Hearth Record

Merit Home Health Services Inc.

A home health agency in Colton, California 92324

1003 E Cooley Dr, Colton, California 92324. (909) 825-8767.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 4, 2026: a complaint inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them at condition level, the most serious.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 4, 2026: complaint inspection4 deficiencies
  • Compliance With Federal, State, Local Law

    The inspectors’ words, 243 words

    “Compliance with Federal, State, Local Law CFR(s): 484.100 Condition of participation: Compliance with Federal, State, and local laws and regulations related to the health and safety of patients. The HHA and its staff must operate and furnish services in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations related to the health and safety of patients. If state or local law provides licensing of HHAs, the HHA must be licensed. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: The agency failed to ensure the Condition of Participation: G 848 484.100 Operate/provide services in compliance with laws/regulations was in compliance when: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the agency failed to operate in compliance with state licensure and certification requirements for two of 51 patients (Patient 1 and Patient 2) by providing Certified Home Health Aid services (CHHA services –services provided by a trained and certified healthcare worker who provides personal care and supportive services to patients in their homes under the supervision of a licensed nurse, therapist, or home health agency) that were not authorized under the services identified on the agency’s current state license. [refer to G860]. The cumulative effects of this deficient practice resulted in patients receiving CHHA services that had not been approved by the state due to lack of state oversight and approval to operate with vetted (carefully examined, evaluated, verified, or investigated to determine suitability, qualifications, accuracy, or reliability before approval or acceptance) CHHA services.”

    Rule G0848. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Organization And Administration Of Services

    The inspectors’ words, 300 words

    “Organization and administration of services CFR(s): 484.105 Condition of participation: Organization and administration of services. The HHA must organize, manage, and administer its resources to attain and maintain the highest practicable functional capacity, including providing optimal care to achieve the goals and outcomes identified in the patient’s plan of care, for each patient’s medical, nursing, and rehabilitative needs. The HHA must assure that administrative and supervisory functions are not delegated to another agency or organization, and all services not furnished directly are monitored and controlled. The HHA must set forth, in writing, its organizational structure, including lines of authority, and services furnished. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: The agency failed to ensure the Condition of Participation: G 940 484.105 Organization and administration of services was in compliance when: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the agency’s governing body (an individual or group that has ultimate authority and responsibility for the agency’s management, operation, policies, and quality of care) failed to exercise operational oversight of the agency for two of 52 patients (Patient 1 and Patient 2) when the agency provided Certified Home Health Aid Services (CHHA services - services provided by a trained and certified healthcare worker who provides personal care and supportive services to patients in their homes) that were not authorized under the services identified on the agency’s current state license. [refer to G942]. The cumulative effects of this deficient practice resulted in the agency providing a type of service that had not undergone required state vetting (carefully examined, evaluated, verified, or investigated to determine suitability, qualifications, accuracy, or reliability before approval or acceptance), approval, or oversight for safety, scope, or regulatory suitability. This had the potential to affect the health and safety of Patient 1 and 2 receiving CHHA services from the agency.”

    Rule G0940. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Licensing

    The inspectors’ words, 992 words

    “Licensing CFR(s): 484.100(b) (b) Standard: Licensing. The HHA, its branches, and all persons furnishing services to patients must be licensed, certified, or registered, as applicable, in accordance with the state licensing authority as meeting those requirements. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the agency failed to operate in compliance with state licensure and certification requirements for two of 52 patients (Patient 1 and Patient 2) by providing Certified Home Health Aid services (CHHA services –services provided by a trained and certified healthcare worker who provides personal care and supportive services to patients in their homes under the supervision of a licensed nurse, therapist, or home health agency) that were not authorized under the services identified on the agency’s current state license. This failure had the potential to affect the health and safety of all patients receiving CHHA services, as the agency operated without state approval and oversight of CHHA services. During an interview on June 2, 2026, at 2:30 PM, with Patient 2, in Patient 2’s home, Patient 2 stated she was currently receiving CHHA services from the agency, once a week. Patient 2 further stated CHHA 1 was the staff member who would provide CHHA services for her. During a concurrent interview and record review on June 2, 2026, at 3:00 PM, with the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS), the agency’s document titled, “Clinician List,” (undated), was reviewed. The list indicated the information of CHHA (CHHA 1) and included but was not limited to: name, hire date of September 25, 2025, and discipline as “CHHA.” The DPCS stated CHHA 1 was currently the agency’s only active CHHA staff and CHHA 1 was assigned to provide services to Patient 1 and 2. During an interview on June 3, 2026, at 9:55 AM, with CHHA 1, CHHA 1 stated she had been working at the agency for nine months as a home health aide and was currently assigned to Patient 1 and Patient 2. During an interview on June 3, 2026, at 10:25 AM, with Patient 1, Patient 1 stated she had been receiving CHHA services by CHHA 1 for approximately nine months now and received services three times a week. During an interview on June 3, 2026, at 2:40 PM, with the DPCS and the Administrator (ADMIN), the ADMIN stated she thought the agency had CHHA services indicated on their state license from the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) but in 2023 the agency identified that their license did not include CHHA services and they had been working with their accrediting organization to determine why CHHA services were not included on their license and to have CHHA services added. The DPCS and the ADMIN both acknowledge the facility has been offering CHHA services to patients despite the agency not having it as an approved service on their state license. During an observation on June 4, 2026, at 10:59 AM, a framed license was displayed on the wall in the facility’s lobby and indicated, “State of California Department of Public Health…License: 550003217, Effective: 06/29/2025 [June 29, 2025], Expires: 06/28/2026 [June 28, 2026] … In accordance with applicable provisions of the Health and Safety Code of California and its rules and regulations, the Department of Public Health hereby issues this License to [name of facility] to operate and maintain the following Home Health Agency [name and address of facility]. In addition to skilled nursing, the following additional services have been approved: Diet Counseling/Nutrition, Medical Social Services, Occupational Therapy, Physical Therapy, Speech Therapy.” There was no mention or listing of Certified Home Health Aide (CHHA) services. During a review of Patient 1’s “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” (document that outline a patient’s in home medical treatment), with a certification period from May 3, 2026, through July 1, 2026, the plan of care included a physician’s order which indicated Patient 1 was to receive CHHA services three times a week for eight weeks, then two times a week for one week starting May 3, 2026. During a review of Patient 2’s “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care,” with a certification period from May 8, 2026, through July 6, 2026, the plan of care included a physician’s order which indicated Patient 2 was to receive CHHA services once a week for eight weeks starting May 8, 2026. During a review of CHHA 1’s “Employment Application,” dated September 25, 2025, the application was signed by CHHA 1 and indicated, “position applying for: HHA [home health aide.]” During a review of CHHA 1’s job description titled, “Home Health Aide,” (undated), the job description indicated CHHA 1’s written name and included CHHA 1’s signature and was dated September 25, 2025. During a review of CHHA 1’s “Wage and Benefit Agreement,” (undated), the document included CHHA 1’s name and indicated, “date of hire: 9/25/25 [September 25, 2025].” During a review of CHHA 1’s work schedule titled, “Clinician Monthly Schedule,” for the month of June 2026, the schedule indicated CHHA 1 was scheduled to perform 19 CHHA home visits from June 1 through July 1, 2026. 14 of the scheduled visits were for Patient 1 and five [5] of the visits were for Patient 2. During a review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “Compliance with Federal, State, and Local Law,” dated January 2026, the P&P indicated, “Responsibility of Agency: The agency and its staff must operate, and furnish services, in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations related to the health and safety of patients. 1. If state, or local, law provides licensing of agencies, the agency must be licensed…Licensing: The agency, its branches, and all persons furnishing services to patients must be licensed, certified, or registered, as applicable, in accordance with the state licensing authority as meeting those requirements….Agency must be in compliance with all laws and regulations including, but not limited to: 1. Local and state licensure…7. Medicare/Medicaid regulations…””

    Rule G0860. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Governing Body

    The inspectors’ words, 1,526 words

    “Governing body CFR(s): 484.105(a) Standard: Governing body. A governing body (or designated persons so functioning) must assume full legal authority and responsibility for the agency’s overall management and operation, the provision of all home health services, fiscal operations, review of the agency’s budget and its operational plans, and its quality assessment and performance improvement program. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the agency failed to ensure its governing body (an individual or group that has ultimate authority and responsibility for the agency’s management, operation, policies, and quality of care) exercised operational oversight of the agency for two of 52 patients (Patient 1 and Patient 2) when Certified Home Health Aid Services (CHHA services - services provided by a trained and certified healthcare worker who provides personal care and supportive services to patients in their homes) were provided when the agency was not authorized under the services identified on the agency’s current state license. This failure resulted in Patient 1 and 2 receiving CHHA services, as the agency operated without state approval and oversight of CHHA services and placed Patient 1 and 2’s health and safety at risk. During an interview on June 2, 2026, at 2:30 PM, with Patient 2, in Patient 2’s home, Patient 2 stated she currently was receiving CHHA services from the agency once a week. Patient 2 further stated CHHA 1 was the staff member who would provide CHHA services for her. During a concurrent interview and record review on June 2, 2026, at 3:00 PM, with the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS), the agency’s document titled, “Clinician List,” (undated), was reviewed. The list indicated the information of CHHA (CHHA 1) including but was not limited to: name, hire date of September 25, 2025, and discipline as “CHHA.” The DPCS stated CHHA 1 was currently the agency’s only active CHHA staff and CHHA 1 was assigned to provide services to Patient 1 and 2. During an interview on June 3, 2026, at 9:55 AM, with CHHA 1, CHHA 1 stated she had been working at the agency for nine months as a home health aide and was currently assigned to Patient 1 and Patient 2. During an interview on June 3, 2026, at 10:25 AM, with Patient 1, Patient 1 stated she had been receiving CHHA services by CHHA 1 for approximately nine months now and received services three times a week. During an interview on June 3, 2026, at 2:40 PM, with the DPCS and the Administrator (ADMIN), the ADMIN stated she thought the agency had CHHA services indicated on their state license from the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) but in 2023 the agency identified that their license did not include CHHA services and they had been working with their accrediting organization (a private, independent organization that evaluates home health agencies to ensure they meet the standards for patient care, safety, and operational quality) to determine why CHHA services were not included on their license and to have CHHA services added. The DPCS and the ADMIN both acknowledged the facility has been offering CHHA services to Patient 1 and 2 despite the agency not having it as an approved service on their state license. During an observation on June 4, 2026, at 10:59 AM, a framed license was displayed on the wall in the facility’s lobby. The framed license indicated, “State of California Department of Public Health…License: 550003217, Effective: 06/29/2025 [June 29, 2025], Expires: 06/28/2026 [June 28, 2026] … In accordance with applicable provisions of the Health and Safety Code of California and its rules and regulations, the Department of Public Health hereby issues this License to [name of facility] to operate and maintain the following Home Health Agency [name and address of facility]. In addition to skilled nursing, the following additional services have been approved: Diet Counseling/Nutrition, Medical Social Services (help patients and families with support and resources during illness or care) , Occupational Therapy (helps people learn or regain the skills they need for everyday activities so they can live as independently as possible), Physical Therapy (helps people improve movement and reduce pain so they can function better), Speech Therapy (helps people improve their speech, language, and communication skills).” There was no mention or listing of Certified Home Health Aide (CHHA) services. During a review of Patient 1’s “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” (document that outline a patient’s in home medical treatment), with a certification period from May 3, 2026, through July 1, 2026, the plan of care included a physician’s order which indicated Patient 1 was to receive CHHA services three times a week for eight weeks, then two times a week for one week starting May 3, 2026. During a review of Patient 2’s “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care,” with a certification period from May 8, 2026, through July 6, 2026, the plan of care included a physician’s order which indicated Patient 2 was to receive CHHA services once a week for eight weeks starting May 8, 2026. During a review of CHHA 1’s “Employment Application,” dated September 25, 2025, the application was signed by CHHA 1 and indicated, “position applying for: HHA [home health aide]” During a review of CHHA 1’s job description titled, “Home Health Aide,” (undated), the job description indicated CHHA 1’s written name and included CHHA 1’s signature and was dated September 25, 2025. During a review of CHHA 1’s “Wage and Benefit Agreement,” (undated), the document included CHHA 1’s name and indicated, “date of hire: 9/25/25 [September 25, 2025].” During a review of CHHA 1’s work schedule titled, “Clinician Monthly Schedule,” dated for the month of June 2026, the schedule indicated CHHA 1 was scheduled to perform 19 CHHA home visits from June 1 through July 1, 2026. Fourteen of the scheduled visits were for Patient 1 and five [5] of the visits were for Patient 2. During a review of the governing body meeting minutes titled, “Home Health Agency Governing Body Meeting Minutes” (meeting minutes), dated August 24, 2023, the meeting minutes indicated, “Attendees – Administrator [name of ADMIN]…DPCS [name of DPCS]…MD [medical director]… Agenda Item: Omission of Certified Home Health Aides (CHHAs) from state license… The administrator informed the governing body that during a recent review of the agency’s licensure documents, it was discovered that certified home health aide (CHHA) services were not listed on the agency’s California State Home Health Agency License… Discussion… 4. Immediate action is necessary to ensure state licensure accurately reflects the services approved through accreditation and intended to be provided by the agency… Governing Body Actions… After discussion, the Governing Body directed the administrator to:… Request amendment or correction of the state license to include CHHA services… maintain documentation of all communications with [name of accrediting organization] Report progress and final resolution to the Governing Body at the next scheduled meeting…Follow up – The Administrator will provide monthly status updates until the matter is resolved and the corrected license is received.” During an interview on June 4, 2026, at 3:15 PM, with the DPCS, the DPCS was asked to provide documentation regarding governing body follow up as indicated in meeting minutes, documentation of communication to [name of accrediting organization] for resolution of CHHA on state license, and documentation for administrator monthly status updates as indicated in “follow up” notes for governing body. The DPCS stated she would attempt to obtain evidence as requested but stated a lot of the discussions and conversations were done over the phone which may not have been documented. During an interview on June 4, 2026, at 4:26 PM, with the DPCS, the DPCS stated agency was unable to provide additional documentation regarding governing body follow up during subsequent governing body meetings and could not provide monthly status updates by the Administrator as indicated in the governing body meeting minutes. The DPCS further stated their accrediting organization was still working on trying to get information regarding why the CHHA services were not included on their state license. During a review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “Compliance with Federal, State, and Local Law,” dated January 2026, the P&P indicated, “Responsibility of Agency: The agency and its staff must operate, and furnish services, in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations related to the health and safety of patients. 1. If state, or local, law provides licensing of agencies, the agency must be licensed…Licensing: The agency, its branches, and all persons furnishing services to patients must be licensed, certified, or registered, as applicable, in accordance with the state licensing authority as meeting those requirements….Agency must be in compliance with all laws and regulations including, but not limited to: 1. Local and state licensure…7. Medicare/Medicaid regulations…” During a review of the facility’s P&P titled, “Governing Body,” dated February 20, 2026, the P&P indicated, “Policy: The agency’s policy is that the governing body/owner (or designated persons functioning) assumes full legal authority, responsibility and accountability for the organization’s overall management and operation, the provision of services, fiscal operations, review of the organization’s budget and its operational plans, and its continuous quality improvement program…””

    Rule G0942. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 4, 2026Complaint inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jun 13, 2017.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • Doesn’t offer home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Mercy Elimhele (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Mercy Elimhele (corporate officer, 50%); Mercy Elimhele (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Esther Oleleayeomiunu (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Esther Oleleayeomiunu (corporate officer, 50%); Esther Oleleayeomiunu (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 1.5 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “No survey results are available for this period.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars1.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate68.39% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate12.37% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.25% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 184 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92324, where this agency’s office is, 145 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 1.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.