Hearth Record

Avera @ Home Pipestone

A home health agency in Pipestone, Minnesota 56164

916 4th Avenue SW, Pipestone, Minnesota 56164. (507) 825-6024.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 29, 2026: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 29, 2026: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Encoding And Transmitting Oasis

    The inspectors’ words, 263 words

    “Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and document review the agency failed to encode and electronically transmit completed Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) assessments to the Center of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) system within 30 days of completing the assessment for 1 of 3 (P6) patients observed during home care visits. Findings include: P6’s plan of care (POC) identified a start of care date (SOC) 11/12/26. P6’s admission OASIS assessment with completion date, was submitted to CMS on 1/12/26, 60 days after completion of the assessment. During interview on 7/29/29 at 9:00 a.m., care manager (CM)-A and nurse manager (NM)-A verified the late OASIS submissions. At this time, there had been a transition with staff and a new person who was responsible for submissions. There was a batch of OASIS assessments that were missed during this time. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services OASIS E Manual, updated 1/1/24, identified OASIS data was collected as part of the comprehensive assessment required by the Medicare Conditions of Participation. The CMS Home Health Conditions of Participation required a home health agency to electronically transmit accurate, completed, and encoded OASIS data to a centralized data submission system within 30 days of the completion of the assessment (M0090 Date Assessment Completed).”

    Rule G0372. Standard-level.

  • Rn Performs Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 356 words

    “RN performs assessment CFR(s): 484.55(a)(1) A registered nurse must conduct an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of the patient; and, for Medicare patients, to determine eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, including homebound status. The initial assessment visit must be held either within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician or allowed practitioner - ordered start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and document review the facility failed to admit a patient within 48 hours of received referral or obtain a provider order to delay start of care (SOC) for 2 of 7 (P4, P5) patients reviewed for admissions. Findings include: A review of P4’s medical record on 7/29/26, indicated P4 had a referral date of 1/14/22. P4’s Plan of Care (POC) for certification period 1/17/22- 3/17/22, indicated P4’s SOC date was 1/17/22. P6 had diagnoses heart failure and lung disease and required a skilled nurse visit every other week. P4’s medical record lacked indication of a rationale for delayed SOC, or an alternate order had been obtained for P4’s SOC to be 6/17/26. A review of P5’s medical record on 7/29/26, indicated P5 had a referral date of 1/23/26. P5’s POC for certification period 1/28/26-3/28/26, indicated P5’s SOC was 1/28/26. P5 had diagnoses of Parkinson’s disease and heart disease and required skilled nursing visits weekly. P5’s medical record lacked indication of a rationale for delayed SOC, or an alternate order had been obtained for P4’s SOC to be 1/28/26. When interviewed on 7/26/29 at 1:21 p.m., clinical manager (CM)-A verified P4 and P5’s SOC occurred more than 48 hours after their referrals were received. Furthermore, CM-A stated there was no rational or new order obtained from the provider for the delayed SOC. An agency policy titled Initial and On-going Nursing Assessments of Clients revised 1/12/26, directed staff to complete a nursing assessment within 5 days of initiation of home care services. However the policy did not address the time frame required from referral date to the initial start of care.”

    Rule G0514. Element-level.

  • Only As Ordered By A Physician

    The inspectors’ words, 510 words

    “Only as ordered by a physician CFR(s): 484.60(b)(1) Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview and document review, the agency failed to ensure medication reconciliation during medication set up was completed by provider orders and without errors for 1 of 1 patients (P1) observed during medication set up. Findings include: P1’s plan of care (POC) for certification period 7/9/26-9/6/26, indicated P1 had diagnoses of surgical aftercare following skin surgery, diabetes, and lung disease. P1 required skilled nursing services weekly for medication set up and assessments related to post surgical care and medical diagnoses. Furthermore, P1’s POC indicated P1 required the following medications: -Cranberry capsule 500 milligrams (mg) take 1,000mg by mouth morning and evening for supplement. -Methenamine mandelate 1 gram (gm) tablet twice daily for urinary tract infection prevention. -Metoprolol tartrate 25mg twice daily for high blood pressure. An observation and interview on 7/27/26 at 1:45 p.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A was completing medication set up during a home visit for P1. LPN-A had a handwritten paper medication list that was used for reconciling P1’s medications and used for medication set up. As LPN-A went through P1’s medications, the following medications were included in the set up: -Cranberry capsule 4200mg daily, which was different from the orders on P1’s POC. -Methenamine Hippurate 1gm twice daily, which was different from the orders on P1’s POC. -Metoprolol tartrate 50 mg twice daily, which was different from the orders on P1’s POC. When the differences were pointed out, LPN-A verified the orders and bottles did not match up for the cranberry capsule, methenamine mandelate, and the metoprolol. LPN-A further stated when orders were changed, the handwritten medication sheet and the POC in the medical record both needed to be updated. LPN-A removed the medication, and stated follow-up would be needed with P1’s provider. A follow up interview on 7/27/26 at 4:04 p.m., LPN-A stated a new script was sent to pharmacy for the cranberry capsule. P1’s metoprolol was increased on 3/11/26, and the new dose was increased on the written paper medication record but had not been updated in the electronic medical record, which should have been done. P1’s Methenamine should be the Hippurate dosing instead of the mandelate and that medication was also sent to pharmacy. When interviewed on 7/27/29 at 4:15 p.m., clinical manager (CM)-A expected the POC in the electronic medical record to be updated when there were medication changes. Furthermore, nursing were expected to review the bottles to the medication order to ensure accuracy of medication set up and prevent errors. An agency policy titled Medication Management Services revised 1/12/26, directed staff to acquire a prescription for all medications managed for clients, including over the counter. The agency will develop and update the client’s medication records and medication management plan when necessary. Furthermore, during medication set up, the nurse will verify the dose of medication consistent with the prescription and review the client’s medication record when setting up medications.”

    Rule G0580. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 29, 2026Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 1, 1968.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • County of Pipestone owns 100% directly since Jan 1, 1966.
  • 3 owners or officers are people: Bradley Burris (corporate officer); Sandra Schlechter (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Gina Vangsness (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
County of PipestoneOwns 5% or more directly100%Jan 1, 1966

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (59 surveys completed): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 72% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate101.28% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate7.75% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.05% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 4 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 56164, where this agency’s office is, 3 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 4 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 56164
PlaceQuality rating
Avera @ Home Pipestone This home health agency3.5
Hendricks Community Hospital Assn & Retirement HomNot given
Good Sam Society Home Care of SW MN4.5
Avera at Home Marshall3.5

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.