Hearth Record

Up Health System Home Care and Hospice Portage

A home health agency in Houghton, Michigan 49931

901 W Sharon Ave, Suite 3, Houghton, Michigan 49931. (906) 483-1160.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 10, 2024: a recertification inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 10, 2024: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 929 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to include objectively measurable goals on the plan of care for 5 of 10 records reviewed (P-1, P-2, P-4, P-8, P-10) resulting in the inability to determine the patient’s progress towards obtaining the goals. Findings include: P-1: The Start of Care (SOC) was dated 3/9/2024. The Plan of Care (POC) for the Certification Period 7/1/24 to 8/29/24 identified diagnoses of Diabetes type 2, Atrial Fibrillation, Alzheimer’s Disease, Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertension, Depression, and Alzheimer’s Disease. This patient was receiving Skilled Nursing and Physical Therapy Services. This patient was receiving Skilled Nursing (SN) services. Upon review of the Plan of Care, it was noted the goals were not objectively measurable to determine the patient’s progress towards obtaining the goals. An example included: “Patient/Caregiver will demonstrate ability to administer medications via Planner Device by being compliant with medications by 8/24/24”. These goals are not objectively measurable to determine the patient’s progress towards obtaining the goals. P-2: The Start of Care was dated 4/28/2024. The Plan of Care for the Certification Period 4/28/24 to 6/26/24 identified diagnoses of Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure (HTN), Diabetes type 2 (DM2), Chronic Systolic and Diastolic Heart Failure (CHF), Anemia, Wheelchair Dependent, and History of Falling. The patient was receiving Skilled Nursing (SN) and Physical Therapy (PT) services. Upon review of the Plan of Care, it was noted the goals were not objectively measurable. Examples included: “Patient/Caregiver will Verbalize/Demonstrate adequate knowledge of safe provision of ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) as evidenced by appropriate home management without complications or injury by 6/25/24; Patient/Caregiver will understand and demonstrate compliance with treatment regimen for diabetes as evidenced by patient verbalizing definition of diabetes by 6/1/24; Patient will achieve highest functional level as outlined in Therapy Plan of Care Objective Goals with Active Range of Motion and/or muscle strength and performance of Home Exercise Program order to maximize lower extremity function by 8 weeks; Patient/Caregiver will verbalize/demonstrate understanding of recommended safety and fall risk reduction strategies by 8 weeks. These goals are not objectively measurable to determine the patient’s progress towards achieving the goals. These findings were reviewed with and acknowledged by the Administrator (Staff A) and the patient care manager (Staff B) during an interview on 7/10/24 at 3:00 p.m. P-4: This patient was admitted to home care on 6/7/24 with diagnoses of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia. The patient was receiving physical therapy services. During record review on 7/9/24 it was noted the 6/7/24 plan of care included the following goals: patient will achieve highest functional level, as outlined in therapy plan of care objective goals with safe transfer(s) with appropriate technique and equipment to allow for in home by 8 weeks; and patient will achieve highest functional level, as outlined in therapy plan of care objective goals, with gait quality, ability to ascend/descend steps/ramps and/or functional ambulation to navigate within the home by 8 weeks. These goals were not stated in measurable terms that would enable staff to perform an objective evaluation of the patient’s progress towards her goals. The finding was reviewed with and acknowledged by the Administrator (Staff A) and the patient care manager (Staff B) during an interview on 7/10/24 at 12:35 p.m. P-8: This 69-year-old patient was admitted to home care on 4/16/24 with diagnoses of hemiplegia post stroke and type 2 diabetes. During record review on 7/9/24, it was noted that the plan of care failed to include measurable nursing goals that were individualized to address patient needs. For example, one goal stated, “patient will achieve highest functional level, as outlined in therapy POC (plan of care) objective goals with safe transfer(s) with appropriate technique and equipment to allow for in home by 8 weeks.” [sic] Another goal stated, “patient/caregiver will verbalize/demonstrate understanding of recommended safety and fall risk reduction strategies by 8 weeks.” There was no evidence of how these goals could be objectively measured to determine progress toward meeting the goals. P-10: This 88-year-old patient was admitted to home care on 6/24/24 with diagnoses of pneumonitis, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. During record review on 7/10/24, it was noted that the plan of care failed to include measurable nursing goals that were individualized to address patient needs. For example, one goal stated, “patient will achieve highest functional level, as outlined in therapy POC objective goals, with AROM (active range of motion), and/or muscle strength and performance of HEP (home exercise program) order to maximize lower extremity function.” Another goal stated, “patient will achieve highest functional level, as outlined in therapy POC objective goals, with sitting and/or standing balance in order to reduce the risk for falls.” There was no evidence of how these goals could be objectively measured to determine progress toward meeting the goals. These findings were reviewed and acknowledged by the administrator (Staff A) and patient care manager (Staff B) during an interview on 7/10/24 at 12:25 p.m.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level.

  • Health, Psychosocial, Functional, Cognition

    The inspectors’ words, 189 words

    “Health, psychosocial, functional, cognition CFR(s): 484.55(c)(1) The patient’s current health, psychosocial, functional, and cognitive status; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the skilled nurse failed to provide baseline data in the Comprehensive Assessment to use in determining if the patient’s Diabetes was improving or worsening with each visit assessment during the course of care in 1 of 7 records reviewed (P-3). Findings included: P-3: The Start of Care was dated July 2, 2023. The Plan of Care for the recertification period of 1/10/24 to 3/7/24 included diagnoses of Diabetes type 2, Right and Left Hand Pain, Left knee pain, Osteoarthritis, Poly arthropathy, History of Falling, Hypertension, Migraine Headaches, Sinusitis, Long-term use of smoking cigarettes, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Upon review of the Comprehensive Assessment, it was noted there was no baseline data or range of the patient’s blood sugar readings to use to determine if the patient’s diabetes was stable, improving, or worsening. This finding was reviewed with and acknowledged by the Administrator (Staff A) and the patient care manager (Staff B) during an interview on 7/10/24 at 3:00 p.m.”

    Rule G0528. Element-level.

  • Provide Services In The Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 185 words

    “Provide services in the plan of care CFR(s): 484.75(b)(3) Providing services that are ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as indicated in the plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the skilled professionals provided services as ordered by the physician in the plan of care for 1 (P-8) of 10 records reviewed, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: P-8: This 69-year-old patient was admitted to home care on 4/16/24 with diagnoses of hemiplegia post stroke and type 2 diabetes. During record review on 7/9/24, it was noted that the plan of care ordered licensed professionals to report pain level greater than 5 to the primary care provider (PCP). On 5/24/24, the speech language pathologist documented sharp pain located in the center low back, rated as a 7 on a scale of 0-10. There was no evidence the PCP was notified. This finding was reviewed and acknowledged by the administrator (Staff A) and patient care manager (Staff B) during an interview on 7/10/24 at 12:25 p.m.”

    Rule G0710. Element-level.

  • Discharge And Transfer Summaries

    The inspectors’ words, 370 words

    “Discharge and transfer summaries CFR(s): 484.110(a)(6)(i-iii) (i) A completed discharge summary that is sent to the primary care practitioner or other health care professional who will be responsible for providing care and services to the patient after discharge from the HHA (if any) within 5 business days of the patient’s discharge; or (ii) A completed transfer summary that is sent within 2 business days of a planned transfer, if the patient’s care will be immediately continued in a health care facility; or (iii) A completed transfer summary that is sent within 2 business days of becoming aware of an unplanned transfer, if the patient is still receiving care in a health care facility at the time when the HHA becomes aware of the transfer. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure a transfer summary was sent to the receiving facility within 2 days of becoming aware of an unplanned transfer for 1 of 1 (P-6) records reviewed in which the patient was transferred, and failed to ensure a discharge summary was sent to the physician within 5 business days of the patient’s discharge for 1 of 3 (P-6) records reviewed in which the patient was discharged from the agency, resulting in the physician or receiving facility not having knowledge of the patient’s health status at the time of transfer/discharge and the potential for unidentified care needs. Findings include: P-6: This patient was admitted to home care on 4/26/24 with diagnoses of a toe amputation on the right foot, type 2 diabetes, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. During record review on 7/10/24, it was noted the patient was discharged/transferred to the hospital on 6/24/24. The discharge/transfer summary was faxed to the patient’s physician and the receiving hospital on 7/1/24, which is 7 days post discharge/transfer. There was no evidence the hospital received a transfer summary within 2 days of the agency becoming aware of the transfer, and no evidence the physician was informed of the discharge within 5 days of discharge. The finding was reviewed with and acknowledged by the Administrator (Staff A) and the patient care manager (Staff B) during an interview on 7/10/24 at 12:35 p.m.”

    Rule G1022. Element-level.

Mar 6, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Communication With Physicians

    The inspectors’ words, 1,057 words

    “Communication with physicians CFR(s): 484.75(b)(7) Communication with all physicians involved in the plan of care and other health care practitioners (as appropriate) related to the current plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to contact the physician in 1 of 10 records reviewed (P-10) for wound care, from a total of 10 records reviewed, resulting in the potential for unresolved healthcare concerns. Findings include: P-10: This patient was admitted to home health care on 8/9/2023, with diagnoses of hemiplegia (Recent stroke affecting right dominant side, occurred in July of 2023), urinary tract infection (UTI), type 2 diabetes, dysphagia (Difficulty swallowing), peripheral vascular disease (reduced blood flow to extremities), and long-term use of insulin. Record review on 3/6/24 showed the plan of care (POC) dated 8/9/23, had skilled nursing visits ordered at a frequency of 2 visits a week for 1 week, then 1 visit a week for 8 weeks. Physical Therapy was ordered at a frequency of 1 visit a week for 2 weeks, 2 visits a week for 2 weeks, then 1 visit a week for 2 weeks. Speech Therapy was ordered at a frequency of 1 visit for 1 week. Home Health Aid services were ordered at a frequency of 1 visit a week for 4 weeks. A Start of Care nursing assessment visit note dated 8/9/24, documented that the nurse was unable to obtain a weight. The patient was unable to walk or stand. The patient is confined to bed. The patient depends entirely upon someone else for all needs. A lower right leg amputation was observed. A blood glucose of 162 was documented. Blood glucose parameters were ordered on the POC, and to notify the physician of blood glucose below 70 or above 250. Caregiver is non-compliant with medication administration. Caregiver stated, “I do not give insulin if the blood sugar is below 200.” Patient is currently not taking any medications on the medication list. This was confirmed by the caregiver and patient’s primary care provider office. Caregiver was educated on medications and nutrition. Patient has a poor appetite and eats one third or less of food provided. No wound documented at this visit. Skilled nurse visit note dated 8/12/23 documented a new wound to left heel and MD was notified. Skilled nursing visit note on 8/17/23 documented an assessment of the left heel stage II pressure ulcer wound site. Educated caregiver on elevating the foot and keeping pressure off the wound. The caregiver was also educated on keeping the patient hydrated and signs and symptoms of dehydration. The caregiver acknowledged the teaching. Caregiver said they are happy with the aide services provided by the agency. A nursing visit note documented a visit scheduled for 8/25/23 and was declined by the patient’s caregiver due to other appointments. A skilled nursing visit note dated 8/28/23 documented that the patient saw the podiatrist last Friday, 9/22/23, due to wound, with orders obtained for skilled nursing to monitor wound weekly. Wound skin is intact, boggy to touch and dark purple. No open areas and no signs of infection. Caregiver educated on daily cleansing and drying area. Also educated on importance of offloading pressure to the wound area including using device/booty and floating heel with pillow. A skilled nursing visit note dated 8/29/23 documented the wound was assessed, no open area, dark in color, no signs of infection. Patient’s heels were floated upon arrival, but patient did kick off pressure boot. Caregiver educated. Blood sugar was 303 this morning, MD notified. A1C was obtained (Results came back at 9.6). A skilled nursing visit on 9/5/23 documented assessment, education and wound care done. Blood sugar is 350 at this time. Blood sugar was 395 at 10:30. Caregiver states blood sugar yesterday was 275 and ranging between 226-395 the past week. Caregiver states she would like to start using the insulin again. MD notified of blood sugar levels and inability to obtain blood draw, awaiting call back for follow-up. A skilled nurse note dated 9/6/23 documented the patient went to the ER for hyponatremia (Low blood sodium). Skilled nurse note dated 9/9/23 documented assessment of wound, no signs or symptoms of infection, still monitoring. Pressure relieving boot in place for wound. Order for wound to be left open to air with pressure boot in place. Skilled nurse note dated 9/15/23 documented no wound concerns at this time, no change in wound status, boot in place. Skilled nurse note dated 9/19/23 documented no wound concerns at this time, no change in wound status, boot in place. Skilled nurse note dated 9/26/23 documented no wound concerns at this time, boot in place. Nurse practitioner visit on 9/27/23, no new orders. Skilled nurse visit note dated 10/4/23 documented education on wound care and medications. Skilled nurse visit dated 10/11/23 documented no changes to wound. No concerns noted. Skilled nurse note dated 10/16/23 documented no wound concerns at this time, no necrotic tissue was documented, boot in place. Nurse Practitioner visit on 10/17/23. No new orders. Skilled nurse visit on 10/25/23. Wound is closed, necrotic with hard tissue. No documentation in the record that the physician was notified of the necrotic tissue. Orders were to notify the physician of any changes to the wound. Skilled nurse visit on 10/30/23 with no changes. No documentation in the record that the physician was notified of the necrotic tissue. Orders were to notify the physician of any changes to the wound. 11/7/23 podiatrist visit with orders to start Doxycycline for foot infection. 11/8/23 nurse visit note documented wound covered with necrotic tissue. Skilled nurse visit note dated 11/11/23, home health care on hold due to patient admitted to U.P. Health System with left foot osteomyelitis and hypokalemia. On 10/16/23 the wound had no necrotic tissue. On the 10/25/23 Skilled Nurse visit, necrotic tissue on the wound was documented with no evidence in the record of communication to the doctor. On 10/30/23 a Skilled Nurse visit note documented necrotic tissue covering the wound. There was no documentation in the record that the physician was notified of the necrotic tissue. On 11/7/23 the podiatrist saw the patient and started antibiotics for a foot infection. 11/11/23 order to hold home care services due to the patient had been admitted to the hospital for osteomyelitis and hypokalemia.”

    Rule G0718. Element-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 10, 2024Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited
Mar 6, 2024Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Oct 6, 1994.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech pathology.
  • Doesn’t offer medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Michigan In-Home Healthcare Partnership -III, LLC owns 100% directly since Apr 1, 2017.
  • LHC Group Inc. runs it.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer, 0%); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer, 0%); Wendy Daigle (corporate director, 0%); Leah K Kinnumen (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer, 0%); Amy Cormier (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 22, 2023
In-Home Healthcare Partnership LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 1, 2017
Michigan In-Home Healthcare Partnership -III, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Apr 1, 2017
Lhcg Partner LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies80%Jan 1, 2020
LHC Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies80%Jan 1, 2020
Home Health Partner LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies20%Jan 1, 2020
Lifepoint Hospitals Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies20%Jan 1, 2020
Historic Lifepoint Hospitals LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies20%Jan 1, 2020
Legacy Lifepoint Health LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies20%Jan 1, 2020
LHC Group Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)Apr 1, 2017

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (154 surveys completed): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 83% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate87.38% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate12.80% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.94% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 3 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 49931, where this agency’s office is, 3 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 3 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 49931
PlaceQuality rating
Up Health System Home Care and Hospice Portage This home health agency3.5
Aspirus at Home4.5
Baraga County Home Care and Hospice3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.