Fmc Dialysis Services of Abilene South
A dialysis facility in Abilene, Texas 79606
2009 Hospital Place, Abilene, Texas 79606. (325) 793-2594.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 2of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 26 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Nov 4, 2025: a complaint inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Nov 4, 2025: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
-
Cfc - Physical Environment
“CFC-PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.60 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 30377 Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to maintain the facility free from defects and/or hazards to ensure safety and functionality. Integrity of all surfaces (floors and walls) must be intact, clean, and free from damage. Intact surface integrity allows for effective cleaning and limits the potential for microbial growth on a porous surface. Refer to tag V402 See pictures attached”
-
Pe - Building - Constructed/Maintained To Ensure Safety
The inspectors’ words, 215 words
“PE-BUILDING-CONSTRUCT/MAINTAIN FOR SAFETY CFR(s): 494.60(a) The building in which dialysis services are furnished must be constructed and maintained to ensure the safety of the patients, the staff and the public. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 30377 Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to maintain the facility free from defects and/or hazards to ensure safety and functionality. Integrity of all surfaces (floors and walls) must be intact, clean, and free from damage. Intact surface integrity allows for effective cleaning and limits the potential for microbial growth on a porous surface. In-center Treatment Floor: During a tour of the facility on 11/03/2025 at 2:30 PM there were defects noted on the in-center treatment floor. * Multiple chase walls below the wall boxes were observed severely damaged. The chase boxes were observed with exposed particle board with multiple areas where the base of the particle board were peeling up. The area could not be thoroughly disinfected between patients. Water Room: * A dried brownish red substance was observed underneath and around the base of the water heater. The dried brownish red substance appeared to be rust buildup. Interview with the Facility Manger on 11/03/2025 at 2:45 PM confirmed all the defects and hazards observed in the In-center treatment and water room.”
-
Assess B/P & Fluid Management Needs
The inspectors’ words, 412 words
“PA-ASSESS B/P, FLUID MANAGEMENT NEEDS CFR(s): 494.80(a)(2) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: Blood pressure, and fluid management needs. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 30377 Based on review of hemodialysis flow sheets, policy and procedures, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure that direct patient care staff reported significant changes in patient health status while receiving hemodialysis to the charge nurse and or the charge nurse failed to reassess the patient when significant changes occurred during treatment and notify the physician when appropriate. The findings included: Review of hemodialysis flow sheets on 11/04/25 in the facility conference room revealed an example of the following discrepancies: Patient #1 Flow Sheet dated 10/31/25 Dialysis Prescription Treatment Time: 3.5 hours Pre Treatment Vitals: Time: 15:02 Blood Pressure: 144/118 Heart Rate: 72 Post Treatment Vitals: Time: 18:41 Blood Pressure: 117/61 Heart Rate: 74 Treatment Initiated Time: 15:08 Blood Pressure: 128/79 Heartache 58. 17:42 Blood Pressure: 80/52 Heart Rate 64 with direct patient care technician documenting “ ....UF off per RN Rob.” There was no documentation presented at time of review that the registered nurse addressed the severe hypotension. 18:01 Blood Pressure: 80/50 Heart Rate 67 with direct patient care technician documenting “ ....RN notified ...UF off: head hurts, nausea.” There was no documentation presented at time of review that the registered nurse addressed the severe hypotension and or complaints of headache and nausea. Post Treatment Assessment: RN documented “Pt stable post tx. Leaving over EDW, no complaint upon discharge.” There was no documentation presented at time of review that the registered nurse addressed the severe hypotension, saline boluses and adjustment of the ultrafiltration during the dialysis treatment. There was not documentation presented that the registered nurse addressed the patient’s complaint of headache and nausea during the dialysis treatment. A review of the facility policy, “Reportable by Direct Patient Care Staff to Charge Nurse.” Revealed that the following parameters were provided for the direct patient care staff to give guidance when a registered nurse needed to evaluate the patient status. Intra-Dialytic Blood Pressure: Systolic: < 100 or > 180 Diastolic: < 50 or > 100 Pulse: < 60 or > 100 Temperature: < 95F or > 100F Any Complaints made by the patient An interview conducted with staff #1 on 11/04/25 following her own review of the findings revealed she was unaware of the discrepancies found in the flow sheets. Staff #1 confirmed the above findings.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2025 | Complaint inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on May 1, 2003.
- Run for profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for dialysis facilities.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 26 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 4 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (36 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 85% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 4 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Taylor County, 4 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 3 of 5, 3 rated 2 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Star rating |
|---|---|
| Fresenius Medical Care Abilene | 2 |
| Hendrick Medical Center | 2 |
| Fresenius Medical Care Abilene Lone Star | 3 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.