Hearth Record

Davita Mequon Road Dialysis

A dialysis facility in Germantown, Wisconsin 53022

W175 N11056 Stonewood Dr, Germantown, Wisconsin 53022. (262) 251-4047.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Sep 30, 2025: a standard inspection.

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Sep 30, 2025: standard inspection6 deficiencies
  • Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene

    The inspectors’ words, 705 words

    “IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29963 Based on record review, observation and interview the facility staff failed to perform glove changes and/or hand hygiene when moving from “dirty” to “clean” tasks while providing cares for 2 of 9 patients (Patients #9, 10); failed to ensure patients completed hand hygiene after glove removal and holding dialysis access sites until bleeding stopped for 1 of 2 patients (Patient #12) observed holding access sites; and failed to wear gloves when touching the dialysis machine for 4 of 9 patients (Patients #9, 12, 13, 14) in a total of 16 observations of patient care. Findings include: A review of the facility’s policy 1-05-01 titled, “Infection Control for Dialysis Facilities,” last revised April 2023 revealed, “All teammates ... will perform hand hygiene ... b. prior to gloving and immediately after removal of gloves, ... after patient and dialysis delivery system contact ... before touching clean areas such as supplies, supply cart, and chairside keyboard/mouse ...7. Disposable gloves will be worn when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station... a. Gloves should be changed when: ii. When going from a ‘dirty’ area or task to a ‘clean’ area or task... iv. After touching one patient or their dialysis delivery system and before arriving to care for another patient or touch another patient’s dialysis delivery system.” A review of the facility’s policy #1-04-01B titled, “Post Dialysis Vascular Access Care: Fistula/Graft Using Safety Fistula Needles” last revised April 2023 revealed, “... When the patient holds their cannulation sites, the patient will be offered gloves and performs hand hygiene when completed...” A review of facility’s policy #1-04-02B titled, “Central Venous Catheter (CVC) ... Procedure” last reviewed April 2025 revealed, “ ... Aseptically disconnect arterial blood line from arterial CVC limb ... Remove gloves and discard, perform hand hygiene ...” Examples of staff failing to complete hand hygiene: During an observation on 09/29/2025 at 9:50 AM, Patient Care Technician F was initiating dialysis on Patient #10’s fistula. Patient Care Technician F cleaned Patient #10’s access, removed glove from right hand and walked over to the supply cart and grabbed a package of iodine wipes, returned to the dialysis station and put a new glove on the right hand and did not complete hand hygiene. During an observation on 09/29/2025 at 10:10 AM, Patient Care Technician E was discontinuing dialysis on Patient #9. Patient Care Technician E disconnected the blood lines from Patient #9’s CVC, removed gloves and then began documenting on computer and did not complete hand hygiene. Examples of staff failing to ensure patients completed hand hygiene after glove removal after holding dialysis access sites: During an observation on 09/29/2025 at 9:15 AM, Patient #12 was observed holding dialysis access site with a gloved hand. Patient #12 removed the glove, walked over to the scale and touched the grab bar. Patient #12 did not perform hand hygiene prior to exiting the treatment area. Examples of staff touching the dialysis machines with a glove wrapped around the finger: During an observation on 09/29/2025 at 9:14 AM, Patient Care Technician D touched Patient #12’s dialysis machine using a glove wrapped around the finger. During an observation on 09/29/2025 at 9:40 AM, Patient Care Technician F touched Patient #14’s dialysis machine using a glove wrapped around the finger. During an observation on 09/29/2025 at 9:50 AM, Patient Care Technician E touched Patient #13’s dialysis machine using a glove wrapped around the finger. During an observation on 09/29/2025 at 10:10 AM, Patient Care Technician E touched Patient #9’s dialysis machine using a glove wrapped around the finger. During an interview on 09/30/2025 at 12:44 PM, the observation findings were discussed with Facility Administrator A who stated the expectation is that staff perform hand hygiene with glove removal and that staff should be offering hand gel to every patient at the completion of dialysis. Facility Administrator A stated the staff are expected to put the glove completely on the hand prior to touching the dialysis machine.”

    Rule V0113. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Items Taken To Station Disposed/Dedicated Or Disinfected

    The inspectors’ words, 421 words

    “IC-IF TO STATION=DISP/DEDICATE OR DISINFECT CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Items taken into the dialysis station should either be disposed of, dedicated for use only on a single patient, or cleaned and disinfected before being taken to a common clean area or used on another patient. -- Nondisposable items that cannot be cleaned and disinfected (e.g., adhesive tape, cloth covered blood pressure cuffs) should be dedicated for use only on a single patient. -- Unused medications (including multiple dose vials containing diluents) or supplies (syringes, alcohol swabs, etc.) taken to the patient’s station should be used only for that patient and should not be returned to a common clean area or used on other patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29963 Based on record review, observation and interview, facility staff failed to ensure that non-disposable items taken into the patient station (thermometer) were disinfected following use for 4 of 4 patients observed (Patients #8, 9, 12, 13) for discontinuation of dialysis in a total of 16 observations of patient care. Findings include: A review of the facility’s policy #1-05-01 titled, “Infection Control For Dialysis Facilities,” last revised April 2023 revealed, “... Non-disposable items are to be disinfected after each patient use, prior to removal from treatment/area station and if contaminated between uses.” During an observation on 09/29/2025 at 9:00 AM, Patient Care Technician D was observed using a thermometer on Patient #12 at the completion of dialysis. Patient Care Technician D then returned the thermometer to the computer cart on wheels without disinfecting the thermometer. During an observation on 09/29/2025 at 9:30 AM, Patient Care Technician F was observed using a thermometer on Patient #8 at the completion of dialysis. Patient Care Technician D then returned the thermometer to the computer cart on wheels without disinfecting the thermometer. During an observation on 09/29/2025 at 9:50 AM, Patient Care Technician E was observed using a thermometer on Patient #13 at the completion of dialysis. Patient Care Technician E then returned the thermometer to the computer cart on wheels without disinfecting the thermometer. During an observation on 09/29/2025 at 10:10 AM, Patient Care Technician E was observed using a thermometer on Patient #9 at the completion of dialysis. Patient Care Technician E then returned the thermometer to the computer cart on wheels without disinfecting the thermometer. During an interview on 09/30/2025 at 12:45 PM, the observation findings were discussed with Manager of Clinical Services G who stated thermometers should be cleaned with a bleach wipe between patients when taken into the dialysis station.”

    Rule V0116. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Clean/Dirty Areas, Med Prep Area, No Common Med Carts

    The inspectors’ words, 272 words

    “IC-CLEAN/DIRTY;MED PREP AREA;NO COMMON CARTS CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Clean areas should be clearly designated for the preparation, handling and storage of medications and unused supplies and equipment. Clean areas should be clearly separated from contaminated areas where used supplies and equipment are handled. Do not handle and store medications or clean supplies in the same or an adjacent area to that where used equipment or blood samples are handled. When multiple dose medication vials are used (including vials containing diluents), prepare individual patient doses in a clean (centralized) area away from dialysis stations and deliver separately to each patient. Do not carry multiple dose medication vials from station to station. Do not use common medication carts to deliver medications to patients. If trays are used to deliver medications to individual patients, they must be cleaned between patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29963 Based on record review, observation and interview the facility staff failed to ensure that supplies were not past expiration dates in 1 of 1 patient treatment areas (in-center treatment area) observed in a total of 1 patient treatment areas observed. Findings include: A review of the facility’s policy 1-06-01, titled “Medication Policy” last revised October 2023, revealed, “All medications in the facility are checked monthly ... Medications are ordered and replaced prior to expiration ...” During an observation on 09/29/2025 at 8:49 AM found (3) boxes of triple antibiotic ointment (144 packets in each box) with an expiration date of 07/20205. During an interview on 09/30/2025 at 12:32 PM, Facility Administrator A stated the staff should be removing supplies from the supply cart when they are expired.”

    Rule V0117. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Clean, Disinfect Surfaces & Equipment/Written Protocols

    The inspectors’ words, 276 words

    “IC-DISINFECT SURFACES/EQUIP/WRITTEN PROTOCOL CFR(s): 494.30(a)(4)(ii) [The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing- (4) And maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the-] (ii) Cleaning and disinfection of contaminated surfaces, medical devices, and equipment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29963 Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility staff failed to complete disinfection of all equipment in the dialysis station for 2 of 2 dialysis stations (Patient #12, 13) observed being cleaned in a total of 16 observations of patient care. Findings Include: A review of the facility’s policy #1-05-01 titled, “Infection Control for Dialysis Facilities” last revised April 2023 revealed, “... At the end of each treatment, the dialysis station will be cleaned and disinfected ... Surfaces to disinfect include but are not necessarily limited to: all surfaces in contact with the patient or their belongings... and frequently contacted by healthcare personnel...” During an observation on 09/29/2025 at 9:20 AM, Patient Care Technician E was observed cleaning dialysis station after Patient #13 completed dialysis. Patient Care Technician E did not wipe down the IV (intravenous) pole, hooks or blood pressure basket on the side of the dialysis machine. During an observation on 09/29/2025 at 9:27 AM, Patient Care Technician D was observed cleaning dialysis station after Patient #12 completed dialysis. Patient Care Technician D did not wipe down the IV pole hooks. During an interview on 09/29/2025 at 12:50 PM, the observation findings were discussed with Facility Administrator A who stated that staff should be wiping down everything on the IV pole and on the dialysis machine.”

    Rule V0122. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Staff Education Re Catheters/Catheter Care

    The inspectors’ words, 390 words

    “IC-STAFF EDUCATION-CATHETERS/CATHETER CARE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(2) Recommendations for Placement of Intravascular Catheters in Adults and Children I. Health care worker education and training A. Educate health-care workers regarding the ... appropriate infection control measures to prevent intravascular catheter-related infections. B. Assess knowledge of and adherence to guidelines periodically for all persons who manage intravascular catheters. II. Surveillance A. Monitor the catheter sites visually of individual patients. If patients have tenderness at the insertion site, fever without obvious source, or other manifestations suggesting local or BSI [blood stream infection], the dressing should be removed to allow thorough examination of the site. Central Venous Catheters, Including PICCs, Hemodialysis, and Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Adult and Pediatric Patients. VI. Catheter and catheter-site care B. Antibiotic lock solutions: Do not routinely use antibiotic lock solutions to prevent CRBSI [catheter related blood stream infections]. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29963 Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure aseptic technique was maintained when working with central venous catheter (CVC), per facility policy for 1 of 4 patients observed (Patients #7) in a total sample of 6 observations of care of patients with a CVC. Findings Include: A review of the facility’s policy #1-04-02 B titled, “Central Venous Catheter (CVC) with Clearguard HD Antimicrobial End Caps and Tegaderm CHG Dressing Procedure” last revised April 2025 revealed, “... Verify patient’s clothing is secured away from the exit site/work area...” During an observation on 09/29/2025 at 11:00 AM, Patient Care Technician E was observed performing CVC exit site care for Patient #7. Patient #7 was observed to be wearing a button-down shirt. Patient Care Technician E was observed moving the collar of the button-down away from Patient #7’s exit site but did not secure the shirt away from the site. Upon completion of exit site cleansing, Patient #7’s shirt was observed to be touching the right side of the exit site. The shirt continued to touch the exposed site while Patient Care Technician E performed other tasks until Patient Care Technician E placed a new dressing over the exit site without repeat cleansing. During an interview on 09/30/2025 at 12:44 PM, the observation findings were discussed with Facility Administrator A who stated, “The shirt should be taped back so there is a 2-3 inch clearance away from the catheter insertion site.””

    Rule V0147. Standard-level.

  • Achieve Adequate Clearance

    The inspectors’ words, 488 words

    “POC-ACHIEVE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) Achieve and sustain the prescribed dose of dialysis to meet a hemodialysis Kt/V of at least 1.2 and a peritoneal dialysis weekly Kt/V of at least 1.7 or meet an alternative equivalent professionally-accepted clinical practice standard for adequacy of dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29963 Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to complete documentation of why physician orders were not followed for prescribed blood flow rates and/or dialysate flow rates for 3 of 5 in-center medical records reviewed (Patients #2, 3, 4) in a total universe of 5 medical records reviewed. Findings include: A review of the facility’s policy #1-03-08 titled, “Pre-Intra-Post Treatment Data Collection, Monitoring and Nursing Assessment,” last revised April 2024 revealed, “ ...Intradialytic Data Collection/Assessment ...At a minimum, obtain and document the following ...Blood and dialysate flows ...If the dialysis prescription is not being met (including dialysis flow rate or change to/inability to obtain prescribed blood flow rate) the reason will be documented and the licensed nurse informed ...” A review of Patient #2’s medical record revealed a physician order for the blood flow rate (BFR) of 400 mL/min (milliliters per minute) and a dialysate flow rate (DFR) of 600 mL/min. The treatment sheet dated 09/19/2025 revealed the DFR was set at 500 mL/min for the entire treatment. There was no documentation in the medical record for the reason the DFR was lower than the ordered rate. The treatment sheets dated 09/22/2025 and 09/26/2025 revealed the BFR was set at 350 mL/min for the entire treatment. Treatment sheet dated 09/24/2025 revealed the BFR was turned down to 350 mL/min mid treatment. There was no documentation in the medical record for the reason the BFR was lower than the ordered rate. A review of Patient #3’s medical record revealed a physician order for the BFR of 350 mL/min and DFR of 800 mL/min. The treatment sheets dated 09/18/2025 and 09/23/2025 revealed the DFR was set at 500 mL/min for the entire treatment. There was no documentation in the medical record for the reason the DFR was lower than the ordered rate. The treatment sheet dated 09/25/2025 revealed the BFR was set at 300 mL/min for the entire treatment. There was no documentation in the medical record for the reason the BFR was lower than the ordered rate. A review of Patient #4’s medical record revealed a physician order for the BFR of 450 mL/min. The treatment sheets dated 09/20/2025, 09/25/2025, and 09/27/2025 revealed the BFR was set at 400 mL/min for the entire treatment. There was no documentation in the medical record for the reason the BFR was lower than the ordered rate. During an interview on 09/30/2025 at 1:05 PM, the medical record findings were discussed with and confirmed by Facility Administrator A who stated facility staff were expected to document a reason for not meeting prescribed blood and dialysate flow rates.”

    Rule V0544. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 30, 2025Standard inspection6 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Oct 15, 2008.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: DaVita.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 12 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 5 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 55 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 3 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Washington County, 3 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.