Hearth Record

Northern Light Home Care & Hospice

A home health agency in So Portland, Maine 04106

225 Gorham Rd, Suite 200, So Portland, Maine 04106. (800) 757-3326.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 11, 2026: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Aug 27, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Provide Services In The Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 1,192 words

    “Provide services in the plan of care CFR(s): 484.75(b)(3) Providing services that are ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as indicated in the plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on document reviews, interviews, and observations, the home health agency failed to ensure wound packing material was removed from a patient’s wound when indicated for one (1) out of ten (10) patients reviewed (Patient #1). This failure led to the wound packing material becoming retained inside of the wound as it healed, which ultimately led to Patient #1 requiring surgery to remove the retained wound packing material. Findings: Northern Light Home Care & Hospice’s procedure for wound packing “Evidence Tag G710 Skills_Wound Packing (Home Health Care),” (no date), states in part, “…Gently remove the tape and old dressing…” “…Assess for the presence of drainage on the old material. Place soiled materials in a plastic bag…” “…Remove gloves, clean hands, and don clean gloves…” “…Clean the wound with a sterile 0.9% sodium chloride solution or another solution ordered by the practitioner…” “…Assess the characteristics of the wound, including drainage, color, size, presence of odor, and signs and symptoms of infection. Use a sterile cotton-tipped applicator and ruler to measure the width, depth, and length of the wound, including any areas of tunneling and undermining…” “Dispose of all soiled dressings, supplies, or single-use equipment in a waterproof bag…” “…Document the procedure in the patient’s record…” Northern Light Home Care & Hospice’s Wound Assessment policy, last revised 03/27/2024 states in part, “…Wound Care: document wound care provided as indicated by the plan of care…” “…Instructions given: document teaching done with patient/caregiver and subject of teaching…” A review of Patient #1’s medical record revealed the patient had a gunshot wound in his/her right lower quadrant of his/her abdomen and was referred to Northern Light Home Care & Hospice following hospitalization for his/her injuries. Patient #1’s medical record revealed that he/she began receiving home health care services from Northern Light Home Care & Hospice on 02/05/2024. The review of Patient #1’s medical record revealed an order for wound care dated 02/05/2024 and signed by PA #1. The order stated in part, “…Traumatic Wound: RLQ Abdominal wound – gun shot – to clean with normal saline and or vashe, lightly pack with ¼ inch iodoform packing strips, covering with gauze and secure with tape. To change daily – Patients [family member] to complete when SN [Skilled Nursing] not in home…” “…Assess wound location, size, stage, drainage, wound bed, and peri-wound area…” The review of Patient #1’s medical record revealed the patient had Skilled Nursing home health visits on the following dates: 02/05/2024, 02/07/2024, 02/09/2024, 02/12/2024, 02/14/2024, 02/16/2024, 02/19/2024, 02/22/2024, 02/26/2024, 02/29/2024, 03/04/2024, 03/11/2024, 03/18/2024, 03/25/2024, 04/03/2024, 04/10/2024, 04/17,2024, 04/23/2024, & 04/30/2024. The review of Patient #1’s medical record did not reveal documentation indicating how many individual pieces of wound packing material were packed into Patient #1’s right lower quadrant abdominal wound during each episode of wound care, nor did the medical record reveal documentation indicating how many individual pieces of old wound packing material were removed from the patient’s wound during each episode of wound care. Patient #1’s medical record did not reveal documentation indicating what specific education was provided to the patient and family regarding the procedure for packing wounds, nor the importance or removing old wound packing material during wound care, nor the risks associated with failure to ensure old packing material was removed from wounds. Patient #1’s medical record contained an entry by RN #2 on 03/18/2024 which stated in part, “…patients [family member] is managing dressing changes when sn not in home, no issues noted…” Patient #1’s medical record revealed the patient was discharged from home health services on 04/30/2024. The review of Patient #1’s medical record revealed an Operative Note written by Surgeon #1 on 06/28/2024 which stated in part, “…Attention was now directed towards the right lower quadrant gunshot wound site. Initial attempts at aspirating fluid were unsuccessful. A cruciate incision was therefore made at this point using an 11 blade. Through this some purulent appearing fluid was seen…” “…I was able to digitize the cavity using my pinky. At this point in time I identified what felt like a foreign substance. This was grasped using a DeBakey and when extracted appeared to be 1 ft of previously placed packing gauze from the time of [his/her] wound care several months prior…” During an interview with the Assistant Vice President for Home Health (AVP-Home Health) on 08/26/2024 at 11:26 AM, the AVP-Home Health stated the home health agency was seeing Patient #1 for services after [he/she] was seen at the hospital for a gunshot wound to the abdomen. The AVP-Home Health stated the patient’s [family member] was involved in the patient’s care, and was completing wound care on the days the home health nurses weren’t seeing the patient. The AVP-Home Health indicated that the agency admitted Patient #1 on 02/05/2024 and discharged Patient #1 on 04/30/2024. The AVP-Home Health stated after being discharged, Patient #1 had gone back into the hospital for a [procedure] and stated that during the procedure the packing was discovered. The AVP-Home Health stated since the home health agency was providing wound care and the patient’s [family member] was also providing wound care, they were not able to determine who had left the packing in the patient’s wound. During an interview with RN #1 on 08/26/2024 at 11:43 AM, they stated the home health agency’s charting system did not show a specific number indicating how many dressings or materials were packed into Patient #1’s wounds during wound care visits. During an interview with RN #1 on 08/26/2024 at 11:46 AM, they indicated that no actions have been taken as of 08/26/2024 (the date of the initiation of the survey) to ensure wound packing materials will not be inappropriately left in another patient’s wound in the future. RN #1 confirmed on 08/26/2024 at 11:47 AM that counting the number or lengths of dressings or materials packed into a wound has not yet been addressed with agency staff since the incident involving Patient #1. RN #1 indicated that the plan was to address this incident with agency staff after 09/30/2024. During an interview with Wound Care Nurse #1 on 08/26/2024 at 3:22 PM they stated that staff did not document how many pieces of packing material were packed into wounds. Wound Care Nurse #1 stated that the nurse would just document that, “the wound care was provided as ordered.” They stated sometimes the packing material would be documented as removed, but stated it hadn’t been something that was required. On 08/26/2024 at 3:30 PM Wound Care Nurse #1 stated caregivers and patients did not receive education regarding the risk of retained packing materials in wounds. Wound Care Nurse #1 stated the risks associated with failing to remove wound packing materials and leaving the packing materials inside of the wound would include, “infection,” and “necrosis of tissues.” Wound Care Nurse #1 stated that patients and family members were not educated regarding these risks because the intention was to never leave packing materials inside of a wound.”

    Rule G0710. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient And Caregiver Education

    The inspectors’ words, 244 words

    “Patient and caregiver education CFR(s): 484.75(b)(5) Patient and caregiver education; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on document reviews, interviews, and observations, the home health agency failed to provide discharge instructions for two (2) out of seven (7) records reviewed for patients who were discharged from home health services (Patient #1 & Patient #6). Findings: Northern Light Home Care & Hospice’s policy titled, “Discharge Instructions,” last revised 11/21/2023 states in part, “…The clinician will complete the form prior to or upon the last visit made to the patient whenever possible and will provide a copy of the discharge instructions to the patient…” A review of Patient #1’s medical record revealed the patient was discharged from home health services on 04/30/2024. The review of Patient #1’s medical record revealed there were no discharge instructions in the medical record for Patient #1’s 04/30/2024 discharge. RN #1 confirmed on 08/26/2024 at 12:16 PM that they reviewed Patient #1’s medical record and confirmed that there were no discharge instructions in the medical record for Patient #1’s 04/30/2024 discharge from home health services. A review of Patient #6’s medical record revealed the patient was discharged from home health services on 08/19/2024. The review of Patient #6’s medical record revealed there were no discharge instructions in the medical record for Patient #6’s 08/19/2024 discharge. RN #1 confirmed on 08/26/2024 at 1:49 PM that there were no discharge instructions in the medical record for Patient #6’s 08/19/2024 discharge.”

    Rule G0714. Element-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 11, 2026Recertification inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Aug 27, 2024Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Feb 3, 1967.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 12 owners or officers are people: Patricia A Small (corporate director, 0%); Ed Gould (corporate director); Timothy J Dentry (corporate officer); Timothy J Dentry (corporate director); Anthony John Filer (corporate officer); Joanne Hale (corporate director, 0%); Suzanne A Moreshead (corporate officer); Suzanne A Moreshead (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Ann Marie Briggs (corporate director, 0%); Leigh Ann Howard (corporate officer); Troy Heald (corporate director); Michael Quinlan (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (314 surveys completed): 91% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, better; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate91.35% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate7.92% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.54% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 7 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 04106, where this agency’s office is, 7 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 7 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 04106
PlaceQuality rating
Northern Light Home Care & Hospice This home health agency3
Centerwell Home Health4
Elara Caring4.5
Mainehealth Home Health and Hospice4
Amedisys Home Health4.5
Bayada Home Health Care Inc.4
Interim Healthcare3.5

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.