Hearth Record

Excel Home Health

A home health agency in La Mesa, California 91942

5575 Lake Parkway, Suite 220, La Mesa, California 91942. (619) 460-6622.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 9, 2026: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 9, 2026: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Program Scope

    The inspectors’ words, 392 words

    “Program scope CFR(s): 484.65(a)(1),(2) Standard: Program scope. (1) The program must at least be capable of showing measurable improvement in indicators for which there is evidence that improvement in those indicators will improve health outcomes, patient safety, and quality of care. (2) The HHA must measure, analyze, and track quality indicators, including adverse patient events, and other aspects of performance that enable the HHA to assess processes of care, HHA services, and operations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the agency failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI- data-driven, proactive approach to improve quality of care and services) program was fully developed, implemented, and maintained when the documents were undated, lacked signatures of the participant attendance, and the document contained no evidence of tracking, monitoring, or analysis. These failures led to the agency being unable to demonstrate an ongoing QAPI program or quality improvement because the required documentation and analysis were not provided. Findings: On 7/8/26 at 2:30 P.M., a joint interview and record review of the agency’s QAPI program binder was conducted with the Director of Patient Care Alternate (DPCSA). The DPCSA stated that she had been responsible for the QAPI program since January 2025. The DPCSA reviewed the QAPI binder under the binder tab labeled PIP - Performance Improvement Program. There were four programs. Program (1) Transfer and discharge summaries: This document was undated, lacked participant signatures, and contained no documented evidence of tracking, monitoring, or analysis. Program (2) Discharge Medication List: This document was undated, lacked participant signatures, and contained no documented evidence of tracking, monitoring, or analysis. Program (3) Coordination of Care Conference: This document was dated 3/15/25, lacked participant signatures, and contained no documented evidence of tracking, monitoring, or analysis. Program (4) NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage): This document was dated 10/15/25, lacked participant signatures, and contained no documented evidence of tracking, monitoring, or analysis. The DPCSA stated that monthly and quarterly QAPI meetings were held but could not provide documentation of data tracking or evaluation of these programs. The DPCSA further said she was still learning her role and responsibilities. Per the undated agency’s policy and procedure, titled Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, “…The QAPI function is designed to assess, measure and improve performance of clinical and administrative process and ultimately patient outcomes…””

    Rule G0642. Standard-level.

  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 332 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the agency failed to ensure hand hygiene (keeping hands clean) was performed prior to accessing the clinical supply bag for one of three home visits observed (Patient 2). This deficient practice has the potential to contaminate the inside of the supply bag and increase the risk of cross-contamination and spreading infectious diseases to other patients. Findings: Per review of the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care (POC), dated 6/18/26 through 8/16/26, Patient 2 was admitted to the agency on 12/20/25 with diagnoses that included a pressure ulcer (wound) of the right elbow. On 7/8/26 at 9:50 A.M., Skilled Nurse (SN) 1 was observed wearing gloves while assessing Patient 2’s tailbone area. At the caregiver’s request, SN 1 then examined Patient 2’s left heel. After completing the assessment, SN 1 was observed reaching into the clinical supply bag with the contaminated gloves still on to get a dressing. A follow-up interview was conducted with SN 1 on 7/8/26. SN 1 stated she should have removed the contaminated gloves and performed hand hygiene prior to retrieving wound supplies from the bag to prevent cross-contamination and spread of infectious diseases to other patients. On 7/8/26 at 2:15 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Patient Care Services Alternate (DPCSA). The DPCSA stated that skilled nurses were required to perform hand hygiene and change gloves before accessing the supply bag to prevent cross-contamination. Per the agency’s undated policy and procedure, titled “Bag Technique,” failed to indicate that the nurse should perform hand hygiene before accessing the supply bag. Per the agency’s undated document, titled “Your 5 Moments for Hand Hygiene,” indicated to, “...Clean your hands after touching a patient and her/his immediate surroundings, when leaving the patient side...””

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 9, 2026Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jan 13, 1995.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Sridhar Gopalakrishnan (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Maria Armas (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jennifer R Douthitt (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Anitha Krishnan (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Zero, or very few, patients met the survey’s rules for inclusion.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate87.59% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate9.54% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 91 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91942, where this agency’s office is, 81 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.