Hearth Record

Vivie Home Health

A home health agency in Alexandria, Minnesota 56308

2715 Hwy 29 South Suite 103, Alexandria, Minnesota 56308. (320) 759-1273.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 2, 2025: a complaint and recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 2, 2025: complaint and recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 525 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview and document review, the agency failed to ensure visits were conducted as required in the plan of care, make attempts to reschedule the missed visit and document the potential clinical impact of the missed service for 1 of 17 patients (P10) reviewed for home health visits. Findings include: P10’s plan of care (POC) 2/3/25 to 4/3/25, identified a start of care (SOC) date 12/5/24. Diagnoses included fracture of the left humerus, high blood pressure, diabetes, heart disease and dementia. Services were ordered for physical therapy two times per week for four weeks then one time per week for three weeks. An additional order was received on 2/28/25, for skilled nurse visits one time per week for four weeks for various assessments, teach/reinforce disease and symptom management and review, reconcile and teaching related to use of medications. Review of P10’s skilled nurse visits (SNV) completed during the recertification period identified no SNV had been provided the week of 3/2/25. The medical record lacked evidence P10 had been contacted to reschedule the missed visit as well as what the potential clinical impact may have been related to the missed visit. Observation of P10’s skilled nurse home visit on 3/31/25, at 11:30 a.m. registered nurse (RN)-B conducted various assessments and education related to disease and symptom management, skin care and assisted P10’s family member (FM)-A to setup two weeks of medications. FM-A demonstrated difficulty managing the medication setup without frequent input from RN-B. RN-B stated FM-A was unable to setup P10’s medications safely without some assistance. During interview on 3/31/25, at 2:00 p.m. clinical manager (CM)-B stated the agency’s process was to document a missed visit in the patients’ medical record and identify why the visit was missed. CM-B stated there should have been some documentation in P10’s medical record as to why the visit was missed and if attempts were made to reschedule as well as a phone call to check with the patient and instruction regarding the patient’s medications. CM-B thought a nurse had phoned to check in with the patient and ensure medications were available for the week but was unsure why the documentation was lacking in P10’s medical record. The agency policy Coordination of Patient care revised March 2019, identified the agency would integrate orders from all physicians to assure the coordination of all services and interventions provided to the patient and coordinate care delivery to meet the patient’s needs and involve the patient, representative and caregiver as appropriate in the coordination of care activities.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 666 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview and document review, the agency failed to include all durable medical equipment (DME) on 2 of 7 patient’s (P9, P14) plan of care (POC) reviewed during home visits and 1 of 5 (P12) active chart reviews. Findings include: P9’s POC with certification period 2/15/25 to 4/15/25, indicated a start of care on 10/18/24. P9’s POC included diagnoses of non-pressure chronic ulcer of right heal and spinal stenosis. P9’s section on the POC that indicated DME and supplies included “skin care” and “wound care products.” P9’s start of care assessment completed on 10/18/24, included P9 had an assistive device of a walker. The section titled “durable medical equipment available” included cane, grab bars, shower bench, and four wheeled walker. During home visit on 3/31/25 at 2:00 p.m., P9 was observed utilizing a four wheeled walker. P12’s POC with certification period 2/10/25 to 4/10/25, indicated a start of care date of 2/10/25. P12’s POC included diagnoses of atrial fibrillation and macular degeneration. P12’s section on the POC that indicated DME and supplies indicated, “none.” P12’s start of care assessment completed on 2/10/25 included P12 had an assistive device of a walker. The section titled “durable medical equipment available” included toilet seat riser and four wheeled walker. P14’s POC with certification period 2/16/25 to 4/16/25, indicated a start of care date of 12/18/24. P14’s POC included diagnoses of spinal stenosis and chronic pain syndrome. P14’s section on the POC that indicated DME and supplies indicated, “none.” P14’s start of care assessment completed 12/18/24, included P14 had an assistive device of walker and wheelchair. The section titled “durable medial equipment available” included grab bars, hand-held shower, shower chair, and four wheeled walker. During home visit on 4/1/25 at 10:00 a.m., P14 was observed with a four wheeled walker. During interview on 4/1/25 at 12:40 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-A confirmed she completed the admission assessment for P14. RN-A confirmed P14 had the DME listed on the start of care assessment. RN-A stated she believed the DME selected during the admission assessment then flowed onto the 485 physician orders (POC). During interview on 4/1/25 at 3:34 p.m., clinical manager (CM)-A confirmed DME was assessed and noted in the start of care assessment. CM-A confirmed R14’s POC DME included none, which did not match the start of care assessment charting. CM-A stated the charts are reviewed by a quality team prior to being sent to providers for signature. CM-A stated the 485 (POC) should have included all DME to fully capture the patient’s needs. During interview on 4/1/25 at 4:00 p.m., quality manager (QM)-A confirmed all charts and 485’s (POCs) are reviewed prior to being submitted. QM-A confirmed the DME section from the start of care assessment does not automatically flow onto the 485 (POC) DME section. Agency policy for 485 (POC) physician orders dated March 2019, included care and services will be provided according to physician orders and orders are current and updated. The policy included the individualized plan of care must include the types of services, supplies and equipment required.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 2, 2025Complaint and recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Mar 16, 2006.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Vivie owns 100% directly since Jan 1, 2024.
  • 22 owners or officers are people: Mark Robert Anderson (corporate officer, 100%); Mark Robert Anderson (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Greg Billberg (corporate director, 0%); Carol Kraft (corporate director, 0%); Alyssa Rohloff (managing employee (on the payroll)); Angela Mae Urman (managing employee (on the payroll)); Katie Perry (corporate officer, 0%); Katie Perry (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Vicki Jodsaas (corporate director, 0%); Jeff Montgomery (corporate director, 0%); Chad Coauette (corporate director, 0%); Fred Semmer (corporate officer, 0%); Michael Finn (corporate director, 0%); Kayla Wohlers (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Julie Critz (corporate director, 0%); Scott Redden (corporate director, 0%); Allison Marie Homstad Juba (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Mark Robert Anderson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Phillip Hanson (corporate officer, 0%); Marnie Marie Gugisberg (corporate director); Marnie Marie Gugisberg (managing employee (on the payroll)); David Steven Wolf (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
VivieOwns 5% or more directly100%Jan 1, 2024

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (394 surveys completed): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 78% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, better; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, better.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate87.45% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate7.87% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.21% (better than the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 6 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 56308, where this agency’s office is, 6 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 2.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 6 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 56308
PlaceQuality rating
Vivie Home Health This home health agency3
Centracare Home Health4
Aveanna Home Health4.5
Glacial Ridge Home Care2
New Dimensions Home Health Care Inc.1.5
Home Care By the Care Campus2

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.