Hearth Record

Cherokee Regional Home Health

A home health agency in Cherokee, Iowa 51012

212 E Bow Drive, Cherokee, Iowa 51012. (712) 225-6459.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Sep 18, 2024: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Sep 18, 2024: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Authentication

    The inspectors’ words, 546 words

    “Authentication CFR(s): 484.110(b) Standard: Authentication. All entries must be legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated, dated, and timed. Authentication must include a signature and a title (occupation), or a secured computer entry by a unique identifier, of a primary author who has reviewed and approved the entry. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency interviews, clinical record reviews and agency policy reviews, the home health agency failed to ensure all clinical documentation was completed in a timely manner for 4 of 7 sampled patients (Patients #3, #5, #6 and #7). Failure to ensure all clinical record documentation was completed in a timely manner increased the risk of ineffective communication between staff members providing services to its patients. Findings include: 3. Patient #3 had a start of care date of 4/23/24. Clinical record review revealed: a. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 7/16/24, signed completed 7/19/24 (1 day late) by Staff D, RN. Agency staff failed to complete documentation in a timely manner. 4. Patient #5 had a start of care date of 8/7/24. Clinical record review revealed: a. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 8/12/24, signed completed 8/15/24 (1 day late) by Staff C, RN. b. The physical therapy visit note, dated 8/16/24, signed completed 8/26/24 (8 days late) by Staff E, PT. c. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 9/9/24, signed completed 9/17/24 (6 days late) by Staff C, RN. Agency staff failed to complete documentation in a timely manner. The above findings shared with the Administrator and Staff C, RN. According to the agency policy titled Home Health and Hospice Clinical Record Documentation, dated 12/2023, all electronic documentation is expected to be completed, signed and submitted into the electronic medical record (EMR) as soon as possible but no later than 2 days for routine charting. During an interview on 8/17/24 at 9:00 AM, the Clinical Manager confirmed routine visit documentation is to be completed within 2 days of the visit. 1.Patient #6 had a start of care date of 4/1/24 and a discharge date of 5/16/24. Clinical record review revealed: a. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 4/13/24, signed completed 4/17/24 (2 days late) by Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN). b. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 4/18/24, signed completed 4/22/24 (2 days late) by Staff C, RN. 2.Patient #7 had a start of care date of 3/6/24 and a discharge date of 3/24/24. Clinical record review revealed: a. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 3/11/24, signed completed 3/15/24 (2 days late) by Staff C, RN. b. The physical therapy visit note, dated 3/12/24, signed completed 3/17/24 (3 days late) by Staff E, Physical Therapist (PT). c. The occupational therapy visit note, dated 3/13/24, signed completed 3/25/24 (10 days late) by Staff G, Occupational Therapist (OT). d. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 3/14/24, signed completed 3/18/24 (2 days late) by Staff C, RN. e. The physical therapy visit note, dated 3/15/24, signed completed 3/18/24 (1 day late) by Staff F, Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA). f. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 3/21/24, signed completed 3/25/24 (2 days late) by Staff C, RN. g. The physical therapy visit note, dated 3/22/24, signed completed 3/25/24 (1 day late) by Staff E, PT. The agency clinical record failed to include timely documentation.”

    Rule G1024. Standard-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 1,049 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency staff interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the home health agency failed to ensure the drug regimen review identified ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy for 6 of 7 sampled patients (Patients #1, #2, #3, #5, #6 and #7) . Failure to ensure medications reviewed at the time of each drug regimen review are current and accurate and failure to identify actual/potential concerns increased the potential for unidentified medication interactions and side effect risks to the patient at the time of each comprehensive assessment. 4.Patient #2 had a start of care date of 3/9/23. Clinical record review revealed: a. Start of Care comprehensive assessment, dated 3/29/23, completed by Staff C, RN, included documentation a Drug Regimen Review (DRR) was completed. b. DRR identified duplicate drug therapy and non compliance with drug therapy but failed to address ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects and significant drug interactions. The RN failed to complete a drug regimen review that included 3 of 5 required components; ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects and significant drug interactions. 5.Patient #6 had a start of care date of 4/1/24 and a discharge date of 5/16/24 . Clinical record review revealed: a. Start of Care comprehensive assessment, dated 4/1/24, completed by Staff C, RN, included documentation a DRR was completed. b. DRR identified duplicate drug therapy and non compliance with drug therapy but failed to address ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects and significant drug interactions. c. Resumption of Care comprehensive assessment, dated 4/9/24, completed by Staff H, RN, included documentation a DRR was completed. d. DRR identified duplicate drug therapy and non compliance with drug therapy but failed to address ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects and significant drug interactions. e. Comprehensive assessment completed at discharge, dated 5/16/24, completed by Staff C, RN, included documentation a DRR was completed. f. DRR identified duplicate drug therapy and non compliance with drug therapy but failed to address ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects and significant drug interactions. The RN failed to complete a drug regimen review that included 3 of 5 required components; ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects and significant drug interactions. 6.Patient #7 had a start of care date of 3/6/24 and a discharge date of 3/24/24. Clinical record review revealed the following: a. Start of Care comprehensive assessment, dated 3/6/24, completed by Staff C, RN, included documentation a DRR was completed. b. DRR identified duplicate drug therapy and non compliance with drug therapy but failed to address ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects and significant drug interactions. c. Comprehensive assessment completed at discharge, dated 3/24/24, completed by Staff D, RN, included documentation a DRR was completed. d. DRR identified duplicate drug therapy and non compliance with drug therapy but failed to address ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects and significant drug interactions. The RN failed to complete a drug regimen review that included 3 of 5 required components; ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects and significant drug interactions. The above information was shared with the Administrator and Staff C, RN. 2. Patient #3 had a start of care date of 4/23/24. Clinical record review revealed: a. Start of Care comprehensive assessment, dated 4/23/23, included documentation the DRR completed for adverse side effects, drug interactions, duplicate therapy, ineffective drug and potential contradictions. The DRR identified “yes” and identified duplicate medications. The DRR failed to answer individual details for adverse side effects, drug interactions, ineffective drug therapy or potential contradiction. The RN failed to complete a drug regimen review that included 4 of 5 required components of ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, potential drug interactions and non-compliance with therapy. 3. Patient #5 had a start of care date of 4/23/24. Clinical record review revealed: a. Start of Care comprehensive assessment, dated 4/23/24, included documentation the DRR completed for adverse side effects, drug interactions, duplicate therapy, ineffective drug and potential contradictions. The DRR identified “yes” and identified duplicate medications. The DRR failed to answer individual details for adverse side effects, drug interactions, ineffective drug therapy or potential contradiction. b. Resumption of Care comprehensive assessment, dated 9/4/24, included documentation the DRR completed for adverse side effects, drug interactions, duplicate therapy, ineffective drug and potential contradictions. The DRR identified “yes” and identified duplicate medications. The DRR failed to answer individual details for adverse side effects, drug interactions, ineffective drug therapy or potential contradiction. The RN failed to complete a drug regimen review that included 4 of 5 required components of ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, potential drug interactions and non-compliance with therapy. According to the agency policy, titled Drug Regimen Review Home Health, dated December 2023, the Registered Nurse, (RN) will complete the drug regimen review contained in the EMR on admission, resumption of care, significant change in condition, recertification and discharge. During an interview with Staff B, Clinical Manager, on 9/17/24 at 9:00 AM, the Registered Nurse, (RN) completes the drug regimen review in the electronic medical record with admission, recertification, resumption of care, and discharge comprehensive assessments and when a new medication is added or a current medication is changed. The provider is given a copy of the drug regimen review which shows duplicate medications, potential or adverse reactions, any needed labs associated with the medications and any side effects noted with the patient. 1. Patient #1 had a start of care date of 8/16/2024. Clinical record review revealed: a. Start of Care comprehensive assessment, dated 08/16/24, included documentation of side effects and compliance, but lacked documentation of duplicate drug therapy, potential drug interactions, ineffective drug therapy, b. Resumption of Care comprehensive assessment, dated 9/10/24 included documentation of side effects and compliance, but lacked documentation of duplicate drug therapy, potential drug interactions, ineffective drug therapy, The RN failed to complete a drug regimen review that included the 5 required components of ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, potential drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy and non-compliance with therapy.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

  • Hh Aide Supervision Elements

    The inspectors’ words, 587 words

    “HH aide supervision elements CFR(s): 484.80(h)(4)(i-vi) Home health aide supervision must ensure that aides furnish care in a safe and effective manner, including, but not limited to, the following elements: (i) Following the patient’s plan of care for completion of tasks assigned to a home health aide by the registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional; (ii) Maintaining an open communication process with the patient, representative (if any), caregivers, and family; (iii) Demonstrating competency with assigned tasks; (iv) Complying with infection prevention and control policies and procedures; (v) Reporting changes in the patient’s condition; and (vi) Honoring patient rights. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review, agency policy review and staff interview, the agency failed to ensure registered nurses supervising home health aides maintained documentation of a review of all required supervisory elements included following the patient plan of care, maintaining open communication with patient/caregiver, demonstrating competency of all assigned tasks, complying with infection prevention and control policies, reporting changes in the patient condition and honoring patient rights for 1 of 1 sampled pediatric patients receiving home health aide services (Patient #4). A total of 30 patients received home health aide services and the agency employed 4 home health aides at the time of the survey. Failure to ensure the supervision of home health aides by registered nurses maintained documentation of a review of all required supervisory elements increased the risk of agency staff not meeting the patients’ personal care needs. Findings include: According to the agency’s policy, titled Home Health Aide Services, dated 12/2023, the home health Registered Nurse (RN) will assume responsibility for supervision of the home health aide. The home health aide supervision must ensure that aides furnish care in a safe and effective manner including at least the following elements: maintaining an open communication process with the patient, representative, caregivers and family, the home health aide is following the patient’s plan of care for completion of tasks assigned to a home health aide by the registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional, the home health aide demonstrated competency with assigned tasks, complying with infection prevention and control policies and procedures, reports changes in the patient’s condition appropriately and honoring of the patient’s rights. During interview on 9/17/24 at 9:00 AM, the Clinical Manager stated the home health aide supervision documented in the skilled nurse visit report or can be documented in a journal note if a nursing visit not completed. Patient #4 had a start of care date of 3/24/22 and a pediatric patient. Clinical record review revealed the following: a. The Plans of Care, 7/11/24 to 9/8/24 and 9/9/24 to 11/4/24, included orders for skilled nursing and home health aide services. b. Skilled nursing visit notes, dated 7/15, 7/29 and 8/26/24, included documentation home health aide supervision was completed and the aide followed the care plan and demonstrated competency. The notes lacked documentation the nurse assessed the aide’s ability to meet the following required supervisory elements: maintaining open communication with patient/caregiver, complying with infection prevention and control policies, reporting changes in the patient condition and honoring patient rights. During an interview on 9/17/24 at 1:38 PM the Administrator stated pediatric patient supervision documented on the electronic medical record system. The program automatically pulls the shorter supervision form. She concurred the form did not include all of the supervisory components. The agency failed to supervise pediatric home health aide services to include all supervisory elements. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Staff C, RN.”

    Rule G0818. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 18, 2024Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Oct 26, 1989.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • St. Luke’s Health System, Inc. runs it.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Tyler Gerstandt (corporate officer); Kellen Ludvigson (corporate director); Clay Leavitt (corporate director); Lisa Huebner (managing employee (on the payroll)); Leslie William Todd (corporate director); Sheila Trapp (corporate director); Kerry Marie Hurd (corporate director); Sarah Cook (corporate director); Gary W Jordan (managing employee (under contract)); Brandon Henke (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (79 surveys completed): 95% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 95% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate90.38% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate12.54% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.49% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • There aren’t enough agencies serving patients in ZIP code 51012 with a quality of patient care rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceQuality rating
Cherokee Regional Home Health This home health agency2.5

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.