Hearth Record

Centerwell Home Health

A home health agency in Jacksonville, Florida 32256

10161 Centurion Pkwy North Ste 320, Jacksonville, Florida 32256. (904) 730-4640.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 16, 2026: a complaint inspection.

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 17, 2024: recertification inspection8 deficiencies
  • Information To Patient

    The inspectors’ words, 465 words

    “Information to patient CFR(s): 484.50(a)(1) Provide the patient and the patient’s legal representative (if any), the following information during the initial evaluation visit, in advance of furnishing care to the patient: This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the agency failed to provide patients with notice of their rights prior to admission for two (#9 and #11) patients out of a sample of seven home visits conducted. The findings include: 1. An interview was conducted with patient #9’s daughter on 7/16/2024 at 4:17 PM while waiting for Staff A, Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA), to arrive for the home visit. Patient #9’s daughter stated the nurse came out on 7/07/2024. “She had me sign an agreement, but we received no information, names, or phone numbers. We did not receive any admission booklet.” Staff A, PTA, conducted patient #9’s home visit on 7/16/2024 at 4:33 PM. Staff A confirmed that the patient did not have an admission pack. “I believe the patient was admitted over the weekend, and the clinician who admitted the patient did not have any extras in his car. I do not know why the home care agreement was the only thing the patient was provided. You will have to ask that clinician.” A review of the Plan of Care (POC) for patient #9 revealed an admission date of 7/07/2024 with a current certification period of 7/07/2024 to 9/04/2024-documentation for Frequency/duration of Visits: SN (skilled nursing) 2wk1, 1wk8, PT (Physical therapy) 1wk1, 2wk4, OT (Occupational therapy) 1wk8. 2. Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN), conducted patient #11’s home visit on 7/17/2024 at approximately 11:30 AM. On 7/17/24 at 11:40 AM, patient #11’s wife said they received no admission booklet when the nurse first came out to start services. “I signed a paper, and that was all I saw. I did not know who to call until the second visit. Staff B, RN, said, “I can get them one now and go over it with them.” Staff B confirmed she had admitted the patient. A review of the Plan of Care (POC) for patient #11 revealed an admission date of 6/30/2024 with a current certification period of 6/30/2024 to 8/28/2024 with documentation for frequency/duration of visits: SN (skilled nursing) 2wk1, 1wk1, 2wk1, 1wk2. 3. During an interview with the administrator on 7/17/2024 at 12:20 PM, she confirmed that the admitting discipline must review the information in the agency admission booklet with the patients before providing care. A review of the agency policy titled 03-09 Patient Rights/Notice of Privacy Practices, which was revised on 4/2022. Policy: Each patient admitted/readmitted will be provided with the Patient Bill of Rights, the Notice of Privacy Practices, and, when applicable, the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) Statement of Patient Privacy Rights. .”

    Rule G0410. Element-level.

  • Written Notice Of Patient’S Rights

    The inspectors’ words, 335 words

    “Written notice of patient’s rights CFR(s): 484.50(a)(1)(i) (i) Written notice of the patient’s rights and responsibilities under this rule, and the HHA’s transfer and discharge policies as set forth in paragraph (d) of this section. Written notice must be understandable to persons who have limited English proficiency and accessible to individuals with disabilities; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the agency failed to ensure patients received appropriate notification regarding the agency’s transfer and discharge policy for two (#9 and #11) patients out of seven home care visits conducted. The findings include: 1. An interview was conducted with patient #9’s daughter on 7/16/2024 at 4:17 PM while waiting for Staff A, Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA), to arrive for the home visit. Patient #9’s daughter stated that the therapist came out on 7/07/2024. “He had me sign an agreement, but we received no information. We did not receive any admission booklet.” Staff A, PTA, conducted patient #9’s home visit on 7/16/2024 at 4:33 PM. Staff A confirmed that the patient did not have an admission pack with information about the transfer and discharge policies. 2. Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN), conducted patient #11’s home visit on 7/17/2024 at approximately 11:30 AM. The home health admission pack was requested to be reviewed. At 11:40 AM, patient #11’s wife said they received no admission booklet or information about the transfer and discharge policies. Staff B, RN, said, “I can get them one now and go over it with them.” Staff B confirmed she had admitted the patient. 3. An interview with the administrator was conducted on 7/17/2024 at 1:20 PM. The administrator said the agency is closed on the weekends and that staff should have extra admission packs with them. “All information for patient rights and transfer and discharge information is in the home care admission book. All they have to do is call us, and we will get some to them. Running out of stock is no excuse.” .”

    Rule G0412. Element-level.

  • Rn Performs Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 564 words

    “RN performs assessment CFR(s): 484.55(a)(1) A registered nurse must conduct an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of the patient; and, for Medicare patients, to determine eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, including homebound status. The initial assessment visit must be held either within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician or allowed practitioner - ordered start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on patient record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the start of care was initiated within 48 hours of the referral for two of 17 patients sampled, Patients #15 and #17. The findings include: 1. A review of patient #17’s medical record revealed the agency received a referral for the patient to receive home health services on 3/11/24. The start of care date was 3/22/24. The review failed to reveal documentation of physician notification of the start of care delay, new orders for an updated start of care date or other documentation of why the admission was delayed. On 7/17/24 at 11:18 AM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator during which she reviewed patient #17’s medical record and verified the agency had received a referral on 3/11/24 and that the start of care was not until 3/22/24. She stated there should be information in the record or a physician’s order for an updated start of care. She confirmed the medical record did not have documentation or other evidence to support that the physician was notified of the delayed start of care or why the admission was not initiated within 48 hours of receipt of the referral. 2. A review of patient #15’s medical record revealed the agency received a referral for the patient to receive home health services on 6/15/24. The start of care date was 6/20/24. The review failed to reveal documentation of physician notification of the delay, new orders for an updated start of care date or other documentation of why the admission was not initiated within 48 hours of receipt of the referral. On 7/17/24 at 12:15 PM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator during which she reviewed the patient’s medical record. She verified that the agency had received a referral for this patient on 6/15/24; however, the start of care was noted to be 6/20/24. She was unable to find evidence to support that the physician was notified of the delayed start of care or documentation as to why the admission was delayed. 3. A review of policy 03-05 “Initial and Comprehensive Assessments” last reviewed on 9/28/18 revealed under the Initial Assessment Visit, “The Home Health agency will conduct an initial assessment visit to the patient: within 48 hours of the referral for services, or within 48 hours of the patient’s discharge from the inpatient facility or on the date the physician/allowed practitioner specifies care is to start. If the Home Health agency receives a referral and cannot make the first visit within 48 hours of the referral or patient discharge from an inpatient facility, the Home Health agency will contact the respective physician/allowed practitioner or referring entity with knowledge of the patient’s current condition. Approval will be obtained for a specific start of care date or referral to another home health agency provider for services.” .”

    Rule G0514. Element-level.

  • Promptly Alert Relevant Physician Of Changes

    The inspectors’ words, 381 words

    “Promptly alert relevant physician of changes CFR(s): 484.60(c)(1) The HHA must promptly alert the relevant physician(s) or allowed practitioner(s) to any changes in the patient’s condition or needs that suggest that outcomes are not being achieved and/or that the plan of care should be altered. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the agency failed to notify the physician of a significant change in condition for one (#8) patient out of seven patients sampled during home care visits. The findings include: Patient #8’s spouse was interviewed on 7/16/2024 at 1:15 PM while waiting for Staff C, Occupational therapist (OT), to arrive for the home visit. The spouse said patient #8 had not had a bowel movement (BM) since 7/12/2024 and would let the therapist know about it today. Then, the spouse tried to get the patient to open his eyes. Patient #8 was asleep in a recliner with a Foley catheter bag and tubing strapped to his right thigh. A home care observation with Staff C, OT, was conducted on 7/16/2024 at 1:45 PM for patient #8. The OT conducted her assessment and asked questions. The spouse reported to Staff C that patient #8 had not had a BM since 7/12/2024 when he was in rehab. “I am afraid that is the reason why he is lethargic. I think the last time this happened to him, he acted the same way. He was lethargic, and all he wanted to do was sleep.” Staff C was observed documenting her findings on her tablet. A review of Staff C’s visit note dated 7/16/2024 for patient #8 revealed documentation that the patient’s last BM was on 7/12/2024. There was no documentation that Staff C, OT, notified the clinical manager or called the physician. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 7/17/2024 at 2:40 PM, the DON said that she had not heard anything from Staff C about patient #8. Review of the agency policy titled 03-12 Physician/Allowed Practitioner Orders, with a revised date of 4/2023 included the following: Obtaining Orders: Any revision of the patient’s POC (Plan of Care) due to a change in health status must be communicated to ALL physicians/allowed practitioners who are issuing orders related to the patient’s care. .”

    Rule G0590. Element-level.

  • Integrate All Orders

    The inspectors’ words, 440 words

    “Integrate all orders CFR(s): 484.60(d)(2) Integrate orders from all physicians or allowed practitioners involved in the plan of care to assure the coordination of all services and interventions provided to the patient. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the agency failed to ensure that all orders for a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) were integrated into the plan of care (POC) for one (#11) patient out of 1 sampled with a PICC line from a total of seven home visits. The findings include: A review of the plan of care (POC) for patient #11 revealed an admission date of 6/30/2024, a current certification period of 6/30/2024 to 8/28/2024, and a pertinent diagnosis of Cellulitis of the left upper arm. The frequency and duration ordered for SN (skilled nursing) were: 2 wk 1, 1 wk 1, 2 wk 1, 1 wk 2. Orders for SN and treatments documented SN to administer RUS (right upper extremity) PICC line IV (Intravenous) therapy. Type: Ceftriaxone dose 2 gm, route IV push over 10 minutes every 24 hours. Flush IV with 10ml 0.9% NA (normal saline) before/after administration and every 8 hours when not used. Change dressing using sterile technique: transparent dressing every 7 days and as needed for soiling. Change the cap weekly and after blood draws. The POC did not order who or when the PICC line should be discontinued. The medical record did not reflect any documentation of the type of PICC line inserted or measurements. A home care observation was made on 7/17/2024 at 11:30 AM with Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN), and patient #11, to observe the removal of a PICC line for the patient. Staff B set up her equipment and assessed patient #11. She said she needed to call patient #11’s physician to verify the PICC line was to be removed. Staff B confirmed that the POC did not have orders to remove the PICC line. Staff B, RN, received a call back from patient #11’s physician, who gave a verbal order to remove the PICC Line. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator on 7/17/2024 at approximately 12:30 PM. The DON confirmed that the order for nursing to discontinue the PICC line did not make it to the POC. A review of the home care referral dated 6/20/2024 revealed orders for an End Date of 7/16. “Pull PICC/EOT (end of treatment). The referral did not document the type or size of the PICC line inserted. The Administrator stated that she would ensure that all orders are on the POC in the future. .”

    Rule G0604. Element-level.

  • Visit Schedule

    The inspectors’ words, 724 words

    “Visit schedule CFR(s): 484.60(e)(1) Visit schedule, including frequency of visits by HHA personnel and personnel acting on behalf of the HHA. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the agency failed to provide a written visit schedule for each discipline providing services for four (#8, #9, #10, #11) patients out of seven patients sampled during home care visits. The findings include: 1. Patient #8’s spouse was interviewed on 7/162024 at 1:15 PM while waiting for Staff C, the Occupational Therapist (OT), to arrive for her visit. The spouse said, “The staff just call or text us when they are coming. It would be nice to have a say on what works for us. We are not morning people. They gave us a dry-erase board, but there is nothing on it. I have been using it for other things. It would be a blessing if we knew beforehand who and what time they were coming.” A home care observation on 7/16/2024 at 1:45 PM for patient #8 revealed no calendars for the discipline visits. The dry-erase board on the patient’s refrigerator with MD appointments and a “To Do” list on the dry-erase calendar did not include a visit schedule. Staff C confirmed that the dry-erase boards were part of the admission pack and that the disciplines were to document the days and times of their visits. 2. An interview was conducted with patient #9’s daughter on 7/16/2024 at 4:17 PM. The caregiver said that when patient #9 was admitted over the weekend, the agency did not tell her the days they would be coming. “The first two visits, they just showed up. Now, they will give me a call when they come.” A home care observation was conducted on 7/16/2024 at 4:30 PM for patient #9. There were no calendars for the discipline visits. The daughter also stated they had not been informed about who or when someone would be coming when patient #9 was admitted. At that time, during an interview with Staff A, the Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA), he said was unsure why the admitting clinician did not give patient #9 an admission booklet with a dry-erase calendar. He said he could not answer for that clinician, but he could get them one. 3. A home care observation for patient #10 was conducted on 7/17/2024 at 10:30 AM. Patient #10 said, “Oh, I keep my home care book in my file cabinet.” The patient was in her wheelchair, rolled herself into her office area, and, with a magnifying glass, looked for the home health admission booklet. Patient #10 found the booklet. The patient’s home care admission booklet review revealed no calendars or dry-erase boards with a visit schedule. Patient #10 also stated, “No, they do not call me in advance. I get calls or texts when they are coming.” During an interview on 7/17/2024 at 10:58 AM, Staff E, Homemaker/companion, said, “I have never seen a calendar in the home. They call her when they are on their way.” 4. A home care observation on 7/17/2024 at 11:30 AM for patient #11 revealed he did not receive a home care admission booklet on admission. An interview was conducted with patient #11’s spouse at that time. The caregiver said they did not give him any information when they admitted patient #11 over the weekend. During an interview with Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN), on 7/17/2024 at 11:30 AM, she said, “I can get them one now and go over the information with them.” 5. An interview on 7/17/2024 at 1:20 PM with the Director of Nursing, the Administrator and the Director of Clinical Operations confirmed patients should receive information on who and when staff will be coming. 6. A review of the home health policy titled 03-09 Patient’s Rights/Notice of Privacy Practices, with a Revised date of 04/2022, revealed the following: As a patient of the company, patients have the right to...8. Participate in and be informed in advance about treatment, including the completion of assessments to determine care needs; decisions about the care to be provided or revisions to the care plan; the name and title of staff who will perform or supervise their care; the frequency of visits; expected outcomes and goals; and any factors that could impact the effectiveness of their treatment. .”

    Rule G0614. Element-level.

  • Patient Medication Schedule/Instructions

    The inspectors’ words, 556 words

    “Patient medication schedule/instructions CFR(s): 484.60(e)(2) Patient medication schedule/instructions, including: medication name, dosage and frequency and which medications will be administered by HHA personnel and personnel acting on behalf of the HHA. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the agency failed to provide written information regarding the patient’s correct medication regime for four (#8, #9, #10, and #11) out of seven patients sampled during seven home visits. The findings include: 1. Patient #8’s spouse was interviewed on 7/16/24 at 1:15 PM while waiting for Staff C, the Occupational Therapist (OT), to arrive for her visit. The spouse said they did not give me anything on medications. I have been using what I got from the facility and adding to it.” A home care observation on 7/16/2024 at 1:45 PM for patient #8 revealed there was not a current list of medications from the home health agency in the home. 2. An interview was conducted with patient #9’s daughter on 7/16/2024 at 4:17 PM. The caregiver said that on admission, they did not review her medications and did not provide anything written that she I could follow. Patient #9’s home care observation was conducted on 7/16/2024 at 4:30 PM. The patient’s daughter provided a copy of the discharge medication profile from the rehab facility. “As you can see, I am trying to make sure I give her what she is supposed to have. I am using different colored highlighters to help me know what is what.” During an interview with Staff A, the Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA), on 7/16/2024 at 4:33 PM, he said, “Our standard is to follow the discharge instructions with the medication list.” 3. A home care observation with Staff D, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) for patient #10 was conducted on 7/17/2024 at 10:30 AM. Staff D provided a copy of the discharge medication list dated 2023. During an interview on 7/17/2024 at 10:40 AM, patient #10 said, “A couple of weeks ago, I had my neighbor try to type up a list of my medications.” During an interview on 7/17/2024 at 10:58 AM, Staff D confirmed no updated mediation profile was in the home. 4. A home care observation on 7/17/2024 at 11:30 AM for patient # 11 revealed he did not receive a home care admission booklet on admission. An interview was conducted with patient #11’s spouse on 7/17/2024 at 11:30 AM who stated, “No, they have not provided me with a medication profile. They did not review the meds either. I have been trying to follow the discharge instructions, but there are meds on there that he has not been taking since he got home.” During an interview with Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN), on 7/17/2024 at 11:35 AM, she confirmed she had not provided the patient with an updated medication profile. 5. During an interview on 7/17/2024 at 1:20 PM with the Director of Nursing, the Administrator and the Director of Clinical Operations, they confirmed medications need to be reviewed and reconciled with what is in the home. A review of the home health agency policy 03-41 Medication Review and Documentation, revised 10/2022, revealed that the home care agency will assess all medications the patient is taking, prescription and over-the-counter (OTC), to include all routes of administration during each patient visit. .”

    Rule G0616. Element-level.

  • In Accordance With Current Clinical Practice

    The inspectors’ words, 605 words

    “In accordance with current clinical practice CFR(s): 484.105(f)(2) All HHA services must be provided in accordance with current clinical practice guidelines and accepted professional standards of practice. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the agency failed to ensure that professional standards of practice were followed during a high-tech procedure for removing a PICC line for one (#11) patient out of a sample of one with a PICC line from seven home visits. The findings include: A review of the Plan of Care (POC) for patient #11 revealed an admission date of 6/30/2024, a current certification period of 6/30/2024 to 8/28/2024, and a pertinent diagnosis of Cellulitis of the left upper arm. Orders for skilled nursing (SN) and treatments documented SN to administer RUS (right upper extremity) PICC line IV (Intravenous) therapy. Type: Ceftriaxone dose 2 gm, route IV push over 10 minutes every 24 hours. Flush IV with 10ml 0.9% NA (normal saline) before/after administration and every 8 hours when not used. Change dressing using sterile technique: transparent dressing every 7 days and as needed for soiling. Change the cap weekly and after blood draws. The medical record did not reflect any documentation of the type of PICC line inserted or measurements. A home care observation was conducted with Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN), for patient #11 on 7/17/2024 at 11:40 AM. Staff B set up her equipment and assessed patient #11. Then, she said she wanted to call patient #11’s physician to verify she was to pull the PICC line today. Staff B, RN, received a call back from patient #11’s physician, who gave a verbal order to remove the PICC Line. Staff B sanitized her hands, gathered gauze and an occlusive dressing, and walked to patient #11, who was sitting on the couch. Staff B then donned non-sterile gloves. Staff B removed the dressing to the PICC insertion site on the right upper arm. Staff B asked the patient to hold his breath and then, with the same gloves on, removed the PICC line. The gauze was applied without a petroleum-based ointment, and the patient held pressure. Staff B removed her gloves with the PICC line wrapped inside them. Staff B walked to the table where the she had set up her equipment. Staff B removed a red biohazard box from her nursing bag and disposed of the PICC line. Staff B did not measure the PICC line or check to ensure the tip of the line was intact. A review of the personnel file for Staff B revealed that a PICC line competency check-off sheet was completed on 5/12/2023. The competency did not have the preceptor or supervisor’s initials or completion date. A request was made for the agency’s policy and procedure for removing a PICC line. A policy was not provided. A review of the agency competency for the removal of PICC line documents: Wash hands, don sterile gloves, explain the procedure to the patient, discontinue all infusates and or clamp extension set, position the patient, remove the dressing from the insertion site, remove stabilization device, inspect the catheter insertion site, slowly remove the catheter, apply pressure to the site with gauze, apply petroleum-based ointment to exit site, and inspect catheter to ensure entire catheter has been removed. An interview was conducted on 7/17/2024 at 12:30 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the administrator. The DON confirmed Staff B should have measured the PICC line after removal. However, the type of PICC line and measurements were not on the referral. The Administrator said, “It will be in the future.” .”

    Rule G0984. Element-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 16, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jul 17, 2024Recertification inspection8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Feb 7, 2002.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • Doesn’t offer home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • SHC Holding Inc. owns 100% directly since Oct 3, 2008.
  • 12 owners or officers are people: Donald H Robinson (corporate officer); Kathleen L Carrion (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David L. Gieringer (runs it (operational or managerial control)); John W Nichols (corporate officer); Linda S Skaggs (corporate officer); Douglas A Edwards (corporate officer); Joseph M Ruschell (corporate officer); Joseph M Ruschell (corporate director); Susan E Benoit (corporate officer); Susan E Benoit (corporate director); Susan M Diamond (corporate officer); Susan M Diamond (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 2, 2018
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 2, 2018
SHC Holding Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Oct 3, 2008
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 17, 2021
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 2, 2018
Pf Development 21, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 1, 2013

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (331 surveys completed): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate90.96% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate9.69% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.13% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 45 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 32256, where this agency’s office is, 41 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.