Hearth Record

Team Select Home Care

A home health agency in Salem, New Hampshire 03079

12 Stiles Road, Salem, New Hampshire 03079. (603) 893-9214.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Nov 25, 2025: a recertification inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Nov 25, 2025: recertification inspection5 deficiencies
  • Plan Based On All Hazards Risk Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 456 words

    “Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment CFR(s): 484.102(a)(1)-(2) §403.748(a)(1)-(2), §416.54(a)(1)-(2), §418.113(a)(1)-(2), §441.184(a)(1)-(2), §460.84(a)(1)-(2), §482.15(a)(1)-(2), §483.73(a)(1)-(2), §483.475(a)(1)-(2), §484.102(a)(1)-(2), §485.68(a)(1)-(2), §485.542(a)(1)-(2), §485.625(a)(1)-(2), §485.727(a)(1)-(2), §485.920(a)(1)-(2), §486.360(a)(1)-(2), §491.12(a)(1)-(2), §494.62(a)(1)-(2) [(a) Emergency Plan. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following:] (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach.* (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. * [For Hospices at §418.113(a):] Emergency Plan. The Hospice must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment, including the management of the consequences of power failures, natural disasters, and other emergencies that would affect the hospice’s ability to provide care. *[For LTC facilities at §483.73(a):] Emergency Plan. The LTC facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least annually. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach, including missing residents. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. *[For ICF/IIDs at §483.475(a):] Emergency Plan. The ICF/IID must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach, including missing clients. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the facility’s Emergency Preparedness Plan (E.P.P.) and interview, it was determined the facility failed ensure their overall E.P.P. policies and procedures were based on/compared with a review of the official community/regional risk assessment to include un-foreseen potential emergency events. Findings include: Review of the facility’s Emergency Preparedness Plan (E.P.P.) on 11/24/25 between 10:00 a.m. and 1:15 p.m. with Staff A (Administrator) and Staff B (Operations Manager) revealed the E.P.P. was only developed using information gathered by a facility-based risk assessment and failed to include the official community-based risk assessment which could present un-foreseen/unknown hazards likely to occur within specific geographic areas. An all-hazards approach in the development of the facilities E.P.P. failed to be represented. Interview on 11/24/25 between 1:15 p.m. and 1:30 p.m. with Staff A and Staff B confirmed the above findings and available E.P.P. documentation presented during the Survey process.”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • Local, State, Tribal Collaboration Process

    The inspectors’ words, 300 words

    “Local, State, Tribal Collaboration Process CFR(s): 484.102(a)(4) §403.748(a)(4), §416.54(a)(4), §418.113(a)(4), §441.184(a)(4), §460.84(a)(4), §482.15(a)(4), §483.73(a)(4), §483.475(a)(4), §484.102(a)(4), §485.68(a)(4), §485.542(a)(4), §485.625(a)(4), §485.727(a)(5), §485.920(a)(4), §486.360(a)(4), §491.12(a)(4), §494.62(a)(4) [(a) Emergency Plan. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. The plan must do the following:] (4) Include a process for cooperation and collaboration with local, tribal, regional, State, and Federal emergency preparedness officials’ efforts to maintain an integrated response during a disaster or emergency situation. * * [For ESRD facilities only at §494.62(a)(4)]: (4) Include a process for cooperation and collaboration with local, tribal, regional, State, and Federal emergency preparedness officials’ efforts to maintain an integrated response during a disaster or emergency situation. The dialysis facility must contact the local emergency preparedness agency at least annually to confirm that the agency is aware of the dialysis facility’s needs in the event of an emergency. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the Emergency Preparedness Plan (E.P.P.) and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the E.P.P. was developed with cooperation, collaboration, or input with/from any emergency management officials familiar with the geographic/regional locations or efforts to maintain an integrated response during an emergency situation. Findings include: Review of the E.P.P. that was presented during the survey on 11/24/25 between 10:00 a.m. and 1:15 p.m. with Staff A (Administrator) and Staff B (Operations Manager) revealed the facility failed to provide any documentation of efforts to contact, cooperate, or collaborate with local, tribal, regional, State, or Federal emergency management officials in E.P.P. planning efforts. Interview on 11/24/25 between 1:15 p.m. and 1:30 p.m. with Staff A and Staff B revealed they were not aware of this requirement or whom to contact.”

    Rule E0009. Standard-level.

  • Homebound Hha/Hospice Inform Ep Officials

    The inspectors’ words, 276 words

    “Homebound HHA/Hospice Inform EP Officials CFR(s): 484.102(b)(2) §418.113(b)(2), §460.84(b)(4), §484.102(b)(2) [(b) Policies and procedures. The [facilities] must develop and implement emergency preparedness policies and procedures, based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The policies and procedures must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. At a minimum, the policies and procedures must address the following:] *[For homebound Hospice at §418.113(b)(2), PACE at §460.84(b)(4), and HHAs at §484.102(b)(2):] The procedures to inform State and local emergency preparedness officials about [homebound Hospice, PACE or HHA] patients in need of evacuation from their residences at any time due to an emergency situation based on the patient’s medical and psychiatric condition and home environment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the Emergency Preparedness Plan (E.P.P.) and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that policies and procedures were developed to inform emergency officials of clients in need of emergency evacuation or assistance. Findings include: Review of the Emergency Preparedness Plan (E.P.P. between 10:00 a.m. and 1:15 p.m. with Staff A (Administrator) and Staff B (Operations Manager) revealed the facility failed to develop policies or procedure to inform emergency officials in the event of an emergency situation in which their client is in need of evacuation assistance due to their current medical issues/needs and capacity during an event. Interview on 11/24/25 between 1:15 p.m. and 1:30 p.m. with Staff A and Staff B confirmed they were not aware of this requirement and had not developed specific policies.”

    Rule E0019. Standard-level.

  • Hha- Procedures For Follow Up Staff/Pts.

    The inspectors’ words, 306 words

    “HHA- Procedures for Follow up Staff/Pts. CFR(s): 484.102(b)(3) §484.102(b)(3) Condition of Participation: [(b) Policies and procedures. The HHA must develop and implement emergency preparedness policies and procedures, based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The policies and procedures must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. At a minimum, the policies and procedures must address the following:] (3) The procedures to follow up with on-duty staff and patients to determine services that are needed, in the event that there is an interruption in services during or due to an emergency. The HHA must inform State and local officials of any on-duty staff or patients that they are unable to contact. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the Emergency Preparedness Plan (E.P.P.) and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that agreements with other health care providers are arranged to ensure continuity of care for clients in the event the facility has an un-foreseen emergency/disaster event that prevents care being provided. Findings include: Review of the Emergency Preparedness Plan (E.P.P. during survey on 11/24/25 between 10:00 a.m. and 1:15 p.m. with Staff A (Administrator) and Staff B (Operations Manager) revealed the facility failed to have agreements to outline transfers of the client for continuity of care, such as a hospital, nursing home, or like services’ provider as well as policies to follow up with clients during an emergency/disaster event beyond the facilities control or when the facility is not able to provide necessary care under their control. Interview on 11/24/25 between 1:15 p.m. and 1:30 p.m. with Staff A and Staff B confirmed the above findings and were unaware of the requirement.”

    Rule E0021. Standard-level.

  • Emergency Officials Contact Information

    The inspectors’ words, 353 words

    “Emergency Officials Contact Information CFR(s): 484.102(c)(2) §403.748(c)(2), §416.54(c)(2), §418.113(c)(2), §441.184(c)(2), §460.84(c)(2), §482.15(c)(2), §483.73(c)(2), §483.475(c)(2), §484.102(c)(2), §485.68(c)(2), §485.542(c)(2), §485.625(c)(2), §485.727(c)(2), §485.920(c)(2), §486.360(c)(2), §491.12(c)(2), §494.62(c)(2). [(c) The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness communication plan that complies with Federal, State and local laws and must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. The communication plan must include all of the following: (2) Contact information for the following: (i) Federal, State, tribal, regional, and local emergency preparedness staff. (ii) Other sources of assistance. *[For LTC Facilities at §483.73(c):] (2) Contact information for the following: (i) Federal, State, tribal, regional, and local emergency preparedness staff. (ii) The State Licensing and Certification Agency. (iii) The Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. (iv) Other sources of assistance. *[For ICF/IIDs at §483.475(c):] (2) Contact information for the following: (i) Federal, State, tribal, regional, and local emergency preparedness staff. (ii) Other sources of assistance. (iii) The State Licensing and Certification Agency. (iv) The State Protection and Advocacy Agency. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the Emergency Preparedness Plan (E.P.P.) and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the E.P.P. emergency contact information list included all the required local, Regional, State, and/or Federal emergency management officials. Findings include: Review of the E.P.P. that was presented during the survey on 11/24/25 between 10:00 a.m. and 1:15 p.m. with Staff A (Administrator) and Staff B (Operations Manager) revealed the facility failed to provide complete documented emergency contact information for some of the required agencies, such as New Hampshire DHHS Licensing and Certification Units, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Homeland Security (HS), and the Hillsborough County Emergency Management (where the main office is located). Additional contact information may be relevant to certain emergency conditions. Interview on 11/24/25 between 1:15 p.m. and 1:30 p.m. with Staff A and Staff B revealed they had included some contact information for the local Police Department (PD), Fire Department (FD), and the town Emergency Management representative but were not aware of the additional contact requirements.”

    Rule E0031. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 25, 2025Recertification inspection5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Feb 27, 2014.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Team Select Holdings LLC owns 100% directly since Nov 5, 2021.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Mike Lovell (owns 5% or more through other companies, 12.35%); Mike Lovell (corporate officer); Susan Valocchi (corporate officer); Tania Philbrook (managing employee (on the payroll)); Fred W Johnson (corporate officer); Mark Kuleck (corporate officer).
  • A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Team Select Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Nov 5, 2021
Ts Investors LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 5, 2021
Csc Ts Parent LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%May 4, 2023
Ts Holdco Parent LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 5, 2021
Csc Ts Acquisition LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%May 4, 2023
Csc Ts Intermediate LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%May 4, 2023
Csc TS Holdings LPOwns 5% or more through other companies66.79%May 4, 2023
JCML Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies14.48%Nov 5, 2021
Csc Ts Management LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies11.49%May 4, 2023
Ts Tcm Investors, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies7.24%Nov 5, 2021

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no : “The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.”
  • CMS gives no : “Zero, or very few, patients met the survey’s rules for inclusion.”
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half starsNot rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • CMS gives this agency no quality of patient care rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.