Hearth Record

Amedisys Home Health

A home health agency in Snow Hill, North Carolina 28580

369 Hwy 13 S Unit C, Snow Hill, North Carolina 28580. (910) 332-2346.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 9, 2025: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 9, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Responsibilities Of Skilled Professionals

    The inspectors’ words, 433 words

    “Responsibilities of skilled professionals CFR(s): 484.75(b) Standard: Responsibilities of skilled professionals. Skilled professionals must assume responsibility for, but not be restricted to, the following: This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the skilled nurse failed to perform wound care as ordered for 1 of 1 patient with a wound. (patient #1) Findings included: A policy, The Provision of Wound and Skin Care (revised 02/26/2025) received on 06/09/2025 at 3:35 PM stated, “Wound care orders are in effect until documentation supports wound care is no longer needed or an order is received to change the wound care or discontinue it.” Patient #1 was admitted on 09/25/2024 with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus with other skin complications. The plan of care for 09/25/2024-11/23/2024 included orders for skilled nurse [SN] visits 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 7 weeks with 2 PRN (as needed) and “RUE [right upper extremity] hand registered nurse/licensed practical to perform/teach incision care … irrigate/cleanse with NSAPPLY [sic, normal saline apply] MEDIHONEY [for debridement, removal of dead tissue] to wound bedmay [sic] apply skin barrier to periwound [tissue surrounding the wound] PRN to prevent maceration… change every other day and ORN [sic, PRN], SN to change 2 week, CG [caregiver] changes on non SNV [skilled nurse visit] days.” A review of the clinical record revealed the following discrepancies: On 10/04/2025 licensed practical nurse (LPN) #3 documented that wound care was completed as ordered and “No Medihoney in the home.” During an interview conducted on 06/09/2025 at 2:35 PM LPN #3 stated, “I remember that there was a point when there was no Medihoney in the home… I don’t remember what I did.” On 10/14/2025 LPN #3 documented, “Betadine [used for disinfection] completed” and that the wound care was completed as ordered.” Further review revealed that there was no order for betadine. During an interview conducted on 06/09/2025 at 2:40 PM LPN #3 stated, “I don’t remember why I put betadine.” On 10/18/2025 LPN #3 documented, “No debridement” and that wound care was completed as ordered. During an interview conducted on 06/09/2025 at 2:42 PM LPN #3 stated, “I don’t know why I put no debridement, maybe it was accidental.” During an interview conducted on 06/09/2025 at 3:58 PM the agency director stated, the expectation is for the nurses to “Follow the company’s policy on completing documentation… complete thorough wound care documentation. We can’t make those decisions [wound care changes] on our own. They should contact the doctor, document, and put the order in.””

    Rule G0704. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Registered Nurse

    The inspectors’ words, 359 words

    “Registered Nurse CFR(s): 484.115(k) Standard: Registered nurse. A graduate of an approved school of professional nursing who is licensed in the state where practicing. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review, personnel record review, and staff interviews, the agency permitted an LPN (licensed practical nurse) to include RN (registered nurse) in her title when signing documents for 1 of 2 licensed practical nurses. (LPN #4) Findings included: Patient #2 was admitted on 03/26/2024 with a diagnosis of Pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 2 (wound with participial thickness skin loss at the base of the spine). The plan of care for 03/26/2024-05/24/2024 included orders for skilled nurse (SN) visits 1 time a week for 2 weeks, 1 every other week for 2 weeks, and 1 time a week for 5 weeks. A review of the clinical record revealed that 5 of 5 SN visits conducted by LPN #4 included RN (registered nurse) on the signature. A review of LPN #4’s personnel record revealed that LPN #4 was not licensed as a registered nurse. LPN #4 was not available for an interview. An interview conducted on 06/09/2025 at 4:02 PM with the agency director revealed that LPN #4 did not have a registered nurse license and the expectation is for the lsignature to be correct. The agency director stated, “In December 2023, someone added the RN [registered nurse]. We do not do that here in the care center.” In a statement received on 06/09/2025 at 5:26 PM the Director, Talent, Operations & Compliance stated, “The process for license renewals requires the Office Manager so [sic] submit documentation (point source verification from the website) of the renewed license via license renewal form via Microsoft Forms. It appears the Office Manager initially submitted the RN license (which was updated in PeopleSoft by the Compliance Specialist). It appears the Office Manager submitted the LPN license three days later (which was also updated in PeopleSoft by the Compliance Specialist). The process is that the Compliance Specialist validates the license(s) submitted prior to updating in PeopleSoft. This will be addressed with both the Office Manager and the Compliance Specialist.””

    Rule G1072. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 9, 2025Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Oct 12, 2013.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Amedisys Holding LLC owns 100% directly since Apr 1, 2022.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Bridget R Kaigler (managing employee (on the payroll)); Bridget R Kaigler (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer); Kristina J Braud (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kristina J Braud (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Jeanne Shingleton (corporate officer); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer); Sherry M Hedrick (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 14, 2025
Amedisys Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 1, 2022
Amedisys Holding LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Apr 1, 2022

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (132 surveys completed): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 78% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate88.42% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate11.58% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.67% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 6 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 28580, where this agency’s office is, 6 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.75 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 6 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 28580
PlaceQuality rating
Amedisys Home Health This home health agency4
Centerwell Home Health4.5
3hc3
Centerwell Home Health4.5
Vidant Home Health and Hospice3.5
Bayada Home Health Care Inc.3.5

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.