Hearth Record

Legacy Home Health, Inc.

A home health agency in Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730

7365 Carnelian Street, Suite 116a, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. (909) 608-7566.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 22, 2025: a recertification inspection.

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 22, 2025: recertification inspection6 deficiencies
  • Ep Training Program

    The inspectors’ words, 1,170 words

    “EP Training Program CFR(s): 484.102(d)(1) §403.748(d)(1), §416.54(d)(1), §418.113(d)(1), §441.184(d)(1), §460.84(d)(1), §482.15(d)(1), §483.73(d)(1), §483.475(d)(1), §484.102(d)(1), §485.68(d)(1), §485.542(d)(1), §485.625(d)(1), §485.727(d)(1), §485.920(d)(1), §486.360(d)(1), §491.12(d)(1). *[For RNCHIs at §403.748, ASCs at §416.54, Hospitals at §482.15, ICF/IIDs at §483.475, HHAs at §484.102, REHs at §485.542, “Organizations” under §485.727, OPOs at §486.360, RHC/FQHCs at §491.12:] (1) Training program. The [facility] must do all of the following: (i) Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. (ii) Provide emergency preparedness training at least every 2 years. (iii) Maintain documentation of all emergency preparedness training. (iv) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. (v) If the emergency preparedness policies and procedures are significantly updated, the [facility] must conduct training on the updated policies and procedures. *[For Hospices at §418.113(d):] (1) Training. The hospice must do all of the following: (i) Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing hospice employees, and individuals providing services under arrangement, consistent with their expected roles. (ii) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. (iii) Provide emergency preparedness training at least every 2 years. (iv) Periodically review and rehearse its emergency preparedness plan with hospice employees (including nonemployee staff), with special emphasis placed on carrying out the procedures necessary to protect patients and others. (v) Maintain documentation of all emergency preparedness training. (vi) If the emergency preparedness policies and procedures are significantly updated, the hospice must conduct training on the updated policies and procedures. *[For PRTFs at §441.184(d):] (1) Training program. The PRTF must do all of the following: (i) Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. (ii) After initial training, provide emergency preparedness training every 2 years. (iii) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. (iv) Maintain documentation of all emergency preparedness training. (v) If the emergency preparedness policies and procedures are significantly updated, the PRTF must conduct training on the updated policies and procedures. *[For PACE at §460.84(d):] (1) The PACE organization must do all of the following: (i) Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing staff, individuals providing on-site services under arrangement, contractors, participants, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. (ii) Provide emergency preparedness training at least every 2 years. (iii) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures, including informing participants of what to do, where to go, and whom to contact in case of an emergency. (iv) Maintain documentation of all training. (v) If the emergency preparedness policies and procedures are significantly updated, the PACE must conduct training on the updated policies and procedures. *[For LTC Facilities at §483.73(d):] (1) Training Program. The LTC facility must do all of the following: (i) Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected role. (ii) Provide emergency preparedness training at least annually. (iii) Maintain documentation of all emergency preparedness training. (iv) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. *[For CORFs at §485.68(d):](1) Training. The CORF must do all of the following: (i) Provide initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. (ii) Provide emergency preparedness training at least every 2 years. (iii) Maintain documentation of the training. (iv) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. All new personnel must be oriented and assigned specific responsibilities regarding the CORF’s emergency plan within 2 weeks of their first workday. The training program must include instruction in the location and use of alarm systems and signals and firefighting equipment. (v) If the emergency preparedness policies and procedures are significantly updated, the CORF must conduct training on the updated policies and procedures. *[For CAHs at §485.625(d):] (1) Training program. The CAH must do all of the following: (i) Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures, including prompt reporting and extinguishing of fires, protection, and where necessary, evacuation of patients, personnel, and guests, fire prevention, and cooperation with firefighting and disaster authorities, to all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. (ii) Provide emergency preparedness training at least every 2 years. (iii) Maintain documentation of the training. (iv) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. (v) If the emergency preparedness policies and procedures are significantly updated, the CAH must conduct training on the updated policies and procedures. *[For CMHCs at §485.920(d):] (1) Training. The CMHC must provide initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles, and maintain documentation of the training. The CMHC must demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. Thereafter, the CMHC must provide emergency preparedness training at least every 2 years. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their Emergency Preparedness Plan was being implemented when three of 21 staff members were not knowledgeable about the facility’s designated alternate meeting location in case of emergencies. This failure has the potential for delay in the overall facility communication and coordination of services for 57 patients who received care from the facility. Findings: During an interview on May 20, 2025, at 11:35 AM, with Certified Home Health Aide (CHHA), in Patient 1’s home, CHAA stated she was aware the office parking lot was the primary emergency meeting location, but she was not aware of alternate emergency meeting location. During an interview on May 20, 2025, at 1:30 PM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN), in Patient 2’s home, LVN stated she did not know where the facility’s alternate meeting location was. LVN further stated she would probably go to Administrator’s (ADMIN) house. During an interview on May 20, 2025, at 4:45 PM, with Speech Therapist (ST), in Patient 3’s home, ST stated she did not know the facility’s alternate meeting location in case of emergencies. During an interview on May 21, 2025, at 4:15 PM, with the ADMIN, the ADMIN stated facility staff should know where the facility’s designated alternate meeting location was in case of emergencies. The ADMIN further stated that, “All staff should have been educated and in serviced on emergency preparedness, they should know the alternate meeting location was the home address of Clinical Nurse Manager (CNM)”. During a concurrent interview record review on May 21, 2025, at 4:25 PM, with the ADMIN, the ADMIN reviewed the facility’s undated policy and procedure titled (P&P), “Emergency Preparedness Plan”, which indicated, “PROCEDURES 1. All staff members will be orientated to the emergency preparedness plan and their associated responsibilities during orientation. Continuity of Operations-Alternate Office Location: In the event of damage, inaccessibility, or other circumstances that prevent regular use of the primary office, operations will continue from designated alternate location”. The ADMIN stated the agency staff did not follow the policy.”

    Rule E0037. Standard-level.

  • Performance Improvement Projects

    The inspectors’ words, 447 words

    “Performance improvement projects CFR(s): 484.65(d)(1)(2) Standard: Performance improvement projects. Beginning July 13, 2018 HHAs must conduct performance improvement projects. (1) The number and scope of distinct improvement projects conducted annually must reflect the scope, complexity, and past performance of the HHA’s services and operations. (2) The HHA must document the quality improvement projects undertaken, the reasons for conducting these projects, and the measurable progress achieved on these projects. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the performance improvement project (PIP- concentrated effort on a particular problem in one area of the facility or facility wide; involves gathering information systematically to clarify issues or problems and intervening for improvements) of their Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program was in progress or in development as per their policy and procedure. This failure resulted in the facility to have missed opportunities for the evaluation and improvement in care services in areas that the facility identifies as needing attention, which had the potential to affect 57 patients. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on May 22, 2025, at 11:30 AM, with the Clinical Nurse Manager (CNM), the CNM reviewed the QAPI meeting minutes from the first quarter of 2024 through fourth quarter of 2024. The CNM stated the facility did not have a performance improvement project in progress or in development. The CNM further stated the facility only had quality metrics which they collect data for and review on a quarterly basis. During further interview, the CNM stated the quality metrics discussed in QAPI every quarter were outcome of general chart audits, infection control reports, hand hygiene compliance reports, complaint and grievance reviews, medication error and hospitalizations. The CNM further stated the facility did not have any currently identified issues in the quality metrics. The CNM further stated the facility did not have any projects they were working on from the first quarter of 2024 to present During a concurrent interview and record review on May 22, 2025, at 1:45 PM, with the CNM, the CNM reviewed the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) tiled, “Organizational Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program”, dated January 1, 2021, which indicated, “PURPOSE-The HHA develops, implements, evaluates and maintains an effective, ongoing, HHA-wide, data driven QAPI program. The HHA governing body must ensure that the program reflects the complexity of its organization and services. GOALS: The primary goals of the organizational QAPI program shall be to continually and systematically plan, design, measure, assess and improve performance of organization wide key functions and processes relative to patient care, treatment and services”. The CNM stated the facility did not follow the P&P.”

    Rule G0658. Standard-level.

  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 491 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines when expired medical supplies were found on the medical supply room and were available for use. This failure had the potential to put the facility’s 57 patients at an increased risk of infection (the invasion and growth of germs like bacteria, viruses or fungi in the body, which can cause illness or damage to tissues) and other complications of infectious microorganism. Findings: During a facility tour on May 19, 2025, at 11:30 AM, in the conference room/medical supply room, with Registered Nurse/Office Staff (RN), the following medical supplies were found to be expired and were available for use: 1. Six pieces of [Brand Name] Urinary leg bag (small, urine drainage bag worn on the thigh or lower leg) with an expiration date of October 31, 2024. 2. Six pieces of [Brand Name] Intermittent Catheter (thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder through the urethra to drain urine) Uncoated 16 Fr (“Fr stands for French,” and its unit of measurement for catheter sizes) with an expiration date of September 30, 2023. 3. Five pieces of [Brand Name] 16 Fr Foley catheter with an expiration date of September 30, 2023. 4. Two pieces of [Brand Name] Silicone Coated Latex Foley Catheter 20 Fr with an expiration date of January 10, 2019. 5. One piece of [Brand Name] Foley Insertion Tray with an expiration date of September 30, 2024. 6. Two pieces of StatLock (catheter stabilization device) with an expiration date of April 28, 2024. 7. Two pieces Nasal Oxygen Cannula with an expiration date of January 13, 2024. 8. Two pieces of IodoForm Packing Strip with an expiration date of January 1, 2024. 9. One box of (50 wipes) SKIN-PREP Protective Wipes with an expiration date of December 12, 2023. The RN verified that all the medical supplies were expired and should have been discarded. During a concurrent interview and record review on May 19, 2025, at 12:15 PM, with the Administrator (ADMIN), the ADMIN reviewed the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “Infection Prevention and Control”, dated November 1, 2021, which indicated, “POLICY [name of facility]. Will implement measures to prevent and control the spread of infection. Prevention strategies will focus on educating the staff providing home care, the clients receiving services, and their families. PROCEDURES-1. An infection is controlled through prevention measures that discourage the spread of infection. 2. Prevention strategies for employees providing client care services are: a. Check all supplies for expiration dates”. The ADMIN stated the medical supplies should have been checked regularly and expired items should have been discarded. The ADMIN further stated the facility did not follow the infection prevention and control policy.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

  • Protection Of Records

    The inspectors’ words, 309 words

    “Protection of records CFR(s): 484.110(d) Standard: Protection of records. The clinical record, its contents, and the information contained therein must be safeguarded against loss or unauthorized use. The HHA must be in compliance with the rules regarding protected health information set out at 45 CFR parts 160 and 164. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure patients clinical records were stored in locked, waterproof file cabinets in a designated clinical records room in accordance with the facility’s policies and procedure. This failure had potential for 210 patient’s clinical record information to be lost or be at risk of unauthorized use. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on May 19, 2025, at 11:40 AM, with the Registered Nurse (RN) and Office Staff (OS), in the medical record room, there were 210 patient’s medical records stored inside 10 cardboard boxes in the room. The RN and OS stated the agency kept the discharged patient’s medical records in the cardboard boxes to review the files. The RN stated, “While we review the patient’s medical files, the files are kept in cardboard boxes in the medical records room, not in metal cabinets”. During a concurrent interview and record review on May 19, 2025, at 4:10 PM, with Administrator (Admin) and Clinical Nurse Manager (CNM), the ADMIN and CNM reviewed policy and procedure (P&P) titled “SAFEGUARDING/RETRIEVAL OF CLINICAL RECORDS,’ dated November 2023, which indicated, “PROCEDURE: 1. All physical patient clinical/service records will be maintained in locked, waterproof file cabinets in a record room: C. The clinical/service record room will not be left unattended during working hours. D. If the room is left unattended during business hours, the door will be locked. E. Only authorized personnel will have access”. The Admin and CNM stated the agency did not follow the procedure.”

    Rule G1028. Standard-level.

  • Have A Confidential Clinical Record

    The inspectors’ words, 579 words

    “Have a confidential clinical record CFR(s): 484.50(c)(6) Have a confidential clinical record. Access to or release of patient information and clinical records is permitted in accordance with 45 CFR parts 160 and 164. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal health information were kept confidential when Certified Home Health Aide (CHHA) received and sent Patient 1’s clinical records using her personal cell phone. This failure resulted in Patient 1’s personal health information being put at risk by not keeping health records confidential, and using personal equipment not being monitored and secured by the agency. Findings: During a review of Patient 1’s face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Patient 1 had a start of care date of August 11, 2024, with a recertification period (time frame during which a patient receives home health care services, generally lasting 60 days) of February 7, 2025, through April 7, 2025. Patient 1 had diagnoses of dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities), hypertension (high blood pressure) and hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood). During a home visit observation on May 20, 2025, at 11:35 AM, with CHHA, CHHA was reviewing Patient 1”s “Aide Care Plan” (detailed document that outlines the specific care and services a home health aide will provide to a client in their home) on her personal cell phone. During a subsequent interview with CHHA, on May 20, 2025, at 11:45 AM, CHHA confirmed she used her personal cell phone to send and receive Patient 1’s medical information to the facility’s main office. During an interview on May 21, 2025, at 3:50 PM, with the Administrator (ADMIN), the ADMIN stated the facility staff were only supposed to send patient information using the facility’s electronic application called [name of the software]. The ADMIN further stated facility staff should not be using their personal phones to send patient’s information to the facility’s cellular (cell) via text messages. During a concurrent interview and record review on May 21, 2025, at 4:10 PM, with the ADMIN, the ADMIN reviewed the facility’s undated P&P, titled, “Transmission Security”, which indicated, “To ensure the confidentiality, integrity and availability of electronic protected health care information (ePHI, technical security measures to guard against unauthorized access. …[name of facility] will take appropriate steps to implement security measures to protect the integrity of ePHI while it is being transmitted over electronic communications networks…Procedure… [name of facility] will use integrity controls to ensure that the value and state of its ePHI is maintained during transmission and that ePHI is protected against unauthorized alteration or destruction during transmission over electronic communication networks…3. Protected health information stored, whether intentionally or not, in a photocopier, facsimile and other devices is subject to the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules…Encryption 1. When deemed necessary, encryption will be used to protect ePHI during transmission over electronic communications networks…”. The ADMIN stated the policy was not followed by the staff. During a review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “Health Information Management Policy and Procedure Manual”, dated August 1, 2020, it indicated, “PUPOSE- To ensure the security and privacy of all patent’s medical records. [name of facility], will take appropriate steps to implement security measures to protect the integrity of ePHI [any individual identifiable health information held or transmitted by a covered entity or its business associate] while it is being transmitted over electronic communications”.”

    Rule G0438. Element-level.

  • Ensure That Hha Employs Qualified Personnel

    The inspectors’ words, 387 words

    “Ensure that HHA employs qualified personnel CFR(s): 484.105(b)(1)(iv) (iv) Ensure that the HHA employs qualified personnel, including assuring the development of personnel qualifications and policies. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the agency failed to ensure criminal background check was performed prior to hire or prior to working with patients for one of six sampled employee (Speech Therapist (ST)). This failure resulted in the agency to allow staff to have access to patients without first ensuring their (staff) background was clear of criminal history related to abuse, neglect, or mistreatment, and had the potential to place 57 patients at risk. Findings: During an observation on May 20, 2025, at 4:25 PM, at Patient 3’s home, ST arrived and provided in-home speech therapy (a healthcare profession that focuses on the assessment, diagnoses, and treatment of disorders related to speech, language, communication, and swallowing) services. During a record review of ST’s employee file on May 21, 2025, at 11:00AM, there was documented evidence to indicate a criminal background check was performed for ST prior to hire. During an interview on May 21, 2025, at 11:45 AM, with the Administrator (ADMIN), the ADMIN stated ST was a contracted staff member who worked for the agency through a contracted registry called [name of the contracted staffing registry] which provided staff to perform speech therapy. The ADMIN further stated the agency did not have documentation of a background check on file for ST. During an interview on May 21, 2025, at 3:45 PM, with the ADMIN, the ADMIN stated the importance of a background check was to ensure staff didn’t have any criminal history prior to working with patients and to ensure they were able to legally work in the United States. During a concurrent interview and record review on May 21, 2025, at 3:55 PM, with ADMIN, the admin reviewed the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “CATEGORIES/QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSONNEL”, dated November 2023, which indicated, “POLICY 3. The organization will employ or contract only those individuals who have valid credentials as stipulated by the state and federal requirements. 4. Personnel qualifications include appropriate professional licensure, certification, and absence of a criminal background for those positions designated by law and regulation”. The ADMIN stated the agency did not follow the policy and procedure.”

    Rule G0952. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 22, 2025Recertification inspection6 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Sep 28, 2007.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 13 owners or officers are people: Catherine T Mendoza (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); Catherine T Mendoza (corporate officer, 25%); Catherine T Mendoza (corporate director, 25%); Justin C Mendoza (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); Justin C Mendoza (corporate officer, 25%); Justin C Mendoza (corporate director, 25%); Macedonia Mendoza (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); Macedonia Mendoza (corporate officer, 25%); Macedonia Mendoza (corporate director, 25%); Macedonia Mendoza (managing employee (on the payroll), 25%); Judd C Mendoza (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); Judd C Mendoza (corporate officer, 25%); Judd C Mendoza (corporate director, 25%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Zero, or very few, patients met the survey’s rules for inclusion.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate75.35% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate14.47% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.13% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 300 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91730, where this agency’s office is, 246 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.