Hearth Record

Davita Mountaineer Dialysis

A dialysis facility in Beckley, West Virginia 25801

2958 Robert C Byrd Dr, Beckley, West Virginia 25801. (304) 252-9183.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 28, 2024: a standard inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 28, 2024: standard inspection2 deficiencies
  • Ic - Sanitary Environment

    The inspectors’ words, 345 words

    “IC-SANITARY ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.30 The dialysis facility must provide and monitor a sanitary environment to minimize the transmission of infectious agents within and between the unit and any adjacent hospital or other public areas. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 38282 Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide, monitor, and maintain a sanitary environment to minimize the transmission of infectious agents to patient access sites on the in-center treatment floor. This failure was observed in five (5) out of seventeen (17) treatment stations (stations #9, #10, #11, #12, and #15); and has the potential to adversely affect all patients receiving treatment at the facility. An observation was conducted on 02/26/24, starting at 10:40 a.m. of the inpatient dialysis treatment area, accompanied by Employee #1. Paper and plastic trash was noted to be on the floor at station #10, #11, and #12. Gloves were noted to be on the floor, as well as trash, at station #15. Several trash cans were overflowing with trash. A large liquid spill was noted to be on the floor by the sink at the medication desk that was cleaned up by Employee #1 after it was questioned. At station #9, there was a large area of a white powdery substance on the floor between the dialysis machine and patient chair, with a patient present and receiving dialysis. An interview was conducted on 02/26/24, at 11:00 a.m. with Employee #1 regarding the condition of the inpatient treatment floor. Employee #1 stated: “The second shift starts around 10:30 a.m. and it can be hectic. Staff need to be more aware of the trash accumulation and water spills in their environment.” Employee #1 explained that the white powdery substance on the floor was most likely bicarbonate that settled out from a dialysate spill; and concurred that it would have had to be on the floor several hours without wiping it up to leave that deposit. Employee #1 then concurred that the state of the inpatient treatment area was not conducive to a sanitary environment.”

    Rule V0111. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Clean, Disinfect Surfaces & Equipment/Written Protocols

    The inspectors’ words, 540 words

    “IC-DISINFECT SURFACES/EQUIP/WRITTEN PROTOCOL CFR(s): 494.30(a)(4)(ii) [The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing- (4) And maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the-] (ii) Cleaning and disinfection of contaminated surfaces, medical devices, and equipment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 38282 Based on observation, document review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that blood pressure cuffs remained off the floor during patient use; and that blood spills were cleaned in the glucose monitoring area. This failure has the potential to adversely affect all patients receiving dialysis at the inpatient treatment center. An observation was conducted on 02/26/24, starting at 10:40 a.m. of the inpatient treatment center area, accompanied by Employee #1. At station #12, a reusable blood pressure cuff was noted to be attached to the dialysis machine and lying on the floor, along with paper and plastic trash, with a patient present and receiving dialysis at that station. A side hallway leading to the water treatment room had a counter where the staff used a glucometer to check patient glucose levels. There was a small absorbent pad with the glucometer lying on it. The pad had several blood stains and two (2) used glucose strips. Employee #1 removed the pad and glucose strips and disposed of them when questioned. When the pad was removed, a dried blood smear was noted to be on the counter under the pad. Another staff member placed a clean pad onto the counter and laid the glucometer on the fresh pad, without cleaning the counter or the glucometer. An observation was conducted on 02/27/24, at 10:35 a.m. of the glucometer area where staff use a glucometer to check patient glucose levels. The absorbent pad had the glucometer on it, and there was a quarter-sized blood stain on the pad. A review of the policy, titled “Infection Control for Dialysis Facilities” revised 04/2023 stated, in part, “Disinfection: Cleaning and/or disinfection of equipment and work surfaces will be performed as soon as possible following exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials ... “Cleaning of visible blood should be performed when first observed ... “Non-disposable items are to be disinfected after each patient use, prior to removal from treatment area/station and if contaminated between uses ...” An interview was conducted on 02/28/24, at 9:30 a.m. with Employee #1 regarding the blood pressure cuff and the glucometer area. Employee #1 concurred that the blood pressure cuff should not have laid in the floor adjacent to trash; and that it should have been retrieved and cleaned, and the trash picked up, as the patient was still receiving treatment. Employee #1 explained that diabetic patients, and other patients with physician orders, had their glucose checked prior to a treatment. And stated: “The staff obtains blood in a syringe when accessing the patients’ fistula or central venous access (CVC). They bring the syringe to the glucometer area and use it on the glucometer, and sometimes it squirts and leaves a mess.” Employee #1 then concurred that all blood spills should be cleaned and disinfected immediately, and that the blood-stained absorbent pad and used glucometer strips should have been discarded.”

    Rule V0122. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 28, 2024Standard inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Sep 18, 2013.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: DaVita.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 17 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (32 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 91% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 55 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 3 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Raleigh County, 3 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5, 1 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.