Hearth Record

Davita Galleria Home Training Dialysis Pd

A dialysis facility in Lakeland, Tennessee 38002

9045 Hwy 64, Suite 102, Lakeland, Tennessee 38002. (901) 213-2955.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 14, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 4, 2025: a standard inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 19, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 4, 2025: standard inspection1 deficiency
  • Achieve Adequate Clearance

    The inspectors’ words, 852 words

    “POC-ACHIEVE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) Achieve and sustain the prescribed dose of dialysis to meet a hemodialysis Kt/V of at least 1.2 and a peritoneal dialysis weekly Kt/V of at least 1.7 or meet an alternative equivalent professionally-accepted clinical practice standard for adequacy of dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46831 Based on policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 (Patient #1) sampled patients received the prescribed dialysis prescription for BFR receiving home hemodialysis. The findings included: 1. Review of the “Blood Flow Problems” policy revised October 2023 revealed, “...To achieve and maintain prescribed blood flow...Check needle gauge and blood flow prescription...” Review of the “Intradialytic Treatment Monitoring” policy revised October 2024, revealed, “...To guide treatment checks, monitoring during dialysis and documentation for every patient in conformity with his/her individual plan of care...Changes are reported to the registered nurse; appropriate action is taken and documented, including patient response...” Review of the “Post Treatment Patient Assessment” policy revised October 2020 revealed, “...The registered nurse notifies the physician as needed of changes in patient status...All findings, interventions and patient response are documented in the patient’s medical record...” 2. Medical record review for Patient #1 revealed an admission date of 08/15/2023 with diagnoses that included Hypertension/Large Vessel Disease and ESRD. A physician’s order dated 05/15/2025 revealed dialysis 4 times per week for 3 hours with a BFR of 350. Review of the 05/15/2025 Home Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the BFR was 400 from 7:03 AM to 7:57 AM; and the BFR was 450 from 7:58 AM to 10:30 AM, at the end of treatment. There was no documentation for the reason the BFR was not administered as prescribed. There was no documentation the registered nurse or the physician was notified of the BFR not being administered at the prescribed rate. Review of the 05/16/2025 Home Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the BFR was 450 from 7:17 AM to 9:51 AM at the end of treatment. There was no documentation for the reason the BFR was not administered as prescribed. There was no documentation the registered nurse or the physician was notified of the BFR not being administered at the prescribed rate. Review of the 05/19/2025 Home Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the BFR was 450 from 7:38 AM to 10:58 AM at the end of treatment. There was no documentation for the reason the BFR was not administered as prescribed. There was no documentation the registered nurse or the physician was notified of the BFR not being administered at the prescribed rate. Review of the 05/24/2025 Home Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the BFR was 450 from 1:22 PM to 5:06 PM at the end of treatment. There was no documentation for the reason the BFR was not administered as prescribed. There was no documentation the registered nurse or the physician was notified of the BFR not being administered at the prescribed rate. Review of the 05/25/2025 Home Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the BFR was 450 from 10:07 AM to 1:36 PM at the end of treatment. There was no documentation for the reason the BFR was not administered as prescribed. There was no documentation the registered nurse or the physician was notified of the BFR not being administered at the prescribed rate. Review of the 05/29/2025 Home Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the BFR was 450 from 11:31 AM to 2:45 PM at the end of treatment. There was no documentation for the reason the BFR was not administered as prescribed. There was no documentation the registered nurse or the physician was notified of the BFR not being administered at the prescribed rate. Review of the 05/30/2025 Home Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the BFR was 450 from 2:07 PM to 4:32 PM at the end of treatment. There was no documentation for the reason the BFR was not administered as prescribed. There was no documentation the registered nurse or the physician was notified of the BFR not being administered at the prescribed rate. Review of the 06/01/2025 Home Hemodialysis Flowsheet revealed the BFR was 450 from 1:10 PM to 4:37 PM at the end of treatment. There was no documentation for the reason the BFR was not administered as prescribed. There was no documentation the registered nurse or the physician was notified of the BFR not being administered at the prescribed rate. 3. During an interview on 06/03/2025 at 1:15 PM, RN #1 confirmed the physicians order for Patient #1’s BFR was 350 and verified the home hemodialysis flowsheets showed a BFR of 450 from 05/15/2025 to 06/01/2025. RN #1 then stated, “...[Patient #1] should have called and reported she had reached the 450 BFR...” During an interview on 06/03/2025 at 2:20 PM, the DHD stated the BFR should have been run at the prescribed rate ordered by the physician. During an interview on 06/04/2025 at 10:35 AM, the MCS stated the BFR should be run at the prescribed rate. If unable to run at the prescribed rate, there must be documentation of why the prescribed rate could not be reached and notification of the charge nurse and physician on the home hemodialysis flowsheets.”

    Rule V0544. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 4, 2025Standard inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Nov 17, 2008.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: DaVita.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • Doesn’t offer in-center hemodialysis and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 5 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, worse than expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Survey data not available for this reporting period.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 49 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Shelby County, 46 have a star rating from CMS: 16 rated 3 of 5, 17 rated 2 of 5, 13 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 19, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.