Hearth Record

Fkc Northside Dialysis

A dialysis facility in Houston, Texas 77090

235 FM 1960 Rd W Ste 235c, Houston, Texas 77090. (281) 583-4698.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 5, 2024: a complaint inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 5, 2024: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
  • Receive Services Outlined In Poc

    The inspectors’ words, 516 words

    “PR-RECEIVE SERVICES OUTLINED IN POC CFR(s): 494.70(a)(12) The patient has the right to- (12) Receive the necessary services outlined in the patient plan of care described in §494.90; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48020 Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility’s licensed nurses and direct care staff failed to administer patients’ hemodialysis treatments based on physicians’ orders in 2 of 16 sampled and closed patients: Patient #s 7 and 5 Findings: Review of the facility’s current Policy and Procedure on Nursing Supervision and Delegation; Policy #45265, published 11/06/2023 directs staff as follows: Policy The registered nurse must evaluate each patient preferably within an hour or according to state requirements to: ... “ Review accuracy and completeness of treatment and patient data “ Review patient treatment prescription and equipment parameters to verify correct settings, and if dialysis prescription is being followed. Patient #7 On 12/04/2024 at 12:33 p.m. Patient #7 was observed on the treatment floor of the facility at station #8 machine #7. The patient was receiving hemodialysis treatment at a blood flow rate of 400 mL/min and dialysate flow rate of 800 mL/min. The patient was utilizing an Optiflux 180 non reuse dialyzer via a left central venous catheter. Review of the physician’s order dated 11/25/2024 revealed the prescribed hemodialysis treatment time of four hours. Treatment sheet review: Review of the patient’s treatment sheet dated 11/26/2024 revealed documentation which indicated the “Hours On” the hemodialysis treatment was 3:47 instead of the prescribed 4:00 hours. There was no documented justification why the patient did not receive the hemodialysis treatment at the prescribed time nor whether the patient signed and early termination Against Medical Advice form. Review of the patient’s treatment sheet dated 11/26/2024 revealed documentation which indicated the “Hours On” the hemodialysis treatment was 3:46 instead of the prescribed 4:00 hours. There was no documented justification why the patient did not receive the hemodialysis treatment at the prescribed time nor whether the patient signed and early termination Against Medical Advice form. Patient #5 On 12/04/2024 at 12:37 p.m. Patient #5 was observed on the treatment floor of the facility at station #10 machine 1. The patient was receiving hemodialysis treatment at a blood flow rate of 400 mL/min and dialysate flow rate of 800 mL/min. The patient was utilizing an Optiflux 180 non reuse dialyzer via a left lower arm vascular access. Review of the physician’s order dated 12/02/2024 revealed the prescribed blood flow rate of 400 mL/min. Treatment sheet review: Review of the patient’s treatment sheet dated 11/29/2024 revealed documentation which indicated the patient was prescribed a blood flow rate of 400 mL/min but received hemodialysis treatment at a blood flow rate of 350 mL/min from 10:09 a.m. - 13:37 p.m. There was no justification documented for the blood flow rate of 350 mL/min. The physician’s order on the treatment sheet revealed a blood flow rate of 400 mL/min. Interview on 12/04/2024 at 2:13 p.m. with the facility’s Clinical Manager (E) confirmed Patient #s 7 and 5 did not receive their hemodialysis treatments as prescribed for the dates in question.”

    Rule V0463. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patients Seen By Med Staff Member Monthly

    The inspectors’ words, 864 words

    “POC-PTS SEEN BY MED STAFF 1X/MO CFR(s): 494.90(b)(4) The dialysis facility must ensure that all dialysis patients are seen by a physician, nurse practitioner, clinical nurse specialist or physician’s assistant providing ESRD care at least monthly, as evidenced by a monthly progress note placed in the medical record, and periodically while the hemodialysis patient is receiving in-facility dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48020 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure patient’s nephrologist round and assess patient’s monthly in 5 of 16 sampled patients: Patient #s 4, 6, 7, 8 and 5 Findings: Patient #4 On 12/04/2024 at 12:27 p.m. Patient #4 was observed on the treatment floor of the facility at station #1 machine #10. The patient was receiving hemodialysis treatment at a blood flow rate of 400 mL/min and dialysate flow rate of 800 mL/min. The patient was utilizing an Optiflux 180 non reuse dialyzer via a left lower arm vascular access. Review of the patient’s clinical record revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 01/21/2021 with diagnoses of end stage renal disease and diabetes on oral medications, on in-center hemodialysis three times weekly. Review of the patient’s Physician Documentation Summary dated 06/01/2024 - 12/04/2024 revealed the most recent physician progress note was documented on 11/22/2024. There was a physician progress note documented for 06/12/2024, 08/07/2024, 08/23/2024, 09/18/2024, 09/30/2024 and 11/20/2024. There was no documented physician note for July 2024 and October 2024. Patient #6 On 12/04/2024 at 12:31 p.m. Patient #6 was observed on the treatment floor of the facility at station #2 machine #15. The patient was receiving hemodialysis treatment at a blood flow rate of 400 mL/min and dialysate flow rate of 800 mL/min. The patient was utilizing an Optiflux 180 non reuse dialyzer via a left upper arm vascular access. Review of the patient’s clinical record revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 11/30/2023 with diagnoses of end stage renal disease, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, history of hypertension and diabetes currently on insulin, on in-center hemodialysis three times weekly. Review of the patient’s Physician Documentation Summary dated 06/01/2024 - 12/04/2024 revealed the most recent physician progress note was documented on 11/22/2024. There was a physician progress note documented for 06/12/2024, 08/07/2024, 08/22/2024, 08/23/2024, 09/18/2024, 09/20/2024 and 09/30/2024. There was no documented physician note for July 2024 and October 2024. Patient #7 On 12/04/2024 at 12:33 p.m. Patient #7 was observed on the treatment floor of the facility at station #8 machine #7. The patient was receiving hemodialysis treatment at a blood flow rate of 400 mL/min and dialysate flow rate of 800 mL/min. The patient was utilizing an Optiflux 180 non reuse dialyzer via a left central venous catheter. Review of the patient’s clinical record revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 02/12/2024 with diagnoses of end stage renal disease, congestive heart failure, history of hypertension and diabetes without medications, on in-center hemodialysis three times weekly. Review of the patient’s Physician Documentation Summary dated 06/01/2024 - 12/04/2024 revealed the most recent physician progress note was documented on 11/22/2024. There was a physician progress note documented for 06/12/2024, 08/07/2024, 08/22/2024, 08/23/2024, 09/18/2024, 09/20/2024 and 09/30/2024. There was no documented physician note for July 2024 and October 2024. Patient #8 On 12/04/2024 at 12:35 p.m. Patient #8 was observed on the treatment floor of the facility at station #9 machine #9. The patient was receiving hemodialysis treatment at a blood flow rate of 500 mL/min and dialysate flow rate of 800 mL/min. The patient was utilizing an Optiflux 200 non reuse dialyzer via a left lower arm vascular access. Review of the patient’s clinical record revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 10/05/2019 with diagnoses of end stage renal disease, and history of hypertension, on in-center hemodialysis three times weekly. Review of the patient’s Physician Documentation Summary dated 06/01/2024 - 12/04/2024 revealed the most recent physician progress note was documented on 11/24/2024. There was a physician progress note documented for 06/12/2024, 08/07/2024, 08/23/2024, 09/18/2024, 09/20/2024 and 09/30/2024. There was no documented physician note for July 2024 and October 2024. Patient #5 On 12/04/2024 at 12:37 p.m. Patient #5 was observed on the treatment floor of the facility at station #10 machine 1. The patient was receiving hemodialysis treatment at a blood flow rate of 400 mL/min and dialysate flow rate of 800 mL/min. The patient was utilizing an Optiflux 180 non reuse dialyzer via a left lower arm vascular access. Review of the patient’s clinical record revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 04/17/2024 with diagnoses of end stage renal disease, and history of hypertension, on in-center hemodialysis three times weekly. Review of the patient’s Physician Documentation Summary dated 06/01/2024 - 12/04/2024 revealed the most recent physician progress note was documented on 11/22/2024. There was a physician progress note documented for 06/12/2024, 08/07/2024, 08/23/2024, 09/18/2024 and 09/30/2024. There was no documented physician note for July 2024 and October 2024. Interview with Clinical Manager (E) on 12/04/2024 at 3:30 p.m. confirmed there was one physician who did not document progress notes for the above dates in question.”

    Rule V0560. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P

    The inspectors’ words, 786 words

    “MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48020 Based on observation, record review and interview: the facility’s registered nurses failed to conduct assessments when patients experienced a change in condition during hemodialysis treatment in 3 of 16 sampled patients: Patient #s 1, 6, 11 Findings: Review of the facility’s current Policy and Procedure on Patient Assessment and Monitoring; Policy # 45284, published 05/01/2023 directs staff as follows: Data Collection Direct patient care staff may collect data such as weight, BP, pulse, respirations, temperature, general observations, access, and complaints reported by the patient. If the PCT/LPN note any changes or abnormal findings in the patient’s condition or vascular access are observed or reported by the patient, or the patient was hospitalized, the registered nurse must assess the patient. o The RN will notify the patient’s physician/physician extender of any abnormal findings, if necessary, based on clinical judgment for additional instruction. The Registered Nurse will assess/re-assess any findings addressed pre or during treatment as needed. Reassessment of edema: Patient #1 On 12/04/2024 at 7:50 a.m. Patient #1 was observed on the treatment floor of the facility at station #5 machine #14. The patient was receiving hemodialysis treatment at a blood flow rate of 400 mL/min and dialysate flow rate of 800 mL/min. The patient was utilizing an Optiflux 180 non reuse dialyzer via a left upper arm vascular access. Review of the patient’s clinical record on 12/04/2024 revealed the following: Treatment sheet review: Review of treatment sheet dated 11/22/2024 revealed the following documentation: 05:55 a.m.: registered nurse documented the pretreatment assessment which revealed “Symptoms Lower Leg - Severity: 1+: 2 mm or less, disappears rapidly Ankle - Severity: 1+: 2 mm or less, disappears rapidly Edema Lower Leg - Location: Bilateral Edema Ankle - Location: Bilateral” 11:17 a.m.: registered nurse documented the post treatment assessment which revealed “General Survey: Alert, Oriented, Wheelchair General Overview: No Complaint Physical Exam: Speech Clear Notes: 2.4kg above EDW. Tolerated tx well. Alert and stable. Verbal education on salt and fluid intake. Pt expressed verbal understanding.” The registered nurse did not document a reassessment of edema found during the pretreatment assessment. Review of Review of treatment sheet dated 11/24/2024 revealed the registered nursed did not document a reassessment of edema found during the pretreatment assessment. Patient #6 On 12/04/2024 at 12:31 p.m. Patient #6 was observed on the treatment floor of the facility at station #2 machine #15. The patient was receiving hemodialysis treatment at a blood flow rate of 400 mL/min and dialysate flow rate of 800 mL/min. The patient was utilizing an Optiflux 180 non reuse dialyzer via a left upper arm vascular access. Review of the patient’s clinical record on 12/05/2024 revealed the following: Treatment sheet review: Review of treatment sheet dated 12/02/2024 revealed the following documentation: 10:23 a.m.: registered nurse documented the pretreatment assessment which revealed “Symptoms Ankle - Severity: 1+: 2 mm or less, disappears rapidly Lower Leg - Severity: 1+: 2 mm or less, disappears rapidly Edema Lower Leg - Location: Bilateral Edema Ankle - Location: Bilateral” 15:04 p.m.: registered nurse documented the post treatment assessment which revealed “General Survey: Alert, Oriented Ambulation Status: Ambulates w/assistive device General Overview: No Complaint Physical Exam: Calm, Pleasant Notes: 0.3kg below EDW. Tolerated tx well. Alert and stable.” The registered nurse did not document a reassessment of edema found during the pretreatment assessment. Reassessment of breath sounds: Patient #11 Review of the patient’s clinical record on 12/05/2024 revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 03/26/2019 with diagnoses of end stage renal disease, history of hypertension and diabetes currently on insulin, on in-center hemodialysis three times weekly. Treatment sheet review: Review of treatment sheet dated 07/17/2024 revealed the following documentation: 18:13 p.m.: registered nurse documented the pretreatment assessment which revealed “Symptoms: Shortness of Breath Lungs: Decreased breath sounds Lungs - Sound Location: Bilateral” 21:16 p.m.: registered nurse documented the post treatment assessment which revealed “General Survey: Alert, Oriented Ambulation Status: Ambulates w/assistive device General Overview: No Complaint Notes: Pt request to leave early because she must be here tomorrow early; v/s acceptable; MD informed. No complaints at d/c.” The registered nurse did not document a reassessment of shortness of breath and decreased breath sounds found during the pretreatment assessment. Interview with Clinical Manager (G) on 12/05/2024 at 2:15 p.m. confirmed the reassessments of edema and lung sounds were not completed post treatment by the registered nurses for the patients above.”

    Rule V0715. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 5, 2024Complaint inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Sep 13, 2018.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 13 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 1 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, worse than expected; readmissions to hospital, worse than expected; blood transfusions, worse than expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (32 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 63% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 51 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 137 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Harris County, 124 have a star rating from CMS: 4 rated 5 of 5, 11 rated 4 of 5, 53 rated 3 of 5, 41 rated 2 of 5, 15 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 1 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.