Hearth Record

Brookestone Home Health & Hospice

A home health agency in Gering, Nebraska 69341

1335 M St., Ste. 101, Gering, Nebraska 69341. (308) 630-1430.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 5, 2024: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 5, 2024: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 556 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the agency failed to include on the patient’s individualized Plan of Care, all the requirements specified by this regulation for 4 of 10 patient records reviewed (Patients 3, 4, 6, and 7). The total sample size was 10. The census was 158. Findings are: A. Review of the agency’s policy and procedure, titled 7.15, Plan of Care / Physician Orders, revised 12/11/17, revealed: 1. The policy included a list of requirements to include on the Plan of Care, including, but not limited to, the patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status, supplies needed for services, and measurable outcome and goals as identified by the agency and the patient. B. Review of Patient 3’s clinical record revealed: 1. Home Health Certification and Plan of Care (POC) for the certification period of 12/30/23 through 2/27/24, included orders for Skilled Nurse (SN), Physical Therapy (PT), Occupational Therapy (OT), and Home Health Aide (HHA) services. 2. The POC did not include measurable outcomes and goals as identified by the home health agency and the patient, for the SN, PT and HHA services. C. Review of Patient 4’s clinical record revealed: 1. POC for the certification periods of 11/23/23 through 1/21/24 and 1/22/24 through 3/21/24, included orders for SN. 2. The POC’s did not include measurable outcomes and goals as identified by the home health agency and the patient for the SN services. D. Review of Patient 6’s clinical record revealed: 1. POC for the certification period of 12/29/23 through 2/26/24, included orders for SN and HHA services. 2. The POC did not include measurable outcomes and goals as identified by the home health agency and the patient, on the POC for the SN and HHA services. 3. The POC did not include the patient’s mental, psychosocial, cognitive status, and supplies needed for services. E. Review of Patient 7’s clinical record revealed: 1. POC for the certification period of 1/20/24 through 3/19/24, included orders for SN, OT, and HHA services. 2. The POC did not include measurable outcomes and goals as identified by the home health agency and the patient for the SN, OT, and HHA services. F. During an interview on 2/5/24 at 9:45 AM, the Administrator confirmed that the agency failed to include on the patient’s individualized POC, all the requirements specified by this regulation for Patients 3, 4, 6, and 7.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • Revised Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 474 words

    “Revised plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(c)(2) A revised plan of care must reflect current information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment, and contain information concerning the patient’s progress toward the measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and patient in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the agency failed to include patient’s progress towards the measurable outcomes and goals identified by the home health agency and the patient, for 6 of 6 patients (Patients 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7) who had revised/updated Plan of Care. The total sample size was 10. The census was 158. Findings are: A. Review of the agency’s policy and procedure, titled 7.15 Plan of Care/Physician Orders, revised 12/11/17, revealed: 1. The policy did not require the revised/updated Plan of Care to include information regarding the patient’s progress towards the measurable outcomes and goals as identified by the home health agency and the patient. B. Review of clinical records revealed: 1. Patient 1’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care (POC) for the certification period of 12/13/23 through 2/10/24, did not include the patient’s progress towards the measurable outcomes and goals as identified by the home health agency and the patient. 2. Patient 2’s POC for the certification periods of 12/1/23 through 1/29/24 and 1/30/24 through 3/29/24, did not include the patient’s progress towards the measurable outcomes and goals as identified by the home health agency and the patient. 3. Patient 3’s POC for the certification periods of 12/30/23 through 2/7/24, did not include the patient’s progress towards the measurable outcomes and goals identified by the home health agency and the patient. 4. Patient 4’s POC for the certification periods 11/23/23 through 1/21/24 and 1/22/24 through 3/21/24, did not include the patient’s progress towards the measurable outcomes and goals as identified by the home health agency and the patient. 5. Patient 6’s POC for the certification period 12/29/23 through 2/26/24, did not include the patient’s progress towards the measurable outcomes and goals as identified by the home health agency and the patient. 6. Patient 7’s POC for the certification period 1/20/24 through 3/19/24, did not include the patient’s progress towards the measurable outcomes and goals as identified by the home health agency and the patient. C. During an interview on 2/5/24 at 9:45 AM, the Administrator confirmed that the progress towards the measurable outcomes and goals as identified by the home health agency and the patient were not included on the POC for Patients 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7, and the policy titled 7.15 Plan of Care/Physician Orders, revised 12/11/17, did not include the requirement to include information regarding the patient’s progress towards the measurable outcomes and goals as identified by the home health on the revised/updated POC.”

    Rule G0592. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 5, 2024Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer speech pathology.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Vetter Senior Living owns 100% directly since Sep 19, 2023.
  • Vetter Senior Living and Vsl Vetter Health Services LLC run it.
  • 16 owners or officers are people: Glenn A Vanekeren (managing employee (under contract)); Glenn A Vanekeren (corporate officer); Glenn A Vanekeren (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Jack D Vetter (managing employee (under contract)); Jack D Vetter (corporate officer); Jack D Vetter (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Brian W Stuhr (managing employee (under contract)); Brian W Stuhr (corporate officer); Brian W Stuhr (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Tyson A Gould (managing employee (under contract)); Tyson A Gould (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Eldora D Vetter (managing employee (under contract)); Eldora D Vetter (corporate officer); Eldora D Vetter (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Robert J Lally (managing employee (under contract)); Robert J Lally (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Vetter Senior LivingOwns 5% or more directly100%Sep 19, 2023
Vetter Senior LivingRuns it (operational or managerial control)Sep 19, 2023
Vsl Vetter Health Services LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)Sep 19, 2023

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (139 surveys completed): 94% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 91% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate78.22% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate11.35% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.25% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 69341, where this agency’s office is, 2 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 2.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 2 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 69341
PlaceQuality rating
Brookestone Home Health & Hospice This home health agency3.5
Morrill County Comm. Hosp. Home Health Agency1.5

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.