Hearth Record

Critical Care Visiting Nurses

A home health agency in Las Vegas, Nevada 89146

2685 S Rainbow Blvd Suite 209, Las Vegas, Nevada 89146. (702) 445-1354.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 29, 2025: a recertification inspection.

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 29, 2025: recertification inspection7 deficiencies
  • Encoding And Transmitting Oasis

    The inspectors’ words, 396 words

    “Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on document review and interview, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to electronically transmit completed OASIS (Outcome and Assessment Information Set) assessments (a comprehensive patient assessment) to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) system within 30 days after completing the assessment. This failure had the potential to affect funding for the agency. Findings include: Review of the CMS OASIS assessment reference manual, effective 01/01/23 and located at https://www.cms.gov/files/document/oasis-e-guidance-manual51622.pdf, directed that the OASIS assessments be transmitted to CMS within 30 days of completion. Review of the Transmission Summary Report provided by the facility, revealed OASIS assessments were submitted to CMS greater than the 30 days after the completion of the assessment for 65 assessments submitted for 2023 Quarter (Q) 1, 57 assessments submitted for 2023 Q2, 32 assessments submitted for 2023 Q3, 39 assessments submitted for 2023 Q4, 35 assessments submitted for 2024 Q1, 36 assessments submitted for 2024 Q2, 31assessments submitted for 2024 Q3, 33 assessments submitted for Q4, and 37 assessments submitted for 2025 Q1. During an interview on 05/28/25 at 2:30 PM, the Director of Clinical Services (DCS) and Administrator stated the HHA used the CMS manual for the completion and transmission instructions for the completion and submission of the patients’ OASIS assessments. The DCS and Administrator confirmed the HHA had failed to submit OASIS assessments within 30 days of completion. The DCS and Administrator also stated that OASIS assessments were delayed in being submitted due to HHA’s process for completing the OASIS for transmission. The DCS and Administrator stated that the Registered Nurse or Physical Therapist performed the assessment, and it was available to the HHA’s office. The DCS and Administrator stated the assessment information was then sent to a third party affiliated with the software vendor for coding with the patient’s diagnoses. The DCS and Administrator stated after the third-party contactor completed the coding, the assessment was returned to the HHA for corrections, if needed and acknowledged OASIS assessments were submitted more than 30 days after the completion of the assessment.”

    Rule G0372. Standard-level.

  • Written Notice Of Patient’S Rights

    The inspectors’ words, 230 words

    “Written notice of patient’s rights CFR(s): 484.50(a)(1)(i) (i) Written notice of the patient’s rights and responsibilities under this rule, and the HHA’s transfer and discharge policies as set forth in paragraph (d) of this section. Written notice must be understandable to persons who have limited English proficiency and accessible to individuals with disabilities; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on document review, policy review, and interview, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to provide information on its discharge and transfer policies in advance of furnishing care for seven out of seven sampled patients (Patients (P) 1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, and P7). This had the potential to affect the patient’s knowledge of the agency’s discharge or transfer criteria before provision of care. Findings include: Review of the agency’s current undated admission packet provided by the agency revealed it did not include information on the agency discharge or transfer policies. A review of an agency’s policy titled, Patient Admission Criteria, dated February 2024, revealed it included a list of items provided to the patient at the initial visit. The list did not include information about the agency discharge or transfer policies. During an interview on 05/27/25 at 2:30 PM, the Administrator confirmed that information about the agency discharge and transfer policies was not included in the admission packet or provided to the patient prior to furnishing care.”

    Rule G0412. Element-level.

  • Hha Administrator Contact Information

    The inspectors’ words, 269 words

    “HHA administrator contact information CFR(s): 484.50(a)(1)(ii) (ii) Contact information for the HHA administrator, including the administrator’s name, business address, and business phone number in order to receive complaints. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on document review, interviews, and policy review, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to provide the name and contact information for the Administrator for two of two patients (Patient (P) 1 and P3) reviewed during home visit observations. This failure had the potential to deter the patient or caregiver from verbalizing a complaint or concern due to the lack of direct contact information. Findings include:that the name of the Administrator was not included in the information provided to the patient/caregiver. The documentation revealed to call the “Administrator” and provided the main phone number for the agency. During an interview on 05/27/25 at 12:50 PM, Family (F) 1 confirmed that there was no information provided that included the name of the Administrator. 2. Review of documentation included in the home health folder provided to P3 during a home visit observation on 05/28/25 at 1:15 PM, revealed the name of the Administrator was not included in the information provided to the patient/caregiver. The documentation revealed to call the Administrator and provided the main phone number for the agency. During an interview on 05/28/25 at 1:25 PM, P3 confirmed that there was no information received from the agency other than what was included in the admission packet. During an interview on 05/29/25 at 10:40 AM, the Administrator stated, “The staff are supposed to bring the agency brochure along with my business card attached to it.””

    Rule G0414. Element-level.

  • Oasis Privacy Notice

    The inspectors’ words, 193 words

    “OASIS privacy notice CFR(s): 484.50(a)(1)(iii) (iii) An OASIS privacy notice to all patients for whom the OASIS data is collected. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on document review and staff interview, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to provide the OASIS (Outcome and Assessment Information Set) notice of privacy to eight of eight sampled patients (Patient (P) 1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, and P8) reviewed for admission to the HHA for care and services. The HHA’s failure to inform patient of their right regarding OASIS privacy may violate the patient’s right to information privacy. Findings include: Review of the HHA’s policy titled, OASIS Statement of Patient Privacy Rights, revised 03/19, documented “Prior to furnishing care during initial evaluation visit, each non-maternal patient over the age of 18 will be informed verbally and in writing of their rights concerning OASIS data collection.” During an interview on 05/28/25 at 1:45 PM, the Administrator confirmed the HHA was not providing services to patients under the age of 18 nor maternal health patients. The Administrator also confirmed the HHA failed to provide the OASIS “Statement of Patient Privacy Rights” as required.”

    Rule G0416. Element-level.

  • 5 Calendar Days After Start Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 324 words

    “5 calendar days after start of care CFR(s): 484.55(b)(1) The comprehensive assessment must be completed in a timely manner, consistent with the patient’s immediate needs, but no later than 5 calendar days after the start of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to complete the patient comprehensive admission assessment within five calendar days after the start of care for three of five patients (Patients (P) 1, P4, and P5) reviewed for the completion of records. The failure to complete the Comprehensive Assessment in a timely manner has the potential to delay implementation of an effective plan of care. Findings include: Review of the agency’s policy titled, Initial Assessment/Comprehensive Assessment, dated February 2024, revealed “Completion of the Comprehensive Assessment …The start of care date is the first visit where the Agency actually provides hands on, direct care services or treatment to the patient … Must be completed in a timely manner consistent with the patient’s needs, but no later than 30 calendar days after the start of care.” The policy failed to identify the Comprehensive Assessment must be completed in five calendar days. Review of P1’s Comprehensive Assessment revealed the Start of Care (SOC) date was 04/22/25 and the Comprehensive Assessment was completed on 05/01/25 which was 10 days after the SOC. Review of P4’s Comprehensive Assessment revealed the SOC date was 12/27/24 and the Comprehensive Assessment was completed on 01/06/25 which was 10 days after the SOC. Review of P5’s Comprehensive Assessment revealed the SOC date was 02/20/25 and the Comprehensive Assessment was completed on 03/06/25 which was 14 days after the SOC. During an interview on 05/27/29 at 2:30 PM, the Administrator stated, “We give them until Friday to complete documentation or the following Friday if the visit was on a Friday, but the nurses are late. We have done training and are working on it.””

    Rule G0520. Element-level.

  • Patient Medication Schedule/Instructions

    The inspectors’ words, 280 words

    “Patient medication schedule/instructions CFR(s): 484.60(e)(2) Patient medication schedule/instructions, including: medication name, dosage and frequency and which medications will be administered by HHA personnel and personnel acting on behalf of the HHA. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on document review, interviews, and policy review, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to provide the patient or caregiver with a written schedule of medications. for two of two patients (Patient (P) 1 and P3) reviewed during home visit observations. This failure had the potential to result in medication errors. Findings include: Review of the agency’s policy titled, Patient Admission Criteria, dated February 2024, revealed “Develop a written medication schedule/instruction including: medication name, dosage, route and frequency and which medications will be administered by the agency staff.” 1.Review of documentation included in the home health folder provided to P1 during a home visit observation on 05/27/25 at 12:30 PM, revealed the lack of a medication list including the name of the medication, dosage, and frequency. During an interview on 05/27/25 at 12:50 PM, Family (F) 1 confirmed the lack of a medication list provided by the agency. 2. Review of documentation included in the home health folder provided to P3 during a home visit observation on 05/28/25 at 1:15 PM, revealed the lack of a medication list including the name of the medication, dosage, and frequency. During an interview on 05/28/25 at 1:25 PM, P3 confirmed the lack of a medication list provided by the agency. During an interview on 05/29/25 at 10:40 AM, the Director of Clinical Services (DCS) stated, “The nurse is expected to print the medication list and bring it to the patient at the next visit.””

    Rule G0616. Element-level.

  • If Concern Identified, Direct Observation

    The inspectors’ words, 230 words

    “If concern identified, direct observation CFR(s): 484.80(h)(1)(ii) The supervisory assessment must be completed onsite (that is, an in person visit), or on the rare occasion by using two-way audio-video telecommunications technology that allows for real-time interaction between the registered nurse (or other appropriate skilled professional) and the patient, not to exceed 1 virtual supervisory assessment per patient in a 60-day episode. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to complete an in person on-site home health aide supervisory visit every 14 days for one of two patients (Patient (P) 1) reviewed for home health aide services. This failure had the potential to result in unidentified patient or caregiver concerns or care not being provided as written in the home health aide care plan. Findings include: Review of the agency’s policy titled, Home Health Aide Supervision, dated February 2024, revealed “The Agency will conduct the 14-day supervisory visit during and on-site, in person visit.” Review of P1’s nursing notes indicated the Director of Clinical Services (DCS) documented a home health aide supervisory visit on 05/06/25 and 05/20/25. During an interview on 05/27/25 at 4:00 PM, the DCS stated he/she has “not done in person supervisory visits for this patient” and that he/she called on the phone to inquire about the home health aide care being provided.”

    Rule G0810. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 29, 2025Recertification inspection7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Sep 12, 2006.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 3 owners or officers are people: Mohammed Ahmed (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Mohammed Ahmed (corporate director); Mohammed Ahmed (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate90.06% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate8.01% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.05% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 156 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 89146, where this agency’s office is, 124 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 2.5 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.