Hearth Record

Caremax Home Health

A home health agency in Simi Valley, California 93065

980 Enchanted Way, Simi Valley, California 93065. (805) 582-1546.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Sep 25, 2025: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Sep 25, 2025: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Participate In Care

    The inspectors’ words, 641 words

    “Participate in care CFR(s): 484.50(c)(4)(i,ii,iii,iv,v,vi,vii,viii) Participate in, be informed about, and consent or refuse care in advance of and during treatment, where appropriate, with respect to-- (i) Completion of all assessments; (ii) The care to be furnished, based on the comprehensive assessment; (iii) Establishing and revising the plan of care; (iv) The disciplines that will furnish the care; (v) The frequency of visits; (vi) Expected outcomes of care, including patient-identified goals, and anticipated risks and benefits; (vii) Any factors that could impact treatment effectiveness; and (viii) Any changes in the care to be furnished. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure multidisciplinary visit notes and plan of care (POC) assessments for seven out of seven patients (Patient 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7) were signed accurately and timely according to the policies and procedures (P&P) and facility protocol. These failures had the potential to result in inaccurate data in patients’ clinical records. Findings: During a review of the clinical records conducted from 9/23/25 to 9/25/25, late signatures were identified for: 1. Patient 1 – Physical Therapy (PT) 30-day re-assessment note, dated 9/6/25 was signed on 9/19/25 and Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) visit note, dated 9/19/25 was signed 9/23/25. 2. Patient 2 – Home Health Aid (HA) visit note, dated 8/29/25 was signed 9/10/25 and HA visit note, dated 9/5/25 was signed 9/15/25. 3. Patient 3 - RNS visit note, dated 9/5/25 was signed 9/16/25, PT visit note, dated 9/3/25 and 9/8/25 was signed on 9/23/25, HA visit note, dated 8/23/25 was signed 9/10/25, HA visit note, dated 9/6/25 was signed 9/19/25, Skilled Nursing (SN) visit note, dated 8/29/25 was signed 9/9/25, SN visit note, dated 9/9/25 was signed 9/23/25. 4. Patient 4 - RNS visit note, dated 9/11/25 was signed 9/16/25. 5. Patient 5 - HA visit note, dated 9/3, 9/6, & 9/10/25 was signed 9/16/25, HA visit note, dated 9/13/25 was signed 9/17/25. 6. Patient 6 - SN visit note, dated 8/12/25 was signed 8/17/25, SN visit note, dated 8/19/25 was signed 9/23/25. 7. Patient 7 - PT visit note, dated 3/24/25, was signed on 4/3/25, SN visit note. Dated 3/26/25, was signed on 4/23/25, POC dated 4/2/25 was signed by the RN on 3/20/25 and by the MD on 9/24/25. During a review of the facility’s P&P titled, “Entries into the Clinical Record,” dated 4/2011, the P&P indicated, “Home health personnel providing direct patient care and supervisory functions have authority to make entries into the clinical record. Documentation in the clinical record will be timely, detailed, accurate, and reflect the care or services provided…7. The clinical note will include…D. The date the service was provided (month, day year). E. Signature of clinician and his/her credentials.” Further review of P&P, indicated an addendum stating, “In addition to Entries Into the Clinical record policy and procedure…entries into the clinical record shall be submitted within 48 hours.” During a review of the P&P titled, “Clinical record Review,” dated 5/2024, the P&P indicated, “Clinical records will be reviewed at least annually by qualified organization personnel to assure that documentation entered is reliable, timely, valid and accurate…1. Each clinical record will be reviewed on an ongoing basis by the Clinical Supervisor Performance Improvement Coordinator, Clinical Director or designees for: A. Timeliness of entries into the clinical record…F. Accuracy of the clinical records.” During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/25/25, at 10:08 a.m. with the Director of Nursing Services (DPCS), the facility’s P&P titled, “Entries in the Clinical Record,” and “Clinical Record Review,” Patient 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7’s’ visit note and the POC assessment were reviewed. The DPCS acknowledged the late signatures and verbalized that all visit notes must be completed on time including signing the document within 48 hours from the date of visit.”

    Rule G0434. Element-level.

  • Integrate All Services

    The inspectors’ words, 749 words

    “Integrate all services CFR(s): 484.60(d)(3) Integrate services, whether services are provided directly or under arrangement, to assure the identification of patient needs and factors that could affect patient safety and treatment effectiveness and the coordination of care provided by all disciplines. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and document an effective, ongoing data-driven Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program for completion of clinical notes and annual tuberculosis (TB) test. These failures had the potential to affect and result in the agency’s substandard quality of care and substantial non-compliance without the necessary measures for identification and implementation of the QAPI program. Findings: 1. During a review of the clinical records conducted from 9/23/25 to 9/25/25, late signatures were identified for: A. Patient 1 – Physical Therapy (PT) 30-day re-assessment note, dated 9/6/25 was signed on 9/19/25 and Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) visit note, dated 9/19/25 was signed 9/23/25. B. Patient 2 – Home Health Aid (HA) visit note, dated 8/29/25 was signed 9/10/25 and HA visit note, dated 9/5/25 was signed 9/15/25. C. Patient 3 - RNS visit note, dated 9/5/25 was signed 9/16/25, PT visit note, dated 9/3/25 and 9/8/25 was signed on 9/23/25, HA visit note, dated 8/23/25 was signed 9/10/25, HA visit note, dated 9/6/25 was signed 9/19/25, Skilled Nursing (SN) visit note, dated 8/29/25 was signed 9/9/25, SN visit note, dated 9/9/25 was signed 9/23/25. D. Patient 4 - RNS visit note, dated 9/11/25 was signed 9/16/25. E. Patient 5 - HA visit note, dated 9/3, 9/6, & 9/10/25 was signed 9/16/25, HA visit note, dated 9/13/25 was signed 9/17/25. F. Patient 6 - SN visit note, dated 8/12/25 was signed 8/17/25, SN visit note, dated 8/19/25 was signed 9/23/25. G. Patient 7 - PT visit note, dated 3/24/25, was signed on 4/3/25, SN visit note. Dated 3/26/25, was signed on 4/23/25, POC dated 4/2/25 was signed by the RN on 3/20/25 and by the MD on 9/24/25. During a review of the facility’s P&P titled, “Entries into the Clinical Record,” dated 4/2011, the P&P indicated, “Home health personnel providing direct patient care and supervisory functions have authority to make entries into the clinical record. Documentation in the clinical record will be timely, detailed, accurate, and reflect the care or services provided…7. The clinical note will include…D. The date the service was provided (month, day year). E. Signature of clinician and his/her credentials.” Further review of P&P, indicated an addendum stating, “In addition to Entries Into the Clinical record policy and procedure…entries into the clinical record shall be submitted within 48 hours.” 2.During a record review on 9/24/25 at 2:46 p.m. it was identified that a Registered Nurse (RN) did not have an updated yearly Tuberculosis (TB – lung infection) Mantoux Test (PPD – Purified Protein Derivative – a substance used in a skin test to detect tuberculosis infection) or chest x-ray (CXR) in their employee personnel file. During an interview on 9/24/25 at 3:01 p.m. with the Office Manager (OM), the OM stated that all employees are required to have yearly PPD tests, and CXR to verify for TB are required every five (5) years. In addition, the OM also confirmed that the RN did not have an updated PPD test located in the employee personnel file. During a review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “Personnel Record Contents,” dated 1/2019, the P&P indicated in part, “…Homemaker-Home-Health aide services are supervised every fourteen (14) days.” Another facility P&P was reviewed titled, “Missed Visits,” dated 4/2011indicated in part, “New Hire Documents: TB Mantoux Test Documentation or CXR record within 5 years…[agency name] will maintain TB Mantoux Test documentation annually.” During a review of the P&P titled, “Clinical record Review,” dated 5/2024, the P&P indicated, “Clinical records will be reviewed at least annually by qualified organization personnel to assure that documentation entered is reliable, timely, valid and accurate. The record review shall reflect the scope of the QAPI program to show measurable improvement in indicators for which there is evidence that improvement in those indicators will improve health outcomes, patient safety and quality of care. The frequency and detail of the data collection shall be approved by the organization’s governing body…1. Each clinical record will be reviewed on an ongoing basis by the Clinical Supervisor Performance Improvement Coordinator, Clinical Director or designees for: A. Timeliness of entries into the clinical record…C. Compliance with organizational policy…F. Accuracy of the clinical records.””

    Rule G0606. Element-level.

  • Onsite Supervisory Visit Every 14 Days

    The inspectors’ words, 380 words

    “Onsite supervisory visit every 14 days CFR(s): 484.80(h)(1)(i) (1)(i) If home health aide services are provided to a patient who is receiving skilled nursing, physical or occupational therapy, or speech language pathology services— (A) A registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional who is familiar with the patient, the patient’s plan of care, and the written patient care instructions described in paragraph (g) of this section, must complete a supervisory assessment of the aide services being provided no less frequently than every 14 days; and (B) The home health aide does not need to be present during the supervisory assessment described in paragraph (h)(1)(i)(A) of this section. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that supervisory nurse (RN) home visits were implemented no less than 14 days as indicated in the facility policy for one (Patient 3) of 7 patients. This failure had the potential to compromise oversight of patient care, delay identification of changes in condition, and increase the risk of unmet needs. Findings: During a record review on 9/24/25 at 3:57 p.m. it was identified that a supervisory nurse (RN) visit was missed for Patient 3 for the week of 09/14/2025 through 09/20/2025. During an interview on 9/24/25 at 4:08 p.m. with the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS), the DPCS confirmed that an RN visit was missed the week of 09/14/2025 through 09/20/2025 and acknowledged that there should have been a supervisory nurse visit during that week. DPCS also verified that there was no documentation indicating that Patient 3’s physician was notified, and there was no evidence of documentation indicating that the RN had attempted to reschedule the missed visit. During a review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “Supervision,” dated 4/2011, the P&P indicated in part, “…Homemaker-Home-Health aide services are supervised every fourteen (14) days.” During a review of the P&P titled, “Missed Visits,” dated 4/2011, the P&P indicated, “If a visit is missed for any reason, the clinician should attempt to reschedule it for the same week so that the physician ordered frequency is maintained….If a visit is missed and not rescheduled, the clinician will: Notify the physician and clinical supervisor of the missed visit and reason for the missed visit.””

    Rule G0808. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 25, 2025Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Mar 26, 1997.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Eduardo L. Lopez (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Eduardo L. Lopez (corporate officer, 100%); Darlyn Grace Bano Lopez (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Darlyn Grace Bano Lopez (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no : “The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.”
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, worse; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half starsNot rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate33.92% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate15.54% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.94% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • CMS gives this agency no quality of patient care rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.