Hegg Home Health Care
A home health agency in Rock Valley, Iowa 51247
1202 21st Avenue, Rock Valley, Iowa 51247. (712) 476-8050.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 2.5of 5 quality of patient care rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Aug 26, 2026: a recertification inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Aug 26, 2026: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
-
Plan Of Care Must Include The Following
The inspectors’ words, 773 words
“Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on home observation visits, patient interview, clinical record reviews and agency policy review, the agency failed to ensure accurate completion of all components comprising the Plan of Care, including all medical supplies/equipment, all medications, treatments, and information related to advance directives for 3 of 7 sampled patients (Patients #2, #6 and #7). Failure to maintain complete and accurate Plans of Care with current orders placed patients at risk to not receive services, supplies, medications and/or treatments according to assessed needs and physician orders. Findings include: According to the agency policy titled Care Planning and Coordination, dated 7/2026, an individualized Plan of Care (POC) is developed by the admitting registered nurse (RN) within 24 hours of the start of care that reflects the patients identified problems and needs, consistent with physician orders or prescriptions. Care planning is a collaborative process that takes into consideration the patient’s wishes with regards to medical intervention and treatment choices. The POC includes interventions to address identified patient needs, a list of all medical equipment and supplies used by the patient and measurable patient outcomes. 1.Patient #2 had a start of care date of 1/10/25. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 7/4/26 to 9/1/26, identified the patient had a primary diagnosis of aftercare following joint replacement surgery and included physician orders for medications used by the patient. The POC included the following medications used by the patient: bisacodyl, bupropion, cyanocobalamin, docusate sodium, magnesium hydroxide, mirabegron, multivitamin, polyethylene glycol and ziprasidone. b. During a home observation visit on 8/25/26 at 9:15 AM with Staff C, RN, they surveyor identified the patient had icy hot pain relief roll on topical ointment and Flonase 50 microgram nasal spray on the table next to patient’s chair. An interview with the patient revealed, the patient has utilized the icy hot for a long time and he/she has used the nasal spray since 6/2026. The agency failed to include all medications the patient uses on the patient’s POC, including icy hot and nasal spray. 2. Patient #6 had a start of care date of 12/24/25 and a discharge date of 1/27/26. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 12/24/25 to 2/21/26, identified the patient had a primary diagnosis of a right hip fracture and listed the patient’s advance directive as a full code (wants life saving measures to restart patient’s heart or breathing). b. The advance directives form in the patient’s clinical record, signed by the patient on 12/24/25, identified the patient does not want cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed. The agency failed to include accurate advance directives on the patient’s POC. 3. Patient #7 had a start of care date of 3/16/26 and a discharge date of 5/14/26. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 3/16/26 to 5/14/26, identified the patient had a primary diagnosis of congestive heart failure, included orders for interventions/treatments and listed the patient’s advance directive as a full code (wants life saving measures to restart patient’s heart or breathing). b. The advance directives form in the patient’s clinical record, signed by the patient on 3/16/26, identified the patient does not want cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed. c. The physical therapist (PT) visit note, dated 5/12/26, completed by Staff G, PT, identified the patient had a Stage III pressure ulcer to the left buttock that has yellow, dry, fibrinous slough throughout the wound bed. The PT cleansed the wound with a wound cleanser, debrided the wound and applied a silicone bordered foam dressing. The agency failed to include accurate advance directives on the patient’s POC and failed to include physician orders for wound care on the POC. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator, Clinical Manager and Staff C, RN.”
-
Promptly Alert Relevant Physician Of Changes
The inspectors’ words, 764 words
“Promptly alert relevant physician of changes CFR(s): 484.60(c)(1) The HHA must promptly alert the relevant physician(s) or allowed practitioner(s) to any changes in the patient’s condition or needs that suggest that outcomes are not being achieved and/or that the plan of care should be altered. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on staff interview, clinical record review and agency policy review, the agency failed to notify the physician of changes in patient condition or needs that suggest an alteration to the Plan of Care for 4 of 7 sampled patients (Patients #2, #3, #4 and #5). Failure to report changes in patient condition or identified needs placed agency patients at risk for inadequate or inappropriate care. Findings include: According to the agency policy titled Care Planning and Coordination, dated 7/2026, an individualized Plan of Care (POC) is developed by the admitting registered nurse (RN) within 24 hours of the start of care that reflects the patients identified problems and needs, consistent with physician orders or prescriptions. Care planning is a collaborative process that takes into consideration the patient’s wishes with regards to medical intervention and treatment choices. The physician is contacted as necessary and appropriate with reports of changes in the patient’s clinical status and/or needs. During an interview on 8/25/26 at 2:30 PM, Staff B, Clinical Manager, identified the electronic medical record (EMR) system has vital sign parameters set up in the system and it highlights if the patient’s vital signs fall outside of those parameters. Staff B stated the provider is not always contacted when this happens, it depends on the patient. During an interview on 8/26/26 at 9:46 AM, the Administrator stated she is unsure what the vital sign parameters are set up as in the EMR. The Administrator said she would expect the doctor be notified if the vital signs are flagged as abnormal in the system. 1.Patient #2 had a start of care date of 1/10/25. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 7/4/26 to 9/1/26, identified the patient had a primary diagnosis of Aftercare following joint replacement surgery and included orders for skilled nurse visits 1 time every 2 weeks. b. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 7/14/26, completed by Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN), identified the patient’s blood pressure of 140 systolic and 66 diastolic as abnormal. c. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 8/11/26, completed by Staff C, RN, identified the patient’s blood pressure of 142 systolic and 76 diastolic as abnormal. The clinical record lacked documentation of communication to the physician regarding the abnormal blood pressure. 2. Patient #3 had a start of care date of 8/17/26. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 8/17/26 to 10/15/26, identified the patient had a primary diagnosis of intertrochanteric fracture and included orders for skilled nurse visits 1 time every week. b. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 8/17/26, completed by Staff B, Clinical Manager, identified the patient’s blood pressure of 140 systolic and 42 diastolic as abnormal. c. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 8/24/26, completed by Staff B, Clinical Manager, identified the patient’s blood pressure of 112 systolic and 53 diastolic as abnormal. The clinical record lacked documentation of communication to the physician regarding the abnormal blood pressure. 3. Patient #4 had a start of care date of 7/31/26. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 7/31/26 to 9/28/26, identified the patient had a primary diagnosis of Type II Diabetes and included orders for skilled nurse visits 2 times every 60 days. b. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 7/31/26, completed by Staff B, Clinical Manager, identified the patient’s blood pressure of 116 systolic and 50 diastolic as abnormal and also identified the patients oxygen saturation level of 91 percent as abnormal. The clinical record lacked documentation of communication to the physician regarding the abnormal blood pressure and abnormal oxygen saturation level. 4. Patient #5 had a start of care date of 8/13/26. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 8/13/26 to 10/11/26, identified the patient had a primary diagnosis of limb girdle muscular dystrophy and included orders for skilled nurse visits 1 time every week. b. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 8/13/26, completed by Staff C, RN, identified the patient’s blood pressure of 100 systolic and 58 diastolic as abnormal and also identified the pulse (number of heart beats per minute) of 56 as abnormal. The clinical record lacked documentation of communication to the physician regarding the abnormal blood pressure and abnormal pulse. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator, Clinical Manager and Staff C, RN.”
-
Required Items In Clinical Record
The inspectors’ words, 456 words
“Required items in clinical record CFR(s): 484.110(a)(1) The patient’s current comprehensive assessment, including all of the assessments from the most recent home health admission, clinical notes, plans of care, and physician or allowed practitioner orders; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on staff interview, clinical record reviews and agency policy review, the agency failed to provide a complete wound assessment on a weekly basis per agency policy for 1 of 3 sampled patients with a wound (Patient #7). Failure to accurately and thoroughly complete wound assessments put patients at an increased risk of unidentified condition changes. Findings include: According to the agency’s policy titled Skin and Wound Assessment, dated 7/2026, wounds will be measured at the time of discovery. A comprehensive assessment will be completed and documented to identify skin, wound or pressure ulcer concerns. A wound assessment should take into account duration of the wound, location of the wound, measurements (length, width and depth), description of wound margins, clinical appearance, odor, pain and general condition surrounding the skin. During an interview on 8/25/26 at 2:30 PM, Staff B, Clinical Manager stated wound documentation can be found in the electronic medical record and wounds are measured each week unless a doctor has specified other instructions. Patient #7 had a start of care date of 3/16/26 and a discharge date of 5/14/26. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 3/16/26 to 5/14/26, identified the patient had a primary diagnosis of congestive heart failure and included orders for skilled nursing and physical therapy services. b. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 3/26/26, completed by Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN), identified the patient had a Stage II pressure ulcer to the left buttock that measured 2.5 centimeters (length in cm) by 0.7 (width in centimeters) but failed to include a depth. c. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 3/30/26, completed by Staff C, RN failed to include documentation of an assessment/measurements to patient’s Stage II pressure ulcer on the left buttock. d. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 5/5/26, completed by Staff A, Administrator, identified the patient had an open area to the buttock but failed to include an assessment or measurements. e. The physical therapist (PT) visit note, dated 5/12/26, completed by Staff G, identified the patient had a Stage III pressure ulcer to the left buttock that has yellow, dry, fibrinous slough throughout the wound bed. The PT cleansed the wound with a wound cleanser and debrided the wound. The PT identified the wound measured 0.7 cm X 0.9cm but failed to include a depth. The agency staff failed to obtain weekly wound assessments and measurements per agency policy. The above findings were review with the Administrator, Clinical Manager and Staff C, RN.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2026 | Recertification inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Mar 27, 1995.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Hegg Memorial Hospital runs it.
- 4 owners or officers are people: William Slater (corporate officer, 0%); Glenn Alan Zevenbergen (corporate director); Sarah Rozeboom (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Melinda Deweerd (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hegg Memorial Hospital | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | 100% | Jun 15, 2009 |
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 2.5 of 5.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 2.5 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 85.71% (same as the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 11.09% (same as the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 4.23% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 3 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 51247, where this agency’s office is, 3 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 2.5 of 5, and this one is rated 2.5 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Hegg Home Health Care This home health agency | 2.5 |
| Sioux Center Home Health and Hospice | 2.5 |
| Orange City Home Health | 3.5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.