Phoenix Home Care
A home health agency in Wichita, Kansas 67226
3450 N Rock Rd, Bldg 200, Ste 213, Wichita, Kansas 67226. (316) 688-5511.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 4.5of 5 quality of patient care rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Sep 4, 2025: a complaint and recertification inspection.
5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Sep 4, 2025: complaint and recertification inspection5 deficiencies
-
Plan Of Care Must Include The Following
The inspectors’ words, 496 words
“Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interview the home health agency failed to ensure each patient’s Plan of Care was individualized, to include all required safety measures and complete medication orders for 5 of 17 sample patients (Patient 4,6,7,11 and 17). This deficient practice had the potential to affect patient safety and to place the patients at risk for adverse outcomes and unmet needs. Findings Include: Patient 4 Review of Patient 4’s clinical record with a Start of Care date of 08/20/25 showed Aspirin 81 mg oral daily in the medication section of the Plan of Care. However, there were no risk of bleeding precautions listed under the safety measures section of the Plan of Care. Patient 6 Review of Patient 6’s clinical record with a Start of Care date of 08/08/25 showed Aspirin 81 mg oral daily in the medication section of the Plan of Care. However, there were no risk of bleeding precautions listed under the safety measures section of the Plan of Care. Patient 7 Review of Patient 7’s clinical record with a Start of Care date of 08/30/25 showed Aspirin 81 mg oral daily in the medication section of the Plan of Care. However, there were no risk of bleeding precautions listed under the safety measures section of the Plan of Care. Patient 11 Review of Patient 11’s clinical record with a Start of Care date of 07/30/25 showed Aspirin 325 mg oral daily in the medication section of the Plan of Care. However, there were no risk of bleeding precautions listed under the safety measures section of the Plan of Care. Patient 17 Review of Patient 17’s clinical record with a Start of Care date of 08/05/25 showed orders for Oxygen 2 L (liters) at night, on the Plan of Care. However, this order was incomplete, in that there was no route of delivery. During an interview on 09/04/25 at 2:30 PM, Staff A, Administrator, confirmed the above findings of the agency’s failure to ensure an individualized Plan of Care for the above patients.”
-
Visit Schedule
The inspectors’ words, 287 words
“Visit schedule CFR(s): 484.60(e)(1) Visit schedule, including frequency of visits by HHA personnel and personnel acting on behalf of the HHA. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to provide the patient and caregiver a copy of written instructions outlining visit schedule including frequency of visits by HHA personnel for 2 of 17 sample patients (Patient 1 and 6). The Home Health Agency’s failure to ensure the patients received written instructions regarding planned visits placed all patients, currently on services at risk for unmet needs, care and services. Findings Include: Patient 1 Observation during home visit with Patient 1 on 09/03/25 at 8:00 AM, there were no written instructions regarding visit frequency or a calendar indicating when the agency personnel would visit. Review of Patient 1’s clinical record lacked documented evidence by agency professional staff regarding giving or delivering written instructions outlining visit frequencies to the patient or caregiver. Patient 6 Observation during home visit with Patient 6 on 09/03/25 at 11:15 AM, there were no written instructions regarding visit frequency or a calendar indicating when the agency personnel would visit. Review of Patient 6’s clinical record lacked documented evidence by agency professional staff regarding giving or delivering written instructions outlining visit frequencies to the patient or caregiver. During an interview on 09/04/25 at 10:45 AM, Staff A, Administrator stated that, the agency does not give the patients a copy of the plan of care but does have a copy of a calendar in the admission packet for use by the professional staff. Staff A also confirmed the above findings of not providing written information regarding the frequency of visits to patients.”
-
Patient Medication Schedule/Instructions
The inspectors’ words, 255 words
“Patient medication schedule/instructions CFR(s): 484.60(e)(2) Patient medication schedule/instructions, including: medication name, dosage and frequency and which medications will be administered by HHA personnel and personnel acting on behalf of the HHA. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review and interview, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to provide the patient and caregiver a copy of written instructions outlining medication schedule/instructions, including medication name, dosage, frequency, and which medications would be administered by HHA personnel for 1 of 17 sample patients (Patient #5). The home health agency’s failure to ensure the patients received written instructions regarding medication administration placed all patients, currently on service at risk for adverse medication outcomes, and unmet needs. Findings Include: Observation during home visit with Patient 5 on 09/03/25 at 10:15 AM, there were no written instructions regarding patient medications found in the home. The patient was asked how he managed his medications or if he had been provided a written list of his medications by the agency, he stated that he wasn’t aware of a list being provided. He also stated, “I just take them all together mixed with agave”. Review of Patient 5’s clinical record lacked documented evidence by agency professional staff regarding giving or delivering written instructions outlining medication to the patients or caregivers. During an interview on 09/04/25 at 10:45 AM, Staff A, Administrator stated that, the medication profile should have been delivered to the patient. Staff A confirmed the above findings of not providing the patient a written medication list.”
-
Treatments And Therapy Services
The inspectors’ words, 333 words
“Treatments and therapy services CFR(s): 484.60(e)(3) Any treatments to be administered by HHA personnel and personnel acting on behalf of the HHA, including therapy services. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to provide the patient and caregiver a copy of written instructions outlining wound care treatments for 2 of 17 sample patients (Patients #1 & #3). The home health agency’s failure to ensure the patients received written instructions regarding treatments to be provided, placed all patients currently on services at risk for adverse outcomes and unmet needs. Findings Include: Patient 1 Observation during home visit with Patient 1 on 09/03/25 at 8:00 AM, there were no written instructions regarding how the wound care was to be performed, found in the home. Review of Plan of Care for Patient 1, with episode dates of 07/22/25 - 09/19/25 showed orders for Skilled Nursing to perform wound care using Collagen, Hydrafera Blue and a foam dressing. Review of Patient 1’s clinical record lacked documented evidence by agency professional staff regarding giving or delivering written instructions to the patient or caregiver, outlining how the wound care was to be preformed. Patient 3 Observation during home visit with Patient 3 on 09/03/25 at 9:15 AM, there were no written instructions regarding how the wound care was to be performed, found in the home. Review of Plan of Care for Patient 3 with a Start of Care dated 07/29/25 showed orders for Skilled Nursing to perform wound care to the left leg per orders from the wound clinic. Review of Patient 3’s clinical record lacked documented evidence by agency professional staff regarding giving or delivering written instructions to the patient or caregiver, outlining how the wound care was to be performed. During an interview on 09/04/25 at 11:00 AM with agency Staff A, Administrator confirmed that, the agency had not given patients written instructions regarding how wound care treatments were to be performed.”
-
Discharge And Transfer Summaries
The inspectors’ words, 438 words
“Discharge and transfer summaries CFR(s): 484.110(a)(6)(i-iii) (i) A completed discharge summary that is sent to the primary care practitioner or other health care professional who will be responsible for providing care and services to the patient after discharge from the HHA (if any) within 5 business days of the patient’s discharge; or (ii) A completed transfer summary that is sent within 2 business days of a planned transfer, if the patient’s care will be immediately continued in a health care facility; or (iii) A completed transfer summary that is sent within 2 business days of becoming aware of an unplanned transfer, if the patient is still receiving care in a health care facility at the time when the HHA becomes aware of the transfer. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, and staff interview, it was determined the Home Health agency (HHA) failed to send a transfer summary to the facility were the patient was receiving in-patient health care services for 1 (Patient #12) of 17 and a discharge summary to the physician following the patient’s care for 2 (Patient #15 & #16). This deficient practice had the potential to affect patient safety and to place the patients at risk for adverse outcomes related to the lack of care coordination with other health care services. Findings Include: Patient 12 Review of Patient 12’s clinical record showed the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care with a Start of Care date of 08/28/23 and a Certification Period from: 06/18/25 to 08/16/25. Review of visit notes showed a transfer to the hospital on 06/24/25 with a “Transfer to In-Patient Facility” (TIF) OASIS/Comprehensive Assessment and a Transfer Summary both being performed. However, the transfer summary was faxed to the physician on 07/07/25 which was after the required timeframe. Patient 15 Review of Patient 15’s clinician record showed the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care with a Start of Care date of 03/28/25 and a Certification Period from : 05/27/25 to 07/25/25. Review of visit notes showed the patient was discharged on 06/09/25 however, there was no evidence the discharge summary was sent to the physician. Patient 16 Review of Patient 16’s clinical record showed the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care with a Start of Care date of 08/14/25 and a Certification Period from: 08/14/25 to 10/12/25. Review of visit notes showed the patient was discharged on 08/25/25 however, there was no evidence the discharge summary was sent to the physician. During an interview on 09/04/25 at 2:30 PM, Staff A, Administrator, confirmed the agency had not provided Transfer/Discharge summaries for the above patient.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2025 | Complaint and recertification inspection | 5 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since May 24, 1996.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Phoenix Healthcare Holdings LLC owns 100% directly since Jan 1, 2013.
- 10 owners or officers are people: Philip R Melugin (owns 5% or more through other companies, 7.99%); Susan Marberry (corporate officer); Debra R Mullen (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jeffery S Bonham (corporate officer); Jeffery S Bonham (corporate director); Anita Angstadt (managing employee (on the payroll)); Anita Angstadt (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Kathy Poland (corporate officer); Kathy Poland (corporate director); Philip R Melugin (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Table Rock Acquisition Co., LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Oct 20, 2021 |
| New Day Healthcare Intermediate LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Oct 20, 2021 |
| New Day Healthcare, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Oct 20, 2021 |
| Phoenix Healthcare Holdings LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Jan 1, 2013 |
| New Day Healthcare Holdings, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Oct 20, 2021 |
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (327 surveys completed): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 81% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 4.5 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 92.75% (better than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 10.08% (same as the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 4.49% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 19 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 67226, where this agency’s office is, 18 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.25 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Enhabit Home Health | 3.5 |
| Progressive Home Health & Hospice | 3 |
| Phoenix Home Care This home health agency | 4.5 |
| Traditions Health | 4.5 |
| Enhabit Home Health | Not given |
| Angels Care Home Health | 2 |
| Interim Healthcare of Wichita | 3 |
| Ascension at Home | 4.5 |
| Home Health & Hospice of Kansas | 2 |
| Love My Nurse, LLC | 1.5 |
| Providence Home Health and Hospice, LLC | 4 |
| Specialized Home Care | 4 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.