Hearth Record

Pike County Health Department

A home health agency in Pittsfield, Illinois 62363

606 W Adams Street, Pittsfield, Illinois 62363. (217) 285-4407.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 23, 2024: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 23, 2024: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Develop Ep Plan, Review And Update Annually

    The inspectors’ words, 317 words

    “Develop EP Plan, Review and Update Annually CFR(s): 484.102(a) §403.748(a), §416.54(a), §418.113(a), §441.184(a), §460.84(a), §482.15(a), §483.73(a), §483.475(a), §484.102(a), §485.68(a), §485.542(a), §485.625(a), §485.727(a), §485.920(a), §486.360(a), §491.12(a), §494.62(a). The [facility] must comply with all applicable Federal, State and local emergency preparedness requirements. The [facility] must develop establish and maintain a comprehensive emergency preparedness program that meets the requirements of this section. The emergency preparedness program must include, but not be limited to, the following elements: (a) Emergency Plan. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be [reviewed], and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do all of the following: * [For hospitals at §482.15 and CAHs at §485.625(a):] Emergency Plan. The [hospital or CAH] must comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local emergency preparedness requirements. The [hospital or CAH] must develop and maintain a comprehensive emergency preparedness program that meets the requirements of this section, utilizing an all-hazards approach. * [For LTC Facilities at §483.73(a):] Emergency Plan. The LTC facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least annually. * [For ESRD Facilities at §494.62(a):] Emergency Plan. The ESRD facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be [evaluated], and updated at least every 2 years. . This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on document review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to review and update the Emergency Plan for the Agency at least every two years. The Emergency Plan manual was reviewed on 2/21/24 at approximately 2:00 PM. The manual noted the last time the Emergency Plan was reviewed and updated was 3/2021. The plan lacked review of at least every 2 years. 2. During an interview on 2/22/24 with E# 1 (Director of Nursing) at approximately 11:00 AM. E#1 verbally confirmed that 3/2021 was the last signed review of the Emergency Plan.”

    Rule E0004. Standard-level.

  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 292 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on document review and interview, it was determined for 1 of 2 (Pt. #3) patients with Aide services, the Agency failed to ensure visits were conducted in accordance with the physician’s ordered plan of care. Findings include: 1. The policy titled “Visit Frequency” was reviewed on 2/21/24 at approximately 11:00 AM. The policy noted “....4. If any visits are...omitted outside the POC (plan of care)/ 485 ordered visit frequency...the order must then be sent to the health care professional responsible for the home health care plan of care for signature...” 2. Pt #3 Start of Care: 01/27/24 Diagnosis: Idiopathic Aseptic Necrosis of Left Femur. The clinical record was reviewed on 2/21/24 at approximately 2:00 PM. The POC dated 1/27/24 noted an order for the Aide to visit the pt. 2 times a week beginning 1/29/24. The record noted a missed visit by the Aide on 2/9 and 2/26/24. The missed visit note lacked documentation the physician was notified. 3. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (E#1) on 2/21/24 at approximately 12:40 PM. E#2 verbally agreed that the doctor wasn’t notified of the missed visits.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level.

  • Home Health Aide Assignments And Duties

    The inspectors’ words, 196 words

    “Home health aide assignments and duties CFR(s): 484.80(g)(1) Standard: Home health aide assignments and duties. Home health aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional, with written patient care instructions for a home health aide prepared by that registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional (that is, physical therapist, speech-language pathologist, or occupational therapist). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on document review and interview, it was determined for 1 of 2 (Pt #3) patients receiving home health aide services, the Agency failed to ensure the the Aide completed care and services as ordered on the plan of care Findings include: 1. Pt #3 Start of Care: 01/27/24 Diagnosis: Idiopathic Aseptic Necrosis of Left Femur. The clinical record was reviewed on 2/21/24 at approximately 2:00 PM. The Aide Care Plan dated 1/27/24 completed by the Registered Nurse, noted, weigh patient every visit. Between 1/31/24 and 2/12/24, 4 out of 5 Aide visit notes lacked weights. 2. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (E#1) on 2/21/24 at approximately 12:40 PM. E#2 verbally agreed that the Aide didn’t weigh the patient as per care plan.”

    Rule G0798. Standard-level.

  • Authentication

    The inspectors’ words, 376 words

    “Authentication CFR(s): 484.110(b) Standard: Authentication. All entries must be legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated, dated, and timed. Authentication must include a signature and a title (occupation), or a secured computer entry by a unique identifier, of a primary author who has reviewed and approved the entry. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on document review and interview, it was determined in 3 of 7 (Pt #1, Pt #3 and Pt #6), patient records reviewed, the Agency failed to ensure documentation was appropriately authenticated within the required timeframe. Findings include: 1. The Policy titled “Clinical Documentation and Filing Timelines” (revised 11-4-21) was reviewed on 2/20/2024 at approximately 11:00AM. The policy noted on page 1, “If using computer system, visits must be locked and closed within 24 hours.” 2. The clinical record of Pt #1 was reviewed on 2/20/2024 at approximately 1:00PM. Pt #1 was SOC (Start of Care) was on 1/18/2024 with the diagnosis of Critical illness myopathy. Pt #1’s clinical record was reviewed, and it was noted 3 of 18 clinical visits reviewed were not locked and closed within 24 hours. Skilled nursing visit dated 1/18/2024 and closed on 1/26/2024. Scheduled physical therapy visit dated 1/19/2024 and closed on 1/30/2024. Physical therapy visit dated 2/1/2024 and closed on 2/12/2024. 3. The clinical record of Pt #3 was reviewed on 2/21/24 at approximately 2:00 PM. Pt #3 SOC was on 1/27/24 with the diagnosis Idiopathic Aseptic Necrosis of Left Femur. It was noted 1 SN (Skilled Nurse) visit dated 2/15/24 was closed on 2/20/24 and 1 PT (Physical Therapist) visit note dated 2/15/24 was closed on 2/20/24. 4. The clinical record of Pt # 6 was reviewed on 2/21/2024 at approximately 1:30 PM. Pt #6 was admitted on 12/5/2023 with the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease with late onset. Pt #6’s clinical noted 2 of 12 clinical visits reviewed were not locked and closed within 24 hours. Scheduled skilled nursing visit dated 12/5/2023 was closed on 12/12/2023. Physical therapy visit note dated 12/19/2023 was closed on 12/26/2023. 5. During an interview on 2/21/2024 at approximately 11:00AM, E #1 (Director of Nursing) reviewed Pt #1, Pt#3 and Pt #6’s record and verbally agreed that the clinical visits were not locked and closed within 24 hours.”

    Rule G1024. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 23, 2024Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: government operated.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 2 owners or officers are people: Anita Andress (corporate director); Anita Andress (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate87.91% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate11.05% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.42% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 4 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 62363, where this agency’s office is, 4 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.25 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 4 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 62363
PlaceQuality rating
Pike County Health Department This home health agency3
Blessing Home Care3.5
Elara Caring V4.5
Hannibal Regional Hospital Home Health Agency3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.