Hearth Record

Community Home Health

A home health agency in Tallassee, Alabama 36078

1526 Gilmer Avenue, Tallassee, Alabama 36078. (334) 283-4522.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 31, 2025: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 31, 2025: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 420 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, agency policy and procedure, and interviews with staff, it was determined the agency failed to ensure the hand hygiene policy was followed. This deficient practice affected one of one observation of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line care including Home Visit (HV) # 2 and had the potential to affect all patients admitted to this agency. Findings include: Agency Policy: PICC Line Dressing Change Policy Number: I-260 Date Revised: Not Listed Purpose: To prevent infection ... Special Considerations: PICC line dressing changes will use sterile technique... Procedure: ... Wash hands... 6. Don non-sterile gloves... 10. Discard old dressing, remove non-sterile gloves... 11. Don sterile gloves. 12. Clean exit site... Agency Policy: Hand Hygiene Policy and Compliance Program. Policy Number: 5.7.1 Revised: March 2018 Policy: Hand hygiene will be done by all employees to reduce the transfer of microbes to patients and to prevent the growth of microorganisms... Purpose: To prevent transfer of germs and transmission of infections to patients and caregivers... Procedure: ...7. The Agency will follow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for hand hygiene: Recommendations: After removing gloves. Before handling invasive device... 1. HV # 2 was admitted on 12/3/25 with diagnoses of Reaction due to Implanted Electrical Neurostimulator of Spinal Cord and Disruption of External Operation (Surgical) Wound. Review of the Home Health Certification (HHC) and Plan of Care (POC) dated 12/3/25 revealed physician’s orders for Skilled Nurse (SN) one visit per week for nine weeks to perform Vascular Access Device (VAD) care to right upper arm PICC line weekly. A HV was conducted on 12/29/25 at 12:55 PM to observe PICC line care provided by Employee Identifier (EI) # 3, Registered Nurse (RN). EI # 3 donned non-sterile gloves, removed the dressing from the PICC line, removed the non-sterile gloves, donned sterile gloves, and cleaned the PICC line insertion site. EI # 3 failed to perform hand hygiene after removing the non-sterile gloves and donning the sterile gloves. An interview was conducted on 12/29/25 at 3:05 PM with EI # 3, who confirmed he/she failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes. An interview was conducted on 12/31/25 at 12:14 PM with EI # 2, RN, Director, who confirmed the agency failed to ensure the staff followed agency policy for hand hygiene.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

  • Authentication

    The inspectors’ words, 1,301 words

    “Authentication CFR(s): 484.110(b) Standard: Authentication. All entries must be legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated, dated, and timed. Authentication must include a signature and a title (occupation), or a secured computer entry by a unique identifier, of a primary author who has reviewed and approved the entry. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on medical record (MR) review, agency policy and procedure, and interviews with staff, it was determined the agency failed to ensure Visit Note (VN) documentation was completed per agency policy. This deficient practice did affect six of 10 MRs reviewed including MR # 6, MR # 4, Home Visit (HV) # 2 MR # 2, HV # 1, MR # 5, and had the potential to negatively affect all patients admitted to this agency. Findings include: Agency Policy: Timely Submission of Patient Documentation Policy Number: 11.5.1 Revised: October 2017 Policy: The agency will ensure the timely and proper submission of patient documentation... Procedure: ...2. Itineraries, with all visit reports attached, must be submitted the next scheduled work day, not exceeding five (5) business days. All patient visit reports from contract personnel must be submitted within five (5) business days from the date of the visit... 4. MR # 2 was admitted on 11/17/25 with diagnoses including Parkinson’s, and Dementia in Other Disease Classified Elsewhere With Mood Disturbance. Review of the HHC and POC dated 11/17/25 revealed physician’s orders for SN one visit per week for nine weeks, and two visits pro re nata (PRN). Review of the SN VN dated 11/17/25 revealed the note was signed by the SN on 12/3/25, which was 12 business days after the visit. Review of the SN VN dated 11/18/25 revealed the note was signed by the SN on 12/4/25, which was 12 business days after the visit. An interview was conducted on 12/31/25 at 12:35 PM with EI # 2, who confirmed the agency failed to ensure the SN VNs were completed and signed per agency policy. 5. HV # 1 was admitted on 12/1/25 with diagnoses including Acute Kidney Failure, Chronic Kidney Failure, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Review of the HHC and POC dated 12/1/25 revealed physician’s orders for SN one visit per week for nine weeks, and two visits PRN. Review of the SN VN dated 12/1/25 revealed the note was signed by the SN on 12/17/25, which was 12 business days after the visit. Review of the SN VN dated 12/4/25 revealed the note was signed by the SN on 12/17/25 which was nine business days after the visit. Review of the SN VN dated 12/10/25 revealed the note was signed by the SN on 12/23/25 which was nine business days after the visit. An interview was conducted on 12/31/25 at 12:35 PM with EI # 2, who confirmed the agency failed to ensure the SN VNs were completed and signed per agency policy. 6. MR # 5 was admitted on 6/17/25 with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes with Other Skin Ulcer, Non-pressure Ulcer of Right Heel and Mid Foot Necrosed Muscle, and Pressure Ulcer Sacral Region. Review of the HHC and POC dated 6/17/25 revealed physician’s orders for SN three visits per week for eight weeks, one visit per week for one week, and two visits PRN. Review of the SN VN dated 7/21/25 revealed the note was signed by the SN on 8/13/25, which was 17 business days after the visit. Review of the SN VN dated 7/23/25 revealed the note was signed by the SN on 8/13/25 which was 15 business days after the visit. Review of the SN VN dated 7/25/25 revealed the note was signed by the SN on 8/13/25 which was 13 business days after the visit. Review of the SN VN dated 7/28/25 revealed the note was signed by the SN on 8/13/25, which was 12 business days after the visit. Review of the SN VN dated 7/30/25 revealed the note was signed by the SN on 8/13/25 which was 10 business days after the visit. Review of the SN VN dated 8/1/25 revealed the note was signed by the SN on 8/13/25 which was 8 business days after the visit. Review of the SN VN dated 8/4/25 revealed the note was signed by the SN on 8/13/25 which was 7 business days after the visit. An interview was conducted on 12/31/25 at 12:35 PM with EI # 2, who confirmed the agency failed to ensure the SN VNs were completed and signed per agency policy. 1. MR # 6 was admitted on 4/11/25 with diagnoses including Aftercare Following Surgery for Neoplasm, Other Acute Procedural Pain, and Unspecified Asthma. Review of the Home Health Certification (HHC) and Plan of Care (POC) dated 4/11/25 revealed physician’s orders for Skilled Nurse (SN) one visit per week for one week, two visits per week for three weeks, then one visit per week for five weeks. Review of the Skilled Nurse SN VN dated 4/11/25 revealed the note was signed by the SN on 4/30/25, which was 14 business days after the visit. Review of the SN VN dated 4/22/25 revealed the note was signed by the SN on 5/4/25, which was eight business days after the visit. Review of the SN VN dated 4/24/25 revealed the note was signed by the SN on 5/5/25, which was seven business days after the visit. Review of the SN VN dated 5/1/25 revealed the note was signed by the SN on 5/13/25, which was eight business days after the visit. Review of the SN VN dated 5/6/25 revealed the note was signed by the SN on 5/15/25 which was seven business days after the visit. Review of the SN VN dated 5/7/25 revealed the note was signed by the SN on 5/22/25 which was 11 business days after the visit. Review of the SN VN dated 5/20/25 revealed the note was signed by the SN on 6/2/25 which was nine business days after the visit. Review of the SN VN dated 6/3/25 revealed the note was signed by the SN on 7/1/25 which was 20 business days after the visit. An interview was conducted on 12/31/25 at 12:35 PM with Employee Identifier (EI) # 2, Registered Nurse (RN), Director, who confirmed the agency failed to ensure the SN VNs were completed and signed per agency policy. 2. MR # 4 was admitted on 9/4/24 and recertified from 3/3/35 to 5/1/25 with diagnoses including Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Hypotension, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia. Review of the HHC and POC dated 3/3/25 revealed physician’s orders for SN one visit per week for nine weeks. Review of the SN VN dated 4/9/25 revealed the SN signed the note on 4/25/25, which was 12 business days after the visit. An interview was conducted on 12/31/25 at 12:35 PM with EI # 2, who confirmed the agency failed to ensure the SN VNs were completed and signed per agency policy. 3. HV # 2 was admitted on 12/3/25 with diagnoses including Reaction due to Implanted Electrical Neurostimulator of Spinal Cord and Disruption of External Operation (Surgical) Wound. Review of the HHC and POC dated 12/3/25 revealed physician’s orders for SN one visit per week for nine weeks. Review of the SN VN dated 12/3/25 revealed the SN signed the note on 12/19/25, which was 12 business days after the visit. Review of the SN VN dated 12/8/25 revealed the SN signed the note on 12/30/25, which was 16 business days after the visit. Review of the SN VN dated 12/15/25 revealed the SN signed the note on 12/30/25, which was 11 business days after the visit. An interview was conducted on 12/31/25 at 12:14 PM with EI # 2, who confirmed the agency failed to ensure the SN VNs were completed and signed per agency policy.”

    Rule G1024. Standard-level.

  • Only As Ordered By A Physician

    The inspectors’ words, 458 words

    “Only as ordered by a physician CFR(s): 484.60(b)(1) Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on medical record review, agency policy and procedure, observation, and interviews with staff, it was determined the agency failed to ensure physician’s orders for Peripherally Inserted Central Cather (PICC) line care were followed. This deficient practice affected one of one patients with a PICC line including Home Visit (HV) # 2 and had the potential to affect all patients with PICC lines admitted to this agency. Findings include: Agency Policy: Plan of Care - CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) # 485 and Physician Orders Policy Number: 9.10.1 Revised: January 2025 Policy: Skilled nursing and other home health services will be in accordance with a Plan of Care ... Procedure: ... 20. Care and services provided will be provided according to physician/practitioner orders... 1. HV # 2 was admitted on 12/3/25 with diagnoses of Reaction due to Implanted Electrical Neurostimulator of Spinal Cord and Disruption of External Operation (Surgical) Wound. Review of the Home Health Certification (HHC) and Plan of Care (POC) dated 12/3/25 revealed physician’s orders for Skilled Nurse (SN) one visit per week for nine weeks to obtain blood sample for laboratory testing weekly via PICC line. SN to obtain specimen then flush with 20 milliliters (ml) of Normal Saline (NS) followed by 5 ml of Heparin 10 units/ml. Review of the SN Visit Note, Infusion Notes, dated 12/3/25, 12/8/25, 12/15/25, 12/22/25, and 12/29/25, revealed blood was withdrawn from the PICC line on each visit and the port was flushed with 10 ml of NS after the blood sample was removed. The staff failed to follow the physician’s orders to flush the PICC line with 20 ml of NS after each blood sample was withdrawn. Review of the Communication Note dated 12/11/25 revealed the SN documented HV # 2 reported the PICC line was not flushing and he/she was going to the hospital Emergency Room. HV # 2 was then scheduled for a PICC line replacement 12/12/25. A HV was conducted on 12/29/25 at 12:55 PM to observe care provided by Employee Identifier (EI) # 3, Registered Nurse (RN). The surveyor observed EI # 3 withdraw a blood sample from the PICC line port and flush the port with 10 ml NS and 5 ml of Heparin. An interview was conducted on 12/29/25 at 3:05 PM with EI # 3 who confirmed he/she flushed the PICC line with 10 ml of NS. An interview was conducted on 12/31/25 at 12:14 PM with EI # 2, RN, Director, who confirmed the agency failed to ensure physician’s orders for flushing the PICC line were followed.”

    Rule G0580. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 31, 2025Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Sep 27, 1994.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy and speech pathology.
  • Doesn’t offer occupational therapy, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Prime Home Health of Lee County, LLC owns 80% directly since Sep 20, 2019; Community Hospital Inc. owns 20% directly since Sep 20, 2019.
  • 2 owners or officers are people: Archie J. Chapman (owns 5% or more through other companies, 80%); Sandra Ledbetter (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Prime Home Health of Lee County, LLCOwns 5% or more directly80%Sep 20, 2019
Prime Home Health of Lee County, LLCLimited partner80%Sep 20, 2019
Community Hospital Inc.Owns 5% or more directly20%Sep 20, 2019

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (123 surveys completed): 92% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate75.92% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate13.12% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.82% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 12 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 36078, where this agency’s office is, 12 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.