Hearth Record

Enhabit Home Health

A home health agency in Anchorage, Alaska 99503

101 W Benson Blvd, Anchorage, Alaska 99503. (907) 272-1275.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Oct 21, 2024: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Oct 21, 2024: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 346 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, observation, and interview, the home health agency failed to ensure acceptable professional standards for infection control occurred. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Nurse (LN) #1 performed acceptable professional standards for hand hygiene and glove use during wound care for one patient (#3), out of one patient observed for wound care. This failed practice placed this patient at risk for the spread of infectious diseases during wound care, which could affect the patient’s overall health and wellbeing. Findings: Record review on 10/14-21/24 revealed Patient #3 had a primary diagnosis of unspecified open wound of left upper arm with a Start of Care date of 9/4/24. During a home visit observation on 10/16/24 at 8:00 AM, LN #1 was observed to sanitize hands, apply gloves, and then remove a dressing from Patient #3’s left upper arm. After this dressing removal and while wearing the same gloves, LN #1 was observed to cleanse the wound area with wound wash. Then LN #1 discarded his/her gloves and sanitized his/her hands before proceeding to dress the wound with a xerofoam dressing and then cover with a gauze dressing. During an interview on 10/17/24 at 10:47 AM, the Clinical Team Lead stated that LN #1 should have removed the soiled gloves and cleansed his/her hands after removing a soiled dressing and proceeding to a clean task. Review of the agency policy “Hand Hygiene,” revised 7/10/24, revealed, “It is the policy that Agency’s employees and contracted staff will follow the CDC Guidelines regarding hand hygiene...At a minimum, personnel will perform hand hygiene in the following instances...After any contact with patient excretions [feces, urine] or secretions [from wounds...] or with articles/surfaces contaminated by secretions or excretions.” Review of the agency policy “Infection Surveillance Exposure Control Plan,” dated 10/9/23, revealed, “Disposable gloves will be replaced as soon as possible when contaminated.””

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

  • Health, Psychosocial, Functional, Cognition

    The inspectors’ words, 426 words

    “Health, psychosocial, functional, cognition CFR(s): 484.55(c)(1) Standard: Content of the comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive assessment must accurately reflect the patient’s status, and must include, at a minimum, the following information: (1) The patient’s current health, psychosocial, functional, and cognitive status; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment accurately reflected the patient’s status for one patient (#3) out of six active patient records reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to affect the skilled professionals’ knowledge of immediate needs of the patient, placing the patient at risk for improper or less than optimal care which had the potential to effect the patient’s overall physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Record review on 10/14-21/24 revealed Patient #3 had a primary diagnosis of unspecified open wound of left upper arm with a Start of Care date of 9/4/24 and a Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 9/6/24 to 11/4/24. A Billable Admission OASIS (the Outcome and Assessment Information set) Data Collection Visit Note Report dated 9/6/24 and completed by the Clinical Team Lead failed to include an accurate infusion assessment in this assessment report. This report failed to include the presence of a central venous catheter (a device that’s inserted into a large vein and used for hemodialysis, a treatment provided to filter waste and extra fluid from the blood) in place on the patient’s right chest. During a home visit observation on 10/16/24 at 8:00 AM, Patient #3 was observed to have a Central Venous Catheter positioned on the right chest area. During an interview on 10/21/24 at 11:37 AM, the Clinical Team Lead stated, when asked if the initial/comprehensive assessment included a description or assessment of the Central Venous Catheter, that there was no assessment of the Central Venous Catheter on the patient’s right chest area on the Billable admission, OASIS Data Collection Visit note report, dated 9/6/24. Review of the agency policy “Admission Process and Patient Assessment,” revised date 10/20/2023 revealed, “The initial admission evaluation/assessment will be performed in the patient’s home by the appropriate licensed professional within 48 hours of the referral or patient’s return from an inpatient stay or on the physician’s ordered start of care...During the initial evaluation/assessment, the admitting professional evaluates the patient and situation, using the admission criteria, and decides to admit or decline the patient for services...as part of the admission process, the admitting professional completes the medication profile and OASIS assessment, and selects the appropriate nursing diagnosis problems.””

    Rule G0528. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 21, 2024Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since May 7, 1996.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • Doesn’t offer occupational therapy and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this agency.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate87.18% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate7.15% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.83% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 7 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 99503, where this agency’s office is, 5 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 7 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 99503
PlaceQuality rating
Enhabit Home Health This home health agency3.5
Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.Not given
Providence at Home With Compassus Hh Anchorage3
Alaskan Home Health, Inc.3.5
Infinite Care of Alaska2
St. Agatha Home Healthcare, LLCNot given
Ancora Home Health & Hospice3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.