Hearth Record

Patient Care

A home health agency in West Orange, New Jersey 07052

300 Executive Drive, Suite 010, West Orange, New Jersey 07052. (973) 243-6299.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 23, 2024: a recertification inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Aug 23, 2024: recertification inspection5 deficiencies
  • Encoding And Transmitting Oasis

    The inspectors’ words, 322 words

    “Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to electronically submit completed OASIS assessments to the CMS system within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. Findings include: On 8/22/24 at 11:09 AM, the OASIS report, “HHA [Home Health Agency] Error Summary by Agency Report” was electronically run in the presence of Staff (S) 4 (Executive Director) and was found to have 1,956 records with errors, 3330, “Record Submitted Late: The submission date is more than 30 days after M0090 (Date Assessment Completed) on this new record.” On 8/22/24 at 11:15 AM, an interview with S4 (Executive Director) indicated that they [the facility] is aware and track every late upload from a quality standpoint. On 8/23/24 at 11:09 AM, during an interview with S4 and S1 (Patient Care Manager), S4 stated there are quality reviewers (QR’s) who monitor this and the information is found on the electronic dashboard. Facility Document titled, “Patient Care - W. [West] Orange, NJ Special Project,” provided by S4 outlines the process the facility used to address the significant backlog of OASIS states, “...10/16/23[:] Clean Up Project initiated to address remaining backlog of OASIS assessments...” A line graph [graphical display of information that changes continuously over time], was attached to this document which includes the numerical percentage of “Late Locks” (late uploads) to the left monthly from April 2023-July 2024. Although this graph shows a fluctuating and overall decrease in trend, 8.17% late uploads were recorded in July 2024. S4 stated, “we are aware and take this very seriously.” N.J.A.C. 8.42-3.1(d)”

    Rule G0372. Standard-level.

  • Accessibility

    The inspectors’ words, 670 words

    “Accessibility CFR(s): 484.50(f)(1,2) Standard: Accessibility. Information must be provided to patients in plain language and in a manner that is accessible and timely to- (1) Persons with disabilities, including accessible web sites and the provision of auxiliary aids and services at no cost to the individual in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. (2) Persons with limited English proficiency through the provision of language services at no cost to the individual, including oral interpretation and written translations.Standard: Accessibility Information must be provided to patients in plain language and in a manner that is accessible and timely to- This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, staff interviews, medical record review, and review of facility policy and procedure, it was determined that the facility failed to provide language translation services to a non-English speaking patient according to facility policy in one of four medical records reviewed (Patient (P) 7). Findings inlcude: On 8/22/24 at 10:34 AM, P7’s initial Physical Therapy home visit was observed. During the evaluation, Staff (S) 10, Physical Therapist, communicated with P7 through his/her spouse. In the middle of the visit, at 11:00 AM, S10 asked P7’s spouse what language the patient speaks. S10 was informed that P7 spoke Russian. On 8/22/24 at 11:25 AM, an interview was conducted with S10 after the home visit was completed. S10 reported that all staff have access to interpreter services on their tablets. S10 explained that he/she typically uses family members for translation if they are present during the treatment. According to S10, they usually only need the interpreter services on the tablet if the patient is alone. On 8/23/24 at 11:30 AM, P7’s medical record was reviewed. The admission assessment was completed on 8/20/24 at 2:17 PM. P7’s response to “What is your preferred language?” was “Russian.” P7’s response to “Do you need or want an interpreter to communicate with a doctor or health care staff?” was “Yes.” On 8/23/24 at 11:45 AM, S1, Patient Care Manager, reported that typically family is used to interpret for the patient. According to S1, patients are informed during the admission process that interpreters are available and the facility is usually made aware that an interpreter is needed during the referral process. S1 explained that staff would document use of an interpreter or offering of an interpreter in the narrative section of the clinician’s documentation. On 8/23/24 at 12:20 PM, S1 and S4, Executive Director, explained that the question asked on admission, “Do you need or want an interpreter to communicate with a doctor or health care staff,” does not imply the patient wants to use interpreter services. S1 and S4 stated that a “yes” answer to this question means that the patient just wants someone to interpret for them, and this could be family. S4 was unable to provide evidence in the medical record that P7 was offered interpreter services. The medical record lacked evidence that P7 was offered and/or declined the use of professional interpreter services as per facility policy. Facility Policy titled, “Limited English Proficiency Persons (LEP)” last reviewed on July 1, 2024, stated, “…Procedure: 1. On admission the patient/family/caregiver will be informed that interpreter services including American Sign Language (ASL) are available. If an individual is identified as a LEP person during the admission process, the agency will make formal arrangements with individuals or organizations to obtain the services of a qualified interpreter when needed….5. Family and friends may not be used to interpret or translate unless client/LEP person is made aware of the availability of interpreters at no charge, and then without coercion, chooses family or friends…When it is expressed by the patient that this service is not wanted (including remote interpreter services), the agency will oblige the patient’s request to allow a family member in order to meet patient’s Rights and Responsibilities in accordance with the agency official policies and procedures. Such an offer and the response will be documented in the patient’s medical record.” N.J.A.C. 8:42-13.2(a)5”

    Rule G0490. Standard-level.

  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 393 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, facility policy review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment by ensuring equipment that is used for more than one patient is disinfected between each patient use. On 8/21/24 at 1:42 PM, during a home visit with Patient (P) 2, Staff (S) 3 (Registered Nurse), was observed taking a tablet out of his/her bag and using it to document during the patient’s home visit. At 2:38 PM, at the conclusion of the visit, S3 provided the tablet to P2, and the patient used his/her finger to sign the tablet. S3 then carried the tablet out of the patient’s home. The tablet was not cleaned following contact with the patient. On 8/23/24 at 12:10 PM, S4 (Executive Director), confirmed “the tablet has to be wiped down with a low-level disinfectant after the patient signs.” The facility policy titled, “Cleaning of Re-Usable Equipment” revised date 6/1/22, states, “…Policy: Equipment used for more than one patient is cleaned between each patient use. …Procedure 1. Non-critical items which will come in contact with intact patient skin will undergo a low-level disinfection between each patient use. …” N.J.A.C. 8:42-12.3 (a)4 Findings include: On 8/21/24 at 1:08 PM, Staff (S) 7, an Occupational Therapist (OT) was observed providing care for P4. At 1:29 PM, S7 began taking P4’s vital signs with gloves on. At 1:31 PM, S7 began entering the vital signs into his/her tablet without doffing gloves and performing hand hygiene. At 1:37 PM, S7 began cleaning vital signs equipment (stethoscope, oximeter, blood pressure cuff and sphygmomanometer) with disinfectant wipes but failed to clean the tablet. At 1:41 PM, P4 signed the tablet using his/her finger. At 1:53 PM, the visit was completed and S7 exited P4’s home without cleaning the tablet. When questioned about the tablet, S7 stated that he/she should have cleaned the tablet before leaving P4’s home. On 8/22/24 at 11:05 AM, an interview was conducted with S8, a Physical Therapist (PT). When questioned about tablets, he/she stated that the facility policy is to clean the tablet before leaving the patient’s house once patient care is completed.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

  • Written Notice For Non-Covered Care

    The inspectors’ words, 162 words

    “Written notice for non-covered care CFR(s): 484.50(c)(8) Receive proper written notice, in advance of a specific service being furnished, if the HHA believes that the service may be non-covered care; or in advance of the HHA reducing or terminating on-going care. The HHA must also comply with the requirements of 42 CFR 405.1200 through 405.1204. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one out of five medical records reviewed (Patient (P) 17) received written notice of non-covered care, prior to discharge. Findings include: On 8/23/24, a review of P17’s medical record indicated he/she was discharged from homecare services on 10/31/23. Review of P17’s medical record lacked evidence that he/she received a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC); a notice that indicates when care is set to end from a home health agency. On 8/23/24 at 12:20 PM, Staff (S)4 (Executive Director) confirmed this finding. N.J.A.C. 8.42-3.1(d)”

    Rule G0442. Element-level.

  • Required Items In Clinical Record

    The inspectors’ words, 831 words

    “Required items in clinical record CFR(s): 484.110(a)(1) The patient’s current comprehensive assessment, including all of the assessments from the most recent home health admission, clinical notes, plans of care, and physician or allowed practitioner orders; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy and procedure, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that patient’s medical records are completed within 24 hours, as per facility policy in eight out of 12 medical records reviewed (Patient (P) 1, P5, P8, P9, P13, P14, P16, and P17). Findings include: Patient (P) 1’s medical record was reviewed on 8/22/24 at 12:30 PM, the following was revealed: P1 was admitted to home care services on 7/27/24 for Physical Therapy (PT) for right hip pain. On 8/2/24, P1 was seen in-home by PT at 9:28 AM. The visit note was completed on 8/4/24 at 6:46 PM. On 8/6/24, P1 was seen in-home by PT at 12:00 PM. The visit note was completed on 8/8/24 at 11:04 AM. On 8/8/24, P1 was seen in-home by PT at 11:05 AM. The visit note was completed on 8/11/24 at 7:11 PM. On 8/14/24, P1 was seen in home by PT at 2:14 PM. The visit note was completed on 8/18/24 at 9:14 AM. P5’s medical record was reviewed on 8/22/24 at 12:30 PM, the following was revealed: On 7/2/24, P5 was seen in-home for a Skilled Nurse (SN) visit at 12:58 PM. The visit note was completed on 7/12/24 at 7:15 AM. On 7/9/24, P5 was seen in-home for a SN visit at 3:18 PM. The visit note was completed on 7/11/24 at 11:56 PM. On 7/12/24, P5 was seen in-home for a SN visit at 7:41 AM. The visit note was completed on 7/14/24 at 6:42 PM. P8’s medical record was reviewed on 8/22/24 at 10:30 AM, the following was revealed: P8 was admitted to home care services on 6/6/24 for a left lower leg wound. The benefit period reviewed was 8/5/24 to the date of the survey, 8/23/24. On 8/5/24, P8 was seen in-home for a skilled nursing visit at 10:47 AM. The visit note was completed on 8/7/24 at 2:26 AM. On 8/8/24, P8 was seen in-home for an Occupational Therapy (OT) visit at 2:51 PM. The visit note was completed on 8/12/24 at 6:26 AM. On 8/12/24, P8 was seen in-home for a PT visit at 10:54 AM. The visit note was completed on 8/14/24 at 7:01 AM. On 8/13/24, P8 was seen in-home for an OT visit at 1:16 PM. The visit note was completed on 8/19/24 at 6:40 AM. On 8/22/24 at 3:02 PM, an interview was conducted with Staff (S)4, Executive Director. S4 stated that clinicians are expected to have visit notes documented in the medical record within 24 hours. P9’s medical record was reviewed on 8/22/24 at 2:00 PM, the following was revealed: On 8/16/24, P9 was seen in-home for a SN visit at 3:10 PM. The visit note was completed on 8/18/24 at 12:27 AM. P13’s medical record was reviewed on 8/23/24 at 10:30 AM, the following was revealed. The Client Coordination Note Report stated, “…Note Date 2/27/24 Note Type MISSED VISIT NOTIFICATION…MISSED VISIT ON 01312024…DISCIPLINE SN…”. The Client Coordination Note Report stated, “…Note Date 2/29/2024 Note Type MISSED VISIT NOTIFICATION…MISSED VISIT ON 02092024…DISCIPLINE PT [Physical Therapist] …”. P14’s medical record was reviewed on 8/23/24 at 11:30 AM, the following was revealed: The Client Coordination Note Report stated, “…Note Date 11/21/2023 Note Type MISSED VISIT NOTIFICATION…MISSED VISIT ON 11012023…DISCIPLINE SN…”. P16’s medical record was reviewed on 8/23/24 at 11:50 AM, the following was revealed: The Client Coordination Note Report stated, “…Note Date 1/26/2024 Note Type MISSED VISIT NOTIFICATION…MISSED VISIT ON: 01/03/2024…DISCIPLINE OT [Occupational Therapist] …”. P17’s medical record was reviewed on 8/23/24 at 11:50 AM, the following was revealed: The Client Coordination Note Report stated, “…Note Date 10/30/2023 Note Type MISSED VISIT NOTIFICATION…MISSED VISIT ON: 10/26/2023…DISCIPLINE PT…”. On 8/23/24 at 11:33 AM, the above findings were confirmed with S4, Executive Director. S4 stated, “we want staff to document within 24 hours, that is the expectation.” The facility policy titled, “Coordination of Care, From Admit Through Discharge” revised date 6/1/24, states, “…PROCEDURE: …5. Coordination of care among disciplines: Patient care is coordinated among various disciplines and services through care planning processes to ensure continuity of care from admission to discharge. This includes: …c. Appropriate, timely communication with the patient, caregivers, and staff involved in the patient’s care regarding patient needs, goals, and care as well as changes in these. i. All clinicians will report within 1 business day to the Patient Care Manager or Clinical Director by fax, telephone, in person at the agency, or through coordination notes by synching point of care devices. Report will include: …Missed visits and changes to scheduled visits…d. Completed visit notes will be submitted to the agency via synchronization within 24 hours of visit for point of care agencies. …” N.J.A.C. 8.42-11.2(a)1”

    Rule G1012. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 23, 2024Recertification inspection5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Mar 1, 1978.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Patient Care, Inc. owns 100% directly since Aug 1, 2008.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Wendy Daigle (corporate director, 0%); Wendy Daigle (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer); Vanetta Mitchell (managing employee (on the payroll)); Amy Cormier (corporate director); Amy Cormier (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 22, 2023
Afam Acquisition LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2018
Patient Care, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Aug 1, 2008
LHC Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 1, 2018
Almost Family, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 1, 2008

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (417 surveys completed): 80% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 74% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate89.33% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate9.99% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.88% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 7 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 07052, where this agency’s office is, 7 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 7 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 07052
PlaceQuality rating
Patient Care This home health agency3.5
Barnabas Health Home Care and Hospice3.5
Promise Care NJ4
Bayada Home Health Care, Inc.4
Atlantic Visiting Nurse4.5
Promise Care NJ4.5
Ascend Home Health3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.