Hearth Record

Fmc Millington

A dialysis facility in Millington, Tennessee 38053

7840 Church Street, Millington, Tennessee 38053. (901) 873-0920.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Nov 8, 2023: a standard inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Nov 8, 2023: standard inspection2 deficiencies
  • Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene

    The inspectors’ words, 419 words

    “IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35244 Based on policy review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene and other measures to prevent the spread of infectious bacteria were performed by 1 of 4 (Nurse #1) staff observed during 1 of 1 (11/6/2023) observation days on the dialysis treatment floor. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility’s “Changing the Catheter Dressing Procedure” policy (5/2/2022) revealed, “ ...The patient and caregiver must wear a mask for all procedures that require accessing the catheter ...Step ...Action/Rationale ...2. Apply mask to patient and caregiver to help prevent contamination by airborne nasal bacterial ...5. Inspect and remove the old dressing ...6. Visually inspect the exit site and surrounding areas ...8. Discard dressing and remove gloves. Perform hand Hygiene ...” Review of the facility’s “Access Assessment and Cannulation” policy (7/5/2022) revealed, “ ...Disinfect cannulation site as follows ...70% isopropyl alcohol pad: Using gentle friction, clean the access site beginning in the center and continuing outward 2 inches in a concentric circle for 30 seconds and allow to dry before cannulating ...” 2. Observations on 11/6/2023 beginning at 10:50 AM revealed Nurse #1 set up supplies to perform dressing change of a CVC for RP #1. Nurse #1 performed hand hygiene, donned clean gloves, and proceeded to remove the old dressing from RP #1’s CVC site. Nurse #1 then began to clean the CVC exit site without first removing gloves, performing hand hygiene and donning clean gloves. Observations also revealed RP #1’s mask was below his nose for the entirety of the procedure. Observations on 11/6/2023 beginning at 11:55 AM revealed Nurse #1 was performing initiation of dialysis for RP #2 via cannulation of an AV Fistula. Nurse #1 applied antiseptic to the first cannulation site with an alcohol pad for 15 seconds and immediately cannulated, without allowing the site to dry. Nurse #1 then applied antiseptic to the second cannulation site with an alcohol pad for 15 seconds, allowing the site to dry before cannulation. In an interview on 11/8/2023 at 10:30 AM, the DO verified masks should be worn covering the nose, gloves should be changed and hand hygiene performed after removing an old CVC dressing, and verified AV fistula sites should be cleaned for 30 seconds, allowing time to dry before cannulation.”

    Rule V0113. Standard-level.

  • Manage Volume Status

    The inspectors’ words, 522 words

    “POC-MANAGE VOLUME STATUS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) The plan of care must address, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Dose of dialysis. The interdisciplinary team must provide the necessary care and services to manage the patient’s volume status; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35244 Based on policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the IDT revised, updated and individualized interventions to address fluid gains and elevated heart rate for 2 of 5 (Patient #3 and #4) sampled patients. The findings included: 1 Review of the facility’s “Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Assessment and Plan of Care” policy (7/3/2023) revealed, “ ...The patient’s Plan of Care will be guided and developed based on the findings identified in the Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Assessment ...The Plan of Care must include measurable and expected outcomes and an estimated timetable to achieve these outcomes ...If the patient specific expected outcome as determined by the attending physician, IDT and patient for the Plan of Care is not achieved within the identified timeframe: The Interdisciplinary team must adjust the patient’s Plan of Care and document changes made to the POC. Implement the Plan of Care changes to address the identified issues ...” 2. Medical record review for Patient #3 revealed a dialysis start date of 8/30/2023 with diagnoses that included ARF and DM. Review of dialysis treatment sheets beginning 10/13/2023 through 11/3/2023 revealed Patient #3’s pre-treatment heart rate was over 100 bpm for 8 of the 10 treatments. There was no documentation the facility RN made the patient’s physician aware of the elevated pre-treatment heart rates. Review of a 10/25/2023 POC revealed no documentation the IDT addressed the patient’s elevated heart rate pre-treatment. Review of the IDT Comprehensive Assessments beginning August 2023 through October 2023 revealed no documentation of goals or interventions by the IDT related to Patient #3’s elevated pre-treatment heart rate. In an interview on 11/7/2023 at 11:30 AM, the CM verified there were no goals or interventions implemented to address Patient #3’s elevated heart rate pre-treatment. 3. Medical record review for Patient #4 revealed a dialysis start date of 5/29/2020 with diagnoses that included ESRD. Review of dialysis orders beginning 10/13/2023 revealed Patient #4’s dry weight was 96.70 kg. Review of 10 dialysis treatment sheets beginning 10/13/23 through 11/3/23 revealed Patient #4 gained 3.0-5.8 kg between each treatment. Further review of treatment sheets revealed Patient #4 left above the ordered dry weight for 6 of the 10 treatments. Review of a 10/1/2023 POC revealed an area of focus as BP and Fluid Management. There was no documented goal related to fluid management. An intervention in progress was documented as “Educate patient/family/caregiver on fluid control” with further documentation stating the patient verbalized understanding of the importance of fluid control and verbalized understanding of signs and symptoms of fluid overload. Review of clinical notes and IDT progress notes beginning August 2023 through October 2023 revealed no updated, revised or individualized interventions to address Patient #4’s continued fluid gains between treatments. In an interview on 11/7/2023 at 11:30 AM the CM verified there were no additional interventions documented addressing Patient #4’s fluid gains between treatments.”

    Rule V0543. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 8, 2023Standard inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Feb 24, 2010.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • 16 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 1 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 51 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 49 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Shelby County, 46 have a star rating from CMS: 16 rated 3 of 5, 17 rated 2 of 5, 13 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 1 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.