Hearth Record

Mosaic Life Care Home Health

A home health agency in Saint Joseph, Missouri 64507

5506 Corporate Drive, Suite 1600, Saint Joseph, Missouri 64507. (816) 271-7593.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 30, 2024: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 30, 2024: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Rn Performs Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 509 words

    “RN performs assessment CFR(s): 484.55(a)(1) A registered nurse must conduct an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of the patient; and, for Medicare patients, to determine eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, including homebound status. The initial assessment visit must be held either within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician or allowed practitioner - ordered start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the home health provider failed to ensure the initial assessment was completed within 48 (forty-eight) hours of the referral in one of five full records reviewed (Record/Patient #4). This deficient practice has the potential to affect the immediate care needs of all the provider’s patients. Findings included: Review of the provider’s policy titled, “Initial & Ongoing Assessment, Communication and Care Planning Process in Home Health,” with an approval date of 06/05/2023, showed admission and resumption of care visits are completed within 48 (forty-eight) hours of referral or discharge from inpatient facility unless otherwise specified by provider. RECORD/PATIENT #4: Review of a referral #2411657 showed, in part: - A creation date of 04/04/2024 for SN (skilled nursing); and - Requested SOC (Start of Care) Date failed to be documented (it was left blank). Review of the clinical record showed the patient was admitted to home health services on 04/09/2024 with a primary diagnosis of pressure ulcer (a lesion caused by unrelieved pressure resulting in damage of underlying tissue) of right ankle, stage 2 (a partial thickness loss of skin layers that presents clinically as an abrasion, blister, or shallow crater). Review of the SOC OASIS (Start of Care Outcome and Assessment Information Set; a standardized data collection tool) dated 04/09/2024 (five days following referral) showed: - Item M0090: Date assessment completed: 04/09/2024 (five days after referral received) - Item M1000: Inpatient Facilities- From which of the following Inpatient Facilities was the patient discharged within the last 14 (fourteen) days? Documented as N/A- Patient was not discharged from an inpatient facility; and - Item M0102: Date of physician-ordered SOC marked N/A, no specific SOC date ordered by physician. Further review of the clinical record showed, in part: - A telephone conversation note dated and timed 04/05/2024 at 10:21 AM between the provider and a MD (Doctor of Medicine) documented the following: Courtesy note to let you know “Named Home Health” will be admitting late d/t (due to) scheduling availability. Thank you. (It failed to clarify if the scheduling availability was an issue of the provider or the patient); and - The clinical record failed to include a specific physician and/or allowed practitioner ordered start of care date. During an interview on 04/30/2024 starting at 1:15 PM the clinical manager stated that: - The SOC should be within 48 hours of referral or discharge home from an inpatient facility; and - He/she agreed the telephone documentation failed to specify who had the scheduling availability issue (the patient or the provider).”

    Rule G0514. Element-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 967 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on policy review, record review, observation and interview, the home health provider failed to ensure staff maintain an accurate and updated medication profile in, but not limited to, two of three home visit observations (Records/Patients #1, and #2). This deficient practice has the potential to affect all patients served by the provider. Findings included: Review of the provider’s policy titled, “Medication Administration, Disposition Including the Delivery of Medication and Medical Provider Orders for Home Health and Hospice”, dated 4/28 2021, showed, in part; - Stock Medications: An order is necessary for the use of stock medications. If the strength or indication for the medication is outside of the standard, a specific order is obtained; - Current medications, including vitamins, supplements, and herbal therapies are listed on the medication profile. Patients have a current medication profile in the medical record. Medication orders include the patient’s name, date, time, medication name, dose, frequency, route of administration, practitioner ordering and indication if ordered PRN (as needed); and - A nurse reviews the medication profile on admission for accuracy and contra-indications (allergies, drug interactions.). The nurse also reviews the medication profile upon receiving new medication orders and prior to administration of medications. If the nurse has questions or concerns about medications, she/he will consult with the Associate Director. Major medication interactions identified with medication validation will be reported to the medical provider. RECORD/PATIENT #1: Review of the clinical record showed the patient admitted to home health services on 01/17/2024 with a primary diagnosis of diabetes (a group of diseases that results in too much sugar in the blood), and a pressure sore on the great toe of the left foot. The patient lived at home alone, and was discharged from services on 04/29/2024, after the home visit. Observation and interview on 04/29/2024 at 2:30 PM, during the patient’s home visit, showed Registered Nurse (RN)- A failed to perform a comprehensive medication reconciliation during the visit. The following medication discrepancies were discovered: - The provider’s medication profile showed a physician’s order for glipizide (a diabetic medication to regulate blood sugar levels), 10 milligrams (mg), take one tablet daily. The patient’s stated that he/she had taken the last dose of the medication on 4/28/2024 and was currently “out” of the medication; - Observation and interview showed the patient stated he/she was currently taking hydrocodone / acetaminophen (a narcotic medication taken for pain) 5 mg /325 mg 1 tablet every 4 to 6 hours for pain as needed. The medication was not listed on the current provider’s list; and - Observation and interview showed the patient stated he/she was taking Vitamin B complex (a dietary supplement) 500 mg 1 tablet daily. The medication was not listed on the current provider’s list. During an interview on 04/30/2024 at 9:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the staff are responsible for following the medication policy and perform medication reconciliation during each home visit to ensure accuracy. RECORD/PATIENT #2: Review of the clinical record showed the patient admitted to home health services on 04/26/2024 with a primary diagnosis of aftercare following joint replacement surgery (left knee) with PT (physical therapy) only. The patient lived at home with his/her sibling. Review of the medication list at discharge from the inpatient facility dated as of 4/24/2024 at 10:53 AM showed, in part, Acetaminophen 325mg tablet (medication for mild to moderate pain) take 650mg by mouth (there failed to be any further directions with frequency limits or if it was scheduled or as needed). Observation on 04/29/2024 at 1:30PM, during the patient’s home visit, the PTA (Physical Therapy Assistant) questioned the patient if there had been any medication changes but failed to do a medication reconciliation. A reconciliation was done by this surveyor utilizing the current medication profile supplied by the agency and a review of the patient’s medication bottles and their list from the inpatient facility discharge (the only medication list in the home) and the following discrepancies were noted: - The patient’s medication list from the inpatient facility showed Acetaminophen 325mg (milligram) tablet (medication for mild to moderate pain) take 650mg by mouth; The provider’s list failed to include the acetaminophen; - The current medication profile supplied by the provider showed Ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) 100mg tablet, take one in the morning; The patient’s bottle label showed 500mg tablets; - The current medication profile supplied by the provider showed biotin 1mg tablet take 1,000mcg (micrograms) by mouth in the morning; The patient’s bottle label showed 5,000mcg tablets. Per interview conducted during observation, the PTA (physical therapy assistant) stated that he/she did not do a complete medication reconciliation because they are done weekly and the PT (physical therapist had just done it Friday (three days prior). Per interview conducted during observation, the patient stated that: - They were taking Tylenol (acetaminophen) as needed (which failed to be on the provider’s medication profile); - They take one of the vitamin C tablets a day (from the bottle labeled with 500mg tablets) (Ordered strength was on the provider’s medication profile was 100mg every morning); and - They take one biotin every day (from the bottled labeled with Biotin 5,000mcg) (Ordered strength was on the provider’s medication profile was 1,000mcg every morning) During an interview on 04/30/2024 starting at 1:15PM, the clinical manager stated that: - This patient was a new admit; - It looked like the Tylenol had “fell off” the bottom of the page; and - The medication doses would be clarified.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

  • Only As Ordered By A Physician

    The inspectors’ words, 517 words

    “Only as ordered by a physician CFR(s): 484.60(b)(1) Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on policy review, record review, observation, and interview, the provider failed to obtain orders to provide services and treatments only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner in one of five full records reviewed (Record/Patient #2) . This deficient practice has the potential to affect the care of all the provider’s patients. Findings included: Review of the home health provider’s policy titled, “Initial & Ongoing Assessment, Communication and Care Planning Process in Home Health,” approval date of 06/05/2023, showed, in part, the following: -Purpose: Provide guidelines for initial and ongoing assessment, treatment, interdisciplinary collaboration, care planning and updating the plan of care to facilitate realistic patient goals; -Plan of care is initiated upon admission; -The plan of care is developed in collaboration with the physician, to facilitate progressive resolution of problems identified on admission; and - Patient care shall follow a developed plan, which is periodically reviewed by the supervising nurses or other appropriate health professionals. RECORD/PATIENT #2: Review of the clinical record showed the patient admitted to home health services on 04/26/2024 with a primary diagnosis of aftercare following joint replacement surgery (left knee) with PT (physical therapy) only. The patient lived at home with his/her sibling. Review of the plan of care dated 04/26/2024 to 06/24/2024 failed to show: - An order for application of ice; and - An order for Miralax (medication used to treat constipation), milk of magnesia (medication used to treat constipation), or Dulcolax (medication used to treat constipation). Review of the PT OASIS (Outcome and Assessment Information Set; a standardized data collection tool) Start of Care note dated 04/26/2024 showed, in part, under the SOC summary section: PT also instructs patient and daughter in adding milk of magnesia, Miralax, and Dulcolax per constipation protocol. (The clinical record failed to contain an order from the physician to initiate this protocol). During a home visit observation on 04/29/2024 starting at 1:30 PM with the PTA (physical therapy assistant): - He/she questioned if the patient had utilized ice as needed to the incisional area , the patient responded yes. (Review of the plan of care and all orders, failed to show an order for patient to use ice.)(The PTA failed to instruct the patient there currently were no orders for ice); - He/she questioned the patient regarding the activity of their bowels and the patient stated that he/she had no issues with bowels now, but did have some right after getting home. The patient also stated that he/she took Miralax granules this morning. (The PTA failed to instruct the patient there currently were no orders for Miralax). During an interview on 04/30/2024 starting at 1:15 PM the clinical manager stated that: - He/she would expect an order for ice with the frequency, location and duration if the patient was utilizing it; and - An order would be expected to follow bowel protocol, if the patient was being instructed to do so.”

    Rule G0580. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 30, 2024Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Dec 12, 1977.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer speech pathology.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Mosaic Health System owns 100% directly since Mar 8, 2019.
  • Heartland Regional Medical Center runs it.
  • 17 owners or officers are people: Adam Stein (corporate director); Renee Hayes (managing employee (on the payroll)); Thomas George Richmond (corporate director); Dwight Carvell (corporate director, 0%); Melody Ann Smith (corporate director); Matthew Lukens (corporate director); Lucinda L Hayden (corporate director); Steven C Looney (corporate director); Rachael Praiswater (managing employee (on the payroll)); Dan J Heckman (corporate director); Julee Thompson (corporate officer); Densie Schrader (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ophelia Rucker (corporate director); Cynthia G Patterson (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Gary W. Frazer (corporate director); Serena Naylor (corporate director); Sterett Schanze (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Mosaic Health SystemOwns 5% or more directly100%Mar 8, 2019
Heartland Regional Medical CenterRuns it (operational or managerial control)Jul 1, 1987

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (369 surveys completed): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, better; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate93.40% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate7.18% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.62% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 5 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 64507, where this agency’s office is, 4 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4.25 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 5 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 64507
PlaceQuality rating
Mosaic Life Care Home Health This home health agency4.5
The Whole Person, Inc.Not given
Freudenthal Home Health2.5
Centerwell Home Health4.5
Faith Home Healthcare4

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.