Albemarle Home Care and Hospice
A home health agency in Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909
1129 Horseshoe Road, Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909. (252) 338-4066.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 3.5of 5 quality of patient care rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Apr 30, 2025: a recertification inspection.
4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Apr 30, 2025: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
-
Infection Prevention
The inspectors’ words, 867 words
“Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency policy, observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the agency failed to include contact precautions in the plan of care for 1 of 1 patient requiring contact precautions (patient # 4) and failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes for 1 of 2 registered nurse home visits (patient #10). Findings included: A policy, Exposure Control Plan (revised 05/2024) received on 04/29/2025 at 3:53 pm from the clinical manager stated, “Preventing and controlling occupational exposures is a shared responsibility of [Agency Name] and all employees…The following controls will be utilized at all [Agency Name] facilities…After removal of personal protective gloves, employees shall perform proper hand hygiene on hands and any other potentially contaminated skin area immediately or as soon as feasible with soap and water and or alcohol based hand rub/cleanser.” A policy, Infection Control Program (revised 06/2024) received on 04/29/2025 at 3:11 pm from the clinical manager stated, “[Agency Name] has established a comprehensive Infection Control Program to…improve patient outcomes by identifying and reducing the risk of infection in patients and [Agency Name] staff…[Agency Name] follows 6 core practices, identified by the CDC…hand hygiene…appropriate use of personal protective equipment”. A policy, Infection Control (revised 10/2024) received on 4/30/2025 at 10:14 am from the clinical manager stated, “To monitor and control the risk of healthcare associated infections throughout the patient population and staff by utilizing the following…hand hygiene before and after direct contact with the patient…before and after use of gloves…after handling potentially contaminated items…between different tasks or procedures on the same patient”. Patient #10 had an admission date of 4/17/2025 with a diagnosis of Vascular dementia with psychotic disturbances (a decline in cognitive function due to impaired blood flow to the brain affecting how a person perceives their environment and interacts with others) and Pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 2 (partial thickness skin loss on the tail bone due to pressure). The plan of care for 4/17/2025 – 6/15/2025 included orders for skilled nurse (SN) visits 1 time a week for 9 weeks with 3 PRN (as needed) and “Clean wound with wound cleaner. Apply zinc oxide ointment daily and prn”. During a joint visit on 4/29/2025 at approximately 11:30 am with RN #14, it was observed that RN#14 did not perform hand hygiene after removing gloves soiled with feces and before putting on clean gloves to perform wound care. During a phone interview conducted on 04/30/2025 at approximately 2:05 pm, RN #14 stated, “If you say so I guess I didn’t clean my hands after removing gloves. Honestly, I do not normally wash my hands with glove changes.” During an interview conducted on 04/30/2025 at approximately 2:30 pm, the agency director stated, “she should have cleaned her hands” and agreed that hand hygiene between glove changes is the expectation of the agency. A policy, Nursing Standards (revised 10/2024) received on 04/30/2025 at 1:10 PM from the clinical manager stated, “The Home Health Nurse will develop a plan of nursing care… Implementation of nursing activities will include: … Implementation of nursing interventions and medical orders.” A policy, Procedures (revised 04/2024) received on 04/30/2025 at 12:45 PM from the clinical manager stated, “Table 31-1 Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)… Transmitted via direct and indirect contact… Prevention… Use of gloves and gowns for patient contact...” A policy, Infection Control Program (revised 06/2024) received on 04/29/2025 at 3:11 PM from the clinical manager stated, “[Agency Name] has established a comprehensive Infection Control Program to…. To reduce the risk of acquired and transmitted infections… [Agency Name] incorporates the following in a continuing cycle… Selection and implementation of best practices to minimize adverse outcomes.” Patient #4 was admitted on 10/01/2024 with a diagnosis of Cellulitis (bacterial skin infection) of the right lower limb. The plan of care for 03/30/2025-05/28/2025 included orders for skilled nurse (SN) visits 2 times a week for 8 weeks with 4 PRN (as needed), “Clean wound to right heel with normal saline, mupirocin 2% ointment [topical antibiotic] to cover wound with gauze wrap with kerlix [gauze bandage roll] secure with tape.” And “SN to do wound care to right heel 2 times a week…” Review of the clinical record revealed that on 03/31/2025 licensed practical nurse (LPN) #13 documented, “MRSA [Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus requiring contact precautions] positive due to lesions on arms and legs.” Further review revealed that there was no documentation in the plan of care for contact precautions.During an interview conducted on 04/30/2025 at approximately 2:30 PM LPN #13 stated, “We received a culture [of the wound as MRSA positive]. Yes, I would expect to see that [contact precautions] in the care plan. Well, I guess I would look at the policy and procedure. We would contact the doctor and get an order [for contact precautions] and add it to the plan of care.” During an interview conducted on 04/30/2025 at 2:37 PM the agency director stated, “They should have called the doctor and put an order in for contact precautions.””
-
Responsibilities Of Skilled Professionals
The inspectors’ words, 290 words
“Responsibilities of skilled professionals CFR(s): 484.75(b) Standard: Responsibilities of skilled professionals. Skilled professionals must assume responsibility for, but not be restricted to, the following: This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the agency failed to obtain and document weekly wound measurements for 1 of 6 patients with wounds. (patient #14) Findings included: A policy Wound Care Standards (revised 08/2024) received on 04/29/2025 at 2:26 PM from the agency director stated, “Any patient with an open wound will have the sites measured weekly.” Patient #14 was admitted on 01/30/2025 with a diagnosis of cutaneous abscess of left lower limb (skin infection left lower leg). The plan of care for 03/31/2025-05/29/2025 included orders for skilled nurse (SN) visits 3 times a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 2 weeks, 1 time a week for 6 weeks, and “SN to clean with normal saline insert iodoform to open wounds, cover with foam dressing. SN to do dressing change 3 times weekly and PRN.” Review of the documentation for the SN home visit on 03/31/2025 revealed that LPN (licensed practical nurse) #10 documented “N/A [not applicable]” for wound measurements. Review of the documentation for the registered nurse (RN) visit on 04/02/2025 revealed that RN #15 documented, “Size: Not Applicable.” Review of the documentation for the SN visit on 04/04/2025 revealed that LPN #4 documented, “Size: Not Applicable”. An interview conducted on 04/29/2025 at 2:05 PM with the Director of Professional Services (DOPS) revealed that the wounds were not measured during the week of 03/30/25. During an interview on 04/29/25 at 2:14 PM the DOPS stated, “The expectation is for the staff [nurses] to measure the wounds 1 time a week.””
-
Plan Of Care Must Include The Following
The inspectors’ words, 809 words
“Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency policy, direct observations, staff/patient/caregiver interviews, the Plan of Care failed to include all the current/correct medications for 3 of 6 patients who received home visits (#14,16,17). Findings included: The policy, Medication Monitoring (revised 04/2024), provided by the Director of Professional Services on 4/29/2025 at 3:11 pm stated, “Whenever new medications are added a medication reconciliation is completed. Medication reconciliation will also occur, at a minimum, with each OASIS [Outcome and Assessment Information Set] time point…in conjunction with RN [Registered Nurse] supervisory visits for aide or LPN [Licensed Practical Nurse], and with any change in medications to assess any potential adverse reactions.” 1. Patient #14 had a Start of Care date of 1/30/2025 with an admitting diagnosis of Cutaneous abscess of left lower limb (A localized collection of pus that develops within the skin and underlying tissues of the leg or foot). The Plan of Care for 3/31/2025-5/29/2025 included orders for SN (Skilled Nurse) visits 3 times a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 2 weeks, 1 time a week for 6 weeks. During a home visit conducted on 4/29/2025 at approximately 11:30 am with LPN (Licensed practical nurse) #8, a medication review was performed and the following discrepancies were noted: The agency medication profile included Hydroxyzine HCL (used to treat anxiety) 10 mg every 12 hours, patient #14 stated that she was taking a 10mg and a 50mg tablet together for a total of 60mg 3 times per day as needed. The agency medication profile failed to include the following long term medications: Furosemide (used to treat fluid retention) 80mg, 1 tablet daily, Potassium (mineral supplement) 20meq 1 tab every other day PRN (as needed), PreserVision AREDS 2 (vitamin and mineral supplement that promotes eye health) 1 tablet daily and Calcium Citrate+D3 (vitamins that promote bone strength) 1 tablet daily. 2. Patient #16 had a Start of Care date of 3/25/2025 with an admitting diagnosis of Fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur (left hip fracture). The Plan of Care for 3/25/2025-5/23/2025 included orders for SN 1 time a week for 7 weeks. During a home visit conducted on 4/29/2025 at approximately 1:30 pm with RN (Registered Nurse) # 6, a medication review was performed and the following discrepancies were noted: The agency medication profile included Warfarin Sodium (used to prevent blood clots) 7.5mg and 10mg to be taken together to equal a total of 17.5mg daily. The patient stated the dose was 17.5mg on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. 20mg on Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays, and Sundays. The agency medication profile listed Insulin Glargine (injectable long-lasting insulin used to treat high blood sugar) 10 units at bedtime. The patient stated he no longer administers insulin and is now on Glipizide (oral tablet used to lower blood sugar) 10mg 2 times daily. The medication profile listed Gabapentin (used to treat nerve pain) 100mg 1 tablet 2 times a day, the frequency is 3 times a day. The medication profile included the following discontinued medications: Nephro-Vite (used to prevent vitamin deficiency) 0.8 mg, Iron (used to treat anemia) 325mg, and Fluticasone Propionate nasal spray (used to treat allergies)50mcg. 3. Patient #17 had a start of care date of 3/18/2025 with an admitting diagnosis of other complications of procedures (Patient has a non-healing wound on left foot). The Plan of Care (POC) for 3/8/2025-5/6/2025 included orders for SN (Skilled Nurse) 2 times a week for 8 weeks. During a home visit on 4/29/2025 at approximately 8:30 am with LPN #4 a comprehensive medication review revealed that patient #17 has been administering Insulin Lispro (used to treat high blood sugar) 6 units before meals if blood sugar is over 160. This medication was not listed on the medication profile. An interview conducted on 04/30/2025 at 2:28 pm with the Agency Director revealed that the expectation is that a comprehensive medication review is to be completed with all medication changes.”
-
Preparing Clinical Notes
The inspectors’ words, 403 words
“Preparing clinical notes CFR(s): 484.75(b)(6) Preparing clinical notes; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency policy, direct observations, and staff interviews, the nurse failed to include medication discrepancies in the visit documentation for 3 of 6 patients with home visits conducted (#14,16,17). Findings included: The policy, Medication Monitoring (revised 04/2024), provided by the Director of Professional Services on 4/29/2025 at 3:11 pm stated, “Whenever new medications are added, a medication reconciliation is completed…the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of medication monitoring are documented in the patient’s medical record”. Patient #14 had a Start of Care date of 1/30/2025 with an admitting diagnosis of Cutaneous abscess of left lower limb (A localized collection of pus that develops within the skin and underlying tissues of the leg or foot). The Plan of Care for 3/31/2025-5/29/2025 included orders for SN (Skilled Nurse) visits 3 times a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 2 weeks, 1 time a week for 6 weeks. During a home visit conducted on 4/29/2025 at approximately 11:30 am with LPN (Licensed practical nurse) #8, a medication review was performed and 5 discrepancies were revealed. Review of the clinical record revealed that LPN #8 documented “no discrepancies” for the visit of 4/29/2025.Patient #16 had a Start of Care date of 3/25/2025 with an admitting diagnosis of Fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur (left hip fracture). The Plan of Care for 3/25/2025-5/23/2025 included orders for SN 1 time a week for 7 weeks. During a home visit conducted on 4/29/2025 at approximately 1:30 pm with RN #6, a medication review was performed and 6 discrepancies were revealed. Review of the clinical record revealed that RN #6 documented “no discrepancies” for the visit on 4/29/2025.Patient #17 had a start of care date of 3/18/2025 with an admitting diagnosis of other complications of procedures (Patient has a non-healing wound on left foot). The Plan of Care for 3/8/2025-5/6/2025 included orders for SN 2 times a week for 8 weeks. During a home visit conducted on 4/29/2025 at approximately 8:30 am with LPN #4, a medication review was performed and 1 discrepancy was revealed. Review of the clinical record revealed that LPN #4 documented “no discrepancies” for the visit on 4/29/2025. An interview conducted on 04/30/2025 at 2:28 pm with the Agency Director revealed that the expectation is that medication discrepancies should be documented in the visit note.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2025 | Recertification inspection | 4 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Feb 6, 1968.
- Ownership: non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy and occupational therapy.
- Doesn’t offer speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Medical Services of America Inc. owns 100% directly since Dec 1, 2015.
- Medical Services of America Inc. runs it.
- 6 owners or officers are people: Patrick W Jeffcoat (corporate officer); Patrick W Jeffcoat (corporate director); Patrick W Jeffcoat (managing employee (on the payroll)); Christina M Jeffcoat (corporate officer); Christina M Jeffcoat (corporate director); Lorrie Davis Simpson (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Young Family Trust F/B/O Patrick Wayne Jeffcoat, Jr. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 25, 2025 |
| Medical Services of America Inc. | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Dec 1, 2015 |
| Medical Services of America Inc. | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | Dec 1, 2015 |
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (243 surveys completed): 91% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 3.5 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 92.90% (better than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 10.32% (same as the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 3.98% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 2 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 27909, where this agency’s office is, 2 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Albemarle Home Care and Hospice This home health agency | 3.5 |
| Sentara Home Care Services | 3.5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.