Medical Center Kidney Clinic
A dialysis facility in Houston, Texas 77030
2254 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, Texas 77030. (713) 797-9909.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 32 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jun 20, 2024: a complaint inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jun 20, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Receive Services Outlined In Poc
The inspectors’ words, 556 words
“PR-RECEIVE SERVICES OUTLINED IN POC CFR(s): 494.70(a)(12) The patient has the right to- (12) Receive the necessary services outlined in the patient plan of care described in §494.90; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48020 Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility’s direct care staff failed to administer patients’ hemodialysis treatments based on physicians’ orders in 3 of 17 sampled patients and closed records: Patient #s 3, 4 and 13. Findings: Review of the facility’s current Policy and Procedure on Nursing Supervision and Delegation; Policy #45265, published 11/06/2023 directs staff as follows: Policy The registered nurse must evaluate each patient preferably within an hour or according to state requirements to: ... “ Review accuracy and completeness of treatment and patient data “ Review patient treatment prescription and equipment parameters to verify correct settings, and if dialysis prescription is being followed. Patient #3 On 06/20/2024 at 7:03 a.m., Patient #3 was observed seated at station #5 machine #21 receiving hemodialysis treatment at a blood flow rate of 400 mL/min and a dialysate flow rate of 800 mL/min via left upper arm vascular access. The patient was utilizing an Optiflux 180 non reuse dialyzer. The dialysate settings were: 2 potassium, 2.5 calcium, 35 bicarbonate, 137 sodium. Observation in the chairside computer revealed a physician’s order dated 03/30/2024 for Bicarbonate setting: 32.0 mEq/L. Review of the hemodialysis treatment time revealed the start time was 5:45 a.m. Interview on 06/20/2024 at 7:20 a.m. with the direct care staff assigned to the patient, Patient Care Technician (B): The Surveyor informed him that the dialysate bicarbonate setting was not set on the hemodialysis machine as prescribed by the physician. Patient Care Technician (B) said, “Oh” and then he corrected the setting on the hemodialysis machine. Patient #4 On 06/20/2024 at 7:15 a.m., Patient #4 was observed seated at station #27 machine #12 receiving hemodialysis treatment at a blood flow rate of 400 mL/min and a dialysate flow rate of 800 mL/min via right central venous catheter. The patient was utilizing an Optiflux 180 non reuse dialyzer. Treatment sheet dated 06/14/2024 Review of the patient’s treatment sheet dated 06/14/2024 revealed documentation which indicated the patient was prescribed a blood flow rate of 400 mL/min but received hemodialysis treatment at a blood flow rate of 350 mL/min from 6:40 a.m. - 9:40 a.m. There was no justification documented for the blood flow rate of 350 mL/min. Interview with Clinical Coordinator (E), the Surveyor informed her that the patient was not administered the blood flow rate prescribed by the physician. Clinical Coordinator (E) said, “I’m not sure when it changed to 400, I will have to check.” Patient #13 Review of the patient’s clinical record (demographic data) on 06/20/2024 revealed the patient was admitted to the facility 08/04/2023. Treatment sheet dated 05/16/2024 Review of the patient’s treatment sheet dated 05/16/2024 revealed documentation which indicated the patient was prescribed a dialysate flow rate of 800 mL/min but received hemodialysis treatment at a dialysate flow rate of 500 mL/min from 12:09 p.m.- 12:35 p.m. and 13:30 p.m.- 14:45 p.m. There was no justification documented for the dialysate flow rate of 500 mL/min. Interview with Clinical Manager (G), the Surveyor informed her that the patient was not administered the dialysate flow rate prescribed by the physician. Clinical Manager (G) said, “I’m not sure why.””
-
Patients Seen By Med Staff Member Monthly
The inspectors’ words, 274 words
“POC-PTS SEEN BY MED STAFF 1X/MO CFR(s): 494.90(b)(4) The dialysis facility must ensure that all dialysis patients are seen by a physician, nurse practitioner, clinical nurse specialist or physician’s assistant providing ESRD care at least monthly, as evidenced by a monthly progress note placed in the medical record, and periodically while the hemodialysis patient is receiving in-facility dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48020 Based on observation, interview and record review patient’s attending nephrologists failed to complete monthly comprehensive progress notes on patients addressing adequacy, vascular access, anemia management, nutritional status, bone mineral metabolism and treatment response in 1 of 17 sampled patients and closed records: Patient #s 6 Findings: Patient #6 Observation on 06/20/2024 at 6:33 a.m., revealed Patient #6 was observed at station #31, hemodialysis machine #34 receiving hemodialysis treatment at a blood flow rate of 500 mL/min and dialysate flow rate of Autoflow 2.0 (800 mL/min) via a left upper arm vascular access. Review of the patient’s clinical record (CMS 2728) revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 05/17/2022 with diagnosis of other cardiac disease, hypertension and end stage renal disease, on in-center hemodialysis three times weekly. Review of the patient’s clinical record (Physician Progress Note) revealed the most current documentation of a physician progress note was on 04/25/2024. There was no documentation of a physician progress note for May 2024. Review of the Facility’s Absence and Hospitalization report revealed Patient #6 was not absent or hospitalized during May 2024. Interview with Clinical Manager (G) at 4:45 p.m. confirmed the physician progress note on 04/25/2024 was the last one the facility had available in their records.”
Jan 10, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
Ic - Handling Infectious Waste
The inspectors’ words, 389 words
“IC-HANDLING INFECTIOUS WASTE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(4)(i) [The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing-] (4) And maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the- (i) Handling, storage and disposal of potentially infectious waste; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 30124 Based on observation and interview with the facility manager, staff ID #A facility failed to maintain a safe environment for its employees, patients, and visitors. Policy reviewed: Review of the facility’s current policy along with the facility manager titled “General Cleanliness and Infection Control Guidelines”, Published: 02/07/2022; Reference Number: 47685; Version: 6. Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to provide guidance for FKC staff on preventing the spread of infectious disease and maintaining a clean, safe, aesthetically pleasant environment for patients, staff and visitors. Responsibility: All staff. Contaminated Needles and Sharps Containers: Contaminated needles/sharps are not to be recapped, bent, sheared or broken. During use, sharps containers shall be: Easily accessible and located as close as feasible to the immediate area where sharps are used or can be reasonably anticipated to be found. Maintained upright throughout use; replaced routinely and not be allowed to overfill. Contaminated sharps shall be discarded immediately or soon as feasible in containers that are: Clearly identifiable as sharp’s container. Designed to close. Puncture resistant. Leak proof on the sides and bottom. Labeled in accordance with OSHA Bloodborne Standard 1910.1030. Designed to prevent anyone from reaching into the container. All containers for storage or disposal needles/sharps shall be replaced on a regular schedule basis or when no more thatn 2/3 or ¾ full. The containers must be closed prior to being full and prior to being disposed. Findings: Observation on 01/09/2024 of the facility’s treatment area revealed 3 of 15 bio-hazard sharps containers were observed to be open and available for use were filled past the required replacement line marked on the containers with previously used open needles. Observation of the medication area revealed 1 bio-hazard sharps container was observed filled past the required replacement line marked on the container with previous used open needles. Interview with staff ID #A on 01/09/2024 at 15:45 PM confirmed the above finding. Staff ID #A confirmed the bio-medical sharps containers should have been changed out and she would take care of it.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Jan 10, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Feb 12, 1997.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 32 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 4 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, better than expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, better than expected.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (38 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 82% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 137 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Harris County, 124 have a star rating from CMS: 4 rated 5 of 5, 11 rated 4 of 5, 53 rated 3 of 5, 41 rated 2 of 5, 15 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.