Grandcare Home Health Services
A home health agency in Pasadena, California 91107
3452 E Foothill Blvd, Suite 130a, Pasadena, California 91107. (866) 554-2447.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 4of 5 quality of patient care rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jan 26, 2026: a complaint inspection.
4 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them at condition level, the most serious.
2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jan 26, 2026: complaint inspection4 deficiencies
-
Comprehensive Assessment Of Patients
The inspectors’ words, 242 words
“Comprehensive Assessment of Patients CFR(s): 484.55 Condition of participation: Comprehensive assessment of patients. Each patient must receive, and an HHA must provide, a patient-specific, comprehensive assessment. For Medicare beneficiaries, the HHA must verify the patient’s eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit including homebound status, both at the time of the initial assessment visit and at the time of the comprehensive assessment. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to meet the Condition of Participation (refers to the requirements that healthcare organizations must meet to participate in federal healthcare programs) for Comprehensive Assessment (a tool used by nurses to evaluate a patient’s complete health status) of Patients as follows: The Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to review all the medications and clarify discrepancies in medication administration with the physician for three of 19 sampled patients (Patient 1, Patient 3 and Patient 4). This deficient practice had the potential to place Patients 1, 3 and 4 at risk for medication errors and adverse drug reactions defined as harmful, unintended responses resulting from the use of medications (Refer to G536). The cumulative effect of these systemic failures resulted in the HHA’s failure to deliver mandated compliance (in a way that is decided and controlled by law) with Federal regulations for Comprehensive Assessment of Patients to ensure the provision of health care services in a safe manner is provided to patients.”
-
Care Planning, Coordination, Quality Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 365 words
“Care planning, coordination, quality of care CFR(s): 484.60 Condition of participation: Care planning, coordination of services, and quality of care. Patients are accepted for treatment on the reasonable expectation that an HHA can meet the patient’s medical, nursing, rehabilitative, and social needs in his or her place of residence. Each patient must receive an individualized written plan of care, including any revisions or additions. The individualized plan of care must specify the care and services necessary to meet the patient-specific needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment, including identification of the responsible discipline(s), and the measurable outcomes that the HHA anticipates will occur as a result of implementing and coordinating the plan of care. The individualized plan of care must also specify the patient and caregiver education and training. Services must be furnished in accordance with accepted standards of practice. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview and record review, the Home Health Agency (HHA, agency providing care to a love one in the comfort of home) failed to ensure compliance with the Condition of Participation for Care Planning, Coordination, and Quality of Care, resulting in failure to meet Medicare [a federal health insurance for people 65 or older, and some people under 65 with certain disabilities or conditions] and Medicaid [a joint federal and state program that helps cover medical costs for some people with limited income and resources] programs) participation requirements, as evidenced by the following: The Physical Therapist Aide (PTA 1) failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for one of 17 sampled patients (Patient 3). On 1/16/2026, while assisting Patient 3 with ambulation on the sidewalk, Patient 3 experienced dizziness and lightheadedness, nearly resulting in a fall. The physician was not notified of this change in condition. This deficient practice increased the risk of syncope episodes and potential fall-related injury for Patient 3. (Refer to G590.) The cumulative effect of these systemic practices resulted in the failure of the HHA to deliver statutorily mandated compliance with the Care planning, Coordination, Quality of care to ensure the highest quality of care was provided to the patients who were assessed to receive care and services.”
-
A Review Of All Current Medications
The inspectors’ words, 1,536 words
“A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to review all the medications and to clarify discrepancies in medication administration with the physician for four of nineteen sampled patients (Patients 1, 3, 4 and 11). This deficient practice had the potential to place Patients 1, 3 and 4 at risk for medication errors and adverse drug reactions defined as harmful, unintended responses resulting from the use of medications. d. During a review of Patient 11’s Start of Care (SOC) record, the SOC indicated that the Home Health Agency (HHA) admitted Patient 11 on 1/16/2026 with diagnoses that included aftercare following joint replacement surgery, presence of right artificial hip joint, and Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease (uncontrolled high blood sugar levels that lead to kidney failure). During a review of Patient 11’s Plan of Care (POC) for the certification period of 1/16/2026 through 3/16/2026, the POC indicated that the Skilled Nurse (SN) was ordered to visit one time per week for two weeks to evaluate the patient and develop the plan of care. The POC further indicated that the SN was responsible for reviewing the medication profile and reconciling medications as needed. The POC also included physician orders for the Physical Therapist (PT) and PT Aide to review the medication profile and reconcile medications as needed, instruct and reinforce medication teaching related to medications used to treat the disease process, and report vital signs falling outside the following established parameters: systolic blood pressure less than 90 or greater than 180, diastolic blood pressure less than 50 or greater than 100, and pulse less than 60 or greater than 100. During a home visit observation on 1/21/2026 at 1:00 p.m. at Patient 11’s residence, Patient 11 was observed sitting on a couch in the living room. During a review of Patient 11’s HHA medication profile during the same visit, the medication profile listed the following medications: Losartan 50 mg, one tablet by mouth dailyCarvedilol Phosphate 10 mg extended-release capsule, one capsule dailyPregabalin 75 mg, one capsule by mouth twice daily During a concurrent interview with Patient 11 on 1/21/2026 at 1:00 p.m., Patient 11 stated he had not taken the above medications since approximately three weeks prior to his surgery on 1/15/2026. During an interview on 1/26/2026 at 11:00 a.m. with the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS) at the HHA office, the DPCS stated that the Skilled Nurse and Physical Therapist were expected to check the patient’s actual medications and ask the patient whether medications were being taken as ordered. During a review of the HHA’s policy and procedure titled “Medication Profile,” revised April 2018, the policy indicated that medication profiles are to be updated with each change to reflect current medications, including newly prescribed and discontinued medications. a. During a review of Patient 1’s Start of Care (SOC) record, the SOC indicated the HHA admitted Patient 1 on 1/3/2026, with a diagnosis of bilateral osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease causing pain, stiffness and reduced mobility when protective cartilage wears down) of the knees. During a review of Patient 1’s Plan of Care (POC) for the certification period 1/3/2026 to 3/3/2026, the POC indicated that the Physical Therapist (PT) and PT Aide were responsible for reviewing the medication profile and reconciling medications as needed, instructing and reinforcing medication education related to the medication treatment of the patient’s disease processes, and reporting vital signs signs that fell outside the following established parameters: systolic blood pressure less than 90 and greater than 180, diastolic blood pressure 50 and greater than 100, pulse less than 60 and greater than 100. The POC included a physician’s order dated 1/3/2026 for the following prescribed medication: 1. Quetiapine 25 mg tablet, an antipsychotic medication used to treat depressive disorders with instructions to administer one-half (0.5) tablet orally once daily for mood stabilization. During an observation on 1/21/2026, at 1:30 p.m., a home visit was conducted at Patient 1’s residence. Patient 1 was observed sitting in a chair in the dining room and appeared confused. Family Member 1 (FM 1) was seen heading towards the kitchen to grab all of Patient 1’s medication in one container to show the surveyor. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/21/2026, at 1:45 p.m., while reviewing Patient 1’s medication, one bottle of Quetiapine 25 mg tablets was observed in the medication tray. FM 1 stated she had been administering one 25 mg tablet daily to Patient 1 since 1/3/2026. FM 1 further stated that the Physical Therapist (PT ) and PT Aide did not review or check Patient 1’s medications during any of their visits. During an interview on 1/26/2026, at 11 a.m., with the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS), the DPCS stated the PT (in general) and the PT aide needed to check the patient’s actual medications and needed to ask the patients if they were taking the medications or not. b. During a review of Patient 3’s Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the patient), the Face Sheet indicated a start of care (SOC) date of 1/7/2026, diagnoses that included essential hypertension (high blood pressure- the force of blood pushing against with the artery walls is consistently too high) and unspecified atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat) and atrial flutter (an electrical short circuit in the heart’s right atrium that causes it to contract rapidly). During a review of Patient 3’s Plan of Care (POC) for the certification period of 1/7/2026 through 3/7/2026, the POC indicated that the Physical Therapist (PT)/PT Aide was responsible for reviewing the medication profile and reconciling medications as needed, instructing and reinforcing medication teaching related to medications used to treat the disease process, and reporting vital signs falling outside the following established parameters: systolic blood pressure less than 90 or greater than 180, diastolic blood pressure less than 50 or greater than 100, and pulse less than 60 or greater than 100. The POC included a physician’s order dated 1/7/2026 for the following medication: Eliquis (blood thinner medication) 2.5 mg, one tablet by mouth twice daily. During an observation on 1/22/2026 at 1:30 p.m., a home visit was conducted at Patient 3’s residence. Patient 3 was observed sitting in a chair in the living room with Family Member 2 (FM 2) present. During the concurrent observation and interview on 1/22/2026 at 1:45 p.m., while reviewing Patient 3’s medications, there was one bottle of Eliquis 5 mg, with directions to take one tablet twice daily, and a refill date of 11/22/2025. Patient 3 stated she had been taking Eliquis 5 mg, one tablet twice daily, for approximately one month. Patient 3 further stated that the PT aide did not check her medications during visits. During an interview on 1/26/2026 at 11:00 a.m. with the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS), the DPCS stated that the PT and PT aide were expected to check the patient’s actual medications and ask patients whether they were taking the medications as ordered. c. During a review of Patient 4’s Start of Care (SOC) record, the SOC indicated that the HHA admitted Patient 4 on 1/14/2026 with a diagnosis of aftercare following joint replacement surgery. During a review of Patient 4’s Plan of Care (POC) for the certification period of 1/14/2026 through 3/14/2026, the POC indicated that the Physical Therapist (PT) and PT Aide were responsible for reviewing the medication profile and reconciling medications as needed, instructing and reinforcing medication teaching related to medications used to treat the disease process, and reporting vital signs falling outside the following established parameters: systolic blood pressure less than 90 or greater than 180, diastolic blood pressure less than 50 or greater than 100, and pulse less than 60 or greater than 100. During an observation on 1/23/2026 at 10:30 a.m., a home visit was conducted at Patient 4’s residence. Patient 4 was observed sitting in a chair in the dining room, alert, oriented, and well groomed. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/23/2026 at 10:45 a.m., while reviewing Patient 4’s medications, there was one bottle of Zofran 4 mg, with directions to take one tablet every six hours as needed for nausea, and a refill date of 1/12/2026. The Zofran medication was not listed on the agency’s medication profile. Patient 4 stated she had been taking the Zofran medication since 1/12/2026 for nausea. During an interview on 1/26/2026 at 11:00 a.m. with the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS), the DPCS stated that the PT and PT aide were expected to check the patient’s actual medications and ask patients whether they were taking the medications as ordered. During a review of the HHA’s policy and procedure titled “Medication Profile,” revised April 2018, the policy indicated that medication profiles are to be updated with each change to reflect current medications, including newly prescribed and discontinued medications.”
-
Promptly Alert Relevant Physician Of Changes
The inspectors’ words, 804 words
“Promptly alert relevant physician of changes CFR(s): 484.60(c)(1) The HHA must promptly alert the relevant physician(s) or allowed practitioner(s) to any changes in the patient’s condition or needs that suggest that outcomes are not being achieved and/or that the plan of care should be altered. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Physical Therapist Aide (PTA 1) failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for one of 17 sampled patients (Patient 3). On 1/16/2026, PTA 1 assisted Patient 3 with ambulation on a sidewalk when the patient experienced dizziness and lightheadedness, nearly resulting in a fall. The physician was not notified of this change in condition. This deficient practice increased the risk of syncope and fall-related injury for Patient 3. During a review of Patient 3’s Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the patient), the Face Sheet indicated a start of care (SOC) date of 1/7/2026, with diagnoses that included essential hypertension (high blood pressure- the force of blood pushing against with the artery walls is consistently too high) and unspecified atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat) and atrial flutter (an electrical short circuit in the heart’s right atrium that causes it to contract rapidly. During a review of Patient 3’s Plan of Care (POC) for the certification period of 1/7/2026 through 3/7/2026, the POC indicated that the Physical Therapist (PT) and PTA were responsible for reviewing the medication profile and reconciling medications as needed, instructing and reinforcing medication teaching related to medications used to treat the disease process, and reporting vital signs falling outside the following established parameters: systolic blood pressure less than 90 or greater than 180, diastolic blood pressure less than 50 or greater than 100, and pulse less than 60 or greater than 100. The POC included a physician’s order dated 1/7/2026 for the following medications: Amiodarone 200 mg, one-half tablet daily Amlodipine 5 mg, one tablet at bedtime Metoprolol 25 mg, one-half tablet twice daily Telmisartan 80 mg, one tablet daily On 1/22/2026 at 1:30 p.m., a home visit was conducted at Patient 3’s residence with Physical Therapist (PT 1). Patient 3 was observed sitting on a couch in the living room, alert and oriented. On 1/22/2026 at 1:45 p.m., during an interview with Patient 3 in the presence of PT 1, Patient 3 stated she had experienced low blood pressure readings for the previous several weeks and believed her blood pressure medications required adjustment. Patient 3 further stated she had experienced episodes of dizziness and lightheadedness when standing and ambulating. Patient 3 reported that on 1/16/2026, PTA 1 assisted her with ambulation on a sidewalk when she experienced dizziness and lightheadedness, nearly resulting in a fall. A review of Patient 3’s blood pressure log revealed the following documented readings: 1/16/2026 at 9:00 a.m.: 90/48, pulse 62 1/18/2026 at 10:00 a.m.: 93/57, pulse 61 1/18/2026 at 2:00 p.m.: 102/54, pulse 65 1/19/2026 at 10:30 a.m.: 100/48, pulse 60 1/19/2026 at 2:00 p.m.: 90/44, pulse 60 1/20/2026 at 10:30 a.m.: 107/59, pulse 60 1/20/2026 at 4:00 p.m.: 88/47, pulse 74 1/21/2026 at 11:00 a.m.: 90/55, pulse 65 1/21/2026 at 2:00 p.m.: 106/53 1/22/2026 at 10:00 a.m.: 90/49, pulse 65 During a telephone interview with PTA 1 on 1/22/2026 at 4:00 p.m., PTA 1 stated he assisted Patient 3 with ambulation on 1/16/2026, during which Patient 3 experienced dizziness and lightheadedness and nearly fell. PTA 1 stated he prevented the fall, discontinued ambulation, and assisted the patient to a seated position. When asked whether he notified the agency, PT 1, the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS), or the physician regarding the incident, PTA 1 stated he did not notify any of them. PTA 1 further stated he did not review Patient 3’s blood pressure log. A review of Patient 3’s Visit Note Reports dated 1/16/2026 and 1/20/2026 revealed no documented evidence that PTA 1 notified the physician of Patient 3’s low blood pressure readings or change in condition. On 1/23/2026 at 2:00 p.m., during a record review and telephone interview with the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS), the DPCS stated she was unaware of Patient 3’s change in condition related to low blood pressure readings. The DPCS stated neither PT 1 nor PTA 1 reported a change in condition for Patient 3. The DPCS further stated Patient 3 demonstrated a change in condition and the physician should have been notified right away that the patient could be having orthostatic hypotension (sudden drop in blood pressure upon standing) and could lead to a risk for falls. A review of the agency’s undated policy titled “Monitoring Patient’s Response/Reporting to Physician” indicated that the physician is to be contacted the same day when there is a significant change in the patient’s condition.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2026 | Complaint inspection | 4 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 17, 2004.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Grandcare Health Services LLC owns 100% directly since Feb 4, 2014.
- Grandcare Health Services LLC runs it.
- 10 owners or officers are people: Jeffrey R. Henderson (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Mirelle Chaljian (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); David A Bell (owns 5% or more through other companies, 30.7%); David A Bell (corporate officer, 30.7%); David F Gallup (owns 5% or more through other companies, 19.4%); David F Gallup (corporate officer, 19.4%); William Lipbew Chui (owns 5% or more through other companies, 13.8%); William Lipbew Chui (corporate officer, 13.8%); Lon E Bell (owns 5% or more through other companies, 8.1%); Lon E Bell (corporate officer, 8.1%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grandcare Health Services LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Feb 4, 2014 |
| Grandcare Health Services LLC | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | 100% | Feb 4, 2014 |
| Grandcare Investments Holding LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 57.3% | Jan 1, 2023 |
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (436 surveys completed): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 81% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, better; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 93.18% (better than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 2.20% (better than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 3.41% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 435 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91107, where this agency’s office is, 369 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Agb Home Health, Inc. | Not given |
| Cqi Homecare | Not given |
| Med Care Plus Home Health Inc. | 2 |
| N & D Healthcare Services Inc. | 4 |
| Grandcare Home Health Services This home health agency | 4 |
| Saint Rita Home Health Care, Inc. | 3 |
| Generations Healthcare Agency, Inc. | 2.5 |
| Mlh Healthcare, Inc. | 2.5 |
| Colorado Home Health Care, Inc. | Not given |
| A1 Quality Health Care, Inc. | 2 |
| Huntington Home Health Agency | Not given |
| Agb Home Health, Inc. | 1.5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.