Hearth Record

Interim Healthcare of the Twin Cities

A home health agency in Roseville, Minnesota 55113

2680 Arthur Street, Roseville, Minnesota 55113. (651) 917-3634.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 24, 2024: a recertification inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 24, 2024: recertification inspection1 deficiency
  • Rn Performs Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 723 words

    “RN performs assessment CFR(s): 484.55(a)(1) A registered nurse must conduct an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of the patient; and, for Medicare patients, to determine eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, including homebound status. The initial assessment visit must be held either within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician or allowed practitioner - ordered start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the initial start of care (SOC) visit was held within 48 hours of referral for 2 of 7 patients (P4, P7) currently receiving home care services. P7’s POC for certification period 1/10/24-3/9/24, indicated P7 had diagnoses which included a fractured radius, type II diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and a history of falling. P7’s POC further indicated, P7 received in home skilled nursing, physical therapy, occupational therapy, and home health aide services. P7’s home care referral (dated 1/4/24), lacked any indication a SOC date was scheduled. P7’s verbal physicians order received 1/9/24, indicated a SOC date of 1/10/24. The order lacked any indication of why the SOC visit was delayed. P7’s medical record lacked any indication P7 requested a delayed SOC date. During interview on 1/25/24 at 1:02 p.m., the director of therapy stated when a referral was received for a patient, it was best practice to complete the initial assessment within 48 hours. If the agency was unable to complete the initial assessment within the required time frame, he would expect the clinician to notify the physician stating the reason for the delay, which would ideally be driven by the patient. The clinician would also be responsible for communicating with the patient in order to see if they want to continue with the agency or go somewhere else and then documenting it in a communication note in the chart. The documentation should also include the reason for the delay of the SOC. During an interview on 1/25/24 at 1:10 p.m. the director of nursing (DON) stated when a referral was received, it was best practice to complete the initial assessment within 48 hours. If the agency was unable to complete the initial assessment, then the provider would need to be notified indicating the reason for the delay and documented in the patient’s chart. During an interview on 1/24/24 at 2:46 p.m., the administrator stated the initial assessment of the patient should be completed within 48 hours of the referral. If the agency was unable to complete the assessment within the timeframe, the clinician was responsible for notifying the physician to get a new SOC order and the reason for the delay of care. The DON also stated the delay of services and the reason for the delay should be documented in the patients’ medical record and verified P4 and P7 did not have a documented reason for why the SOC was delayed. The facility’s policy titled initial comprehensive assessment dated 4/2/2021, indicated an initial comprehensive assessment of an individual was conducted within 48 hours of a referral for home care services, an individual’s return home, or on the physician’s ordered SOC date. P4’s plan of care (POC) for certification period dated 12/11/23-2/8/24, indicated P4 had diagnoses a leg laceration, peripheral vascular disease, and history of falling. P4’s POC further indicated P4 required in home skilled nursing, physical therapy, and occupational therapy services. P4’s home care referral dated 12/6/23, lacked indication a SOC date was scheduled. P4’s physician order dated 12/8/23, indicated P4’s SOC date was “ok” to be completed on 12/11/23. The order lacked indication of why the SOC visit was delayed. P4’s medical record lacked indication P4’s requested a delayed SOC date. When interviewed on 1/23/24 at 3:30 p.m., the Administrator stated it was best practice was to initiate SOC within 48 hours of the referral. If staff were unable to complete the SOC within the 48-hour time timeframe a provider order was obtained. An interview on 1/23/24 at 11:29 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-A stated SOC should be completed within 48 hours after a referral. If it cannot be done, the patient and provider were contacted, and an order obtained for an extension. If the delay was the patient’s wish, a provider order would still be obtained.”

    Rule G0514. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 24, 2024Recertification inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 15, 1981.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Compass CARE Holdings LLC owns 100% directly since Mar 16, 2026.
  • 3 owners or officers are people: Alan Robert Turkus (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Alan Robert Turkus (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50.03%); Joshua James Schustak (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Compass CARE Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Mar 16, 2026
Entrepreneurial Capital Fund I, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies19.97%Mar 16, 2026
Psc Fund Consolidated LPOwns 5% or more through other companies18%Mar 16, 2026
Kando Capital Fund I, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies10%Mar 16, 2026

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (528 surveys completed): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 77% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate89.17% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate10.80% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.00% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 42 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 55113, where this agency’s office is, 30 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.