Findings include: On 05/20/2026 at 9:05 AM, the survey team requested access to the personnel training records for RNA1, RN, HHA1, CNA1, and SW to review and verify infection control training. On 05/20/2026 at 9:30 AM, the Director of Clinical Operations (DCO) confirmed the agency was unable to provide documentation that RNA1, RN, HHA1, CNA1, and SW participated in infection control training. The DCO stated training was completed without a staff signature to document attendance. The agency’s policy and procedure, “Attendance at Orientation and Training,” with no documented reviewed date, revealed, “At or near the time of hire, all employees are required to be presented with the Agency’s general orientation program and Employee Handbook and are required to attend all Agency orientation and training programs. Employee may also be required to attend further training programs, meetings, conferences, or other similar matters, and sign documents proving attendance at them. The refusal or failure of an employee to attend such programs or meetings or to sign documentation proving attendance, are grounds for disciplinary action up to and including termination.””

    Rule G0686. Standard-level.

  • 12 Hours Inservice Every 12 Months

    The inspectors’ words, 544 words

    “12 hours inservice every 12 months CFR(s): 484.80(d) Standard: In-service training. A home health aide must receive at least l2 hours of in-service training during each 12-month period. In-service training may occur while an aide is furnishing care to a patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the agency failed to ensure 1) annual continuing education was tracked for 8 of 10 (Home Health Aides (HHA)1, HHA2, HHA3, HHA4, HHA5, HHA6, HHA7, HHA8) and 2) monthly in-service training for continuing education was completed by 1 of 2 (Restorative Nursing Assistants (RNA)1). This deficient practice of allowing staff to work without proper education had the potential to affect all patients receiving care from the above-identified HHAs and RNA. Findings include: Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the agency failed to ensure 1) annual continuing education was tracked for 8 of 10 (Home Health Aides (HHA)1, HHA2, HHA3, HHA4, HHA5, HHA6, HHA7, HHA8) and 2) monthly in-service training for continuing education was completed by 1 of 2 (Restorative Nursing Assistants (RNA)1). This deficient practice had the potential to affect all patients on service by allowing staff to work without proper education. Findings include: The agency provided an undated in-service list of annual education for aides, along with a list of staff and their date of hire (DOH). The two documents revealed the following information: - HHA1: There was no continuing education recorded since DOH on 02/18/2026. - HHA2: There was no continuing education recorded since DOH on 09/15/2025. - HHA3: There was one in-service recorded for the year (DOH 06/30/2025). - HHA4: There was no continuing education recorded for the year (DOH 08/06/2019). - HHA5: There was no continuing education recorded for the year (DOH 05/14/2019). - HHA6: There was no continuing education recorded since DOH on 10/31/2025. - HHA7: There was no continuing education recorded since DOH on 02/20/2026. - HHA8: There was no continuing education recorded since DOH on 02/20/2026. - RNA1: There was no continuing education recorded since DOH on 01/01/2026. On 05/18/2026 at 11:15 AM, the Administrative Assistant (AA) indicated the tracking was January through December. The AA explained, “Staff got their own training from the computer course . . . the facility had not been tracking the training.” On 05/19/2026 at 9:45 AM during an interview, HHA1 acknowledged receiving a schedule about available monthly in-services and continuing education. On 05/19/2026 at 11:45 AM during an interview, RNA1 denied being aware of any available monthly in-services and continuing education offerings. On 05/20/2026 at 9:33 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated there was no formalized program for tracking the staff education. The agency’s undated “In-Service Education” policy documented the following: “Purpose: To provide staff members with information, to improve Agency’s performance, and to ensure the competency of the Agency’s staff. Policy: The Agency provides in-services education programs for its staff. Procedure: 1. DON plans annual in-service calendar. . . 4. Home Health Aides must attend twelve (12) hours of in-service during each twelve (12) month period. The 12-month period shall begin on the Date of Hire. . . 5. Maintain an in-service notebook which contains: A) Inservice content materials. B) Minutes/Attendance sheets. C) Employee Inservice/ Continuing Education Record. . .””

    Rule G0774. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 20, 2026Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Dec 21, 2010.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 3 owners or officers are people: Alexis L Garcia Calipusan (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Wilva A Cadianza (managing employee (on the payroll)); Alexis L Garcia Calipusan (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate74.37% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate14.08% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.27% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 168 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 89119, where this agency’s office is, 126 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.