Hearth Record

Genesis Home Health Services

A home health agency in Elko, Nevada 89801

2620 Ruby Vista Drive, Elko, Nevada 89801. (775) 753-7626.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 10, 2025: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 10, 2025: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 674 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that two of three staff followed disinfectant wipe directions when cleaning equipment after use on two of two patients during home visits (Patient (P) 2 and P1) from two of three home visits observed. This failure had the potential to affect two of two patients. Findings include: Review of the undated facility document titled, “Infection Control-Standard Precautions” states, “Hand Hygiene will be performed when moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during patient care. Gloves are to be changed between task and procedures on the same patient.” Review of facility document titled, “Hand Hygiene,” revised November 2024, revealed that staff were to use alcohol-based hand rub product to palm of one hand and rub hands together until hands are dry when moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site. During home visit observations of P2 and interview on 04/09/25 beginning at 11:00 AM located in P2’s home, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 removed vital sign monitoring equipment from CNA1’s work bag and placed the equipment on a clean barrier. CNA1 checked P2’s pulse, blood pressure, oxygen level, and temperature placing the equipment back on the same barrier. CNA1 donned (put on) gloves, then undressed P2, and assisted P2 to the shower where CNA1 washed and rinsed P2’s body, cleansing the perianal area last and potentially contaminating the gloves. Without changing the potentially contaminated gloves, CNA1 towel dried P2, rubbed baby oil and lotion on P2’s trunk and limbs, and dressed P2. CNA1 did not change gloves and perform hand hygiene when moving from a potentially contaminated body site to a clean body site. When the surveyor mentioned that CNA did not change gloves after completing P2’s shower, CNA1 replied, “Oh, I missed that. It went right over my head.”” When asked if gloves should have been changed after showering P2, CNA1 verified that the gloves should have been changed but were not changed. Near the end of the visit CNA1 doffed the potentially contaminated gloves, performed hand hygiene, and donned gloves before removing a “Chlorox” wipe container from CNA1’s bag. CNA1 cleaned the thermometer, blood pressure cuff, stethoscope, pulse oximeter, used to take vital signs, wiping each piece of equipment for less than one minute each before placing the equipment back into the bag. The “Chlorox” wipe container instructions indicated “To clean and disinfect allow surface to remain wet 4 minutes.” CNA1 did not keep the used equipment wet for four minutes before placing each piece into the clean bag. When the surveyor pointed out the instructions on the “Chlorox” wipes, CNA1 stated, “I did not keep the equipment wet for 4 minutes.” During home visit observations for P1 and interview on 04/08/25 beginning at 2:00 PM located in P1’s home, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 removed vital sign monitoring equipment from RN1’s bag placing the equipment on a barrier. After checking P1’s pulse, oxygen level, blood pressure, and temperature, RN1 placed the used equipment back on the barrier. RN1 used disinfectant wipes labeled, “CVS [consumer value store] Disinfectant Wipes” to clean each piece of vital sign monitoring equipment, wiping each piece for about one minute. The wipes container’s instructions state to “Allow surface to remain wet for 4 minutes.” After the visit was completed, RN1 verified he/she did not keep the equipment wet for four minutes. During a meeting with the Chief of Clinical Operations (CCO) and the Administrator on 04/09/25, at approximately 4:15 PM, the above issues were discussed. The CCO confirmed that the Home Health Agency (HHA) did not furnish disinfectant wipes to staff to use on home visits but rather staff purchased their own wipes. CCO added that it was the expectation that CNA1 should have changed gloves and disinfected hands after showering P2.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

  • Rn Performs Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 228 words

    “RN performs assessment CFR(s): 484.55(a)(1) A registered nurse must conduct an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of the patient; and, for Medicare patients, to determine eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, including homebound status. The initial assessment visit must be held either within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician or allowed practitioner - ordered start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an initial patient assessment was completed within 48 hours of referral for one of seven sampled patients (Patient (P) 1) reviewed for assessments. This failure resulted in the potential to affect one of one patient. Findings include: Review of P1’s “Initial Admission OASIS [Outcome and Assessment Information Set] Assessment” located in the electronic medical record (EMR) “Referral” tab indicated that P1 had a referral for home health services on 08/30/24. Review of the “OASIS” tab indicated that the initial assessment was completed on 09/04/24. During an interview with the Chief of Clinical Operations (CCO) on 04/10/25 at 3:40 PM, the CCO stated, “Yes we found we had problems with that (delay in completing initial assessments) and are working on a PIP (Performance Improvement Plan) for that. I think we are improving now.””

    Rule G0514. Element-level.

  • Onsite Supervisory Visit Every 14 Days

    The inspectors’ words, 234 words

    “Onsite supervisory visit every 14 days CFR(s): 484.80(h)(1)(i) (1)(i) If home health aide services are provided to a patient who is receiving skilled nursing, physical or occupational therapy, or speech language pathology services— (A) A registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional who is familiar with the patient, the patient’s plan of care, and the written patient care instructions described in paragraph (g) of this section, must complete a supervisory assessment of the aide services being provided no less frequently than every 14 days; and (B) The home health aide does not need to be present during the supervisory assessment described in paragraph (h)(1)(i)(A) of this section. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure supervisory visits were conducted every fourteen days for one of four sampled patients (Patient (P) 2) who received Home Health aide services out of a total of seven patients sampled. This failure had the potential to affect one of one patient. Findings include: Review of P2’s electronic medical record (EMR) “Notes” tab indicated that supervisory visits were conducted 02/12/25, 02/26/25, and 03/13/25. The supervisory visit between 02/26/25 and 03/13/25 was fifteen days. During an interview with the Chief of Clinical Operations (CCO) and the Director of Clinical Services (DCS) on 04/10/25 at 3:40 PM., the DCS stated that the supervisory visit on 03/13/25 was one day late.”

    Rule G0808. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 10, 2025Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jan 17, 2006.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer speech pathology.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 8 owners or officers are people: Querubin Iguban (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Querubin Iguban (corporate officer, 50%); Querubin Iguban (corporate director, 50%); Querubin Iguban (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Celestine Q Hernandez (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Celestine Q Hernandez (corporate officer, 50%); Celestine Q Hernandez (corporate director, 50%); Celestine Q Hernandez (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (73 surveys completed): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 90% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate79.28% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate11.52% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.87% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 89801, where this agency’s office is, 2 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.75 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 2 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 89801
PlaceQuality rating
Genesis Home Health Services This home health agency4.5
New Horizon Home Care, LLC3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.