Hearth Record

E P I C Home Care

A home health agency in Livonia, Michigan 48154

15443 Middlebelt Rd, Livonia, Michigan 48154. (248) 579-6533.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Sep 19, 2024: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Sep 19, 2024: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 281 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the plan of care included interventions with objectively measurable goals specific to the individualized needs of the patient in 1 (P-5) of 7 records reviewed, resulting in the potential for poor patient outcomes and unmet care needs for this patient. Findings include: P-5: This 82-year-old patient was admitted to home care on 8/3/24, with diagnoses of hypertensive heart disease and chronic kidney disease. During record review on 9/17/24, it was noted that the plan of care failed to include measurable nursing goals that are individualized to address patient needs. For example, one goal stated, “patient will verbalize understanding of proper use of pain medication.” Another goal stated, “patient will verbalize an understanding of energy conserving measures.” There was no evidence of how these goals could be objectively measured to determine progress toward meeting the goals. This finding was reviewed and acknowledged by the alternate administrator (Staff B), the clinical manager (Staff C), and administrative support (Staff E) during an interview on 9/19/24 at 9:40 a.m.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 1,391 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment included an accurate review of all medications to determine potential adverse effects or duplicate drug therapy in 3 of 7 (P-1, 2, 3) records reviewed, resulting in the potential for harmful medication effects for all patients serviced by this agency. Findings include: Agency policy: Medication Profile; Policies and Procedures Manual (Revised March 2018) 11.8.1 states, “The comprehensive assessment performed at time of admission includes a review of all medications that the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicative drug therapy and non-compliance with drug therapy. P-1: The start of care (SOC) was dated 11/17/23, with diagnoses of hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. During record review on 9/16/24, it was noted that the medication profile and the plan of care (POC) dated 11/17/23, documented Eliquis/Apixaban (Anticoagulant) oral 5 MG 1-tab 4X/day, and another order for Eliquis oral 5 MG 1-tab 2X/day. Albuterol Sulfate inhalation (2.5 MG/3ML) 0.083% HHN Q 4-6 ML as needed anti-asthmatic and bronchodilator, and another order for Albuterol Sulfate HFA inhalation 108 (90 Base) MCG/ACT 1-2 puffs every 4 hours as needed for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) anti-asthmatic and bronchodilator. Pravastatin Sodium oral 10 MG 1 tab twice daily, and Pravastatin Sodium oral 10 MG 1 tab at bedtime. There was no documented clarification in the record as to which of these duplicate orders the patient should be taking. The medication profile signed by registered nurse (Staff C) also documented there were no discrepancies or interactions. P-2: The SOC was dated 9/6/24 with diagnoses of osteoarthritis, weakness, and unsteady. During record review on 9/17/24, it was noted that the medication profile and the plan of care (POC) dated 9/6/24, documented Trelegy Ellipta inhalation 100-62.5-25 MCG/INH 1 puff daily listed twice. Pantoprazole Sodium oral 40 MG 1 tab daily was listed twice. Metoprolol Succinate ER oral 50 MG 1 tab daily, and Metoprolol Succinate ER oral 25 MG 1 tab daily. Atorvastatin Calcium oral 40 MG 1 tab daily at bedtime, and Atorvastatin Calcium oral 40 MG 1 tab daily. Amiodarone HCL oral 200 MG 1-tab oral daily was listed twice. Furosemide 40 MG oral 1 tab daily was listed twice. Eliquis/Apixaban (Anticoagulant) oral 5 MG 1 tab oral daily, Eliquis oral 5 MG 1 tab twice daily and Eliquis oral 2.5 MG 2 tabs patient to take one tablet twice daily orally. 3 separate orders for Eliquis were documented on the medication profile. The medication profile also documented Clopidogrel Bisulfate (Another anticoagulant) oral 75 MG 1 tab oral daily. There was no documented clarification in the record as to which of these duplicate orders the patient should be taking. The medication profile signed by registered nurse (Staff C) also documented there were no discrepancies or interactions. During an interview on 9/19/24 at 1:30 p.m., the alternate administrator (Staff B), the clinical manager/registered nurse (Staff C), and the administrative assistant (Staff E) acknowledged the above findings. P-3: This 78-year-old patient was admitted to home care on 2/29/24 with diagnoses of wound on the toe, varicose veins, and peripheral vascular disease. During record review on 9/16/24, it was noted that the plan of care dated 2/29/24 contained multiple duplicate medications. For example, Xarelto 20mg was listed four times; 21 medications (vitamin E 1000U, vitamin C 500mg, fluconazole 100mg, melatonin 5mg, Claritin 10mg, hydrocodone 10/325mg, gabapentin 300mg, fenofibrate 200mg, esomeprazole 40mg, doxycycline 100mg, furosemide 20mg, digoxin 125 mcg, ropinirole 0.5mg, cilostazol 100mg, cholestyramine 4gm, cholecalciferol 10mg, Cartia XT 180mg, biotin 1000mcg, atorvastatin 10mg, allopurinol 100mg, and Synthroid 50mcg) were listed twice; and two medications (duloxetine 30mg and silver sulfadiazine 400gm) were listed once. This finding was reviewed and acknowledged by the alternate administrator (Staff B), the clinical manager (Staff C), and administrative support (Staff E) during an interview on 9/19/24 at 9:40 a.m. Staff B and Staff E stated they were unsure of why medications were populating multiple times on the plan of care while the medication profile listed medications once, and will be following up with the electronic medical record company. Agency policy: Medication Profile; Policies and Procedures Manual (Revised March 2018) 11.8.1 states, “The comprehensive assessment performed at time of admission includes a review of all medications that the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicative drug therapy and non-compliance with drug therapy. P-1: The start of care (SOC) was dated 11/17/23, with diagnoses of hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. During record review on 9/16/24, it was noted that the medication profile and the plan of care (POC) dated 11/17/23, documented Eliquis/Apixaban (Anticoagulant) oral 5 MG 1-tab 4X/day, and another order for Eliquis oral 5 MG 1-tab 2X/day. Albuterol Sulfate inhalation (2.5 MG/3ML) 0.083% HHN Q 4-6 ML as needed anti-asthmatic and bronchodilator, and another order for Albuterol Sulfate HFA inhalation 108 (90 Base) MCG/ACT 1-2 puffs every 4 hours as needed for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) anti-asthmatic and bronchodilator. Pravastatin Sodium oral 10 MG 1 tab twice daily, and Pravastatin Sodium oral 10 MG 1 tab at bedtime. There was no documented clarification in the record as to which of these duplicate orders the patient should be taking. The medication profile signed by registered nurse (Staff C) also documented there were no discrepancies or interactions. P-2: The SOC was dated 9/6/24 with diagnoses of osteoarthritis, weakness, and unsteady. During record review on 9/17/24, it was noted that the medication profile and the plan of care (POC) dated 9/6/24, documented Trelegy Ellipta inhalation 100-62.5-25 MCG/INH 1 puff daily listed twice. Pantoprazole Sodium oral 40 MG 1 tab daily was listed twice. Metoprolol Succinate ER oral 50 MG 1 tab daily, and Metoprolol Succinate ER oral 25 MG 1 tab daily. Atorvastatin Calcium oral 40 MG 1 tab daily at bedtime, and Atorvastatin Calcium oral 40 MG 1 tab daily. Amiodarone HCL oral 200 MG 1-tab oral daily was listed twice. Furosemide 40 MG oral 1 tab daily was listed twice. Eliquis/Apixaban (Anticoagulant) oral 5 MG 1 tab oral daily, Eliquis oral 5 MG 1 tab twice daily and Eliquis oral 2.5 MG 2 tabs patient to take one tablet twice daily orally. 3 separate orders for Eliquis were documented on the medication profile. The medication profile also documented Clopidogrel Bisulfate (Another anticoagulant) oral 75 MG 1 tab oral daily. There was no documented clarification in the record as to which of these duplicate orders the patient should be taking. The medication profile signed by registered nurse (Staff C) also documented there were no discrepancies or interactions. During an interview on 9/19/24 at 1:30 p.m., the alternate administrator (Staff B), the clinical manager/registered nurse (Staff C), and the administrative assistant (Staff E) acknowledged the above findings. P-3: This 78-year-old patient was admitted to home care on 2/29/24 with diagnoses of wound on the toe, varicose veins, and peripheral vascular disease. During record review on 9/16/24, it was noted that the plan of care dated 2/29/24 contained multiple duplicate medications. For example, Xarelto 20mg was listed four times; 21 medications (vitamin E 1000U, vitamin C 500mg, fluconazole 100mg, melatonin 5mg, Claritin 10mg, hydrocodone 10/325mg, gabapentin 300mg, fenofibrate 200mg, esomeprazole 40mg, doxycycline 100mg, furosemide 20mg, digoxin 125 mcg, ropinirole 0.5mg, cilostazol 100mg, cholestyramine 4gm, cholecalciferol 10mg, Cartia XT 180mg, biotin 1000mcg, atorvastatin 10mg, allopurinol 100mg, and Synthroid 50mcg) were listed twice; and two medications (duloxetine 30mg and silver sulfadiazine 400gm) were listed once. This finding was reviewed and acknowledged by the alternate administrator (Staff B), the clinical manager (Staff C), and administrative support (Staff E) during an interview on 9/19/24 at 9:40 a.m. Staff B and Staff E stated they were unsure of why medications were populating multiple times on the plan of care while the medication profile listed medications once, and will be following up with the electronic medical record company.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

  • Required Items In Clinical Record

    The inspectors’ words, 315 words

    “Required items in clinical record CFR(s): 484.110(a)(1) The patient’s current comprehensive assessment, including all of the assessments from the most recent home health admission, clinical notes, plans of care, and physician or allowed practitioner orders; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the clinical record contained accurate clinical notes for 1 (P-3) of 7 records reviewed, resulting in the potential for poor patient outcomes and a lack of information for all agency staff caring for the patient. Findings include: P-3: This 78-year-old patient was admitted to home care on 2/29/24 with diagnoses of wound on the toe, varicose veins, and peripheral vascular disease. During record review on 9/16/24, it was noted that the nursing notes from 3/13/24, 3/20/24, and 3/25/24 contained identical comments for all three visit notes. For example, cardiovascular comments stated, “Patient has dried right leg venous ulcer, healed, concerns for very large bruise to right thigh, leg, increase in swelling and pain.” Musculoskeletal comments stated, “Patient reports walking exacerbates pain, in wheelchair today, concern for pressure to right back of thigh, instruct to shift weight, elevate legs through the day.” Psychosocial comments stated, “patient anxious about bruise to whole right upper thing in pain with lump of unknown cause, patient agitated.” Pain comments stated, “Patient reports taking Norco to help with pain in knees, and right hip.” Digestive nutrition comments stated, “encouraged to eat 3 meals a day and to incorporate protein into diet to promote wound healing. Encouraged not to skip meals, eating hardboiled egg.” These findings were reviewed and acknowledged by the alternate administrator (Staff B), the clinical manager (Staff C), and administrative support (Staff E) during an interview on 9/19/24 at 9:40 a.m. Staff B stated nursing notes are prefilled with prior comments to assist with continuity of care and stated staff should be updating the comments.”

    Rule G1012. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 19, 2024Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Nov 1, 2009.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 2 owners or officers are people: Deepika Ray (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Deepika Ray (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate87.53% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate8.01% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 109 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 48154, where this agency’s office is, 103 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.