Hearth Record

Professional Care Home Health Services

A home health agency in Munster, Indiana 46321

1650 45th Ave, Suite G, Munster, Indiana 46321. (219) 922-8100.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 11, 2025: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 11, 2025: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • 5 Calendar Days After Start Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 211 words

    “5 calendar days after start of care CFR(s): 484.55(b)(1) The comprehensive assessment must be completed in a timely manner, consistent with the patient’s immediate needs, but no later than 5 calendar days after the start of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, and interview, the agency failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment was completed within 5 days of the start of care for 1 of 1 patient with occupational therapy. (Patient # 3). Findings include: 1. An undated policy, titled, “Initial and Comprehensive Assessment,” indicated the comprehensive assessment would be completed no later than 5 calendars days after the start of care. 2. A referral, dated 07/02/2025, indicated Patient #3 was to be evaluated for occupational therapy. A Plan of Care, for certification period 07/02/2025 to 08/30/2025, indicated a start of care date of 07/02/2025. An Occupational Therapy Initial Evaluation, dated 07/08/2025, failed to evidence Patient’s comprehensive assessment was completed within 5 calendar days from the start of care. During an interview, on 07/10/2025, beginning at 3:00 PM, the Administrator, Administrative Staff 1, indicated there was a delay for the occupational therapist to evaluate Patient due to difficulty contacting the occupational therapist and the comprehensive assessment was not completed within the 5 days allowed.”

    Rule G0520. Element-level.

  • Health, Psychosocial, Functional, Cognition

    The inspectors’ words, 203 words

    “Health, psychosocial, functional, cognition CFR(s): 484.55(c)(1) Standard: Content of the comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive assessment must accurately reflect the patient’s status, and must include, at a minimum, the following information: (1) The patient’s current health, psychosocial, functional, and cognitive status; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, and interview, the agency failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment included patient’s current health status in 1 of 1 Patient’s with a gastrostomy tube (a tube into the stomach for nutrition) (Patient #4). Findings include: 1. An undated policy, titled, “Patient Assessment Guidelines,” indicated a comprehensive assessment would be utilized to identify the patients’ needs for home care and would include but not limited to physical assessment and review of systems. 2. A Plan of Care, for certification period 05/25/2025 to 07/23/2025, for Patient #4 indicated Patient had a gastrostomy tube. A Comprehensive Assessment, dated 05/23/2025, indicated under gastrointestinal abdomen soft no further details and failed to evidence documentation and assessment of the gastrostomy tube site. During an interview, on 07/10/2025, beginning at 3:00 PM, the Administrator, Administrative Staff 1, indicated the gastrostomy tube documentation and evaluation should have been and was not documented on the comprehensive assessment. 410 IAC 17-14-1(a)(1)(A)”

    Rule G0528. Element-level.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 791 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review, and interview, the agency failed to ensure the plan of care included all treatments, nutritional/fluid requirements or restrictions in 3 of 4 active clinical records reviewed with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar that affects how the body processes glucose) (Patient #1, Patient #3, Patient #4). Findings include: 1. An undated policy, titled, “Patient Plan of Care,” indicated the plan of care should meet the individual needs of each patient based on patient assessments. The policy indicated the plan of care would consist of problems or needs identified, actions or interventions to be taken and services to be provided. 2. A Start of Care Comprehensive Assessment, for Patient #1, dated 06/18/2025, indicated a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 2 that was controlled with oral diabetic medications and blood sugar testing frequency was before each meal. A Plan of Care, for certification period 06/18/2025 to 08/16/2025, indicated Patient was to be assessed for diabetes management and appropriate interventions, Patient’s blood glucose levels would remain within prescribed parameters, and Patient/caregiver would demonstrate knowledge of diabetes management and appropriate interventions. During an observation of a home visit, on 07/08/2025, beginning at 3:00 PM, RN 1 obtained Patient’s blood sugar with a level of 244. The Plan of Care failed to include the frequency of blood sugar testing and prescribed parameters. During an observation of a home visit, on 07/08/2025, beginning at 3:00 PM, Patient’s spouse indicated Patient’s blood sugars are checked three times per day. During an interview, on 07/09/2025, beginning at 3:30 PM, the Administrator, Administrative Staff 1, indicated the plan of care should include the frequency of blood sugar testing and blood sugar parameters should have been and were not included in the plan of care. 3. A Start of Care Comprehensive Assessment, for Patient #3, dated 07/02/2025, indicated a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus, was on oral diabetic medication, blood sugar testing frequency was before each meal and had a continuous glucose monitor free style libre 2. A Plan of Care, for certification period 07/02/2025 to 08/30/2025, indicated to notify the physician of blood sugars greater than 300 or less than 50 and indicated Patient would be instructed on frequency of glucose monitoring. During an observation of a home visit, on 07/09/2025, beginning at 12:00 PM, Patient was observed with a continuous glucose monitor libre 2 on her/his arm. Patient indicated the continuous glucose monitor results went to a monitor and he/she checked the monitor 2 times per day, and her/his physician changed the continuous glucose monitor sensor every week. The Plan of Care failed to include the frequency of the blood sugar monitoring, the use of the continuous glucose monitor, and the frequency of the continuous blood sugar sensor change. During an interview, on 07/10/2025, beginning at 3:00 PM, the Administrator indicated the continuous glucose monitor use and the frequency of blood sugar checks should have been and were not included in the plan of care. 4. A Comprehensive Assessment, dated 05/23/2025, for Patient #4, indicated a diagnosis of diabetes with a random blood sugar of 110. A Plan of Care, for certification period 05/25/2025 to 07/23/2025, indicated Patient/caregiver would demonstrate diabetes management and appropriate interventions, and blood glucose levels would remain within prescribed parameters. The Plan of Care failed to include blood glucose monitoring frequency and blood glucose parameters. The Comprehensive Assessment indicated Patient had a gastrostomy tube (tube into the stomach for nutrition) and was to have 100 milliliters of hydration after each feeding. The Plan of Care failed to include hydration after each feeding. During an interview, 07/09/2025, beginning at 3:36 PM, the Administrator indicated the gastrostomy tube flushes, and the blood sugar frequency and parameters should have been and were not included in the plan of care. 410 IAC 17-13-1(a)(1)(D)(viii, ix)”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 11, 2025Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Oct 5, 2004.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Vrusha Patel (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Mariclaire Silverman (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jonathan M Silverman (corporate director); Vrusha Patel (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate71.58% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate14.45% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate5.11% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 35 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 46321, where this agency’s office is, 30 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 2.5 of 5, and this one is rated 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.