Hearth Record

Lenity Home Care LLC

A home health agency in Fresno, California 93727

4920 E. Yale Ave., Ste. 101, Fresno, California 93727. (559) 742-8005.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 9, 2025: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them at condition level, the most serious.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 9, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Basis And Scope

    The inspectors’ words, 1,178 words

    “Basis and Scope CFR(s): §484.1 Basis and Scope (a) Basis. This part is based on: (1) Sections 1861(o) and 1891 of the Act, which establish the conditions that an HHA must meet in order to participate in the Medicare program and which, along with the additional requirements set forth in this part, are considered necessary to ensure the health and safety of patients; and (2) Section 1861(z) of the Act, which specifies the institutional planning standards that HHAs must meet. (b) Scope. The provisions of this part serve as the basis for survey activities for the purpose of determining whether an agency meets the requirements for participation in the Medicare program. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview and record review, the agency failed to establish the conditions that an HHA must meet in order to participate in the Medicare program when the agency knowingly provide services in a new location and county without first completing CMS (center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) application form. This failure resulted in providing home health care services in a location the facility was not approved to provide services starting on 8/3/23 and potentially could negatively affect the care of all patients. The cumulative effect of these systemic problems resulted in the agency’s inability to provide care in a safe and quality setting. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 1/6/25 at 1:30 p.m., with the Administrator/Direct Patient Care Services (Adm/DPCS), at the agency located in 4950 E. Yale Ave Fresno, the State License was observed displaying the following information. “State of California Department of Public Health…this License to [agency] 315 W Oak Avenue Visalia, CA 93291-4928...effective: 08/05/2024 expires: 08/04/2025…” The Adm/DPCS was asked to explain the reason for not having current address on the license displayed in the lobby. The Adm/DPCS stated the agency relocated from Visalia to Fresno on 10/1/23 (more than a year ago). The Adm/DPCS stated “I have received the letter from CAB (Central Applications Branch - the unit of CDPH that reviews and processes Change of Location applications) on 9/20/24 and submitted the required doc (documents) on 10/1/24. Sacramento called me on 12/24/24 stating she wanted more information about change of address. She validated change of address and she said everything was fine.” During a concurrent interview and record review, on 1/6/25 at 2:10 p.m., with the Adm/DPCS, the letter from CAB titled “Application Deemed Incomplete” dated September 20, 2024, addressed to the previous administrator (Adm 1) 315 W Oak Avenue, Visalia, CA 93291, was reviewed. When the letter was presented to Adm/DPCS, the Adm/DPCS stated the letter was sent out to the previous administrator and previous address and she did not receive it. he ADM/DPCS was asked to provide proof of Report of Change (ROC) to update the Administrator, and any notification of approval. The Adm/DPCS stated she did not report the change of Administrator that occurred in April 2024, but that Adm 1 had reported the change of location In August 2023. During an interview on 1/6/25 at 3:00 p.m., with the Adm/DPCS, the Adm/DPCS stated the reason for the agency moved from Visalia to Fresno was to manage business in one location along with the Hospice and In-Home care in Fresno since the HHA in Visalia was not busy. The Adm/DPCS stated the HHA in Fresno currently had 20 active patients. The Adm/DPCS stated the current Fresno location had been not busy as well and she was planning to move the agency to a smaller place. During an interview on 1/6/25 at 3:30 p.m., with the Designated Administrator (DA), the DA stated she was the one who submitted the application for CHOL The DA stated she thought if she reported the changes to the State within 30 days, the agency followed the law. The DA stated she did not know the agency required approval prior to move. During a phone interview on 1/6/25 at 3:40 p.m. with Adm 1, Adm 1 stated that as of April 2024 he was no longer the administrator, and all the correspondence should have gone to the Adm/DPCS. Adm 1 stated he knew the CHOL process and that a licensing survey needed to be completed upon approval of the application. The Adm 1 stated the agency moved to the current location on 8/3/23 and the ROC was filed on 8/6/23. Adm 1 stated he reported to CMS (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) and filed 855A (Medicare Enrollment application) on 8/21/23. Adm 1 stated he did not know the application was incomplete. Adm 1 stated he changed Email contact to Adm/DPCS on March 2024 when he was no longer the Administrator of the HHA (Home Health Agency). A review of the facility’s copy of the form HS 200 (a form for Licensure & Certification Application) dated 8/6/23, contained the agency’s letterhead titled “Change of Location and Mailing Address.” The packet included the priority mail receipt indicating the package was shipped to CAB on 8/23/23. A review of the agency’s CHOL application packet contained the document titled “Commercial Lease Agreement”. The lease agreement, dated and signed on 7/26/23, indicated the term begins on September 1, 2023. A review of the agency’s Email inquiry titled “CDPH (California Department of Public Health) Internet Admin Inquiries” indicated the provider emailed CAB on 6/28/24 inquiring the status of the CHOL application submitted on 8/16/23. The CAB replied to the provider on 7/2/24, indicating that they received the application on 2/22/24 and it was currently pending assignment to an analyst. A review of letter from CAB titled “Application Deemed Incomplete” dated 9/20/24, contained the list of missing information from the provider and the instructions to complete the application. During a review of faxed document titled “Application Pending Regional Office Review Medicare Application” dated 8/21/23, indicated, “Your current Medicare application in PECOS. Status Approval Pending Regional Office Approval.” During a review of “Certificate of Accreditation from ACHC” posted in the agency’s lobby, the certificate indicated, “[the agency] Home Health Accreditation #77779 Visalia California From November 12, 2022, through November 12, 2025.” During an interview on 1/9/25 at 2:00 p.m., with the Adm/DPCS, at the agency, the Adm/DPCS stated she knew she had been providing home health services for over one year without approved state license reflecting current address. The Adm/DPCS also stated she could not provide any evidence that the agency informed the deeming agency /CMS for CHOL. The Adm/DPCS acknowledged she violated state law and Health and Safety Code by not responding to the correspondence and by not following up on the status of the CHOL for an extended period time. During a review of patient listing on the date of move on 8/3/23 contained 22 patients. During a review of patients listing for discharged patients from 8/3/23 (moving date) to 9/6/24 (survey entrance date) contained 122 patients. During a review of active patient listing on 1/6/24 (survey entrance date) contained 20 patients. A review of the agency’s job description titled “Executive Director/Administrator” dated 12/18, indicated, “Complying with applicable law and regulation…Ensuring the accuracy of public information materials and activities…””

    Rule G0325. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Compliance With Federal, State, Local Law

    The inspectors’ words, 1,153 words

    “Compliance with Federal, State, Local Law CFR(s): 484.100 Condition of participation: Compliance with Federal, State, and local laws and regulations related to the health and safety of patients. The HHA and its staff must operate and furnish services in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations related to the health and safety of patients. If state or local law provides licensing of HHAs, the HHA must be licensed. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview and record review, the agency failed to follow federal and state laws and regulations related to submission of a complete Change of Location (CHOL) for their licensed agency The Home Health Agency changed location and county without first submitting a complete application for review and approval. The agency failed to follow federal rules to submit a CHOL application prior to relocating. These failures resulted in providing home health care services in a location the facility was not approved to provide services starting on 8/3/23 and potentially could negatively affect the care of all patients. The cumulative effect of these systemic problems resulted in the agency’s inability to provide care in a safe and quality setting. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 1/6/25 at 1:30 p.m., with the Administrator/Direct Patient Care Services (Adm/DPCS), at the agency located in 4950 E. Yale Ave Fresno, the State License was observed displaying the following information. “State of California Department of Public Health…this License to [agency] 315 W Oak Avenue Visalia, CA 93291-4928...effective: 08/05/2024 expires: 08/04/2025…” The Adm/DPCS was asked to explain the reason for not having current address on the license displayed in the lobby. The Adm/DPCS stated the agency relocated from Visalia to Fresno on 10/1/23 (more than a year ago). The Adm/DPCS stated “I have received the letter from CAB (Central Applications Branch - the unit of CDPH that reviews and processes Change of Location applications) on 9/20/24 and submitted the required doc (documents) on 10/1/24. Sacramento called me on 12/24/24 stating she wanted more information about change of address. She validated change of address and she said everything was fine.” During a concurrent interview and record review, on 1/6/25 at 2:10 p.m., with the Adm/DPCS, the letter from CAB titled “Application Deemed Incomplete” dated September 20, 2024, addressed to the previous administrator (Adm 1) 315 W Oak Avenue, Visalia, CA 93291, was reviewed. When the letter was presented to Adm/DPCS, the Adm/DPCS stated the letter was sent out to the previous administrator and previous address and she did not receive it. he ADM/DPCS was asked to provide proof of Report of Change (ROC) to update the Administrator, and any notification of approval. The Adm/DPCS stated she did not report the change of Administrator that occurred in April 2024, but that Adm 1 had reported the change of location In August 2023. During an interview on 1/6/25 at 3:00 p.m., with the Adm/DPCS, the Adm/DPCS stated the reason for the agency moved from Visalia to Fresno was to manage business in one location along with the Hospice and In-Home care in Fresno since the HHA in Visalia was not busy. The Adm/DPCS stated the HHA in Fresno currently had 20 active patients. The Adm/DPCS stated the current Fresno location had been not busy as well and she was planning to move the agency to a smaller place. During an interview on 1/6/25 at 3:30 p.m., with the Designated Administrator (DA), the DA stated she was the one who submitted the application for CHOL The DA stated she thought if she reported the changes to the State within 30 days, the agency followed the law. The DA stated she did not know the agency required approval prior to move. During a phone interview on 1/6/25 at 3:40 p.m. with Adm 1, Adm 1 stated that as of April 2024 he was no longer the administrator, and all the correspondence should have gone to the Adm/DPCS. Adm 1 stated he knew the CHOL process and that a licensing survey needed to be completed upon approval of the application. The Adm 1 stated the agency moved to the current location on 8/3/23 and the ROC was filed on 8/6/23. Adm 1 stated he reported to CMS (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) and filed 855A (Medicare Enrollment application) on 8/21/23. Adm 1 stated he did not know the application was incomplete. Adm 1 stated he changed Email contact to Adm/DPCS on March 2024 when he was no longer the Administrator of the HHA (Home Health Agency). A review of the facility’s copy of the form HS 200 (a form for Licensure & Certification Application) dated 8/6/23, contained the agency’s letterhead titled “Change of Location and Mailing Address.” The packet included the priority mail receipt indicating the package was shipped to CAB on 8/23/23. A review of the agency’s CHOL application packet contained the document titled “Commercial Lease Agreement”. The lease agreement, dated and signed on 7/26/23, indicated the term begins on September 1, 2023. A review of the agency’s Email inquiry titled “CDPH (California Department of Public Health) Internet Admin Inquiries” indicated the provider emailed CAB on 6/28/24 inquiring the status of the CHOL application submitted on 8/16/23. The CAB replied to the provider on 7/2/24, indicating that they received the application on 2/22/24 and it was currently pending assignment to an analyst. A review of letter from CAB titled “Application Deemed Incomplete” dated 9/20/24, contained the list of missing information from the provider and the instructions to complete the application. During a review of faxed document titled “Application Pending Regional Office Review Medicare Application” dated 8/21/23, indicated, “Your current Medicare application in PECOS. Status Approval Pending Regional Office Approval.” During a review of “Certificate of Accreditation from ACHC” posted in the agency’s lobby, the certificate indicated, “[the agency] Home Health Accreditation #77779 Visalia California From November 12, 2022, through November 12, 2025.” During an interview on 1/9/25 at 2:00 p.m., with the Adm/DPCS, at the agency, the Adm/DPCS stated she knew she had been providing home health services for over one year without approved state license reflecting current address. The Adm/DPCS also stated she could not provide any evidence that the agency informed the deeming agency /CMS for CHOL. The Adm/DPCS acknowledged she violated state law and Health and Safety Code by not responding to the correspondence and by not following up on the status of the CHOL for an extended period time. During a review of patient listing on the date of move on 8/3/23 contained 22 patients. During a review of patients listing for discharged patients from 8/3/23 (moving date) to 9/6/24 (survey entrance date) contained 122 patients. During a review of active patient listing on 1/6/24 (survey entrance date) contained 20 patients. A review of the agency’s job description titled “Executive Director/Administrator” dated 12/18, indicated, “Complying with applicable law and regulation…Ensuring the accuracy of public information materials and activities…””

    Rule G0848. Condition-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 9, 2025Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Nov 12, 2019.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 7 owners or officers are people: Rebecca R Shergill (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Rebecca R Shergill (holds 5% or more security interest, 50%); Rebecca R Shergill (general partner, 50%); Rebecca R Shergill (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Luthar Ian U Nermal (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Luthar Ian U Nermal (holds 5% or more security interest, 50%); Luthar Ian U Nermal (general partner, 50%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2.5 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate90.75% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate11.32% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.01% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 76 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 93727, where this agency’s office is, 61 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 2.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.