Hearth Record

Davita Harrisonburg Dialysis

A dialysis facility in Harrisonburg, Virginia 22801

871 Martin Luther King Jr Way, Ste 100, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22801. (540) 434-1033.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 20, 2024: a standard inspection.

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Aug 20, 2024: standard inspection7 deficiencies
  • Esrd Patient Orientation Training

    The inspectors’ words, 261 words

    “ESRD Patient Orientation Training CFR(s): The dialysis facility must provide appropriate orientation and training to patients, including the areas specified in paragraph (d)(1) of this section. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46466 Based on interview, medical record and facility documentation review, the facility failed to perform quarterly patient fire safety training for two (2) of fifteen (15) patients included in the survey sample. The findings include: On August 19, 2024 and August 20, 2024, the survey team reviewed fifteen (15) patient medical records. A review of Patient #6’s medical record revealed that Patient #6’s last quarterly Fire Safety Training was conducted on January 9, 2024. There was no documented evidence to support that Patient #6 received Fire Safety Training after January 9, 2024. A review of Patient #9’s medical record revealed that Patient #9’s last quarterly Fire Safety Training was conducted on March 5, 2024. There was no documented evidence to support that Patient #9 received Fire Safety Training after March 5, 2024. On August 20, 2024 at 12:00 PM, Staff Member #1 verified that the facility had no evidence related to Patient’s #6 and #9 receiving Fire Safety Training in the second quarter of 2024. A review of the facility’s policy “Facility Emergency Management Plan (ICHD, Home)”, revised April 2024 indicated in part: “...Training and Education. Emergency Management Plan 1. The FA, or designee, is responsible to provide training of EMP:...b. Patients...ii. Quarterly: 1. Fire Safety Preparedness...”. The findings were discussed with Staff Members #1, #2, #15, #16 and #17 on August 20, 2024 at 2:00 p.m.”

    Rule E0040. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene

    The inspectors’ words, 540 words

    “IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 21229 Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure infection protocols for hand hygiene preventing the transmission of infections were followed. The findings include: On 8/19/24, at 11:15 a.m. during observations of care on the treatment unit, the surveyor observed Staff Member #9 remove gloves after caring for a patient at 3/3 (pod 3, station 3). The staff member did not sanitize hands after removing the gloves, then donned clean gloves and silenced an alarm on 3/4 (pod 3, station 4). The staff member was then observed to go to 4/2 and adjust settings on the machine wearing the same gloves. Staff member #9 was also observed to clean a station at 3/2 and after cleaning the station, removed gloves, did not sanitize hands, and entered information in the computer at the station. Without sanitizing or washing hands, staff member #9 retrieved supplies and placed them at the station for the next patient treatment. At 11:50 a.m., Staff Member #9 was observed removing gloves after assisting a patient at 2/4 (pod 2, station 4) and without sanitizing or washing hands, donned clean gloves and retrieved supplies needed at 2/4. The staff member was observed to remove gloves, and without sanitizing hands, retrieve one glove and use the glove to adjust the settings on 2/3. The facility policy “Infection Control for Dialysis Facilities (April 2023)” was reviewed and evidenced, in part: “Hand Hygiene: 1. All teammates, Physicians, and non-Physician (NPP) will perform hand hygiene...b. prior to gloving and immediately after the removal of gloves...d. after patient and dialysis delivery system contact...g. before touching clean areas such as supplies, supply cart, and chairside keyboard/mouse...” The surveyor discussed the observations with Administrative Staff #1 and #2 on 8/20/24 at 11:45 a.m. and the requirements for new staff regarding competency checks and monitoring. Staff Member #1 indicated all staff should have a competency checklist prior to being on the floor, however, there were no checklists found for Staff Members #9 or #10. Staff Member #2 explained that the employees should have had the checklist “before going on the floor”. The facility provided the surveyor with documents related to the “Skills Verification Checklists” for teammates. The fifteen (15) page “PCT (patient care technician) checklist” document evidenced, in part: “1. After the new teammate completes the applicable (Rise StarLearning) course which includes review of the policies and procedures corresponding to the skills referenced...the teammate will then explain and demonstrate the procedural skill to the preceptor while being corrected and reinstructed as needed. After completion...the skills verification checklist will be initialed and dated by the preceptor. 2. After sufficient guidance and practice, when the preceptor considers the new teammate proficient, the registered nurse overseeing the training will evaluate the new teammates performance...required the initials of the registered nurse to verify satisfactory performance of skill...” The surveyor again discussed the observations at the exit conference on 8/20/24 at 2:00 p.m. with Staff Members #1, 2, 15, 16, and 17.”

    Rule V0113. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Wear Gowns, Shields/Masks; Staff Not Eat/Drink In Tx Area

    The inspectors’ words, 197 words

    “IC-GOWNS, SHIELDS/MASKS-NO STAFF EAT/DRINK CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Staff members should wear gowns, face shields, eye wear, or masks to protect themselves and prevent soiling of clothing when performing procedures during which spurting or spattering of blood might occur (e.g., during initiation and termination of dialysis, cleaning of dialyzers, and centrifugation of blood). Staff members should not eat, drink, or smoke in the dialysis treatment area or in the laboratory. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46466 Based on observations and interviews, facility staff failed to wear proper attire while caring for patients on the treatment floor. The findings include: On August 19, 2024 at 11:50 AM, a staff member was observed on the treatment floor, caring for patients while wearing Croc’s (Croc’s are a rubberized shoes that have open holes throughout the shoe). At 12:20 PM, a different staff member was observed on the treatment floor wearing Croc’s. On August 19, 2024 at approximately 3:00 PM, Staff Member #2 explained that Croc’s shoes are not appropriate to wear on the treatment floor. The findings were discussed with Staff Members #1, #2, #15, #16 and #17 at the exit conference on August 20, 2024, at 2:00 PM.”

    Rule V0115. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Clean, Disinfect Surfaces & Equipment/Written Protocols

    The inspectors’ words, 385 words

    “IC-DISINFECT SURFACES/EQUIP/WRITTEN PROTOCOL CFR(s): 494.30(a)(4)(ii) [The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing- (4) And maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the-] (ii) Cleaning and disinfection of contaminated surfaces, medical devices, and equipment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 21229 Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control guidelines for the cleaning and disinfection of a patient treatment station. The findings include: On 8/19/24 at 11:15 a.m., during observation on the treatment floor, the surveyor observed Staff Member #9 cleaning a dialysis treatment station in preparation for the next patient. The surveyor observed that staff member #9 did not clean the attached IV (intravenous pole), did not clean left or right outer sides of the machine, did not remove, empty, nor disinfect the prime receptacle bucket (contained approximately two inches of fluid), did not open the cover of machine for the Hanson connectors and cleaned them or their housing. When cleaning the treatment chair, Staff Member #9 did not clean the sides of the chair underneath the tray tables on either side. The staff member was observed to remove gloves, and without sanitizing retrieve supplies to place at the station for the next patient. The surveyor intervened and discussed with Staff Member #9 that the station was not clean and ready for another patient. Staff Member #9 did re-clean the station. The surveyor at the time, discussed the observation with an experienced Staff Member (#4). The facility policy “Infection Control for Dialysis Facilities (April 2023)” was reviewed and evidenced, in part: “13. At the end of each treatment, the dialysis station will be cleaned and disinfected. a. Surfaces to disinfect include, but are not necessarily limited to: all surfaces in contact with the patient or their belongings (e.g., dialysis chair, tray tables, blood pressure cuff) and frequently contacted by healthcare personnel (e.g., control paned; top, front and sides of dialysis machine; touchscreens, countertops) ...ii. priming containers are to be emptied prior to disinfection...” The surveyor discussed the observations with Staff Member #1 and #2 on 8/20/24 at 11:45 a.m., and again at the exit conference on 8/20/24 at 2:00 p.m. with Staff Members #1, 2, 15, 16, and 17.”

    Rule V0122. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Hbv - Test Pts/Staff Post Last Dose

    The inspectors’ words, 296 words

    “IC-HBV-TEST PTS/STAFF POST LAST DOSE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Hepatitis B Screening: Patients and Staff Test all vaccines [patients and staff] for anti-HBs 1-2 months after last primary vaccine dose. -- If anti-HBs is <10 mIU/mL, consider patient or staff member susceptible, revaccinate with an additional three doses, and retest for anti-HBs. -- If anti-HBs are =10 mIU/mL, consider immune, and retest patients annually. -- Give booster dose of vaccine to patients if anti-HBs declines to <10 mIU/mL and continue to retest patients annually. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46466 Based on interviews, medical record and facility document review, the facility staff failed to administer tuberculosis screenings for one (1) of fifteen (15) patient records sampled. The findings include: On August 20, 2024, the surveyors reviewed fifteen (15) patient medical records. Patient #2’s medical record indicated that Patient #2 had a previous positive PPD (purified protein derivative) test. A PPD test is used to diagnose a person for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Patient #2 had a chest x-ray performed on January 25, 2021. There was no documented evidence that Patient #2 received tuberculosis (TB) symptoms screenings in 2022, 2023 and 2024. On August 20, 2024 at 11:30 AM, Staff Member #1 confirmed that there was no documentation to support that Patient #2 received TB screenings in 2022, 2023 and 2024. A review of the facility’s policy “Tuberculosis Infection Control Policy”, last revised 4/2024, stated in part: “...1. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)...will be screened for TB prior to first treatment, as well as participated in ongoing surveillance following admission...2. TB surveillance will be performed on admission, annually and as indicated...”. The findings were discussed with Staff Members #1, #2, #15, #16 and #17 at the exit conference on August 20, 2024, at 2:00 PM.”

    Rule V0127. Standard-level.

  • Personnel - Training Program/Periodic Audits

    The inspectors’ words, 312 words

    “PERSONNEL-TRAINING PROGRAM/PERIODIC AUDITS CFR(s): 494.40(a) 9 Personnel: training program/periodic audits A training program that includes quality testing, the risks and hazards of improperly prepared concentrate, and bacterial issues is mandatory. Operators should be trained in the use of the equipment by the manufacturer or should be trained using materials provided by the manufacturer. The training should be specific to the functions performed (i.e., mixing, disinfection, maintenance, and repairs). Periodic audits of the operators’ compliance with procedures should be performed. The user should establish an ongoing training program designed to maintain the operator’s knowledge and skills. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46466 Based on interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to train four (4) new staff members in water skills, acid concentrate and bicarb mixing skills and document completion of these competencies. The findings include: On August 20, 2024, the surveyors reviewed six (6) personnel files. Staff Members #9, #10, #18, #19, and #20’s personnel files did not include any evidence that their water skills, acid concentrate mixing skills and bicarbonate mixing skills competencies were completed. An interview was conducted with Staff Members #2 on August 20, 2024 at 11:00 AM. Staff Member #2 stated that all of these staff members were new hires and had completed their ten (10) week training course and were currently working on the treatment floor delivering direct patient care. Staff Member #2 also confirmed that all of these staff members had not completed their water skills, acid concentrate mixing skills and bicarbonate mixing skills competency checklists and they should have been completed. A review of the facility’s “Digital Teammate Files Document Guidance Checklist”, last updated January 2023, indicated in part: “Onboarding Documents...Verification of Competency...Annual Documents...Water Skills Checklist...”. The findings were discussed with Staff Members #1, #2, #15, #16 and #17 at the exit conference on August 20, 2024 at 2:00 PM.”

    Rule V0260. Standard-level.

  • Staff Licensed As Req/Qualified/Demonstrate Competencies

    The inspectors’ words, 314 words

    “PQ-STAFF LIC AS REQ/QUAL/DEMO COMPETENCY CFR(s): 494.140 All dialysis facility staff must meet the applicable scope of practice board and licensure requirements in effect in the State in which they are employed. The dialysis facility’s staff (employee or contractor) must meet the personnel qualifications and demonstrated competencies necessary to serve collectively the comprehensive needs of the patients. The dialysis facility’s staff must have the ability to demonstrate and sustain the skills needed to perform the specific duties of their positions. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46466 Based on interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide evidence that staff members knowledge and skills were maintained according to facility policy. The findings include: On August 20, 2024, the surveyors reviewed six (6) personnel files. Staff Members #9, #10, #18, #19, and #20’s personnel files did not include any evidence that their competencies were verified prior to performing direct patient care. Their personnel files also did not include verification of their water skills, including bicarb and acid concentrate mixing. An interview was conducted with Staff Members #2 on August 20, 2024 at 11:00 AM. Staff Member #2 stated that all of these staff members were new hires and had completed their ten (10) week training course and were currently working on the treatment floor performing direct patient care. Staff Member #2 also confirmed that all of these staff members should have completed the training and have documentation of the verification of competencies and water skills checklists in their personnel files but the documentation was not there and could not be found. A review of the facility’s “Digital Teammate Files Document Guidance Checklist”, last updated January 2023, indicated in part: “Onboarding Documents...Verification of Competency...Annual Documents...Water Skills Checklist...”. The findings were discussed with Staff Members #1, #2, #15, #16 and #17 at the exit conference on August 20, 2024 at 2:00 PM.”

    Rule V0681. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 20, 2024Standard inspection7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on May 1, 1978.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: DaVita.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 34 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (65 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 62% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other dialysis facility CMS lists is in Harrisonburg City.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.