Fmc - Virginia Beach
A dialysis facility in Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452
525 S Independence Blvd Ste 150, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452. (757) 687-7902.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 4of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 15 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Nov 28, 2023: a standard inspection.
5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Nov 28, 2023: standard inspection5 deficiencies
-
Dialysis Emergency Equipment
The inspectors’ words, 325 words
“Dialysis Emergency Equipment CFR(s): §494.62(b)(9) Condition for Coverage: [(b) Policies and procedures. The dialysis facility must develop and implement emergency preparedness policies and procedures, based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The policies and procedures must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. At a minimum, the policies and procedures must address the following:] (9) A process by which the staff can confirm that emergency equipment, including, but not limited to, oxygen, airways, suction, defibrillator or automated external defibrillator, artificial resuscitator, and emergency drugs, are on the premises at all times and immediately available. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 42725 Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility staff failed to remove expired supplies from the emergency cart. The findings included: During the flash tour on 11/27/23, a surveyor conducted a review of the contents in the facility’s emergency cart and evacuation kit. The following were discovered during the review: One (1) - Nasal cannula tubing - expired 6/14/23 One (1) - Yankauer catheter - expired 11/22/23 The surveyor notified SM #9 of the expired supplies while on the treatment floor who immediately replaced the nasal cannula and started working on replacing the yankauer catheter. On 11/27/23 at 3:45 p.m., the surveyors discussed the findings with SMs #1, 3 and 5 and requested a policy regarding the contents of the emergency cart. On 11/28/23, a review of the facility’s policy titled, Emergency Medication, Equipment and Supplies, was conducted and reads, in part: “...Emergency cart: ... The emergency cart must be: ... Checked monthly or after use for contents, expiration dates... Items approaching expiration must be reordered and replaced prior to the actual expiration date...”. At the exit conference on 11/28/23 at 3:45 p.m., the findings were reviewed again with SMs #1, 3 and 5.”
-
Ic - Wear Gowns, Shields/Masks; Staff Not Eat/Drink In Tx Area
The inspectors’ words, 274 words
“IC-GOWNS, SHIELDS/MASKS-NO STAFF EAT/DRINK CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Staff members should wear gowns, face shields, eye wear, or masks to protect themselves and prevent soiling of clothing when performing procedures during which spurting or spattering of blood might occur (e.g., during initiation and termination of dialysis, cleaning of dialyzers, and centrifugation of blood). Staff members should not eat, drink, or smoke in the dialysis treatment area or in the laboratory. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45736 Based on observations and document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to adhere to the facility’s policy, specific to the removal of PPE (personal protective equipment) when leaving the treatment floor. The findings included: On 11/27/23 at 1:05 p.m., during the flash tour, Staff Member #8 (Nurse Practitioner SM#8) was observed entering the treatment floor. SM#8 remained on the treatment floor until approximately 2:30 p.m., when they exited the treatment floor and entered the office space of the facility. SM#8 failed to remove their PPE gown. SM#8 did remove their PPE gown but then proceeded to place the gown back on while still in the office space and spoke with SM#6 (Social Worker) for approximately ten (10) minutes. A facility policy, Personal Protective Equipment, published 02/14/2018, version 5, evidenced, in part, “Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to identify exposure to hazardous chemicals, blood, or other potentially infectious material...Policy...All personal protective equipment shall be removed prior to leaving the treatment area.” These findings were discussed with SM#1 (Clinical Manager) SM#3 (Regional Operations Director) and SM#5 (Registered Nurse) on 11/27/23 at 3:45 p.m. and again at the exit conference on 11/28/23 at 3:45 p.m.”
-
Ic - Handling Infectious Waste
The inspectors’ words, 434 words
“IC-HANDLING INFECTIOUS WASTE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(4)(i) [The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing-] (4) And maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the- (i) Handling, storage and disposal of potentially infectious waste; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 42725 Based on observations and document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to place the access needles in the sharps container after removal for three (3) of four (4) observations. The findings included: On 11/27/23 at 1:25 p.m., a surveyor observed SM #12 removing an access needle for a patient at station #1. Upon removal, SM #12 capped the needle and laid it down on the tray. SM #12 placed gauze and tape to the patient’s access site. Once completed, SM #12 picked up the capped needle and disposed of it in the sharps container. SM #12 repeated the same process for the second needle removal. At 2:03 p.m., SM #12 was observed removing an access needle for a patient at station #2. SM #12 removed the needle, capped it and laid it on the tray. SM #12 placed gauze and tape over the access site. Once completed, SM #12 picked up the capped needle and disposed of it in the sharps container. SM #12 repeated the same process for the second needle removal. At 2:20 p.m., SM #13 was observed removing an access needle for a patient at station #5. SM #13 removed the needle from the access site, capped it and laid it down on the tray. SM #13 repeated the same steps for the second needle. After providing post-dialysis care to the patient, SM #13 picked up both of the capped needles and placed them in the sharps container for disposal. On 11/27/23 at 3:45 p.m., the surveyors discussed the findings with SMs #1, 3 and 5 and requested a policy regarding discontinuation of treatment for a AV (arteriovenous) graft/fistula. A facility’s policy titled, Termination of Treatment Using an Arteriovenous Fistula or Graft and Optiflux Single Use Ebeam Dialyzer, was reviewed. The policy referenced another policy titled, Post Treatment Fistula Needle Removal. The surveyors requested and received this policy from SM #1. The policy titled, Post Treatment Fistula Needle Removal, was reviewed and read, in part: “...Procedure... 1... Ensure a sharps container is easily accessible... 6. Carefully remove the needle... Engage the safe needle device per manufacturer’s instructions for use. Discard needle in sharps container...”. At the exit conference on 11/28/23 at 3:45 p.m., the findings were reviewed again with SMs #1, 3 and 5.”
-
Ic - Clean, Disinfect Surfaces & Equipment/Written Protocols
The inspectors’ words, 252 words
“IC-DISINFECT SURFACES/EQUIP/WRITTEN PROTOCOL CFR(s): 494.30(a)(4)(ii) [The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing- (4) And maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the-] (ii) Cleaning and disinfection of contaminated surfaces, medical devices, and equipment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45736 Based on observation and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that proper cleaning and disinfecting of equipment was performed. The findings included: On 11/27/23 at 1:30 p.m., during the flash tour, the surveyor observed the following: Staff Member #10 (Patient Care Technician SM#10) was observed cleaning dialysis station thirteen (13). SM#10 failed to clean the dialysis station counter above the wall box. A facility policy, Cleaning and Disinfecting the Dialysis Station, published 09/05/2023, version 14, was reviewed and evidenced, in part, “Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to provide guidance to prevent the spread of infectious disease in accordance with the appropriate regulations, and to maintain a clean, safe, and aesthetically pleasant environment for patients, staff and visitors...Background:...a dialysis station must be cleaned and disinfected between dialysis patients. The chair and dialysis equipment are used by multiple patients during a treatment day and it is critical that these items be thoroughly cleaned and disinfected between uses.” These findings were discussed with SM#1 (Clinical Manager) SM#3 (Regional Operations Director) and SM#5 (Registered Nurse) on 11/27/23 at 3:45 p.m. and again at the exit conference on 11/28/23 at 3:45 p.m.”
-
Ic - Aseptic Techniques For Iv Meds
The inspectors’ words, 219 words
“IC-ASEPTIC TECHNIQUES FOR IV MEDS CFR(s): 494.30(b)(2) [The facility must-] (2) Ensure that clinical staff demonstrate compliance with current aseptic techniques when dispensing and administering intravenous medications from vials and ampules; and This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45736 Based on observations and document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a safe environment for dialysis patients, staff, and the public by not labeling opened medications as per the facility’s policy. The findings included: During the flash tour on 11/27/23 at approximately 12:35 p.m., one (1) surveyor observed seven (7) oral medications cups that were labeled with the medication, route, dose, and name of patient but failed to include the date, time and initials of the person who prepared the medication. A facility policy, Medication Preparation and Administration, published 09/05/2023, version 10, stated, in part, “Labeling Reconstituted Medication Solutions and Syringes: All medications in syringes not being administered immediately shall be labeled appropriately with the name of the medication, route, dose, name of patient, date, time and initials of the person who prepared the medication...Oral medications not being administered immediately must also be labeled as indicated above.” These findings were discussed with SMs #1, 3 and 5 on 11/27/23 at 3:45 p.m. and again at the exit conference on 11/28/23 at 3:45 p.m.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2023 | Standard inspection | 5 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on May 4, 2005.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 15 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 4 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, better than expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 9 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Virginia Beach City, 9 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 3 rated 4 of 5, 3 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.