Hearth Record

Saint Joseph VNA Home Care

A home health agency in South Bend, Indiana 46617

707 Cedar Street Suite 320, South Bend, Indiana 46617. (574) 335-8600.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 12, 2024: a complaint inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 12, 2024: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
  • Authentication

    The inspectors’ words, 278 words

    “Authentication CFR(s): 484.110(b) Standard: Authentication. All entries must be legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated, dated, and timed. Authentication must include a signature and a title (occupation), or a secured computer entry by a unique identifier, of a primary author who has reviewed and approved the entry. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review, and interview, the agency failed to ensure the accuracy of the medication profile for 1 of 2 home visit observations (Patient #3). Findings include: During a home observation on 7/12/2024 with Patient #3, licensed practical nurse (LPN) 2 compared Patient #3’s pill bottles with the medication list on their computer tablet. LPN 2 indicated the medication list had the same medications listed twice. The Clinical Manager, also at the visit, looked at the tablet and indicated they would need to discontinue one of the duplicate entries. The duplicate entries included amlodipine – benazepril (for high blood pressure), atorvastatin (for high cholesterol), metformin (for diabetes), low – dose aspirin (may reduce risk of heart attack and stroke), and metoprolol tartrate (for hypertension). The agency failed to ensure the accuracy of the medical record. During an interview on 7/12/2024 at 3:10 PM, LPN 2 indicated they did not know why the medications were listed twice or were not fixed at previous visits. LPN 2 indicated this was the first time they had seen the medications listed twice. During an interview on 7/12/2024 at 3:15 PM, the Administrator indicated the EMR duplicated the medications. When asked, the Alternate Clinical Manager indicated the nurse would see the medication already listed in the system and should have discontinued the duplicate. 410 IAC 17-15-1(a)(7)”

    Rule G1024. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient’S Needs

    The inspectors’ words, 575 words

    “Patient’s needs CFR(s): 484.55(c)(4) The patient’s medical, nursing, rehabilitative, social, and discharge planning needs; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, observation, and interview, the agency failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the patient’s current medical status in 1 of 4 active records reviewed of patients with wounds (Patient #2). Findings indicate: 1. Review of an agency policy titled “Wound Measurement Program” indicated utilizes the expertise of the Wound Ostomy Continence Nurse Society (WOCN) and wound care measurements should be done weekly to document wound progress. 2. Review of the WOCN recommendations for measuring wounds indicated the depth of a wound would usually be measured by inserting a Q-tip into the deepest part of the wound and determining how well a wound would be healing depends on consistent measurements and if different care team members measure it differently, it would result in inconsistency, errors, and treatment problems with the healing process. 3. Review of the registered nurse (RN) job description indicated the RN is to accurately assess patient’s condition and needs. 4. Review of the clinical record of Patient #2, start of care date 10/16/2023 with diagnosis, but not limited to, cancer of left breast. The wound record report included a baseline assessment of the left chest area cancer lesion completed on 10/16/2023 with wound depth measurement of 0.3 centimeters (cm). During a home visit on 07/12/2024 beginning at 9:00 AM, RN 2 removed the old dressings to a wound to the left chest area and observed a large wound protruding outward from the skin surface. Review of the wound care report for certification period 04/13/2024 – 06/11/2024 included the following depth measurements: on 05/13/2024 RN 2 documented 0.2 cm, on 05/20/2024 licensed practical nurse (LPN) 1 documented 0.1 cm, on 05/27/24 the clinical manager documented 13.0 cm, on 06/03/2024 RN 2 documented 0 cm, and on 06/10/2024 RN 2 documented 5 cm. Documentation failed to evidence an accurate depth measurement of the wound. Review of the wound care report for certification period 06/12/2024 – 08/10/2024 included the following depth measurements: on 06/17/2024 RN 2 documented 0.1 cm, on 06/24/2024 LPN 1 documented 0.1 cm, on 07/01/2024 RN 3 documented 7 cm, and on 07/08/2024 LPN 1 documented 0.1 cm. Documentation failed to evidence a consistent depth measurement of the wound. During an interview on 07/12/2024 at 12:12 PM, when asked how to measure the depth of the wound of Patient #2, RN 2 indicated the wound had changed and used to have a small section at the top of the wound with depth, and today during the home visit there was no open area. During an interview on 07/12/2024 at 2:50 PM, when asked about the depth measurement of 13 cm on 05/27/2024, the clinical manager indicated the wound sometimes had a small open area with depth and that the wound had never been 13 cm in depth, that was a mistake. During an interview on 07/12/2024 at 2:56 PM, when asked how to measure the depth of the wound of Patient #2, RN 3 indicated measures depth from the skin level outward, and with Patient #2 the depth measured would be how far the wound protrudes from the skin. During an interview on 07/12/2024 at 3:01 PM, when asked how to measure the depth of the wound of Patient #2, LPN 1 indicated when the wound had a small open area would measure the depth. 410 IAC 17-14-1(a)(1)(B)”

    Rule G0534. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Provide Services In The Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 269 words

    “Provide services in the plan of care CFR(s): 484.75(b)(3) Providing services that are ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as indicated in the plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to provide services as ordered by the physician and included in the plan of care (POC) for 1 of 5 active records reviewed (Patient #4). Findings include: 1. Review of an agency policy titled “Care Management and Plan of Care” indicated the agency provides the patient with the services according to the individualized POC that is developed. 2. Review of the registered nurse (RN) job description indicated the RN provides services as indicated in the POC. 3. Review of the medical record of Patient #4 included a POC for certification period 06/13/2024 – 08/11/2024 that included skilled nurse interventions at each visit for wound vac (removes the pressure over a wound, which helps to reduce swelling and helps clean the wound) dressing changes. Review of a physician order dated 06/17/2024 indicated the skilled nurse was to make five visits for one week to Patient #4 effective 06/16/2024. Review of the skilled nurse visits made the week of 06/16/2024 – 06/22/2024 indicated the RN made two visits that week, on 06/17/2024 and on 06/19/2024. Documentation failed to evidence the SN made five visits as ordered. During an interview on 07/12/2024 at 3:08 PM, when asked why 5 SN visits were not made the week of 06/16/2024 – 06/22/2024 as ordered, the administrator indicated the previous clinical manager must have approved the order before making the corrections.”

    Rule G0710. Element-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 12, 2024Complaint inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 16 owners or officers are people: Ray Anderson (corporate director); Emily Bove (managing employee (on the payroll)); Marcus A Bowens (corporate officer); Corinne Francis (corporate director); Benjamin E Petersen (corporate officer); Daniel Roth (corporate director); Joshua Moore (corporate director); Daniel Drake (corporate officer); Daniel Drake (corporate director); Daniel Drake (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Robert F Casalou (corporate officer); Robert F Casalou (corporate director); Daniel Isacksen (corporate director); Karen Joyce (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Christine Seppala (corporate officer); Stacey Stires (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Trinity Health CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 26, 2015

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (391 surveys completed): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, better; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate95.27% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate8.17% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.73% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 6 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 46617, where this agency’s office is, 6 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.75 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 6 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 46617
PlaceQuality rating
Saint Joseph VNA Home Care This home health agency4.5
Interim Healthcare of South Bend3
Elara Caring4.5
Paragon Home Healthcare2
Aunova Home Care LLC3.5
Purposecare of Indiana4

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.