Hearth Record

Around the Clock Home Care

A home health agency in Bakersfield, California 93309

5251 Office Park Drive, Suite 400, Bakersfield, California 93309. (661) 395-5800.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 9, 2025: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 9, 2025: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Infection Control Education

    The inspectors’ words, 352 words

    “Infection control education CFR(s): 484.70(c) Standard: Education. The HHA must provide infection control education to staff, patients, and caregiver(s). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the agency failed to provide education to one of seven sampled patients (Patient 1) regarding environmental factors regarding infection prevention according to the plan of care. This failure had the potential to result in Patient 1 having worsening wound and/or developing wound infections. Findings: During an observation on 7/7/25 at 10:45 a.m. in Patient 1’s home, Patient 1 was sitting on her bed. Patient 1 had wound dressing on her bottom and abdominal area. There was a detached wound VAC (vacuum assisted closure, negative pressure wound therapy used to help wounds heal. It works by applying gentle suction to the wound through a special dressing, which helps to remove excess fluid, reduce swelling, and promote the growth of new tissue) on the bed. There were clutters everywhere, folded clothes, books, shelves filled with things, bed was filled with folded clothes and miscellaneous things. The walkways were very narrow filled with various things on the sides, the floors had debris and stains. The Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 performed the home visit to Patient 1 but did not educate Patient 1 regarding environmental safety and cleanliness. During a review of Patient 1’s “Orders and Treatments (OT)” dated 5/15/25, the OT indicated, “SN [Skilled Nurse] to instruct on maintaining a safe/sanitary home environment to ensure optimal health and healing.” During an interview on 7/8/25 at 12:47 p.m. with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated she did not educate Patient 1 on maintaining a safe and sanitary home environment. LVN 1 stated, “I have not seen any progress [on maintaining safe and sanitary environment]. I did not tell her yesterday [7/7/25].” During a review of the agency’s policy and procedure (P&P) on “Education-Patient/Family” dated 11/2018, the P&P indicated, “Educate of patient/family may include, but is not limited to medications, safety, infection control, treatments and procedures and discharge planning. Continue to reinforce the new information or skills to reinstruct the patient/family as needed.””

    Rule G0686. Standard-level.

  • Social Worker

    The inspectors’ words, 340 words

    “Social Worker CFR(s): 484.115(m) Standard: Social worker. A person who has a master’s or doctoral degree from a school of social work accredited by the Council on Social Work Education, and has 1 year of social work experience in a health care setting. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the agency failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) on “Competency Program” and “Performance Evaluation” for one of one sampled Social Worker (SW 1) when annual competencies and performance evaluations were not completed annually. This failure had the potential for compromised care to patients. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/8/25 at 2:58 p.m. with Vice President of Operations (VPO), SW 1’s employee file was reviewed. SW 1’s “Initial competency assessment skills checklist - Medical Social worker” dated 6/19/20 was reviewed. VPO stated, SW 1 date of hire was 6/19/20, and SW 1’s had an initial competency but no annual competency since 2020. VPO stated there were no performance evaluations in SW 1’s employee file. VPO stated SW 1 should have had an annual competency and performance evaluation annually, and this had not been completed. During a review of the agency’s P&P titled “Competency Program” revised November 2024, the P&P indicated, “Purpose: To ensure that the competence of clinical organization personnel is assessed, maintained, and improved on a continuing bases. Procedure: The organization will establish and annually re-evaluate its job specific “Competency Based Orientation Checklist” which reflects duties commonly required in the performance of patient contact positions. 2. The organization will establish and annually evaluate a group of specific “Competency Based Orientation Checklist” which reflects duties commonly required in the performance of patient contact positions.” During a review of the agency’s P&P titled “Performance Evaluations” revised November 2024, the P&P indicated, “Purpose To provide consistent and regular performance evaluations to promote improvement. Procedure: 1. Performance evaluations will be completed (and dated) on all personnel as follows: A. During the probationary period. B. Annually, based on personnel’s annual evaluation date.””

    Rule G1076. Standard-level.

  • Protect Patient During Investigation

    The inspectors’ words, 184 words

    “Protect patient during investigation CFR(s): 484.50(e)(1)(iii) (iii) Take action to prevent further potential violations, including retaliation, while the complaint is being investigated. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the agency failed to ensure its policies and procedures on abuse prevention and patient complaints indicated the requirement to suspend staff accused of abuse while the complaint is being investigated. This failure had the potential to place patients at risk for retaliation and further abuse. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/9/25 at 9 a.m. with Administrator, the agency’s policies and procedures (P&Ps) titled “Abuse/Neglect Assessment and Reporting” dated November 2018 and “Complaint and Grievance Process – Customer” dated November 2018 were reviewed. Administrator stated the above policies were the agency’s P&Ps on abuse prevention and patient complaints. The P&Ps did not indicate staff accused of patient abuse will be suspended pending the investigation of the abuse allegation. Administrator stated suspending staff accused of abuse while the allegations are being investigated is important to protect patients from abuse and should be included in the P&Ps.”

    Rule G0486. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 9, 2025Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jan 16, 1997.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 9 owners or officers are people: Mary Saia Vasinda (owns 5% or more directly, 51%); Mary Saia Vasinda (corporate officer, 51%); Mary Saia Vasinda (managing employee (on the payroll), 51%); John Vasinda (owns 5% or more directly, 49%); John Vasinda (corporate officer, 49%); Todd A Farrer (corporate director, 0%); Renee Hieb (corporate director, 0%); Michelle A Marquez (corporate director, 0%); Jina Lynn Morrow (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (348 surveys completed): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 80% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate82.45% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate9.70% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.77% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 108 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 93309, where this agency’s office is, 94 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.