Hearth Record

Sunrise Home Health Care Services Inc.

A home health agency in Merrillville, Indiana 46410

2711 W Lincoln Highway, Merrillville, Indiana 46410. (219) 738-2000.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 23, 2026: a recertification inspection.

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 23, 2026: recertification inspection8 deficiencies
  • Policies/Procedures-Volunteers And Staffing

    The inspectors’ words, 337 words

    “Policies/Procedures-Volunteers and Staffing CFR(s): 484.102(b)(5) §403.748(b)(6), §416.54(b)(5), §418.113(b)(4), §441.184(b)(6), §460.84(b)(7), §482.15(b)(6), §483.73(b)(6), §483.475(b)(6), §484.102(b)(5), §485.68(b)(4), §485.542(b)(6), §485.625(b)(6), §485.727(b)(4), §485.920(b)(5), §491.12(b)(4), §494.62(b)(5). [(b) Policies and procedures. The [facilities] must develop and implement emergency preparedness policies and procedures, based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The policies and procedures must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. At a minimum, the policies and procedures must address the following:] (6) [or (4), (5), or (7) as noted above] The use of volunteers in an emergency or other emergency staffing strategies, including the process and role for integration of State and Federally designated health care professionals to address surge needs during an emergency. *[For RNHCIs at §403.748(b):] Policies and procedures. (6) The use of volunteers in an emergency and other emergency staffing strategies to address surge needs during an emergency. *[For Hospice at §418.113(b):] Policies and procedures. (4) The use of hospice employees in an emergency and other emergency staffing strategies, including the process and role for integration of State and Federally designated health care professionals to address surge needs during an emergency. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to include in its policies the use of volunteers in an emergency and the role for integration of State and Federally designated health care professionals to address needs during an emergency. The findings include: Review of the emergency preparedness plan and its policies failed to evidence the use of volunteers and the integration of State and Federally designated health care professionals to address needs during an emergency. On 01/23/2026 at 3:08 PM, the Administrator indicated the use for emergency staffing was a hypothetical situation and the use of the phone tree was the plan to activate emergency staffing. The Administrator indicated there was no emergency staff included in the phone tree.”

    Rule E0024. Standard-level.

  • Ep Training And Testing

    The inspectors’ words, 477 words

    “EP Training and Testing CFR(s): 484.102(d) §403.748(d), §416.54(d), §418.113(d), §441.184(d), §460.84(d), §482.15(d), §483.73(d), §483.475(d), §484.102(d), §485.68(d), §485.542(d), §485.625(d), §485.727(d), §485.920(d), §486.360(d), §491.12(d), §494.62(d). *[For RNCHIs at §403.748, ASCs at §416.54, Hospice at §418.113, PRTFs at §441.184, PACE at §460.84, Hospitals at §482.15, HHAs at §484.102, CORFs at §485.68, REHs at §485.542, CAHs at §486.625, “Organizations” under 485.727, CMHCs at §485.920, OPOs at §486.360, and RHC/FHQs at §491.12:] (d) Training and testing. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, policies and procedures at paragraph (b) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The training and testing program must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. *[For LTC facilities at §483.73(d):] (d) Training and testing. The LTC facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, policies and procedures at paragraph (b) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The training and testing program must be reviewed and updated at least annually. *[For ICF/IIDs at §483.475(d):] Training and testing. The ICF/IID must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, policies and procedures at paragraph (b) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The training and testing program must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. The ICF/IID must meet the requirements for evacuation drills and training at §483.470(i). *[For ESRD Facilities at §494.62(d):] Training, testing, and orientation. The dialysis facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training, testing and patient orientation program that is based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, policies and procedures at paragraph (b) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The training, testing and orientation program must be evaluated and updated at every 2 years. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to maintain an emergency training program. The findings include: An undated policy titled “Emergency Disaster Plan Orientation and Training” indicated the agency would provide emergency preparedness training to all staff initially and then annually. Review of the emergency preparedness binder, training binder, and personnel files failed to evidence emergency preparedness training for staff. On 01/23/2026 at 3:19 PM, the Administrator indicated there was no training offered for emergency preparedness.”

    Rule E0036. Standard-level.

  • Ep Testing Requirements

    The inspectors’ words, 2,044 words

    “EP Testing Requirements CFR(s): 484.102(d)(2) §416.54(d)(2), §418.113(d)(2), §441.184(d)(2), §460.84(d)(2), §482.15(d)(2), §483.73(d)(2), §483.475(d)(2), §484.102(d)(2), §485.68(d)(2), §485.542(d)(2), §485.625(d)(2), §485.727(d)(2), §485.920(d)(2), §491.12(d)(2), §494.62(d)(2). *[For ASCs at §416.54, CORFs at §485.68, REHs at §485.542, OPO, “Organizations” under §485.727, CMHCs at §485.920, RHCs/FQHCs at §491.12, and ESRD Facilities at §494.62]: (2) Testing. The [facility] must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan annually. The [facility] must do all of the following: (i) Participate in a full-scale exercise that is community-based every 2 years; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct a facility-based functional exercise every 2 years; or (B) If the [facility] experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the [facility] is exempt from engaging in its next required community-based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the actual event. (ii) Conduct an additional exercise at least every 2 years, opposite the year the full-scale or functional exercise under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section is conducted, that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the [facility’s] response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the [facility’s] emergency plan, as needed. *[For Hospices at 418.113(d):] (2) Testing for hospices that provide care in the patient’s home. The hospice must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least annually. The hospice must do the following: (i) Participate in a full-scale exercise that is community based every 2 years; or (A) When a community based exercise is not accessible, conduct an individual facility based functional exercise every 2 years; or (B) If the hospice experiences a natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the hospital is exempt from engaging in its next required full scale community-based exercise or individual facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional exercise every 2 years, opposite the year the full-scale or functional exercise under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section is conducted, that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or a facility based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (3) Testing for hospices that provide inpatient care directly. The hospice must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan twice per year. The hospice must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual facility-based functional exercise; or (B) If the hospice experiences a natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the hospice is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community based or facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional annual exercise that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or a facility based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop led by a facilitator that includes a group discussion using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the hospice’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events and revise the hospice’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For PRFTs at §441.184(d), Hospitals at §482.15(d), CAHs at §485.625(d):] (2) Testing. The [PRTF, Hospital, CAH] must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan twice per year. The [PRTF, Hospital, CAH] must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) If the [PRTF, Hospital, CAH] experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the [facility] is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an [additional] annual exercise or and that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or individual, a facility-based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the [facility’s] response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events and revise the [facility’s] emergency plan, as needed. *[For PACE at §460.84(d):] (2) Testing. The PACE organization must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least annually. The PACE organization must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) If the PACE experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the PACE is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional exercise every 2 years opposite the year the full-scale or functional exercise under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section is conducted that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or individual, a facility based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the PACE’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events and revise the PACE’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For LTC Facilities at §483.73(d):] (2) The [LTC facility] must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least twice per year, including unannounced staff drills using the emergency procedures. The [LTC facility, ICF/IID] must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise. (B) If the [LTC facility] facility experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the LTC facility is exempt from engaging its next required a full-scale community-based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional annual exercise that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or an individual, facility based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the [LTC facility] facility’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the [LTC facility] facility’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For ICF/IIDs at §483.475(d)]: (2) Testing. The ICF/IID must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least twice per year. The ICF/IID must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise; or. (B) If the ICF/IID experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the ICF/IID is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community-based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional annual exercise that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or an individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the ICF/IID’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the ICF/IID’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For HHAs at §484.102] (d)(2) Testing. The HHA must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least annually. The HHA must do the following: (i) Participate in a full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise every 2 years; or. (B) If the HHA experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the HHA is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community-based or individual, facility based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional exercise every 2 years, opposite the year the full-scale or functional exercise under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section is conducted, that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or an individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the HHA’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the HHA’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For OPOs at §486.360] (d)(2) Testing. The OPO must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan. The OPO must do the following: (i) Conduct a paper-based, tabletop exercise or workshop at least annually. A tabletop exercise is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. If the OPO experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the OPO is exempt from engaging in its next required testing exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Analyze the OPO’s response to and maintain documentation of all tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the [RNHCI’s and OPO’s] emergency plan, as needed. *[ RNCHIs at §403.748]: (d)(2) Testing. The RNHCI must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan. The RNHCI must do the following: (i) Conduct a paper-based, tabletop exercise at least annually. A tabletop exercise is a group discussion led by a facilitator, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (ii) Analyze the RNHCI’s response to and maintain documentation of all tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the RNHCI’s emergency plan, as needed. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to conduct a community or facilty -wide exercise to test the emergency plan at least every 2 years. The findings include: Review of the emergency preparedness plan failed to evidence a community or facility-wide exercise since the last recertification survey of 02/02/2023. On 01/23/2026 at 3:08 PM, the Administrator indicated the agency had not conducted a community or facility-wide exercise as the agency was informed they did not have to conduct a facility-wide exercise if the agency was not allowed to be included in the community-wide exercise.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level.

  • Program Scope

    The inspectors’ words, 341 words

    “Program scope CFR(s): 484.65(a)(1),(2) Standard: Program scope. (1) The program must at least be capable of showing measurable improvement in indicators for which there is evidence that improvement in those indicators will improve health outcomes, patient safety, and quality of care. (2) The HHA must measure, analyze, and track quality indicators, including adverse patient events, and other aspects of performance that enable the HHA to assess processes of care, HHA services, and operations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency’s Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program failed to track quality indicators to include all documented Patient infections in 1 of 1 active clinical records reviewed with a suprapubic catheter (Patient #1). Findings include: An undated policy, titled, “Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement,” indicated the QAPI Program Components would include infection prevention integration. The policy indicated the QAPI Committee would be responsible for identifying performance issues and reviewing data. The policy indicated the agency’s QAPI program would focus on improving clinical care and patient outcomes. A Plan of Care, for certification period 11/16/2025 to 01/14/2026, indicated Patient #1 had a suprapubic catheter (device used to drain urine from the bladder through an incision in the abdominal wall), and was sent to urgent care on 11/07/2025 for blood and sediment in the urine, a urinalysis and culture was performed and a new antibiotic cefpodoxime for 7 days was started on 11/10/2025 for the bacteria that the bacteria was sensitive to on the culture. A RN Skilled Nursing Visit Note, dated 01/07/2026, indicated Patient #1 was started on an antibiotic cefpodoxime on 01/02/2026 for a urinary tract infection. A review of the Infection Logs failed to include Patient #1’s urinary tract infections for 11/07/2025 and 01/02/2026. During an interview on 01/23/2026, beginning at 2:40 PM, the Alternate Administrator indicated the agency was tracking infections for quality indicators for their QAPI program. The Alternate Administrator indicated Patient #1’s urinary tract infections should have been and were not on the tracked infection logs. 410 IAC 17-12-2(a)”

    Rule G0642. Standard-level.

  • Health, Psychosocial, Functional, Cognition

    The inspectors’ words, 218 words

    “Health, psychosocial, functional, cognition CFR(s): 484.55(c)(1) Standard: Content of the comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive assessment must accurately reflect the patient’s status, and must include, at a minimum, the following information: (1) The patient’s current health, psychosocial, functional, and cognitive status; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment included a complete patient’s health status in 1 of 1 active clinical records reviewed of a patient with a suprapubic catheter (Patient #1). Findings include: An undated policy, titled, “Comprehensive Client Assessment,” indicated the comprehensive assessment would include but not limited to a general health status and system assessment, and integumentary (skin) status. A Comprehensive Assessment, dated 01/14/2026, indicated Patient #1 had a suprapubic catheter (device used to drain urine from the bladder through an incision in the abdominal wall), and required skilled nursing visits to assess urine output, evaluate catheter patency and stoma (skin opening) site, and monitor for signs and symptoms of infection. The Comprehensive Assessment failed to include an assessment of the suprapubic catheter stoma site. During an interview on 01/23/2026, beginning at 1:45 PM, the Administrator indicated there was not an assessment of the suprapubic catheter stoma site on the comprehensive assessment and should have been assessed and documented. 410 IAC 17-14-1(a)(1)(B)”

    Rule G0528. Element-level.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 411 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure all treatments were included on the plan of care in 1 of 3 active clinical records reviewed with a diagnosis of diabetes (Patient #3). Findings include: A policy, revised 01/26/2024, titled, “Plan of Care,” indicated the plan of care should include the care and services necessary to meet patient’s specific needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment. A Start of Care Comprehensive Assessment, dated 12/12/2025, indicated Patient #3, start of care 12/12/2025, had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes with hyperglycemia (elevated blood sugar), Patient was not on hypoglycemic medications, and Patient and caregiver required instruction on use of the glucometer (device to check blood sugar).The Comprehensive Assessment indicated Patient’s fasting blood sugar was 111 at the time of the visit. A Plan of Care, for certification period 12/12/2025 to 02/09/2026, indicated skilled nursing once weekly for 9 weeks to instruct Patient and caregiver on use of glucometer and to record blood sugar readings. The Plan of Care indicated to notify the physician if fasting blood sugar was greater than 300 or less than 60. The Plan of Care was completed by the Alternate Director of Nursing. The Plan of Care failed to evidence a blood sugar testing frequency order. During an interview on 01/23/2026, beginning at 2:30 PM, the Alternate Director of Nursing indicated Patient was to have blood sugar checked weekly, the frequency of blood sugar monitoring should have been and was not on the plan of care. 410 IAC 17-13-1(a)(1)(D)(ix)”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • Verbal Orders

    The inspectors’ words, 694 words

    “Verbal orders CFR(s): 484.60(b)(3)(4) (3) Verbal orders must be accepted only by personnel authorized to do so by applicable state laws and regulations and by the HHA’s internal policies. (4) When services are provided on the basis of a physician or allowed practitioner’s verbal orders, a nurse acting in accordance with state licensure requirements, or other qualified practitioner responsible for furnishing or supervising the ordered services, in accordance with state law and the HHA’s policies, must document the orders in the patient’s clinical record, and sign, date, and time the orders. Verbal orders must be authenticated and dated by the physician or allowed pracitioner in accordance with applicable state laws and regulations, as well as the HHA’s internal policies. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure verbal orders for start of care or recertification were obtained or documented in the patient’s clinical record in 2 of 4 active clinical records reviewed with skilled nursing care ordered (Patient #3,Patient #8), and in 1 of 2 active clinical records reviewed with occupational therapy ordered (Patient #6). Findings include: 1.An undated policy, titled, “Verbal Order Policy,” indicated verbal orders would be documented by the clinician into the electronic medical record system on the day they were received and include date, time, name of ordering physician and clinician that received the order. 2.A Plan of Care, for certification period 12/12/2025 to 02/09/2026, indicated skilled nursing frequency was to be one time per week for 8 weeks to instruct Patient #3 on daily blood pressure monitoring and blood sugar monitoring device use. The Plan of Care physician signed the plan of care on 12/22/2025. The Plan of Care was completed by the Alternate Director of Nursing. A review of the clinical record failed to evidence a verbal order from the plan of care physician to start care on 12/12/2025. During an interview on 01/23/2026, beginning at 2:30 PM, the Alternate Director of Nursing indicated she did not obtain verbal orders to start care on Patient. 3.A Plan of Care, for certification period 12/03/2025 to 01/31/2026, indicated Patient #8, start of care 06/06/2025, was to have skilled nursing visits one time per week for 8 weeks to test fasting blood sugar and report results to the physician if blood sugar was less than 60 or greater than 250, and monitor for signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) or hyperglycemia (elevated blood sugar). The Plan of Care physician signed the plan of care on 12/04/2025. A Recertification Comprehensive Assessment, dated 12/01/2025, indicated Patient’s random blood sugar was tested with a result of 138, and the skilled nurse instructed Patient on symptoms of hyperglycemia, and to drink more water to remove excess sugar from the blood through urine, and the skilled nurse was to perform blood sugar testing due to Patient was unable to perform. A review of orders failed to evidence a verbal order from the plan of care physician to continue care for certification period 12/03/2025 to 01/31/2026. During an interview on 01/23/2026, beginning at 2:00 PM, the Administrator confirmed the agency did not obtain verbal orders to continue care for the certification period of 12/03/2025 to 01/31/2026. 4. A Plan of Care, for certification period 01/09/2026 to 03/09/2026, indicated Patient #6, start of care 01/09/2026, was to receive occupational therapy once per week for 8 weeks. The Plan of Care physician signed the plan of care on 01/15/2026. The Plan of Care was completed by RN 1. A Missed Visit Order Form, dated 01/13/2026, indicated the plan of care physician was notified Patient requested the initial occupational therapy evaluation for the week of 01/22/2026. A Referral, dated 01/07/2026, indicated disciplines ordered were physical therapy and occupational therapy. During an interview, on 01/23/2026, beginning at 12:45 PM, RN 1 indicated she completed the plan of care and included the occupational therapy frequency based on the referral received, the occupational therapist would complete the plan of care orders and frequency after the evaluation. RN 1 indicated she did not contact the plan of care physician to obtain verbal orders for the occupational therapy frequency. 410 IAC 17-14-1(a)(F)”

    Rule G0584. Element-level.

  • Onsite Supervisory Visit Every 14 Days

    The inspectors’ words, 336 words

    “Onsite supervisory visit every 14 days CFR(s): 484.80(h)(1)(i) (1)(i) If home health aide services are provided to a patient who is receiving skilled nursing, physical or occupational therapy, or speech language pathology services— (A) A registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional who is familiar with the patient, the patient’s plan of care, and the written patient care instructions described in paragraph (g) of this section, must complete a supervisory assessment of the aide services being provided no less frequently than every 14 days; and (B) The home health aide does not need to be present during the supervisory assessment described in paragraph (h)(1)(i)(A) of this section. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure home health aide supervisory assessments were conducted onsite in 1 of 2 active clinical records reviewed with home health aide services (Patient #4). Findings include: A Plan of Care, for certification period 11/11/2025 to 01/09/2026, indicated Patient #4 had Physical Therapy once a week for 9 week, and Home Health Aide (HHA) services twice a week for 9 weeks. An Aide Care Plan, for certification period 11/11/2025 to 01/09/2026, indicated HHA was to complete pulse, respiration and temperature assessment every visit; provide incontinent care, record bowel movement every visit; assist with transfer and positioning every visit; perform shower and shampoo hair every visit. Aide Supervisory Visits, dated 11/21/2025, 12/05/2025, 12/19/2025, and 01/02/2026 indicated RN 1 completed supervisory visits on HHA 1, and HHA 1 was not present at time of visits. The Aide Supervisory Visits indicated HHA 1 demonstrated competency with assigned tasks, complied with infection prevention and control policies and procedures, followed plan of care as instructed and honored Patient’s Rights. During an interview on 01/23/2026, beginning at 12:45 PM, RN 1 indicated she completed HHA supervisory visits by calling Patient on the phone to assess Patient’s satisfaction with care, did not complete the visits on site, and would only go to Patient’s home for every 60 day recertifications.”

    Rule G0808. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 23, 2026Recertification inspection8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Oct 17, 2011.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Ray Dodson (owns 5% or more directly, 95%); Michael Dodson (owns 5% or more directly, 5%); Ray Dodson (general partner); Ray Dodson (corporate director); Michael Dodson (corporate director); Michael Dodson (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate63.44% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate14.46% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.10% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 51 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 46410, where this agency’s office is, 37 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 2.5 of 5, and this one is rated 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.