Capuano Home Health Care Inc.
A home health agency in East Longmeadow, Massachusetts 01028
265 Benton Drive # 201, East Longmeadow, Massachusetts 01028. (413) 525-2124.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 2of 5 quality of patient care rating
- 3of 5 patient survey rating
- 7 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Sep 12, 2024: a recertification inspection.
7 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Sep 12, 2024: recertification inspection7 deficiencies
-
Encoding And Transmitting Oasis
The inspectors’ words, 180 words
“Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on document review and staff interview, the agency failed to ensure Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) assessments were transmitted to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary, as required. Findings include: Review of the agency’s Home Health Agency Error Summary Report, dated 4/12/24 through 9/10/24, indicated that 88 of 933 OASIS Assessments processed, were submitted more than 30 days after completion. During an interview on 9/12/24 at 1:45 P.M., the Administrator said that the data on the Error Summary Report was correct, and those 88 OASIS Assessments were submitted late. She said there was no pattern to why they had been submitted late but were not submitted timely as required.”
-
Plan Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 721 words
“Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review, policy review, and interview, the Agency failed to ensure home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care (POC) that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, were provided for 3 Patients (#1, #7 and #8), out of a total sample of 8 patients. Findings include: Review of the agency policy, titled, Missed Visits, revised April 2021, included the following: *If a visit is missed for any reason, the clinician should attempt to reschedule if the same day/week so that the physician ordered frequency is maintained and would not be considered a missed visit. *If a visit is missed and not rescheduled the clinician will: Notify the clinical supervisor of the missed visit and reason for the missed visit. Document in the patient’s clinical record the following information: Patient name, date and type of visit that was missed, reason for the missed visit, any other follow-up needed, other person(s) that were notified of the missed visit, signature of staff member reporting the information. 1. Patient #1 was admitted to the Agency in June 2024 with a diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (a disease in which the immune system eats away at the protective covering of the nerves). Review of the Physician orders for the Home Health Certification period, 6/25/24 through 8/23/24, indicated the following: *Effective 7/7/24: Occupational Therapy visit (OTV) 1 to 2 times a week for 7 weeks. Review of the Physician orders for the Home Health Certification period, 8/24/24 through 10/22/24 indicated the following: Effective 8/27/24: OTV 1 to 2 times per week for 9 weeks. Review of the clinical record for Patient #1 failed to indicate that OTVs were provided for the week of 8/18/24 and the week of 9/1/24. There was no documentation as to why the visits were not provided. During an interview on 9/11/24 at 1:40 P.M., the Business Director said that missed visits should be documented in the clinical record During an interview on 9/11/24 at 2:07 P.M., the Business Director said that he had reviewed the clinical record and was not able to find documentation for the missed OTVs for the weeks of 8/18/24 and 9/1/24, and services were not provided as ordered. 2. Patient #7 was admitted to the Agency in February 2024 with a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (a disease that occurs when the body cannot produce or use insulin properly, causing high blood sugars). Review of the Physician ordered Home Health Certification POC, dated 2/2/24 through 4/21/24, included the following orders: *Effective 2/22/24: 1 Skilled Nurse visit (SNV) 1 time a day for 10 weeks. Review of the clinical record indicated that a SNV was not provided as ordered on 2/24/24 and 4/7/24. During an interview on 9/12/24 at 2:30 P.M., the Director of Business said the POC was not followed, as ordered. He also said nursing did not document why the 2 visits were missed. 3. Patient #8 was admitted to the Agency in April 2024 with a diagnosis of bilateral hip osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease which involves the tissues in the joint). Review of the Physician ordered Home Health Certification POC, dated 7/31/24 through 9/28/24, included the following orders: *Effective 8/20/24: 1 Home Health Aide visit (HHAV) 3x a week for 6 weeks. Review of the clinical record indicated Patient #8 had been hospitalized 8/21/24 through 9/3/24. Review of the clinical record indicated no HHA visits between 9/4/24 and 9/7/24. Additionally, the record indicated only 1 HHAV was provided (9/9/24) between 9/8/24 and 9/12/24. During an interview on 9/12/24, the Director of Business said the HHAVs were not provided as ordered for Patient #8, and there was no documentation indicating why the visits were not provided.”
-
Infection Prevention
The inspectors’ words, 417 words
“Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interviews and policy review, the Agency failed to ensure that 1 of 3 clinicians (Registered Nurse #1) observed during home visits, adhered to infection control practices to limit the risk of spread of infection. Findings include: Review of the agency policy, titled, Safety Medication Assistance and Administration Policy and Procedure, effective 3/8/2020, included the following: -Infection control procedures will be followed throughout the medication administration process Review of the agency policy, titled, Narcotic Count Sheet, approved 9/1/2021, included the following: -All controlled medications must be counted safely and on a clean surface as to not contaminate the medication On 9/12/24 at 9:30 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #1 administer and prefill medications for Patient #5. Nurse #1 performed hand hygiene and donned gloves. She contaminated her gloves by touching the outside of the lockbox. She opened a container, poured a pill into the cap of the container and then placed the pill into a medication organizer. With the same gloves she touched her electronic device to document the medication, further contaminating her gloves. During the process a capsule fell from the container onto the top of the lockbox and Nurse #1 picked it up and placed the contaminated capsule into the medication organizer. With the same gloves on Nurse #1 again opened the lockbox, removed a medication container and poured a pill into her gloved hand and then into the medication organizer. Three times she removed medications from the lockbox the lid closed, and she had to reopen the lockbox, further contaminating her gloves. When the administration was completed Nurse #1 counted a controlled medication by pouring the pills from the container into her contaminated gloved hand and then putting them back into the container. During an interview on 9/12/24 at 9:45 A.M., Nurse #1 said that she should not have administered a medication that had fallen, should not have put medications into a contaminated glove hand before placing them in a medication organizer and should have used a clean surface to count controlled medication. During an interview on 9/12/24 at 10:20 A.M., the Business Director said that medication that has fallen should not be administered, medications should not be poured into a contaminated gloved hand and controlled medications should be counted on a clean surface.”
-
Rn Performs Assessment
The inspectors’ words, 474 words
“RN performs assessment CFR(s): 484.55(a)(1) A registered nurse must conduct an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of the patient; and, for Medicare patients, to determine eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, including homebound status. The initial assessment visit must be held either within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician or allowed practitioner - ordered start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review, policy review and staff interview, the Agency failed to ensure the Registered Nurse conducted an initial assessment within 48 hours of the referral date for 2 patients (#8 and #2), from a total sample of 8 patients. Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated that Patient #2 had a referral date of June 6, 2024 and a diagnosis of Lymphoedema. The referral indicated that the patient was homebound requiring skilled nursing services for indwelling catheter and wound care. The documented referral date for Patient #2 was June 6, 2024. The start of care date was documented as June 14, 2024, 8 days past the referral date, with no documented reason for the delay. During an interview on 9/12/24 at 9:05 A.M., the Business Director said he spoke with the nurse who said that Patient #2 was not discharged from the prior agency until 6/10/24. He further said that the expectation is that the nurse should have documented this information in the clinical record. Review of the Agency’s policy entitled, Intake Process, dated April 2021, indicated the following: *The organization accepts only those patients whose needs can be met by the services it provides. *Patient referrals for home care services may be accepted by clinicians, including the director, supervisor, and intake coordinator. *The Clinical Supervisor/Intake Coordinator will assign personnel and schedule an initial assessment visit. The initial assessment visit will be performed either within 48 hours of the referral, or within 48 hours of a patient’s return home, or on the start of care dated ordered by the physician (or other authorized licensed independent practitioner). *If the patient cannot be assessed within the timeframe specified, a call log and/or physician ordered (IPO) will be completed. 1. Review of the clinical record of Patient #8 indicated a referral date of 3/21/24. Patient #8 was admitted to the Agency in April 2024 with a diagnosis of bilateral hip osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease that can affect the many tissues of the joint). Further review of the clinical record indicated the initial assessment was not completed until 4/2/24. During an interview on 9/12/24 at 1:55 P.M., after reviewing Patient #8’s clinical record, the Business Director said the initial assessment was not done within the required timeframe and there was no document to indicate why it was completed late.”
-
Preparing Clinical Notes
The inspectors’ words, 2,159 words
“Preparing clinical notes CFR(s): 484.75(b)(6) Preparing clinical notes; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review, interview and policy review, the agency failed to ensure that 1.) the clinician prepared clinical notes for 1 Patient (#4), and 2.) failed to ensure clinical notes were completed timely for 3 Patients (#6, #7 and #8), out of a total sample of 8 patients. Findings include: 2. For Patient #2, the Home Health Agency failed to document why there was a delay in starting home health services within 48 hours from the referral date. Patient #2 was admitted to the Agency in June 2024 with a diagnosis of lymphoedema. Review of the clinical record indicated that Patient #2 had a documented referral date of June 6, 2024, but his/her start of care was documented as June 14, 2024, 8 days after the referral was made. During an interview on 9/12/24 at 9:05 A.M., the Business Director said he contacted the nurse involved who said Patient #2 was not discharged from the previous agency until 6/10/24, but she did not document this in the clinical record. The Business Director said the expectation is the nurse should have documented this information in the clinical record. 3. For Patient #6, the Agency failed to ensure that the Physical Therapist completed his documentation with 48 hours per policy for Patient #6. Patient #6 was admitted to the Agency In January 2024 with a diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Review of the clinical record indicated that during the certification period of 1/22/24 - 3/21/24 the patient was to receive physical therapy service 1-2 times a week for 9 weeks. Further review of the clinical record indicated that for 6 of 9 visits the documentation for the visits were signed and dated as completed after 48 hours, including the following: *The Physical therapy home visit was conducted on 1/22/24, but documentation for the visit was not signed and dated until 1/26/24. *The Physical therapy home visit was conducted on 2/1/24, but documentation for the visit was not signed and dated until 2/8/24. *The Physical therapy home visit was conducted on 2/6/24, but documentation for the visit was not signed and dated until 2/13/24. *The Physical therapy home visit was conducted on 2/9/24, but documentation for the visit was not signed and dated until 2/15/24. *The Physical therapy home visit was conducted on 3/8/24, but documentation for the visit was not signed and dated until 3/19/24. *The Physical therapy home visit was conducted on 3/12/24, but documentation for the visit was not signed and dated until 3/19/24. During an interview on 9/12/24 at 1:25 P.M., the Business Director said the documentation for the visit should be completed within 48 hours, per the Agency’s policy. Review of the agency policy, titled, Missed Visits, revised April 2021, included the following: -If a visit is missed and not rescheduled the clinician will: Document in the patient’s clinical record the following information: Patient name, date and type of visit that was missed, reason for the missed visit, any other follow-up needed, other person(s) that were notified of the missed visit, signature of staff member reporting the information. Review of the Occupational Therapy (OT) orders for certification period 6/25/24 through 8/23/24 indicated the following OT order: Start on 7/7/24 1-2 times for 7 weeks. Review of the OT orders for certification period 8/24/24 through 10/22/24 indicated the following OT order: Start on 8/27/24 1-2 times per week for 9 weeks. Review of the clinical record for Patient #1 failed to indicate that OT was provided for the week of 8/18/24 and the week of 9/1/24. There was no documentation as to why the visits were missed. During an interview on 9/11/24 at 1:40 P.M., the Business Director said that missed visits should be documented in the clinical record. During an interview on 9/11/24 at 2:07 P.M., the Business Director said that he had reviewed the clinical record and was not able to find documentation for the missed OT visits for the weeks of 8/18/24 and 9/1/24. Review of the Agency’s policy entitled, Clinical Signatures on Visit Notes, dated 3/19/21, indicated the following: *The Agency must maintain updated, accurate, and complete visit notes. *Applies to all field staff who complete patient visits. *All visits must be signed by the clinician who completed the care within 48 hours of the date of the visit. *In the event the clinician is unable to meet the 48 hour requirement, the clinician must communicate with the supervisor to discuss and determine a deadline for completion. 1. For Patient #4, the Agency staff failed to document the reason the initial assessment was not completed within 48 hours of the referral date. Patient #4 was admitted to the Agency in July 2024 with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction (damage to the tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area). Review of the clinical record indicated a referral date of 7/23/24, and the initial assessment (start of care) visit was documented as completed on 7/31/24. Review of the late entry note, dated 9/11/24, indicated the Physical Therapist spoke with Patient #4’s spouse on 7/25/24, who requested a delay of the initial visit to 7/31/24, when the Physical Therapist would be available. During an interview on 9/12/24 at 9:30 A.M., the Director of Business said he reached out to the Physical Therapist who said he failed to document his phone conversation with Patient #4’s spouse to delay the initial assessment. 2a.) For Patient #6, the Agency failed to ensure that the Physical Therapist completed his documentation with 48 hours per policy for Patient #6. Patient #6 was admitted to the Agency In January 2024 with a diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Review of the clinical record indicated that during the certification period of 1/22/24 - 3/21/24 the patient was to receive physical therapy (PT) service 1-2 times a week for 9 weeks. Further review of the clinical record indicated that for 6 of 9 visits the documentation for the visits were signed and dated as completed after 48 hours, including the following: *The PT home visit was conducted on 1/22/24, but documentation for the visit was not signed and dated until 1/26/24. *The PT home visit was conducted on 2/1/24, but documentation for the visit was not signed and dated until 2/8/24. *The PT home visit was conducted on 2/6/24, but documentation for the visit was not signed and dated until 2/13/24. *The PT home visit was conducted on 2/9/24, but documentation for the visit was not signed and dated until 2/15/24. *The PT home visit was conducted on 3/8/24, but documentation for the visit was not signed and dated until 3/19/24. *The PT home visit was conducted on 3/12/24, but documentation for the visit was not signed and dated until 3/19/24. During an interview on 9/12/24 at 1:25 P.M., the Business Director said the documentation for the visit should be completed within 48 hours, per the Agency’s policy. 2b.) For Patient #7, the Agency failed to ensure that nursing staff signed and dated their visit notes within 48 hours of the visit. Patient #7 was admitted to the Agency in February 2024 with a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (a disease that occurs when the body cannot produce or use insulin properly, causing high blood sugars). Review of the Physician ordered Home Health Certification POC, dated 2/2/24 through 4/21/24, included the following orders: *Effective 2/22/24: 1 Skilled Nurse visit (SNV) a day for 10 weeks. Review of the clinical record indicated a SNV was made on 2/22/24, however it was not signed and dated until 2/25/24. Review of the clinical record indicated a SNV was made on 2/23/24, however it was not signed and dated until 2/27/24. Review of the clinical record indicated SNVs were made on 2/26/24, 2/28/24 2/9/24 and 3/2/24 however then of the notes were not signed and dated until 3/5/24. Review of the clinical record indicated SNVs were made on 3/7//24, 3/8/24, and 3/9/24 however then of the notes were signed and dated until 3/12/24. Review of the clinical record indicated a SNV was made on 3/11/24, however it was not signed and dated until 3/16/24. Review of the clinical record indicated a SNV was made on 3/12/24, however it was not signed and dated until 3/15/24. Review of the clinical record indicated SNVs were made on 3/13/24, however it was not signed and dated until 3/16/24. Review of the clinical record indicated SNVs were made on 3/25/24 and 3/27/24, however the notes were not signed and dated until 4/1/24. Review of the clinical record indicated a SNV was made on 4/28/24, however it was not signed and dated until 4/2/24. Review of the clinical record indicated a SNV was made on 4/1/24, however it was not signed and dated until 4/5/24. Review of the clinical record indicated a SNV was made on 4/2/24, however it was not signed and dated until 4/6/24. Review of the clinical record indicated a SNV was made on 4/17/24, however it was not signed and dated until 4/24/24. Review of the Physician’s ordered Home Health Certification POC, dated 4/22/24 through 6/20/24, included the following orders: *Effective 4/22/24: 1 Skilled Nurse visit (SNV) a day for 9 weeks. Review of the clinical record indicated SNVs were made on 4/24/24 and 4/26/24, however the notes were not signed and dated until 4/29/24. Review of the clinical record indicated a SNV was made on 5/2/24, however it was not signed and dated until 5/5/24. Review of the clinical record indicated a SNV was made on 5/6/24, however it was not signed and dated until 5/9/24. Review of the clinical record indicated SNVs were made on 5/9/24 and 5/10/24, however the notes were not signed and dated until 5/14/24. Review of the clinical record nursing completed the discharge summary, however it was not signed and dated until 6/2/24. 2c.) For Patient #8, the Agency failed to ensure that staff, including the Physical Therapist, the Occupational Therapist and Nursing, signed their visit notes within 48 hours of their visits. Patient #8 was admitted to the Agency in April 2024 with a diagnosis of bilateral hip osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease which involves the tissues in the joint). Review of the Physician ordered Home Health Certification POC, dated 4/2/24 through 5/31/24, included the following orders: *Effective 4/2/24: Physician Therapy visit (PTV) once a day for one day. *Effective 4/8/24: 1 to 2 PTVs a week for 8 weeks. Review of the clinical record indicated a PTV was made on 4/2/24, however it was not signed and dated until 4/8/24. Review of the clinical record indicated a PTV was made on 5/3/24, however it was not signed and dated until 5/8/24. Review of the clinical record indicated a PTV was made on 5/31/24, however it was not signed and dated until 6/5/24. Review of the Physician ordered Home Health Certification POC, dated 6/1/24 through 7/30/24, included the following orders: *Effective 6/5/24: 1 PTV a week for one week, then 1 to 2 PTVs week for 8 weeks. *Effective 6/11/24: 1 Occupational Therapy visit (OTV) a week for 1 week. *Effective 6/16/24: 1 to 2 OTVs a week for 7 weeks. Review of the clinical record indicated an OTV was made on 6/13/24, however it was not signed and dated until 6/16/24. Review of the clinical record indicated a PTV was made on 6/28/24, however it was not signed and dated until 7/5/24. Review of the clinical record indicated a PTV was made on 7/26/24, however it was not signed and dated until 8/1/24. Review of the clinical record indicated an OTV was made on 7/30/24, however it was not signed and dated until 8/4/24. Review of the Physician ordered Home Health Certification POC, dated 7/31/24 through 9/28/24, included the following orders: *Effective 8/4/24: 1 to 2 PTVs a week for 8 weeks. *Effective 9/5/24: 1 OTV a week for 1 week, and 1 Skilled Nurse visit (SNV) a day for 1 day. Review of the clinical record indicated a PTV was made on 9/4/24, however it was not signed and dated until 9/8/24. Review of the clinical record indicated an OTV was made on 9/5/24, however it was not signed and dated until 9/8/24. Review of the clinical record indicated a SNV was made on 9/5/24, however it was not signed and dated until 9/11/24. During an interview on 9/12/24 at 9:35 A.M., the Director of Business said staff are required to sign and date their documented visit within 48 hours of the visit, and if they are not able to there should be documentation to indicate why a note was not completed timely. During a second interview on 9/12/24 at 2:30 P.M., the Director of Business said he had reviewed the clinical records for Patients #7 and #8. He said that staff had completed the above noted documentation late and not within 48 hours of their visit as the agency requires.”
-
Communication With Physicians
The inspectors’ words, 467 words
“Communication with physicians CFR(s): 484.75(b)(7) Communication with all physicians involved in the plan of care and other health care practitioners (as appropriate) related to the current plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review and interview, the Agency failed to ensure the staff communicated to the physician when there was a change in the plan of care (POC) for 2 patients (#8 and #7), out of a total sample of 8 patients. Findings include: Patient #8 was admitted to the Agency in April 2024 with a diagnosis of bilateral hip osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease which involves the tissues in the joint). Review of the Physician ordered Home Health Certification POC, dated 4/2/24 through 5/31/24, included the following orders: *Effective 4/2/24: Physician Therapy visit (PTV) once a day for one day. *Effective 4/8/24: 1 to 2 PTVs a week for 8 weeks. Review of the clinical record included documented notes that PTVs were not provided on 5/7/24, 5/21/24, and 5/23/24, however the notes did not indicate the physician was notified of the missed visits. Review of the Physician ordered Home Health Certification POC, dated 6/1/24 through 7/30/24, included the following orders: *Effective 6/5/24: 1 PTV a week for one week, then 1 to 2 PTVs week for 8 weeks. Review of the clinical record included documented notes that PTVs were not provided on 6/20/24, 7/2/24, 7/9/24, 7/16/24 and 7/18/24, however the notes did not indicate the physician was notified of the missed visits. Review of the Physician ordered Home Health Certification POC, dated 7/31/24 through 9/28/24, included the following orders: *Effective 8/4/24: 1 to 2 PTVs a week for 8 weeks. Review of the clinical record included a documented note that a PTV was not provided on 8/13/24, however the note did not indicate the physician was notified of the missed visit. 2. Patient #7 was admitted to the Agency in February 2024 with a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (a disease that occurs when the body cannot produce or use insulin properly, causing high blood sugars). Review of the Physician ordered Home Health Certification POC, dated 2/2/24 through 4/21/24, included the following orders: *Effective 2/22/24: 1 Skilled Nurse visit (SNV) 1 time a day for 10 weeks. Review of the clinical record included documented notes that SNVs were not provided on 2/2724, 3/21/24, 4/6/24, 4/14/24, 4/18/24 and 421//24, however the notes did not indicate the physician was notified of the missed visits. During an interview on 9/12/24 at 1:55 P.M., the Business Director said staff write interim orders, which are sent to the attending physician, indicating when visits or services were not provided, as ordered in the POC. He said there were no interim orders notifying the physician of the above missed visits for Patient #8 and Patient #7”
-
Onsite Supervisory Visit Every 14 Days
The inspectors’ words, 401 words
“Onsite supervisory visit every 14 days CFR(s): 484.80(h)(1)(i) (1)(i) If home health aide services are provided to a patient who is receiving skilled nursing, physical or occupational therapy, or speech language pathology services— (A) A registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional who is familiar with the patient, the patient’s plan of care, and the written patient care instructions described in paragraph (g) of this section, must complete a supervisory assessment of the aide services being provided no less frequently than every 14 days; and (B) The home health aide does not need to be present during the supervisory assessment described in paragraph (h)(1)(i)(A) of this section. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the Home Health Agency failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) completed a supervisory assessment of the Home Health Aide (HHA) services, at least every 14 days for 1 patient (#2), in a total sample of 8 patients. Findings include: Review of the Agency’s policy entitled, Home Health Aide Supervisory Visits, last revised April 2021, indicated the following, but not limited to: *The frequency of supervisory visits will be based upon the needs of the patient after the plan of care is established. They must be conducted no less frequently than every 14 days if the patient is receiving skilled services. *Supervisory visits and overall supervision will be documented in the clinical record. Patient #2 was admitted to the Home Health Agency in June 2024 with a diagnosis of Lymphoedema. The Physician’s orders for the certification periods of 6/14/24 - 8/12/24 and 8/13/24 - 10/11/24 indicated that Patient #2 was to receive Home Health Aide services 6 times a week, with the exception of 5 times a week between 8/13/24 - 8/17/24. Review of the clinical record indicated that the Home Health Aide visits were made 6 times a week for the weeks of 8/4/24 through 9/7/24. During this time there were no documented Home Health Aide supervisory visits by the RN, after 8/6/24. During an interview on 9/12/24 at 9:05 A.M., the Business Director said the RN forgot to document her supervisory visit on 8/13/24 when she was working with the Home Health Aide. He also said we dropped the ball since there were no other supervisory visits documented from 8/6/24 through 9/11/24. The expectation is that the RN should have documented her supervisory visit.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2024 | Recertification inspection | 7 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since May 20, 1996.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy and home health aide services.
- Doesn’t offer speech pathology and medical social services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 11 owners or officers are people: Tiara Chatman (owns 5% or more directly, 30%); Tiara Chatman (corporate officer, 30%); Tiara Chatman (managing employee (on the payroll), 30%); Nicholas Chatman (owns 5% or more directly, 30%); Nicholas Chatman (corporate officer, 30%); Michael Griffin (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); Michael Griffin (corporate officer, 20%); Michael Griffin (managing employee (on the payroll), 20%); Mary Driscoll Griffin (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); Mary Driscoll Griffin (corporate officer, 20%); Mary Driscoll Griffin (managing employee (on the payroll), 20%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 2 of 5.
- Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (105 surveys completed): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 74% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 2 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 46.56% (worse than the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 24 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 01028, where this agency’s office is, 20 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 2.75 of 5, and this one is rated 2 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Capuano Home Health Care Inc. This home health agency | 2 |
| Integrihome Inc. | Not given |
| Comfort Plus Caregivers LLC | 3.5 |
| Care Central VNA & Hospice Inc. | 3.5 |
| Baystate Home Health | 3 |
| Holyoke Visiting Nurse Assoc | 3.5 |
| Amedisys Home Health Care | 4 |
| Legacy Lifecare Visiting Nurse Agency - West | 4 |
| Aveanna Healthcare | 2.5 |
| Elara Caring | 5 |
| International Health Solutions | 2 |
| Excel Home Care Services Inc. | 2.5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.