Hearth Record

Sanford Home Health and Hospice Sheldon

A home health agency in Sheldon, Iowa 51201

118 North Seventh Avenue, Sheldon, Iowa 51201. (712) 324-6420.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 22, 2026: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 22, 2026: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Health, Psychosocial, Functional, Cognition

    The inspectors’ words, 381 words

    “Health, psychosocial, functional, cognition CFR(s): 484.55(c)(1) Standard: Content of the comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive assessment must accurately reflect the patient’s status, and must include, at a minimum, the following information: (1) The patient’s current health, psychosocial, functional, and cognitive status; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on staff interview, clinical record reviews and agency policy review, the agency failed to provide a complete comprehensive assessment for patients with wounds during start of care, recertifications, resumption of care and discharge assessments for 1 of 1 sampled patient with wounds (Patient #3). Failure to accurately and thoroughly complete wound assessments or provide a comprehensive assessment placed patients at an increased risk of unidentified condition changes. Findings include: According to the agency policy, titled Documentation of Wound Care, reviewed 9/23/25, wounds will be measured in centimeters (length by width by depth) at least weekly unless covered with a non-removable dressing during the nurse visit. During Interview on 1/22/25 at 10:30 AM, the Administrator concured the documentation failed to include measurement of the wounds depth. Patient #3 had a start of care date of 12/19/25. Clinical record review revealed: a. The Plan of Care (POC), dated 12/19/25 to 2/16/26, identified the patient had a diagnosis of infection of a surgical site. Orders included skilled nurse services 2 times a week. b. The skilled nurse comprehensive visit note at start of care, dated 12/19/25, Staff D, Resgistered Nurse (RN) identified the patient had an open wound on the left dorsal foot. The wound measured 3.1 centimeters (cm) (length) by 1.9 cm (width). The assessment failed to include documentation of measurements of wound depth. c. The skilled nurse assessment, dated 12/24/25, Staff D, RN documented the patient had an open wound of the left dorsal foot. The wound measured 3.1 cm by 1.9 cm. The assessment failed to include documentation of measurements of wound depth. d. The skilled nurse assessments, dated 12/29/25, 1/7, 1/12, and 1/20/26, Staff D, RN documented the patient had an open wound of the left dorsal foot. The wound measured 3.3 cm by 2.3 cm at each visit. The assessments failed to include documentation of measurements of wound depth. The agency nurses failed to provided complete skilled nurse services. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule G0528. Element-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 372 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, patient interviews, staff interview, clinical record reviews and agency policy review, the agency failed to complete an accurate drug regimen review with each comprehensive assessment for 1 of 3 sampled patients with home observation visits (Patient #1). Failure to ensure medications reviewed at the time of each drug regimen review are current and accurate placed the patients at risk for increased potential unidentified medication interactions, side effects and duplication of medications. Findings include: According to the agency policy titled Medication Management, dated 11/12/25,a drug regimen review in post-acute care is generally considered to include medication reconcilliation, a review of all medications and a review of the drug regimen to identify and prevent potential medicataion issues. During an interview on 1/22/26 at 10:10 AM the Clinical Manager stated the Registered Nurse (RN) responsible to complete the Drug Regimen Review (DRR) at admission, recertification and discharge. Patient #1 had a start of care date of 8/12/2020. Clinical record review revealed the following: a. The Plan of Care (POC), dated 1/13/25 to 3/13/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney discease with heart failure and included physician orders for medications and skilled nursing services. b. The comprehensive assessment at recertification, dated 1/12/25, completed by Staff C, RN, included documentation a DRR was completed. c. During a home observation visit on 1/20/26 at 10:00 AM with Staff D, RN, the patient interview revealed the following medication discrepancies orders and patient stated medication schedule: 1) Anoro/Ellipta 62.5-25 microgram inhaler, 1 puff daily. The patient identified the medication not used in over 6 months. 2) Triamcinolone 0.1% cream. Apply 3 times a week to arms and legs. The patient stated the medication not utilized in over 1 year. The DRR failed to include an accurate review of all current medications taken by the patient. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

  • Within 48 Hours Of The Patient’S Return

    The inspectors’ words, 326 words

    “Within 48 hours of the patient’s return CFR(s): 484.55(d)(2) Within 48 hours of the patient’s return to the home from a hospital admission of 24 hours or more for any reason other than diagnostic tests, or on physician or allowed practitioner - ordered resumption date; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency policy review, clinical record review and agency staff interview, the agency failed to ensure completion of the update to the comprehensive assessment within 48 hours of the agency’s knowledge of return home from an inpatient facility for 1 of 1 sampled patients requiring a resumption of care assessment (Patient #6). The agency performed 5 resumption of care assessments in the previous 6 months. Failure to complete resumption of care comprehensive assessment in a timely manner increased the potential that patients might not receive services in a manner to meet individualized patient needs. Findings include: According to the agency policy, titled OASIS (Outcome and Assessment Information Set), dated 7/30/25, at the resumption of care (ROC), the comprehensive assessment must be completed within 48 hours of returning home after discharge from an inpatinet facility or a physician ordered resumption of care. Patient #6 had a start of care date of 8/29/25. Clinical record review revealed the following: a. The OASIS transfer document, dated 9/19/25, Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN) documented the patient transfered to the hospital. b. The Communication note, dated 9/27/25, Staff E, RN documented the patient discharge to home on 9/26/25 and a visit made to the home. The documentation lacked an assessment of the patient. c. The updateded comprehensive assessment at resumption of care, dated 10/1/25, completed by Staff C, RN, 5 days following discharge from the hospital and 3 days late. The agency failed to complete the update to the comprehensive assessment completed at resumption of care within 48 hours of the patient’s discharge from the hospital. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule G0548. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 22, 2026Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 22, 1985.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Sanford Health owns 100% directly since Nov 2, 2009.
  • 23 owners or officers are people: Mark Allen Lundeen (corporate director); Marnie Lynn Ventling-Herrmann (corporate director); Tony Lee Morrison (managing employee (on the payroll)); Brent Gerard Teiken (corporate director); Jolyn Joy Munson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Joel Adam Fluit (corporate officer); Dana James Dykhouse (corporate director); Andrew Stewart North (corporate director); Aimee Nicole Middleton (corporate officer); Stephanie Marie Herseth Sandlin (corporate director); William Joseph Gassen (corporate officer); William Joseph Gassen (corporate director); George Joseph Brown (corporate director); Wesley Owen Engbrecht (corporate director); Maureen Patricia Mccausland (corporate director); Nathan Thomas Schema (corporate officer); Thomas Richard Wenzel (corporate director); David Jonathan Shulkin (corporate director); Neil Leslie Gulsvig (corporate director); Kevin Victor Schieffer (corporate director); Lauris Nelson Molbert (corporate director); Nicholas Wayne Olson (corporate officer); Teresa Mayer (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
SanfordOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 2, 2009
Sanford HealthOwns 5% or more directly100%Nov 2, 2009

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (40 surveys completed): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 77% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate91.19% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate12.98% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.01% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 4 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 51201, where this agency’s office is, 3 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 2.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 4 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 51201
PlaceQuality rating
Sanford Home Health and Hospice Sheldon This home health agency2.5
Family First Home Care of IowaNot given
Avera @ Home4
Orange City Home Health3.5

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.