Hearth Record

Angels Care Progressive Home Health

A home health agency in Grand Island, Nebraska 68801

3032 W Stolley Park Rd, Grand Island, Nebraska 68801. (308) 589-0170.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 30, 2024: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 30, 2024: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 552 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, policy and procedure review, observation of provision of care, and staff interview, 1 of 5 staff (Staff E) observed during the provision of cares to 1 of 5 patients, (Patient 3), failed to follow the agency’s policy and procedure for proper hand hygiene and bag technique. The total sample size was 13. The census was 200. Findings are: A. Review of the agency’s policy and procedure titled Infection Control, Policy Number CC.015, revised August 2022, revealed all employees are to be educated regarding policies and procedures related to infection control program and standard precautions, including hand hygiene, upon hire and annually. The policy did not include when hand hygiene should be performed. B. Review of the agency’s Hand Hygiene procedure, from Medbridge Clinical Procedure Manual, revealed steps to perform hand hygiene by using soap and water or hand sanitizer. The procedure did not include when hand hygiene should be performed. C. Review of agency’s Bag Technique procedure, from Medbridge Clinical Procedure Manual, revealed: 1. The bag is to be placed on a nonpermeable barrier. 2. Equipment needed for the appointment is to be placed on a clean section of the barrier. After use, equipment is to be placed on the dirty side of the barrier. 3. Hands are to be sanitized and clean gloves are to be put on prior to cleaning the equipment with alcohol wipe. Cleaned equipment is to be placed on the clean section of the barrier. 4. Gloves are to be removed, hands are to be sanitized prior to placing clean equipment back into bag. D. A Case Conference Education, on proper bag technique and review of employee handwashing competency checklist, was conducted with the agency staff by the Director of Nursing on 12/7/23. This education included keeping the supply bag off of the floor. Staff E was not included in this education. E. Review of Patient 3’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care (POC) for the certification period 3/29/24 through 5/27/24, included orders for Physical Therapy (PT) 2 times weekly for 4 weeks, to provide therapeutic exercises, establish a home exercise program, gait training, stretching/flexibility, safety training, and balance. F. During the observation of the provision of care to Patient 3, on 5/23/24 at 2:30 PM, Staff E failed to: 1. Sanitize hands when entering the home. 2. Place the supply bag on a barrier. 3. Keep the supply bag off of the floor. 4. Sanitize hands prior to entering the supply bag to get equipment used during visit. 5. Place equipment needed on a clean section of the barrier. 6. Placed equipment used during the visit on a dirty section of the barrier. 7. Sanitize hands prior to cleaning equipment and prior to placing equipment back into the supply bag. 8. Perform proper hand hygiene prior to leaving the home. G. During an interview on 5/30/24 at 12:30 PM, the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that Staff E failed to follow the agency’s policy and procedures for hand hygiene and bag technique during the provision of cares to Patient 3.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 1,194 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the agency failed to ensure that medication orders were included, accurate, and updated on the patient’s medication profile (a real-time document used by the agency that lists the patient’s medications, including new and updated orders) and on the physician’s approved plan of care, on admission and when there was a change in orders, for 3 of 13 records reviewed (Patients 1, 9 and 11). The census was 200. Findings are: A. Review of the agency’s policy and procedure titled Medication Profile/ Drug Regimen Review, Policy Number CC.020, revised February 2022, revealed: 1. On admission, the admitting nurse was to initiate a medication profile to document the current medication regimen of the patient. 2. The drug regimen review was to include all of the patient’s prescription and over-the-counter medications. 3. During the drug regimen review, any discrepancies in medications, including medications in the home that were different than what was on the medication listing that was received at the time of the referral, was to be reported to the provider to obtain resolution. Documentation was to be included in the medical record. 4. Medication reviews were to occur during each comprehensive assessment, or as any new medications were added during the episode of care, but at least every 60 days. 5. The medication profile was to be current and updated as changes occur with the patient’s medication regimen. 6. Review of medication changes were to be documented in the visit note and communicated with the clinical supervisor or any other clinicians involved in the patient’s care. B. Review of Patient 1’s clinical record revealed: 1. The Home Health Certification and Plan of Care (POC) for the certification periods of 3/12/24 through 5/10/24 and 5/11/24 through 7/9/24, included orders for Santyl (an ointment used to remove damaged tissue from wounds) 250 units/gram, apply a nickel thick layer topically to wound bed once daily with each dressing change. The POC did not specify which wound to apply the Santyl ointment. 2. The patient’s medication profile, printed on 5/22/24, included Santyl 250 units/gram, apply a nickel thick layer topically to the wound bed once daily with each dressing change. The orders did not specify which wound to apply the Santyl ointment. 3. New orders, dated 3/20/24, from Mary Lanning Healthcare Wound Center, revealed: a. Apply Aquacel AG (A dressing impregnated with silver, that adsorbs wound fluid), cover with a border foam dressing and apply a dry gauze or ABD (a thick gauze dressing that absorbs fluids from wounds), and secure with tape, to left medial buttock wound. Change dressing daily and as needed of soiled. b. Wound Vac (A vacuum-assisted sealed wound care system, with an electronically controlled pump and a foam dressing that drains fluid from a wound), to right hip wound, to be changed 3 times weekly. 4. The agency failed follow up with the provider to get orders to discontinue Santyl after 3/20/24, and discontinue on the medication profile. C. Review of Patient 9’s record revealed: 1. The Transition Orders and Information for the Continuation of Patient Care from the discharging facility, Mary Lanning Healthcare, to the agency, dated 5/3/24, included orders for the patient to start: a. Quetiapine (a medication to help regulate mood, behavior and thoughts), 25 milligrams (mg), by mouth, at bedtime as needed for agitation or insomnia, b. Furosemide (a medication to treat fluid retention) 20 mg by mouth every morning. c. Vitamin D3 (a vitamin supplement that helps prevent bone weakness), 125 micrograms (mcg), by mouth, 3 times a week, on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday mornings. 2. The POC for the Certification period of 5/4/24 through 7/2/24, and the patient’s medication profile, printed on 5/22/24, revealed: a. Quetiapine 25 mg by mouth at bedtime as needed for agitation or insomnia was not on the POC or the medication profile. b. The POC and the medication profile listed furosemide as 40 mg instead of 20 mg by mouth daily. c. The POC and the medication profile listed Vitamin D3 125 mcg as 1 tablet by mouth, 3 times daily instead of 3 times weekly on Monday, Wednesday and Fridays. D. Review of Patient 11’s record, revealed: 1. The discharge orders from Mary Lanning Healthcare transfer information to the agency, dated 1/1/24, included orders to start: a. Bacitracin Zinc Ointment (an antibiotic ointment to help prevent wound infection), topically to left leg wound daily. b. Pantoprazole (a medication to treat gastric reflux), 40 mg by mouth daily with breakfast. c. Povidone-iodine (an antiseptic used for skin disinfection) 10 % (percent) swabs, topically to 5th toe, daily. d. Sucralfate (an antacid used to treat and prevent intestinal ulcers) suspension, 10 milliliters (1,000 mg total) by mouth 4 times daily before meals and at bedtime. e. Aquaphor ointment (used to soothe skin irritation) 41% topically, daily to lower legs. 2. The POC for the Certification period of 1/2/24 through 3/1/24 and 3/2/24 through 4/30/24, and the patient’s medication profile, printed on 5/22/24, revealed: a. New orders from Mary Lanning Healthcare transfer summary to the agency, dated 1/1/24, for bacitracin zinc ointment, pantoprazole, povidone-iodine, sucralfate suspension, and Aquaphor ointment, were not listed on the medication profile or the POC. b. Amlodipine (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) 5 mg, by mouth, daily, was listed on the medication profile and the POC, but was not included on orders from Mary Lanning Healthcare transfer summary to the agency. c. Furosemide 40 mg, by mouth, 2 times daily, was listed on the medication profile and the POC, but was not included on orders from Mary Lanning Healthcare transfer summary to the agency. d. Lisinopril (A medication used to treat high blood pressure and heart failure) 40 mg, by mouth, daily, was listed on the medication profile and the POC but was not included on orders from Mary Lanning Healthcare transfer summary to the agency. e. Prednisone (a medication used to treat inflammation) 10 mg, by mouth, 2 times daily, was listed on the medication profile and the POC but was not included on orders from Mary Lanning Healthcare transfer summary to the agency. 3. The agency failed to communicate with the provider, and document in the medical record, regarding discrepancies in medications in the home that were different than what was on the medication listing that was received from Mary Lanning Healthcare, to obtain resolution. E. During an interview on 5/30/24, at 12:30 PM, the Administrator and the Director of Nursing confirmed the agency failed to follow the agency’s policy and procedure to ensure medication orders were included, accurate, and updated on the medication profile and on the POC when there was a change in orders, and failed to communicate with the provider, and document in the medical record, when medication discrepancies were noted for Patients 1, 9, and 11.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 30, 2024Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 5, 2012.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Acsk Home Care, Inc. owns 100% directly since Nov 4, 2020.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Angela W Eddins (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Mark A Eddins (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Michael Heath Beaty (corporate officer); Evan Uden (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Kimberly Grabenstein (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Angela W Eddins (corporate officer); Angela W Eddins (corporate director); Mark A Eddins (corporate officer); Mark A Eddins (corporate director); Cindy M Godfrey (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Acsk Home Care, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Nov 4, 2020

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (218 surveys completed): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, worse; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate82.79% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate13.51% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.72% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 6 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 68801, where this agency’s office is, 5 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4.5 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 6 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 68801
PlaceQuality rating
Angels Care Progressive Home Health This home health agency4
Chi Health at Home - Grand Island4.5
Pediatric Home ServiceNot given
Eventide Home Health Care4.5
Brookestone Home Health & Hospice3
Good Samaritan Society Home Health5

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.